Type int? vs type intNullable<int> vs. int? - Is there any difference?How is the boxing/unboxing behavior of Nullable<T> possible?Cast int to enum in C#Create Generic method constraining T to an EnumRandom number generator only generating one random numberUsing LINQ to remove elements from a List<T>Get int value from enum in C#Type Checking: typeof, GetType, or is?Distinct() with lambda?How do I generate a random int number?Call one constructor from anotherTry-catch speeding up my code?
Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?
Purchasing a ticket for someone else in another country?
What is the best translation for "slot" in the context of multiplayer video games?
Why not increase contact surface when reentering the atmosphere?
Fastening aluminum fascia to wooden subfascia
Class Action - which options I have?
Risk of infection at the gym?
How to run a prison with the smallest amount of guards?
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?
How can a function with a hole (removable discontinuity) equal a function with no hole?
Integer addition + constant, is it a group?
How to safely derail a train during transit?
What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?
Why are there no referendums in the US?
How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?
Is exact Kanji stroke length important?
Is this version of a gravity generator feasible?
Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleagues
How to check is there any negative term in a large list?
Detecting if an element is found inside a container
Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle
Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!
For a non-Jew, is there a punishment for not observing the 7 Noahide Laws?
Type int? vs type int
Nullable<int> vs. int? - Is there any difference?How is the boxing/unboxing behavior of Nullable<T> possible?Cast int to enum in C#Create Generic method constraining T to an EnumRandom number generator only generating one random numberUsing LINQ to remove elements from a List<T>Get int value from enum in C#Type Checking: typeof, GetType, or is?Distinct() with lambda?How do I generate a random int number?Call one constructor from anotherTry-catch speeding up my code?
I've this comparison which equals false
as expected
bool eq = typeof(int?).Equals(typeof(int));
now I have this code
List<object> items = new List<object>() (int?)123 ;
int result = items.OfType<int>().FirstOrDefault();
but this returns 123
- anyway that value is of type int?
How can this be?
c# casting
|
show 2 more comments
I've this comparison which equals false
as expected
bool eq = typeof(int?).Equals(typeof(int));
now I have this code
List<object> items = new List<object>() (int?)123 ;
int result = items.OfType<int>().FirstOrDefault();
but this returns 123
- anyway that value is of type int?
How can this be?
c# casting
int?
boxed asint
, and basically every Nullable type, Edit : Marc Gravell have the full answer
– styx
15 hours ago
Related post about nullable type: stackoverflow.com/questions/4028830/…. This is called as "type lifting".
– Tetsuya Yamamoto
15 hours ago
Before reading this topic I wouldn't even guess that evenList<int?>
already holds justint
types. Proof
– Sinatr
15 hours ago
7
@Sinatr no, that is incorrect;List<int?>
holdsint?
. The important distinction in this example is the use ofList<object>
. What you're seeing in that "proof" is something very different;GetType()
on anyT?
either returns theT
, or throws a NRE. It never returnsT?
- better example: dotnetfiddle.net/3Gy3Fa - and as for why: becauseGetType()
is non-virtual, it cannot be overridden, and thus callingGetType()
is a boxing operation (even if used via "constrained call"). And when you box aT?
, you either get aT
as anobject
, or anull
.
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
@TetsuyaYamamoto That is not a relevant link. How is the boxing/unboxing behavior of Nullable<T> possible? is.
– GSerg
12 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
I've this comparison which equals false
as expected
bool eq = typeof(int?).Equals(typeof(int));
now I have this code
List<object> items = new List<object>() (int?)123 ;
int result = items.OfType<int>().FirstOrDefault();
but this returns 123
- anyway that value is of type int?
How can this be?
c# casting
I've this comparison which equals false
as expected
bool eq = typeof(int?).Equals(typeof(int));
now I have this code
List<object> items = new List<object>() (int?)123 ;
int result = items.OfType<int>().FirstOrDefault();
but this returns 123
- anyway that value is of type int?
How can this be?
c# casting
c# casting
asked 15 hours ago
Dr. SnailDr. Snail
693628
693628
int?
boxed asint
, and basically every Nullable type, Edit : Marc Gravell have the full answer
– styx
15 hours ago
Related post about nullable type: stackoverflow.com/questions/4028830/…. This is called as "type lifting".
– Tetsuya Yamamoto
15 hours ago
Before reading this topic I wouldn't even guess that evenList<int?>
already holds justint
types. Proof
– Sinatr
15 hours ago
7
@Sinatr no, that is incorrect;List<int?>
holdsint?
. The important distinction in this example is the use ofList<object>
. What you're seeing in that "proof" is something very different;GetType()
on anyT?
either returns theT
, or throws a NRE. It never returnsT?
- better example: dotnetfiddle.net/3Gy3Fa - and as for why: becauseGetType()
is non-virtual, it cannot be overridden, and thus callingGetType()
is a boxing operation (even if used via "constrained call"). And when you box aT?
, you either get aT
as anobject
, or anull
.
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
@TetsuyaYamamoto That is not a relevant link. How is the boxing/unboxing behavior of Nullable<T> possible? is.
– GSerg
12 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
int?
boxed asint
, and basically every Nullable type, Edit : Marc Gravell have the full answer
– styx
15 hours ago
Related post about nullable type: stackoverflow.com/questions/4028830/…. This is called as "type lifting".
– Tetsuya Yamamoto
15 hours ago
Before reading this topic I wouldn't even guess that evenList<int?>
already holds justint
types. Proof
– Sinatr
15 hours ago
7
@Sinatr no, that is incorrect;List<int?>
holdsint?
. The important distinction in this example is the use ofList<object>
. What you're seeing in that "proof" is something very different;GetType()
on anyT?
either returns theT
, or throws a NRE. It never returnsT?
- better example: dotnetfiddle.net/3Gy3Fa - and as for why: becauseGetType()
is non-virtual, it cannot be overridden, and thus callingGetType()
is a boxing operation (even if used via "constrained call"). And when you box aT?
, you either get aT
as anobject
, or anull
.
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
@TetsuyaYamamoto That is not a relevant link. How is the boxing/unboxing behavior of Nullable<T> possible? is.
– GSerg
12 hours ago
int?
boxed as int
, and basically every Nullable type, Edit : Marc Gravell have the full answer– styx
15 hours ago
int?
boxed as int
, and basically every Nullable type, Edit : Marc Gravell have the full answer– styx
15 hours ago
Related post about nullable type: stackoverflow.com/questions/4028830/…. This is called as "type lifting".
– Tetsuya Yamamoto
15 hours ago
Related post about nullable type: stackoverflow.com/questions/4028830/…. This is called as "type lifting".
– Tetsuya Yamamoto
15 hours ago
Before reading this topic I wouldn't even guess that even
List<int?>
already holds just int
types. Proof– Sinatr
15 hours ago
Before reading this topic I wouldn't even guess that even
List<int?>
already holds just int
types. Proof– Sinatr
15 hours ago
7
7
@Sinatr no, that is incorrect;
List<int?>
holds int?
. The important distinction in this example is the use of List<object>
. What you're seeing in that "proof" is something very different; GetType()
on any T?
either returns the T
, or throws a NRE. It never returns T?
- better example: dotnetfiddle.net/3Gy3Fa - and as for why: because GetType()
is non-virtual, it cannot be overridden, and thus calling GetType()
is a boxing operation (even if used via "constrained call"). And when you box a T?
, you either get a T
as an object
, or a null
.– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
@Sinatr no, that is incorrect;
List<int?>
holds int?
. The important distinction in this example is the use of List<object>
. What you're seeing in that "proof" is something very different; GetType()
on any T?
either returns the T
, or throws a NRE. It never returns T?
- better example: dotnetfiddle.net/3Gy3Fa - and as for why: because GetType()
is non-virtual, it cannot be overridden, and thus calling GetType()
is a boxing operation (even if used via "constrained call"). And when you box a T?
, you either get a T
as an object
, or a null
.– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
@TetsuyaYamamoto That is not a relevant link. How is the boxing/unboxing behavior of Nullable<T> possible? is.
– GSerg
12 hours ago
@TetsuyaYamamoto That is not a relevant link. How is the boxing/unboxing behavior of Nullable<T> possible? is.
– GSerg
12 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Nullable types have special "boxing" rules; "boxing" is when a value-type is treated as object
, as per your code. Unlike regular value-types, a nullable value-type is boxed either as null
(regular null
, no type), or as the non-nullable type (the T
in T?
). So: an int?
is boxed as an int
, not an int?
. Then when you use OfType<int>()
on it, you get all the values that are int
, which is: the single value you passed in, since it is of type int
.
phew ok thank you for that explanaion. Is that C# basic knowledge?
– Dr. Snail
15 hours ago
12
@Dr.Snail "basic" is relative / subjective, and I'd wager that a good percentage of developers never have a need to know that nuance; it is useful context if you're dealing with boxing, though... and technically it isn't really C# knowledge, but rather: .NET knowledge (it would apply to all languages)
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
How would the query to obtain onlyint?
from aboveitems
list will look like?
– Sinatr
15 hours ago
4
@Sinatr you can't - the list never containsint?
- it only containsint
because of the boxing rules on nullable types
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
Maybe I'm missing something but it returning 123 makes perfect sense to be. This long explanation does not. You added an int to a list and said give me all the integers in the list. The ? makes it so you can pass a null in the place of an int.
– Kyle Johnson
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
A nullable value type is boxed by the following rules:
- If
HasValue
returnsfalse
, the null reference is produced. - If
HasValue
returnstrue
, a value of the underlying value typeT
is
boxed, not the instance of nullable.
In your example second rule has been followed as you have value, e.g. var i = (object)(int?)123;
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55372675%2ftype-int-vs-type-int%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Nullable types have special "boxing" rules; "boxing" is when a value-type is treated as object
, as per your code. Unlike regular value-types, a nullable value-type is boxed either as null
(regular null
, no type), or as the non-nullable type (the T
in T?
). So: an int?
is boxed as an int
, not an int?
. Then when you use OfType<int>()
on it, you get all the values that are int
, which is: the single value you passed in, since it is of type int
.
phew ok thank you for that explanaion. Is that C# basic knowledge?
– Dr. Snail
15 hours ago
12
@Dr.Snail "basic" is relative / subjective, and I'd wager that a good percentage of developers never have a need to know that nuance; it is useful context if you're dealing with boxing, though... and technically it isn't really C# knowledge, but rather: .NET knowledge (it would apply to all languages)
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
How would the query to obtain onlyint?
from aboveitems
list will look like?
– Sinatr
15 hours ago
4
@Sinatr you can't - the list never containsint?
- it only containsint
because of the boxing rules on nullable types
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
Maybe I'm missing something but it returning 123 makes perfect sense to be. This long explanation does not. You added an int to a list and said give me all the integers in the list. The ? makes it so you can pass a null in the place of an int.
– Kyle Johnson
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Nullable types have special "boxing" rules; "boxing" is when a value-type is treated as object
, as per your code. Unlike regular value-types, a nullable value-type is boxed either as null
(regular null
, no type), or as the non-nullable type (the T
in T?
). So: an int?
is boxed as an int
, not an int?
. Then when you use OfType<int>()
on it, you get all the values that are int
, which is: the single value you passed in, since it is of type int
.
phew ok thank you for that explanaion. Is that C# basic knowledge?
– Dr. Snail
15 hours ago
12
@Dr.Snail "basic" is relative / subjective, and I'd wager that a good percentage of developers never have a need to know that nuance; it is useful context if you're dealing with boxing, though... and technically it isn't really C# knowledge, but rather: .NET knowledge (it would apply to all languages)
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
How would the query to obtain onlyint?
from aboveitems
list will look like?
– Sinatr
15 hours ago
4
@Sinatr you can't - the list never containsint?
- it only containsint
because of the boxing rules on nullable types
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
Maybe I'm missing something but it returning 123 makes perfect sense to be. This long explanation does not. You added an int to a list and said give me all the integers in the list. The ? makes it so you can pass a null in the place of an int.
– Kyle Johnson
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Nullable types have special "boxing" rules; "boxing" is when a value-type is treated as object
, as per your code. Unlike regular value-types, a nullable value-type is boxed either as null
(regular null
, no type), or as the non-nullable type (the T
in T?
). So: an int?
is boxed as an int
, not an int?
. Then when you use OfType<int>()
on it, you get all the values that are int
, which is: the single value you passed in, since it is of type int
.
Nullable types have special "boxing" rules; "boxing" is when a value-type is treated as object
, as per your code. Unlike regular value-types, a nullable value-type is boxed either as null
(regular null
, no type), or as the non-nullable type (the T
in T?
). So: an int?
is boxed as an int
, not an int?
. Then when you use OfType<int>()
on it, you get all the values that are int
, which is: the single value you passed in, since it is of type int
.
answered 15 hours ago
Marc Gravell♦Marc Gravell
792k19721582561
792k19721582561
phew ok thank you for that explanaion. Is that C# basic knowledge?
– Dr. Snail
15 hours ago
12
@Dr.Snail "basic" is relative / subjective, and I'd wager that a good percentage of developers never have a need to know that nuance; it is useful context if you're dealing with boxing, though... and technically it isn't really C# knowledge, but rather: .NET knowledge (it would apply to all languages)
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
How would the query to obtain onlyint?
from aboveitems
list will look like?
– Sinatr
15 hours ago
4
@Sinatr you can't - the list never containsint?
- it only containsint
because of the boxing rules on nullable types
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
Maybe I'm missing something but it returning 123 makes perfect sense to be. This long explanation does not. You added an int to a list and said give me all the integers in the list. The ? makes it so you can pass a null in the place of an int.
– Kyle Johnson
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
phew ok thank you for that explanaion. Is that C# basic knowledge?
– Dr. Snail
15 hours ago
12
@Dr.Snail "basic" is relative / subjective, and I'd wager that a good percentage of developers never have a need to know that nuance; it is useful context if you're dealing with boxing, though... and technically it isn't really C# knowledge, but rather: .NET knowledge (it would apply to all languages)
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
How would the query to obtain onlyint?
from aboveitems
list will look like?
– Sinatr
15 hours ago
4
@Sinatr you can't - the list never containsint?
- it only containsint
because of the boxing rules on nullable types
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
Maybe I'm missing something but it returning 123 makes perfect sense to be. This long explanation does not. You added an int to a list and said give me all the integers in the list. The ? makes it so you can pass a null in the place of an int.
– Kyle Johnson
4 hours ago
phew ok thank you for that explanaion. Is that C# basic knowledge?
– Dr. Snail
15 hours ago
phew ok thank you for that explanaion. Is that C# basic knowledge?
– Dr. Snail
15 hours ago
12
12
@Dr.Snail "basic" is relative / subjective, and I'd wager that a good percentage of developers never have a need to know that nuance; it is useful context if you're dealing with boxing, though... and technically it isn't really C# knowledge, but rather: .NET knowledge (it would apply to all languages)
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
@Dr.Snail "basic" is relative / subjective, and I'd wager that a good percentage of developers never have a need to know that nuance; it is useful context if you're dealing with boxing, though... and technically it isn't really C# knowledge, but rather: .NET knowledge (it would apply to all languages)
– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
How would the query to obtain only
int?
from above items
list will look like?– Sinatr
15 hours ago
How would the query to obtain only
int?
from above items
list will look like?– Sinatr
15 hours ago
4
4
@Sinatr you can't - the list never contains
int?
- it only contains int
because of the boxing rules on nullable types– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
@Sinatr you can't - the list never contains
int?
- it only contains int
because of the boxing rules on nullable types– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
Maybe I'm missing something but it returning 123 makes perfect sense to be. This long explanation does not. You added an int to a list and said give me all the integers in the list. The ? makes it so you can pass a null in the place of an int.
– Kyle Johnson
4 hours ago
Maybe I'm missing something but it returning 123 makes perfect sense to be. This long explanation does not. You added an int to a list and said give me all the integers in the list. The ? makes it so you can pass a null in the place of an int.
– Kyle Johnson
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
A nullable value type is boxed by the following rules:
- If
HasValue
returnsfalse
, the null reference is produced. - If
HasValue
returnstrue
, a value of the underlying value typeT
is
boxed, not the instance of nullable.
In your example second rule has been followed as you have value, e.g. var i = (object)(int?)123;
add a comment |
A nullable value type is boxed by the following rules:
- If
HasValue
returnsfalse
, the null reference is produced. - If
HasValue
returnstrue
, a value of the underlying value typeT
is
boxed, not the instance of nullable.
In your example second rule has been followed as you have value, e.g. var i = (object)(int?)123;
add a comment |
A nullable value type is boxed by the following rules:
- If
HasValue
returnsfalse
, the null reference is produced. - If
HasValue
returnstrue
, a value of the underlying value typeT
is
boxed, not the instance of nullable.
In your example second rule has been followed as you have value, e.g. var i = (object)(int?)123;
A nullable value type is boxed by the following rules:
- If
HasValue
returnsfalse
, the null reference is produced. - If
HasValue
returnstrue
, a value of the underlying value typeT
is
boxed, not the instance of nullable.
In your example second rule has been followed as you have value, e.g. var i = (object)(int?)123;
edited 10 hours ago
answered 14 hours ago
JohnnyJohnny
3,4251021
3,4251021
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55372675%2ftype-int-vs-type-int%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
int?
boxed asint
, and basically every Nullable type, Edit : Marc Gravell have the full answer– styx
15 hours ago
Related post about nullable type: stackoverflow.com/questions/4028830/…. This is called as "type lifting".
– Tetsuya Yamamoto
15 hours ago
Before reading this topic I wouldn't even guess that even
List<int?>
already holds justint
types. Proof– Sinatr
15 hours ago
7
@Sinatr no, that is incorrect;
List<int?>
holdsint?
. The important distinction in this example is the use ofList<object>
. What you're seeing in that "proof" is something very different;GetType()
on anyT?
either returns theT
, or throws a NRE. It never returnsT?
- better example: dotnetfiddle.net/3Gy3Fa - and as for why: becauseGetType()
is non-virtual, it cannot be overridden, and thus callingGetType()
is a boxing operation (even if used via "constrained call"). And when you box aT?
, you either get aT
as anobject
, or anull
.– Marc Gravell♦
15 hours ago
@TetsuyaYamamoto That is not a relevant link. How is the boxing/unboxing behavior of Nullable<T> possible? is.
– GSerg
12 hours ago