QGIS extract QTiles beyond layer extentQtiles on QGIS + QGIS ServerQtiles won't work with Range ScaleQGIS QTiles / QMetaTiles poor image qualityQTiles generating blank tiles on QGISQGIS canvas refresh & rendering control from plugin?QGIS Snow Cover extent extractQTiles PNG artefactsAdd tiles created with Qtiles as a layer into QgisQGIS extract average attribute value from layer based on vectorCadTools plugin functionality in QGIS 3 beyond Advanced Digitising Panel?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

How can I make a cone from a cube and view the cube with different angles?

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Either or Neither in sentence with another negative

Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?

Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance

Modeling an IP Address

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

Schoenfled Residua test shows proportionality hazard assumptions holds but Kaplan-Meier plots intersect

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

Which models of the Boeing 737 are still in production?

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Test whether all array elements are factors of a number

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Unknown notation: What do three bars mean?

Replacing matching entries in one column of a file by another column from a different file

a relationship between local compactness and closure

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Compress a signal by storing signal diff instead of actual samples - is there such a thing?



QGIS extract QTiles beyond layer extent


Qtiles on QGIS + QGIS ServerQtiles won't work with Range ScaleQGIS QTiles / QMetaTiles poor image qualityQTiles generating blank tiles on QGISQGIS canvas refresh & rendering control from plugin?QGIS Snow Cover extent extractQTiles PNG artefactsAdd tiles created with Qtiles as a layer into QgisQGIS extract average attribute value from layer based on vectorCadTools plugin functionality in QGIS 3 beyond Advanced Digitising Panel?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I'm trying to export a layer via QTiles, gotten from the Data Source Manager and connecting to (USGSHydroCached).



I have QTiles set to zoom levels 0-20 and Render tiles outside of layers extent checked (basemap goes up to 20). For some reason, the hydro layer only shows up to zoom level 17 (as per Leaflet). At zoom levels 18,19,20 the layer disappears.



QTiles is generating folders and files up to zoom level 20 (assuming this is the extent checkbox).



Is there a way to have it render the tile beyond that zoom level (poor resolution is fine)?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Is the Leaflet maxzoom property > 17 ? stackoverflow.com/questions/38126343/…

    – Richard Law
    yesterday











  • Yeah it displays other layers to 20 without issue (it's set to 20).

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday

















3















I'm trying to export a layer via QTiles, gotten from the Data Source Manager and connecting to (USGSHydroCached).



I have QTiles set to zoom levels 0-20 and Render tiles outside of layers extent checked (basemap goes up to 20). For some reason, the hydro layer only shows up to zoom level 17 (as per Leaflet). At zoom levels 18,19,20 the layer disappears.



QTiles is generating folders and files up to zoom level 20 (assuming this is the extent checkbox).



Is there a way to have it render the tile beyond that zoom level (poor resolution is fine)?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Is the Leaflet maxzoom property > 17 ? stackoverflow.com/questions/38126343/…

    – Richard Law
    yesterday











  • Yeah it displays other layers to 20 without issue (it's set to 20).

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday













3












3








3


1






I'm trying to export a layer via QTiles, gotten from the Data Source Manager and connecting to (USGSHydroCached).



I have QTiles set to zoom levels 0-20 and Render tiles outside of layers extent checked (basemap goes up to 20). For some reason, the hydro layer only shows up to zoom level 17 (as per Leaflet). At zoom levels 18,19,20 the layer disappears.



QTiles is generating folders and files up to zoom level 20 (assuming this is the extent checkbox).



Is there a way to have it render the tile beyond that zoom level (poor resolution is fine)?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I'm trying to export a layer via QTiles, gotten from the Data Source Manager and connecting to (USGSHydroCached).



I have QTiles set to zoom levels 0-20 and Render tiles outside of layers extent checked (basemap goes up to 20). For some reason, the hydro layer only shows up to zoom level 17 (as per Leaflet). At zoom levels 18,19,20 the layer disappears.



QTiles is generating folders and files up to zoom level 20 (assuming this is the extent checkbox).



Is there a way to have it render the tile beyond that zoom level (poor resolution is fine)?







qgis qgis-plugins qgis-3 tiles






share|improve this question







New contributor




Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 2 at 20:22









Antoine ZambelliAntoine Zambelli

186




186




New contributor




Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Is the Leaflet maxzoom property > 17 ? stackoverflow.com/questions/38126343/…

    – Richard Law
    yesterday











  • Yeah it displays other layers to 20 without issue (it's set to 20).

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday

















  • Is the Leaflet maxzoom property > 17 ? stackoverflow.com/questions/38126343/…

    – Richard Law
    yesterday











  • Yeah it displays other layers to 20 without issue (it's set to 20).

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday
















Is the Leaflet maxzoom property > 17 ? stackoverflow.com/questions/38126343/…

– Richard Law
yesterday





Is the Leaflet maxzoom property > 17 ? stackoverflow.com/questions/38126343/…

– Richard Law
yesterday













Yeah it displays other layers to 20 without issue (it's set to 20).

– Antoine Zambelli
yesterday





Yeah it displays other layers to 20 without issue (it's set to 20).

– Antoine Zambelli
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3





+100









The layer info at the link you provide indicates the MapServer should provide tiles up to level 19, not 20 as you'd like. But that shouldn't create problems at level 17!



However, I've played around with zooming in on the layer the QGis map window and it shows up at scales up to 1:6019, but not more detailed than that. So there's something funny with the tiles being returned by the server at levels 17+. QTiles is a red herring here, it's just that's what's asking for the layer at detailed scales.



Since it's actually a simple line layer, it would be much better if you could find a vector (rather than tile/raster) source for it. I tried a trick that often works, to try to connect to it as an ArcGisFeatureServer rather than MapServer, replacing MapServer with FeatureServer in the URI, but that didn't work. Your ideal solution would be to hunt and see a FeatureServer or WFS source for it.



Failing that, you can get a jagged version by exporting it in the region of interest at a scale that works, and then loading that into your map instead. To do that, load it in, zoom into a generous area well beyond your area of interest, right click on the layer in the layer tree and choose Export / Save as...



Then do the following; note VRT is off, click on Map Canvas Extent to set the region that will be exported, and the resolution 2.388657133974685 is chosen since that's the resolution of a Level 16 tile that works. Then use your saved .tif rather than the MapServer version.



enter image description here



If you want to get fancy, keep both layers, but make them visible at different scales via layer properties.
And/or vectorize the raster you saved, and then style it to your heart's content (color, line thickness etc) that will then render properly at any scale level (just of course with the level of underlying detail you exported, no more no less).






share|improve this answer























  • At usgs.gov/news/new-hydro-map-service-available found "This new cache supports visualization zooming down to 1:9,000 scale (Level 17 in Google Maps tile levels)." So Level 17 is the most detailed available and you're being thrown by the faulty info provided by the MapServer that up to Level 20 is available.

    – Houska
    yesterday











  • Thanks for digging into this! I was, in fact, being thrown off by QTiles and the map docs. Gotta wait a few hours before I can offer the bounty.

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday


















2














As @Houska has noted the map service that you are using only provides tiles down to level 17. However, the data supplied in the map service is the USGS National Hydrography Dataset which is freely available to download in vector form, so if you want to generate tiles at any zoom level, this can be done by using a styled version of the vector NHD data.






share|improve this answer























  • I'll take a look at styled vector data. Too new to this stuff to figure out the stylesheet stuff right now but I might 'upgrade' to using that in the future.

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "79"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f317552%2fqgis-extract-qtiles-beyond-layer-extent%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3





+100









The layer info at the link you provide indicates the MapServer should provide tiles up to level 19, not 20 as you'd like. But that shouldn't create problems at level 17!



However, I've played around with zooming in on the layer the QGis map window and it shows up at scales up to 1:6019, but not more detailed than that. So there's something funny with the tiles being returned by the server at levels 17+. QTiles is a red herring here, it's just that's what's asking for the layer at detailed scales.



Since it's actually a simple line layer, it would be much better if you could find a vector (rather than tile/raster) source for it. I tried a trick that often works, to try to connect to it as an ArcGisFeatureServer rather than MapServer, replacing MapServer with FeatureServer in the URI, but that didn't work. Your ideal solution would be to hunt and see a FeatureServer or WFS source for it.



Failing that, you can get a jagged version by exporting it in the region of interest at a scale that works, and then loading that into your map instead. To do that, load it in, zoom into a generous area well beyond your area of interest, right click on the layer in the layer tree and choose Export / Save as...



Then do the following; note VRT is off, click on Map Canvas Extent to set the region that will be exported, and the resolution 2.388657133974685 is chosen since that's the resolution of a Level 16 tile that works. Then use your saved .tif rather than the MapServer version.



enter image description here



If you want to get fancy, keep both layers, but make them visible at different scales via layer properties.
And/or vectorize the raster you saved, and then style it to your heart's content (color, line thickness etc) that will then render properly at any scale level (just of course with the level of underlying detail you exported, no more no less).






share|improve this answer























  • At usgs.gov/news/new-hydro-map-service-available found "This new cache supports visualization zooming down to 1:9,000 scale (Level 17 in Google Maps tile levels)." So Level 17 is the most detailed available and you're being thrown by the faulty info provided by the MapServer that up to Level 20 is available.

    – Houska
    yesterday











  • Thanks for digging into this! I was, in fact, being thrown off by QTiles and the map docs. Gotta wait a few hours before I can offer the bounty.

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday















3





+100









The layer info at the link you provide indicates the MapServer should provide tiles up to level 19, not 20 as you'd like. But that shouldn't create problems at level 17!



However, I've played around with zooming in on the layer the QGis map window and it shows up at scales up to 1:6019, but not more detailed than that. So there's something funny with the tiles being returned by the server at levels 17+. QTiles is a red herring here, it's just that's what's asking for the layer at detailed scales.



Since it's actually a simple line layer, it would be much better if you could find a vector (rather than tile/raster) source for it. I tried a trick that often works, to try to connect to it as an ArcGisFeatureServer rather than MapServer, replacing MapServer with FeatureServer in the URI, but that didn't work. Your ideal solution would be to hunt and see a FeatureServer or WFS source for it.



Failing that, you can get a jagged version by exporting it in the region of interest at a scale that works, and then loading that into your map instead. To do that, load it in, zoom into a generous area well beyond your area of interest, right click on the layer in the layer tree and choose Export / Save as...



Then do the following; note VRT is off, click on Map Canvas Extent to set the region that will be exported, and the resolution 2.388657133974685 is chosen since that's the resolution of a Level 16 tile that works. Then use your saved .tif rather than the MapServer version.



enter image description here



If you want to get fancy, keep both layers, but make them visible at different scales via layer properties.
And/or vectorize the raster you saved, and then style it to your heart's content (color, line thickness etc) that will then render properly at any scale level (just of course with the level of underlying detail you exported, no more no less).






share|improve this answer























  • At usgs.gov/news/new-hydro-map-service-available found "This new cache supports visualization zooming down to 1:9,000 scale (Level 17 in Google Maps tile levels)." So Level 17 is the most detailed available and you're being thrown by the faulty info provided by the MapServer that up to Level 20 is available.

    – Houska
    yesterday











  • Thanks for digging into this! I was, in fact, being thrown off by QTiles and the map docs. Gotta wait a few hours before I can offer the bounty.

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday













3





+100







3





+100



3




+100





The layer info at the link you provide indicates the MapServer should provide tiles up to level 19, not 20 as you'd like. But that shouldn't create problems at level 17!



However, I've played around with zooming in on the layer the QGis map window and it shows up at scales up to 1:6019, but not more detailed than that. So there's something funny with the tiles being returned by the server at levels 17+. QTiles is a red herring here, it's just that's what's asking for the layer at detailed scales.



Since it's actually a simple line layer, it would be much better if you could find a vector (rather than tile/raster) source for it. I tried a trick that often works, to try to connect to it as an ArcGisFeatureServer rather than MapServer, replacing MapServer with FeatureServer in the URI, but that didn't work. Your ideal solution would be to hunt and see a FeatureServer or WFS source for it.



Failing that, you can get a jagged version by exporting it in the region of interest at a scale that works, and then loading that into your map instead. To do that, load it in, zoom into a generous area well beyond your area of interest, right click on the layer in the layer tree and choose Export / Save as...



Then do the following; note VRT is off, click on Map Canvas Extent to set the region that will be exported, and the resolution 2.388657133974685 is chosen since that's the resolution of a Level 16 tile that works. Then use your saved .tif rather than the MapServer version.



enter image description here



If you want to get fancy, keep both layers, but make them visible at different scales via layer properties.
And/or vectorize the raster you saved, and then style it to your heart's content (color, line thickness etc) that will then render properly at any scale level (just of course with the level of underlying detail you exported, no more no less).






share|improve this answer













The layer info at the link you provide indicates the MapServer should provide tiles up to level 19, not 20 as you'd like. But that shouldn't create problems at level 17!



However, I've played around with zooming in on the layer the QGis map window and it shows up at scales up to 1:6019, but not more detailed than that. So there's something funny with the tiles being returned by the server at levels 17+. QTiles is a red herring here, it's just that's what's asking for the layer at detailed scales.



Since it's actually a simple line layer, it would be much better if you could find a vector (rather than tile/raster) source for it. I tried a trick that often works, to try to connect to it as an ArcGisFeatureServer rather than MapServer, replacing MapServer with FeatureServer in the URI, but that didn't work. Your ideal solution would be to hunt and see a FeatureServer or WFS source for it.



Failing that, you can get a jagged version by exporting it in the region of interest at a scale that works, and then loading that into your map instead. To do that, load it in, zoom into a generous area well beyond your area of interest, right click on the layer in the layer tree and choose Export / Save as...



Then do the following; note VRT is off, click on Map Canvas Extent to set the region that will be exported, and the resolution 2.388657133974685 is chosen since that's the resolution of a Level 16 tile that works. Then use your saved .tif rather than the MapServer version.



enter image description here



If you want to get fancy, keep both layers, but make them visible at different scales via layer properties.
And/or vectorize the raster you saved, and then style it to your heart's content (color, line thickness etc) that will then render properly at any scale level (just of course with the level of underlying detail you exported, no more no less).







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









HouskaHouska

6807




6807












  • At usgs.gov/news/new-hydro-map-service-available found "This new cache supports visualization zooming down to 1:9,000 scale (Level 17 in Google Maps tile levels)." So Level 17 is the most detailed available and you're being thrown by the faulty info provided by the MapServer that up to Level 20 is available.

    – Houska
    yesterday











  • Thanks for digging into this! I was, in fact, being thrown off by QTiles and the map docs. Gotta wait a few hours before I can offer the bounty.

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday

















  • At usgs.gov/news/new-hydro-map-service-available found "This new cache supports visualization zooming down to 1:9,000 scale (Level 17 in Google Maps tile levels)." So Level 17 is the most detailed available and you're being thrown by the faulty info provided by the MapServer that up to Level 20 is available.

    – Houska
    yesterday











  • Thanks for digging into this! I was, in fact, being thrown off by QTiles and the map docs. Gotta wait a few hours before I can offer the bounty.

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday
















At usgs.gov/news/new-hydro-map-service-available found "This new cache supports visualization zooming down to 1:9,000 scale (Level 17 in Google Maps tile levels)." So Level 17 is the most detailed available and you're being thrown by the faulty info provided by the MapServer that up to Level 20 is available.

– Houska
yesterday





At usgs.gov/news/new-hydro-map-service-available found "This new cache supports visualization zooming down to 1:9,000 scale (Level 17 in Google Maps tile levels)." So Level 17 is the most detailed available and you're being thrown by the faulty info provided by the MapServer that up to Level 20 is available.

– Houska
yesterday













Thanks for digging into this! I was, in fact, being thrown off by QTiles and the map docs. Gotta wait a few hours before I can offer the bounty.

– Antoine Zambelli
yesterday





Thanks for digging into this! I was, in fact, being thrown off by QTiles and the map docs. Gotta wait a few hours before I can offer the bounty.

– Antoine Zambelli
yesterday













2














As @Houska has noted the map service that you are using only provides tiles down to level 17. However, the data supplied in the map service is the USGS National Hydrography Dataset which is freely available to download in vector form, so if you want to generate tiles at any zoom level, this can be done by using a styled version of the vector NHD data.






share|improve this answer























  • I'll take a look at styled vector data. Too new to this stuff to figure out the stylesheet stuff right now but I might 'upgrade' to using that in the future.

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday















2














As @Houska has noted the map service that you are using only provides tiles down to level 17. However, the data supplied in the map service is the USGS National Hydrography Dataset which is freely available to download in vector form, so if you want to generate tiles at any zoom level, this can be done by using a styled version of the vector NHD data.






share|improve this answer























  • I'll take a look at styled vector data. Too new to this stuff to figure out the stylesheet stuff right now but I might 'upgrade' to using that in the future.

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday













2












2








2







As @Houska has noted the map service that you are using only provides tiles down to level 17. However, the data supplied in the map service is the USGS National Hydrography Dataset which is freely available to download in vector form, so if you want to generate tiles at any zoom level, this can be done by using a styled version of the vector NHD data.






share|improve this answer













As @Houska has noted the map service that you are using only provides tiles down to level 17. However, the data supplied in the map service is the USGS National Hydrography Dataset which is freely available to download in vector form, so if you want to generate tiles at any zoom level, this can be done by using a styled version of the vector NHD data.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Andy HarfootAndy Harfoot

2,4241427




2,4241427












  • I'll take a look at styled vector data. Too new to this stuff to figure out the stylesheet stuff right now but I might 'upgrade' to using that in the future.

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday

















  • I'll take a look at styled vector data. Too new to this stuff to figure out the stylesheet stuff right now but I might 'upgrade' to using that in the future.

    – Antoine Zambelli
    yesterday
















I'll take a look at styled vector data. Too new to this stuff to figure out the stylesheet stuff right now but I might 'upgrade' to using that in the future.

– Antoine Zambelli
yesterday





I'll take a look at styled vector data. Too new to this stuff to figure out the stylesheet stuff right now but I might 'upgrade' to using that in the future.

– Antoine Zambelli
yesterday










Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Antoine Zambelli is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f317552%2fqgis-extract-qtiles-beyond-layer-extent%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221

Creating closest line along the point''s azimuth using PostgreSQL Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Drawing line between points at specific distance in PostGIS?How to efficiently find the closest point over the dateline?How to find the nearest point by using PostGIS function?PostGIS nearest point with LATERAL JOIN in PostgreSQL 9.3+Creating a table and inserting selected streets using plpgsql functionsCreating a table that stores Distances and other columnSaving select query results (year wise) from PostgreSQL/PostGIS to text filesWhat is the information behind this geometry?How to give start and end vertex ids dynamically in pgr_dijkstra?Point to Polygon nearest distance DS_distance is not using geography index & knn <-> or <#> does not give result in orderLine to point conversion with start point and end point detection?

Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given