Use of noexpand in the implementation of TextOrMath for eTeXWhen to use edef, noexpand, and expandafter?Does noexpand have to be a primitive?Problem with nested noexpand and edefReplacement for unexpanded without eTeX extensionWhy do some arguments in a macro need to be preceded by noexpand?How to use noexpand in an edef?Why six noexpand in a row?How can I use noexpand and unexpanded without appending a space to the unexpanded tokens?How should I /protect this command for use in csname?ifx doesn't treat noexpand as relax
What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Why do falling prices hurt debtors?
Dragon forelimb placement
Risk of getting Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in the United States?
Python: next in for loop
Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?
Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?
Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?
How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?
Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?
Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, with equal bases have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.
Is a tag line useful on a cover?
Mathematical cryptic clues
Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?
What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?
Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?
Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?
Is this a crack on the carbon frame?
Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?
How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?
Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?
How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?
How to format long polynomial?
Use of noexpand in the implementation of TextOrMath for eTeX
When to use edef, noexpand, and expandafter?Does noexpand have to be a primitive?Problem with nested noexpand and edefReplacement for unexpanded without eTeX extensionWhy do some arguments in a macro need to be preceded by noexpand?How to use noexpand in an edef?Why six noexpand in a row?How can I use noexpand and unexpanded without appending a space to the unexpanded tokens?How should I /protect this command for use in csname?ifx doesn't treat noexpand as relax
In latexrelease
2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath
: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected
). My question concerns the latter:
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef
isn't simply written this way:
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
Since the internal TextOrMath<space>
macro is protected
, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand
inside the edef
? Is it because the author feared that protected
might be deficient?..
I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):
% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi
edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto
ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi
vfill
eject
bye
This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?
Thanks!
macros expansion definition protected-macro
add a comment |
In latexrelease
2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath
: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected
). My question concerns the latter:
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef
isn't simply written this way:
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
Since the internal TextOrMath<space>
macro is protected
, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand
inside the edef
? Is it because the author feared that protected
might be deficient?..
I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):
% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi
edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto
ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi
vfill
eject
bye
This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?
Thanks!
macros expansion definition protected-macro
thanks I suppose we could change that:-)
– David Carlisle
Apr 2 at 20:24
Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!
– frougon
Apr 2 at 20:26
add a comment |
In latexrelease
2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath
: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected
). My question concerns the latter:
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef
isn't simply written this way:
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
Since the internal TextOrMath<space>
macro is protected
, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand
inside the edef
? Is it because the author feared that protected
might be deficient?..
I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):
% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi
edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto
ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi
vfill
eject
bye
This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?
Thanks!
macros expansion definition protected-macro
In latexrelease
2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath
: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected
). My question concerns the latter:
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef
isn't simply written this way:
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
Since the internal TextOrMath<space>
macro is protected
, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand
inside the edef
? Is it because the author feared that protected
might be deficient?..
I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):
% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi
edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2
showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto
ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi
vfill
eject
bye
This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?
Thanks!
macros expansion definition protected-macro
macros expansion definition protected-macro
asked Apr 2 at 18:56
frougonfrougon
783611
783611
thanks I suppose we could change that:-)
– David Carlisle
Apr 2 at 20:24
Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!
– frougon
Apr 2 at 20:26
add a comment |
thanks I suppose we could change that:-)
– David Carlisle
Apr 2 at 20:24
Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!
– frougon
Apr 2 at 20:26
thanks I suppose we could change that:-)
– David Carlisle
Apr 2 at 20:24
thanks I suppose we could change that:-)
– David Carlisle
Apr 2 at 20:24
Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!
– frougon
Apr 2 at 20:26
Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!
– frougon
Apr 2 at 20:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482829%2fuse-of-noexpand-in-the-implementation-of-textormath-for-etex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....
add a comment |
No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....
add a comment |
No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....
No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....
answered Apr 2 at 20:14
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
498k4111441892
498k4111441892
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482829%2fuse-of-noexpand-in-the-implementation-of-textormath-for-etex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
thanks I suppose we could change that:-)
– David Carlisle
Apr 2 at 20:24
Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!
– frougon
Apr 2 at 20:26