What would the climate of a planetwide city be like?What would the climate be like on an earth-like planet with only one convection cell per hemisphere?Vertical city - effects on climate?What would the geology and climate of a supposed landmass near the pole be like, assuming a thoroughly warmer planet?What would the climate on a planet with 85% or more of the surface area covered in water be like?How would this horrible climate be possibly?What would the climate zones of Pangea be?How would you redesign and revamp the city transit system?City-Closing EventCreating a layout of the cityIron deposits mined from under the city
Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
Mathematical cryptic clues
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Adding span tags within wp_list_pages list items
Writing rule stating superpower from different root cause is bad writing
How do I create uniquely male characters?
Python: next in for loop
Problem of parity - Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments...
Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?
Test if tikzmark exists on same page
How could an uplifted falcon's brain work?
Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?
Modeling an IPv4 Address
Risk of getting Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in the United States?
Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?
Test whether all array elements are factors of a number
Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?
What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)
Is this a crack on the carbon frame?
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?
How to write a macro that is braces sensitive?
Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)
What would the climate of a planetwide city be like?
What would the climate be like on an earth-like planet with only one convection cell per hemisphere?Vertical city - effects on climate?What would the geology and climate of a supposed landmass near the pole be like, assuming a thoroughly warmer planet?What would the climate on a planet with 85% or more of the surface area covered in water be like?How would this horrible climate be possibly?What would the climate zones of Pangea be?How would you redesign and revamp the city transit system?City-Closing EventCreating a layout of the cityIron deposits mined from under the city
$begingroup$
Assume the entirety of Earth (all the land) is covered in a city. What would the climate be like in different parts of it? I.e., what would it be like on the coast, or inland?
I imagine it would be unbearably hot inland because you have a planet-wide heat island effect plus hardly any wind. Interior parts of the city would also almost certainly suffer from near-perpetual drought in my mind. However, these are just my thoughts, and I am by no means an expert on climate nor the effects of urban development on local and global climate.
climate megastructures city
edited Apr 2 at 20:24
a CVn♦
21.9k1291180
asked Apr 2 at 19:10
V. RedV. Red
262
New contributor
V. Red is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume the entirety of Earth (all the land) is covered in a city. What would the climate be like in different parts of it? I.e., what would it be like on the coast, or inland?
I imagine it would be unbearably hot inland because you have a planet-wide heat island effect plus hardly any wind. Interior parts of the city would also almost certainly suffer from near-perpetual drought in my mind. However, these are just my thoughts, and I am by no means an expert on climate nor the effects of urban development on local and global climate.
climate megastructures city
edited Apr 2 at 20:24
a CVn♦
21.9k1291180
asked Apr 2 at 19:10
V. RedV. Red
262
New contributor
V. Red is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Are you thinking of a world that's gone completely urbanized, like Trantor in Asimov's Foundation series? If so, why would it matter? The entire enclosed city would be climate-controlled.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Apr 2 at 19:15
$begingroup$
If you're covering all of the land with city then that raises a lot of questions as to the specifics which depending on their answer will lead to dramatically different climates. For one there's the question of what the cities are actually made of since if you are covering all the landmass then you're likely to have moved beyond concrete (plus you may be deliberately using paint to alter albedo). There's also the question of how dense the city is. Plus of course co2 levels may be different in this sort of scenario.
$endgroup$
– Vakus Drake
Apr 2 at 19:16
1
$begingroup$
We need a lot more detail to be able to provide an answer. What have your city builders done about mountains, oceans, and rivers? What is the city made out of? How are they converting all that CO2 back into O2 without any plants? What kind of pollution is being created? There's just... thousands of different ways this could go depending on the details.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
Apr 2 at 19:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume the entirety of Earth (all the land) is covered in a city. What would the climate be like in different parts of it? I.e., what would it be like on the coast, or inland?
I imagine it would be unbearably hot inland because you have a planet-wide heat island effect plus hardly any wind. Interior parts of the city would also almost certainly suffer from near-perpetual drought in my mind. However, these are just my thoughts, and I am by no means an expert on climate nor the effects of urban development on local and global climate.
climate megastructures city
edited Apr 2 at 20:24
a CVn♦
21.9k1291180
asked Apr 2 at 19:10
V. RedV. Red
262
New contributor
V. Red is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Assume the entirety of Earth (all the land) is covered in a city. What would the climate be like in different parts of it? I.e., what would it be like on the coast, or inland?
I imagine it would be unbearably hot inland because you have a planet-wide heat island effect plus hardly any wind. Interior parts of the city would also almost certainly suffer from near-perpetual drought in my mind. However, these are just my thoughts, and I am by no means an expert on climate nor the effects of urban development on local and global climate.
climate megastructures city
climate megastructures city
edited Apr 2 at 20:24
a CVn♦
21.9k1291180
asked Apr 2 at 19:10
V. RedV. Red
262
New contributor
V. Red is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Apr 2 at 20:24
a CVn♦
21.9k1291180
asked Apr 2 at 19:10
V. RedV. Red
262
New contributor
V. Red is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Apr 2 at 20:24
a CVn♦
21.9k1291180
edited Apr 2 at 20:24
a CVn♦
21.9k1291180
edited Apr 2 at 20:24
a CVn♦
21.9k1291180
21.9k1291180
asked Apr 2 at 19:10
V. RedV. Red
262
New contributor
V. Red is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Apr 2 at 19:10
V. RedV. Red
262
asked Apr 2 at 19:10
V. RedV. Red
262
262
New contributor
V. Red is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
V. Red is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
V. Red is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
$begingroup$
Are you thinking of a world that's gone completely urbanized, like Trantor in Asimov's Foundation series? If so, why would it matter? The entire enclosed city would be climate-controlled.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Apr 2 at 19:15
$begingroup$
If you're covering all of the land with city then that raises a lot of questions as to the specifics which depending on their answer will lead to dramatically different climates. For one there's the question of what the cities are actually made of since if you are covering all the landmass then you're likely to have moved beyond concrete (plus you may be deliberately using paint to alter albedo). There's also the question of how dense the city is. Plus of course co2 levels may be different in this sort of scenario.
$endgroup$
– Vakus Drake
Apr 2 at 19:16
1
$begingroup$
We need a lot more detail to be able to provide an answer. What have your city builders done about mountains, oceans, and rivers? What is the city made out of? How are they converting all that CO2 back into O2 without any plants? What kind of pollution is being created? There's just... thousands of different ways this could go depending on the details.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
Apr 2 at 19:56
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Are you thinking of a world that's gone completely urbanized, like Trantor in Asimov's Foundation series? If so, why would it matter? The entire enclosed city would be climate-controlled.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Apr 2 at 19:15
$begingroup$
If you're covering all of the land with city then that raises a lot of questions as to the specifics which depending on their answer will lead to dramatically different climates. For one there's the question of what the cities are actually made of since if you are covering all the landmass then you're likely to have moved beyond concrete (plus you may be deliberately using paint to alter albedo). There's also the question of how dense the city is. Plus of course co2 levels may be different in this sort of scenario.
$endgroup$
– Vakus Drake
Apr 2 at 19:16
1
$begingroup$
We need a lot more detail to be able to provide an answer. What have your city builders done about mountains, oceans, and rivers? What is the city made out of? How are they converting all that CO2 back into O2 without any plants? What kind of pollution is being created? There's just... thousands of different ways this could go depending on the details.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
Apr 2 at 19:56
3
3
$begingroup$
Are you thinking of a world that's gone completely urbanized, like Trantor in Asimov's Foundation series? If so, why would it matter? The entire enclosed city would be climate-controlled.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Apr 2 at 19:15
$begingroup$
Are you thinking of a world that's gone completely urbanized, like Trantor in Asimov's Foundation series? If so, why would it matter? The entire enclosed city would be climate-controlled.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Apr 2 at 19:15
$begingroup$
If you're covering all of the land with city then that raises a lot of questions as to the specifics which depending on their answer will lead to dramatically different climates. For one there's the question of what the cities are actually made of since if you are covering all the landmass then you're likely to have moved beyond concrete (plus you may be deliberately using paint to alter albedo). There's also the question of how dense the city is. Plus of course co2 levels may be different in this sort of scenario.
$endgroup$
– Vakus Drake
Apr 2 at 19:16
$begingroup$
If you're covering all of the land with city then that raises a lot of questions as to the specifics which depending on their answer will lead to dramatically different climates. For one there's the question of what the cities are actually made of since if you are covering all the landmass then you're likely to have moved beyond concrete (plus you may be deliberately using paint to alter albedo). There's also the question of how dense the city is. Plus of course co2 levels may be different in this sort of scenario.
$endgroup$
– Vakus Drake
Apr 2 at 19:16
1
1
$begingroup$
We need a lot more detail to be able to provide an answer. What have your city builders done about mountains, oceans, and rivers? What is the city made out of? How are they converting all that CO2 back into O2 without any plants? What kind of pollution is being created? There's just... thousands of different ways this could go depending on the details.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
Apr 2 at 19:56
$begingroup$
We need a lot more detail to be able to provide an answer. What have your city builders done about mountains, oceans, and rivers? What is the city made out of? How are they converting all that CO2 back into O2 without any plants? What kind of pollution is being created? There's just... thousands of different ways this could go depending on the details.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
Apr 2 at 19:56
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What you are describing is a giant urban heat island (UHI).
I'm oversimplifying it here, but basically concrete and asphalt absorb more heat and release it slower than rural areas and this effect can be exaggerated where there are tall buildings and narrow streets as this traps the air and therefore the heat.
The difference in temperature between urban and rural areas is usually greatest in the evening as the cooling process is slowed in urban areas.
This warming effect isn't known to be exaggerated over time, i.e. cities don't continuously get warmer.
City sizes can affect the evening cooling process, so the center of an area with tall buildings and narrow streets will cool after the outskirts of that area. But they won't necessarily reach a higher temperature in the first place just because they are the center of this urbanised area.
So in general, your planet sized city is likely to be a few degrees warmer than it would be if left rural, especially at night.
UHIs in hotter climates are known to effect rainfall, as clouds will rise over these warm air pockets leading to precipitation. So more rain around the coast of you giant UHI, this will especially be true the closer you get to the equator and areas where the prevalent wind comes from the ocean. Of course, with no rural land, that is a lot of water to drain away. Precipitation will still be affected by natural geography to a point though (e.g. how far above sea level an area is).
edited Apr 3 at 13:43
Frostfyre
18k1067132
answered Apr 2 at 19:51
K MoK Mo
2,389514
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing which makes heat islanding such a big deal is partially that it's in pockets, contrasting with the cooler land forms around the hardscaped area, and that differential then drives local convection loops, trapping the heated air mass above the urban scape.
The whole prospect changes absent the contrast; we need to know SO much more about the planet overall to posit reasonable responses:
- land/sea ratios
- topography (mountains, plains, valleys)
- exposed geography / plantscapes in whatever un-urbanized areas there are (mountains - rocky or vegetated?)
- whether there are extensive parks (Paris, London, Tokyo, Bejing, New York, Philadelphia, Denver, Boston) or disastrously few parks (Fresno, Jacksonville, Mesa)
We also need to know how carefully this has been thought out and planned in process - there are some strategies which could make large scale urbanscaping far less climate-unfriendly:
- greenrooves
- pervious / impervious paving
- grass pavers vs asphault
- intentionally designed mico-climate generating ratios of heat islanding between differing sections and heights to intentionally generate currents, winds and pressure differentials
- alignment of taller structures with prevailing winds to cool large masses / generate wind-power
- power generating base: coal or oil-fired, nuclear fission or fusion, wind and tide turbines, massive solar on all rooves, antimatter/matter reactors, Schwartschild Discontiuity generators
- widely used high efficacy mass transit - so no cars, nor significant commuting pollution
Hopefully you get the idea.
answered Apr 2 at 21:34
GerardFallaGerardFalla
4,785729
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As @KMo mantioned, the Heat Island Effect (HIE) won't really effect windfall or overall wind patterns. You will still get relatively normal winds.
What will have a big effect on rainfall will be the height of the city. As wind is diverted upward, it's density/pressure decreases and it can't hold as much water. That water then precipitates as rain.
If the mega city is similar to our own cities where most buildings are 1 to 10 levels tall, then there won't be much affect on anything. The leading edge of the city on the coast will act as low rolling hills and might slightly increase rainfall there.
If the buildings are taller 100-200 levels then the edge effects become more pronounced and more rainfall will happen at the edge.
If the buildings are 500+ levels, they start to have the effect of mountains and you will tend to get very little rain away from the coasts.
I see 3 issues. The one relating to the above is water management. The water collected at the coast has to get transported toward the center. The second is the lack of O2 from the loss of plants. The third, relating to the second issue is massive starvation due to lack of food.
answered Apr 2 at 21:40
ShadoCatShadoCat
15.6k2053
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is talk about how it would create a hot island effect but I find that whenever people envision a world city, they think in terms of our cities today - concrete, glass, and steel (mainly) and so it is understandable to end up at such a point. My thought has always been that a city in general, but especially if the city were to sprawl across the entirety of the world I think that the world would need to adjust accordingly.
One thing is what about new building materials, which would likely be developed by the time a world could advance to the point of covering the planet. I don't think that the materials that would be used would be the sort of materials of current time.
The next thing is that the rooftops of buildings are a great place for greenery. You can easily put grass, trees, and flowers on top of the buildings. From a satelite, it would look as if the planet was completely green. It wouldn't be until you got closer that you would see the city underneath. From there, you can still cover the sides of structures with greenery as well. These are things already in place around the world and so I imagine a world-city would likely go this route.
I am sure that this would still have a major impact on the climate, but I think that this would minimize any hot island effect and would make the place more pleasant to view and live in.
edited Apr 3 at 8:34
Liam Morris
981316
answered Apr 2 at 23:17
Shane SeptonShane Septon
212
New contributor
Shane Septon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well it all depends on how your city is constructed. If most of your buildings are one or two storeys then lack of wind is hardly going to be an issue (as opposed to if every building was 20 storeys tall.
Additionally, it depends on how many green spaces you have in the city. For example, New York City is not just one big slab of concrete with buildings on it, you have central park, a large green space in the middle of the city. In this global city, you could have a lot of these green spaces and still claim the world is covered by a city.
Something to consider, you would still need crop farms, tree farms and orchards in your planet-wide city, otherwise you will not have any any food or wood. Even if these are built in the city, they still need to exist, reducing the heating effect.
Finally, consider the original temperature of the planet, if most of it originally was a frozen wasteland, having this mega city could instead make it a comfortable temperature.
answered Apr 3 at 0:08
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
981316
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
V. Red is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143059%2fwhat-would-the-climate-of-a-planetwide-city-be-like%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What you are describing is a giant urban heat island (UHI).
I'm oversimplifying it here, but basically concrete and asphalt absorb more heat and release it slower than rural areas and this effect can be exaggerated where there are tall buildings and narrow streets as this traps the air and therefore the heat.
The difference in temperature between urban and rural areas is usually greatest in the evening as the cooling process is slowed in urban areas.
This warming effect isn't known to be exaggerated over time, i.e. cities don't continuously get warmer.
City sizes can affect the evening cooling process, so the center of an area with tall buildings and narrow streets will cool after the outskirts of that area. But they won't necessarily reach a higher temperature in the first place just because they are the center of this urbanised area.
So in general, your planet sized city is likely to be a few degrees warmer than it would be if left rural, especially at night.
UHIs in hotter climates are known to effect rainfall, as clouds will rise over these warm air pockets leading to precipitation. So more rain around the coast of you giant UHI, this will especially be true the closer you get to the equator and areas where the prevalent wind comes from the ocean. Of course, with no rural land, that is a lot of water to drain away. Precipitation will still be affected by natural geography to a point though (e.g. how far above sea level an area is).
edited Apr 3 at 13:43
Frostfyre
18k1067132
answered Apr 2 at 19:51
K MoK Mo
2,389514
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What you are describing is a giant urban heat island (UHI).
I'm oversimplifying it here, but basically concrete and asphalt absorb more heat and release it slower than rural areas and this effect can be exaggerated where there are tall buildings and narrow streets as this traps the air and therefore the heat.
The difference in temperature between urban and rural areas is usually greatest in the evening as the cooling process is slowed in urban areas.
This warming effect isn't known to be exaggerated over time, i.e. cities don't continuously get warmer.
City sizes can affect the evening cooling process, so the center of an area with tall buildings and narrow streets will cool after the outskirts of that area. But they won't necessarily reach a higher temperature in the first place just because they are the center of this urbanised area.
So in general, your planet sized city is likely to be a few degrees warmer than it would be if left rural, especially at night.
UHIs in hotter climates are known to effect rainfall, as clouds will rise over these warm air pockets leading to precipitation. So more rain around the coast of you giant UHI, this will especially be true the closer you get to the equator and areas where the prevalent wind comes from the ocean. Of course, with no rural land, that is a lot of water to drain away. Precipitation will still be affected by natural geography to a point though (e.g. how far above sea level an area is).
edited Apr 3 at 13:43
Frostfyre
18k1067132
answered Apr 2 at 19:51
K MoK Mo
2,389514
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What you are describing is a giant urban heat island (UHI).
I'm oversimplifying it here, but basically concrete and asphalt absorb more heat and release it slower than rural areas and this effect can be exaggerated where there are tall buildings and narrow streets as this traps the air and therefore the heat.
The difference in temperature between urban and rural areas is usually greatest in the evening as the cooling process is slowed in urban areas.
This warming effect isn't known to be exaggerated over time, i.e. cities don't continuously get warmer.
City sizes can affect the evening cooling process, so the center of an area with tall buildings and narrow streets will cool after the outskirts of that area. But they won't necessarily reach a higher temperature in the first place just because they are the center of this urbanised area.
So in general, your planet sized city is likely to be a few degrees warmer than it would be if left rural, especially at night.
UHIs in hotter climates are known to effect rainfall, as clouds will rise over these warm air pockets leading to precipitation. So more rain around the coast of you giant UHI, this will especially be true the closer you get to the equator and areas where the prevalent wind comes from the ocean. Of course, with no rural land, that is a lot of water to drain away. Precipitation will still be affected by natural geography to a point though (e.g. how far above sea level an area is).
edited Apr 3 at 13:43
Frostfyre
18k1067132
answered Apr 2 at 19:51
K MoK Mo
2,389514
$endgroup$
What you are describing is a giant urban heat island (UHI).
I'm oversimplifying it here, but basically concrete and asphalt absorb more heat and release it slower than rural areas and this effect can be exaggerated where there are tall buildings and narrow streets as this traps the air and therefore the heat.
The difference in temperature between urban and rural areas is usually greatest in the evening as the cooling process is slowed in urban areas.
This warming effect isn't known to be exaggerated over time, i.e. cities don't continuously get warmer.
City sizes can affect the evening cooling process, so the center of an area with tall buildings and narrow streets will cool after the outskirts of that area. But they won't necessarily reach a higher temperature in the first place just because they are the center of this urbanised area.
So in general, your planet sized city is likely to be a few degrees warmer than it would be if left rural, especially at night.
UHIs in hotter climates are known to effect rainfall, as clouds will rise over these warm air pockets leading to precipitation. So more rain around the coast of you giant UHI, this will especially be true the closer you get to the equator and areas where the prevalent wind comes from the ocean. Of course, with no rural land, that is a lot of water to drain away. Precipitation will still be affected by natural geography to a point though (e.g. how far above sea level an area is).
edited Apr 3 at 13:43
Frostfyre
18k1067132
answered Apr 2 at 19:51
K MoK Mo
2,389514
edited Apr 3 at 13:43
Frostfyre
18k1067132
edited Apr 3 at 13:43
Frostfyre
18k1067132
edited Apr 3 at 13:43
Frostfyre
18k1067132
18k1067132
answered Apr 2 at 19:51
K MoK Mo
2,389514
answered Apr 2 at 19:51
K MoK Mo
2,389514
answered Apr 2 at 19:51
K MoK Mo
2,389514
2,389514
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing which makes heat islanding such a big deal is partially that it's in pockets, contrasting with the cooler land forms around the hardscaped area, and that differential then drives local convection loops, trapping the heated air mass above the urban scape.
The whole prospect changes absent the contrast; we need to know SO much more about the planet overall to posit reasonable responses:
- land/sea ratios
- topography (mountains, plains, valleys)
- exposed geography / plantscapes in whatever un-urbanized areas there are (mountains - rocky or vegetated?)
- whether there are extensive parks (Paris, London, Tokyo, Bejing, New York, Philadelphia, Denver, Boston) or disastrously few parks (Fresno, Jacksonville, Mesa)
We also need to know how carefully this has been thought out and planned in process - there are some strategies which could make large scale urbanscaping far less climate-unfriendly:
- greenrooves
- pervious / impervious paving
- grass pavers vs asphault
- intentionally designed mico-climate generating ratios of heat islanding between differing sections and heights to intentionally generate currents, winds and pressure differentials
- alignment of taller structures with prevailing winds to cool large masses / generate wind-power
- power generating base: coal or oil-fired, nuclear fission or fusion, wind and tide turbines, massive solar on all rooves, antimatter/matter reactors, Schwartschild Discontiuity generators
- widely used high efficacy mass transit - so no cars, nor significant commuting pollution
Hopefully you get the idea.
answered Apr 2 at 21:34
GerardFallaGerardFalla
4,785729
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing which makes heat islanding such a big deal is partially that it's in pockets, contrasting with the cooler land forms around the hardscaped area, and that differential then drives local convection loops, trapping the heated air mass above the urban scape.
The whole prospect changes absent the contrast; we need to know SO much more about the planet overall to posit reasonable responses:
- land/sea ratios
- topography (mountains, plains, valleys)
- exposed geography / plantscapes in whatever un-urbanized areas there are (mountains - rocky or vegetated?)
- whether there are extensive parks (Paris, London, Tokyo, Bejing, New York, Philadelphia, Denver, Boston) or disastrously few parks (Fresno, Jacksonville, Mesa)
We also need to know how carefully this has been thought out and planned in process - there are some strategies which could make large scale urbanscaping far less climate-unfriendly:
- greenrooves
- pervious / impervious paving
- grass pavers vs asphault
- intentionally designed mico-climate generating ratios of heat islanding between differing sections and heights to intentionally generate currents, winds and pressure differentials
- alignment of taller structures with prevailing winds to cool large masses / generate wind-power
- power generating base: coal or oil-fired, nuclear fission or fusion, wind and tide turbines, massive solar on all rooves, antimatter/matter reactors, Schwartschild Discontiuity generators
- widely used high efficacy mass transit - so no cars, nor significant commuting pollution
Hopefully you get the idea.
answered Apr 2 at 21:34
GerardFallaGerardFalla
4,785729
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing which makes heat islanding such a big deal is partially that it's in pockets, contrasting with the cooler land forms around the hardscaped area, and that differential then drives local convection loops, trapping the heated air mass above the urban scape.
The whole prospect changes absent the contrast; we need to know SO much more about the planet overall to posit reasonable responses:
- land/sea ratios
- topography (mountains, plains, valleys)
- exposed geography / plantscapes in whatever un-urbanized areas there are (mountains - rocky or vegetated?)
- whether there are extensive parks (Paris, London, Tokyo, Bejing, New York, Philadelphia, Denver, Boston) or disastrously few parks (Fresno, Jacksonville, Mesa)
We also need to know how carefully this has been thought out and planned in process - there are some strategies which could make large scale urbanscaping far less climate-unfriendly:
- greenrooves
- pervious / impervious paving
- grass pavers vs asphault
- intentionally designed mico-climate generating ratios of heat islanding between differing sections and heights to intentionally generate currents, winds and pressure differentials
- alignment of taller structures with prevailing winds to cool large masses / generate wind-power
- power generating base: coal or oil-fired, nuclear fission or fusion, wind and tide turbines, massive solar on all rooves, antimatter/matter reactors, Schwartschild Discontiuity generators
- widely used high efficacy mass transit - so no cars, nor significant commuting pollution
Hopefully you get the idea.
answered Apr 2 at 21:34
GerardFallaGerardFalla
4,785729
$endgroup$
The thing which makes heat islanding such a big deal is partially that it's in pockets, contrasting with the cooler land forms around the hardscaped area, and that differential then drives local convection loops, trapping the heated air mass above the urban scape.
The whole prospect changes absent the contrast; we need to know SO much more about the planet overall to posit reasonable responses:
- land/sea ratios
- topography (mountains, plains, valleys)
- exposed geography / plantscapes in whatever un-urbanized areas there are (mountains - rocky or vegetated?)
- whether there are extensive parks (Paris, London, Tokyo, Bejing, New York, Philadelphia, Denver, Boston) or disastrously few parks (Fresno, Jacksonville, Mesa)
We also need to know how carefully this has been thought out and planned in process - there are some strategies which could make large scale urbanscaping far less climate-unfriendly:
- greenrooves
- pervious / impervious paving
- grass pavers vs asphault
- intentionally designed mico-climate generating ratios of heat islanding between differing sections and heights to intentionally generate currents, winds and pressure differentials
- alignment of taller structures with prevailing winds to cool large masses / generate wind-power
- power generating base: coal or oil-fired, nuclear fission or fusion, wind and tide turbines, massive solar on all rooves, antimatter/matter reactors, Schwartschild Discontiuity generators
- widely used high efficacy mass transit - so no cars, nor significant commuting pollution
Hopefully you get the idea.
answered Apr 2 at 21:34
GerardFallaGerardFalla
4,785729
answered Apr 2 at 21:34
GerardFallaGerardFalla
4,785729
answered Apr 2 at 21:34
GerardFallaGerardFalla
4,785729
answered Apr 2 at 21:34
GerardFallaGerardFalla
4,785729
4,785729
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As @KMo mantioned, the Heat Island Effect (HIE) won't really effect windfall or overall wind patterns. You will still get relatively normal winds.
What will have a big effect on rainfall will be the height of the city. As wind is diverted upward, it's density/pressure decreases and it can't hold as much water. That water then precipitates as rain.
If the mega city is similar to our own cities where most buildings are 1 to 10 levels tall, then there won't be much affect on anything. The leading edge of the city on the coast will act as low rolling hills and might slightly increase rainfall there.
If the buildings are taller 100-200 levels then the edge effects become more pronounced and more rainfall will happen at the edge.
If the buildings are 500+ levels, they start to have the effect of mountains and you will tend to get very little rain away from the coasts.
I see 3 issues. The one relating to the above is water management. The water collected at the coast has to get transported toward the center. The second is the lack of O2 from the loss of plants. The third, relating to the second issue is massive starvation due to lack of food.
answered Apr 2 at 21:40
ShadoCatShadoCat
15.6k2053
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As @KMo mantioned, the Heat Island Effect (HIE) won't really effect windfall or overall wind patterns. You will still get relatively normal winds.
What will have a big effect on rainfall will be the height of the city. As wind is diverted upward, it's density/pressure decreases and it can't hold as much water. That water then precipitates as rain.
If the mega city is similar to our own cities where most buildings are 1 to 10 levels tall, then there won't be much affect on anything. The leading edge of the city on the coast will act as low rolling hills and might slightly increase rainfall there.
If the buildings are taller 100-200 levels then the edge effects become more pronounced and more rainfall will happen at the edge.
If the buildings are 500+ levels, they start to have the effect of mountains and you will tend to get very little rain away from the coasts.
I see 3 issues. The one relating to the above is water management. The water collected at the coast has to get transported toward the center. The second is the lack of O2 from the loss of plants. The third, relating to the second issue is massive starvation due to lack of food.
answered Apr 2 at 21:40
ShadoCatShadoCat
15.6k2053
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As @KMo mantioned, the Heat Island Effect (HIE) won't really effect windfall or overall wind patterns. You will still get relatively normal winds.
What will have a big effect on rainfall will be the height of the city. As wind is diverted upward, it's density/pressure decreases and it can't hold as much water. That water then precipitates as rain.
If the mega city is similar to our own cities where most buildings are 1 to 10 levels tall, then there won't be much affect on anything. The leading edge of the city on the coast will act as low rolling hills and might slightly increase rainfall there.
If the buildings are taller 100-200 levels then the edge effects become more pronounced and more rainfall will happen at the edge.
If the buildings are 500+ levels, they start to have the effect of mountains and you will tend to get very little rain away from the coasts.
I see 3 issues. The one relating to the above is water management. The water collected at the coast has to get transported toward the center. The second is the lack of O2 from the loss of plants. The third, relating to the second issue is massive starvation due to lack of food.
answered Apr 2 at 21:40
ShadoCatShadoCat
15.6k2053
$endgroup$
As @KMo mantioned, the Heat Island Effect (HIE) won't really effect windfall or overall wind patterns. You will still get relatively normal winds.
What will have a big effect on rainfall will be the height of the city. As wind is diverted upward, it's density/pressure decreases and it can't hold as much water. That water then precipitates as rain.
If the mega city is similar to our own cities where most buildings are 1 to 10 levels tall, then there won't be much affect on anything. The leading edge of the city on the coast will act as low rolling hills and might slightly increase rainfall there.
If the buildings are taller 100-200 levels then the edge effects become more pronounced and more rainfall will happen at the edge.
If the buildings are 500+ levels, they start to have the effect of mountains and you will tend to get very little rain away from the coasts.
I see 3 issues. The one relating to the above is water management. The water collected at the coast has to get transported toward the center. The second is the lack of O2 from the loss of plants. The third, relating to the second issue is massive starvation due to lack of food.
answered Apr 2 at 21:40
ShadoCatShadoCat
15.6k2053
answered Apr 2 at 21:40
ShadoCatShadoCat
15.6k2053
answered Apr 2 at 21:40
ShadoCatShadoCat
15.6k2053
answered Apr 2 at 21:40
ShadoCatShadoCat
15.6k2053
15.6k2053
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is talk about how it would create a hot island effect but I find that whenever people envision a world city, they think in terms of our cities today - concrete, glass, and steel (mainly) and so it is understandable to end up at such a point. My thought has always been that a city in general, but especially if the city were to sprawl across the entirety of the world I think that the world would need to adjust accordingly.
One thing is what about new building materials, which would likely be developed by the time a world could advance to the point of covering the planet. I don't think that the materials that would be used would be the sort of materials of current time.
The next thing is that the rooftops of buildings are a great place for greenery. You can easily put grass, trees, and flowers on top of the buildings. From a satelite, it would look as if the planet was completely green. It wouldn't be until you got closer that you would see the city underneath. From there, you can still cover the sides of structures with greenery as well. These are things already in place around the world and so I imagine a world-city would likely go this route.
I am sure that this would still have a major impact on the climate, but I think that this would minimize any hot island effect and would make the place more pleasant to view and live in.
edited Apr 3 at 8:34
Liam Morris
981316
answered Apr 2 at 23:17
Shane SeptonShane Septon
212
New contributor
Shane Septon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is talk about how it would create a hot island effect but I find that whenever people envision a world city, they think in terms of our cities today - concrete, glass, and steel (mainly) and so it is understandable to end up at such a point. My thought has always been that a city in general, but especially if the city were to sprawl across the entirety of the world I think that the world would need to adjust accordingly.
One thing is what about new building materials, which would likely be developed by the time a world could advance to the point of covering the planet. I don't think that the materials that would be used would be the sort of materials of current time.
The next thing is that the rooftops of buildings are a great place for greenery. You can easily put grass, trees, and flowers on top of the buildings. From a satelite, it would look as if the planet was completely green. It wouldn't be until you got closer that you would see the city underneath. From there, you can still cover the sides of structures with greenery as well. These are things already in place around the world and so I imagine a world-city would likely go this route.
I am sure that this would still have a major impact on the climate, but I think that this would minimize any hot island effect and would make the place more pleasant to view and live in.
edited Apr 3 at 8:34
Liam Morris
981316
answered Apr 2 at 23:17
Shane SeptonShane Septon
212
New contributor
Shane Septon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is talk about how it would create a hot island effect but I find that whenever people envision a world city, they think in terms of our cities today - concrete, glass, and steel (mainly) and so it is understandable to end up at such a point. My thought has always been that a city in general, but especially if the city were to sprawl across the entirety of the world I think that the world would need to adjust accordingly.
One thing is what about new building materials, which would likely be developed by the time a world could advance to the point of covering the planet. I don't think that the materials that would be used would be the sort of materials of current time.
The next thing is that the rooftops of buildings are a great place for greenery. You can easily put grass, trees, and flowers on top of the buildings. From a satelite, it would look as if the planet was completely green. It wouldn't be until you got closer that you would see the city underneath. From there, you can still cover the sides of structures with greenery as well. These are things already in place around the world and so I imagine a world-city would likely go this route.
I am sure that this would still have a major impact on the climate, but I think that this would minimize any hot island effect and would make the place more pleasant to view and live in.
edited Apr 3 at 8:34
Liam Morris
981316
answered Apr 2 at 23:17
Shane SeptonShane Septon
212
New contributor
Shane Septon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
There is talk about how it would create a hot island effect but I find that whenever people envision a world city, they think in terms of our cities today - concrete, glass, and steel (mainly) and so it is understandable to end up at such a point. My thought has always been that a city in general, but especially if the city were to sprawl across the entirety of the world I think that the world would need to adjust accordingly.
One thing is what about new building materials, which would likely be developed by the time a world could advance to the point of covering the planet. I don't think that the materials that would be used would be the sort of materials of current time.
The next thing is that the rooftops of buildings are a great place for greenery. You can easily put grass, trees, and flowers on top of the buildings. From a satelite, it would look as if the planet was completely green. It wouldn't be until you got closer that you would see the city underneath. From there, you can still cover the sides of structures with greenery as well. These are things already in place around the world and so I imagine a world-city would likely go this route.
I am sure that this would still have a major impact on the climate, but I think that this would minimize any hot island effect and would make the place more pleasant to view and live in.
edited Apr 3 at 8:34
Liam Morris
981316
answered Apr 2 at 23:17
Shane SeptonShane Septon
212
New contributor
Shane Septon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Apr 3 at 8:34
Liam Morris
981316
edited Apr 3 at 8:34
Liam Morris
981316
edited Apr 3 at 8:34
Liam Morris
981316
981316
answered Apr 2 at 23:17
Shane SeptonShane Septon
212
New contributor
Shane Septon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Apr 2 at 23:17
Shane SeptonShane Septon
212
answered Apr 2 at 23:17
Shane SeptonShane Septon
212
212
New contributor
Shane Septon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Shane Septon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Shane Septon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well it all depends on how your city is constructed. If most of your buildings are one or two storeys then lack of wind is hardly going to be an issue (as opposed to if every building was 20 storeys tall.
Additionally, it depends on how many green spaces you have in the city. For example, New York City is not just one big slab of concrete with buildings on it, you have central park, a large green space in the middle of the city. In this global city, you could have a lot of these green spaces and still claim the world is covered by a city.
Something to consider, you would still need crop farms, tree farms and orchards in your planet-wide city, otherwise you will not have any any food or wood. Even if these are built in the city, they still need to exist, reducing the heating effect.
Finally, consider the original temperature of the planet, if most of it originally was a frozen wasteland, having this mega city could instead make it a comfortable temperature.
answered Apr 3 at 0:08
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
981316
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well it all depends on how your city is constructed. If most of your buildings are one or two storeys then lack of wind is hardly going to be an issue (as opposed to if every building was 20 storeys tall.
Additionally, it depends on how many green spaces you have in the city. For example, New York City is not just one big slab of concrete with buildings on it, you have central park, a large green space in the middle of the city. In this global city, you could have a lot of these green spaces and still claim the world is covered by a city.
Something to consider, you would still need crop farms, tree farms and orchards in your planet-wide city, otherwise you will not have any any food or wood. Even if these are built in the city, they still need to exist, reducing the heating effect.
Finally, consider the original temperature of the planet, if most of it originally was a frozen wasteland, having this mega city could instead make it a comfortable temperature.
answered Apr 3 at 0:08
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
981316
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well it all depends on how your city is constructed. If most of your buildings are one or two storeys then lack of wind is hardly going to be an issue (as opposed to if every building was 20 storeys tall.
Additionally, it depends on how many green spaces you have in the city. For example, New York City is not just one big slab of concrete with buildings on it, you have central park, a large green space in the middle of the city. In this global city, you could have a lot of these green spaces and still claim the world is covered by a city.
Something to consider, you would still need crop farms, tree farms and orchards in your planet-wide city, otherwise you will not have any any food or wood. Even if these are built in the city, they still need to exist, reducing the heating effect.
Finally, consider the original temperature of the planet, if most of it originally was a frozen wasteland, having this mega city could instead make it a comfortable temperature.
answered Apr 3 at 0:08
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
981316
$endgroup$
Well it all depends on how your city is constructed. If most of your buildings are one or two storeys then lack of wind is hardly going to be an issue (as opposed to if every building was 20 storeys tall.
Additionally, it depends on how many green spaces you have in the city. For example, New York City is not just one big slab of concrete with buildings on it, you have central park, a large green space in the middle of the city. In this global city, you could have a lot of these green spaces and still claim the world is covered by a city.
Something to consider, you would still need crop farms, tree farms and orchards in your planet-wide city, otherwise you will not have any any food or wood. Even if these are built in the city, they still need to exist, reducing the heating effect.
Finally, consider the original temperature of the planet, if most of it originally was a frozen wasteland, having this mega city could instead make it a comfortable temperature.
answered Apr 3 at 0:08
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
981316
answered Apr 3 at 0:08
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
981316
answered Apr 3 at 0:08
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
981316
answered Apr 3 at 0:08
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
981316
981316
add a comment |
add a comment |
V. Red is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
V. Red is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
V. Red is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
V. Red is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143059%2fwhat-would-the-climate-of-a-planetwide-city-be-like%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Are you thinking of a world that's gone completely urbanized, like Trantor in Asimov's Foundation series? If so, why would it matter? The entire enclosed city would be climate-controlled.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Apr 2 at 19:15
$begingroup$
If you're covering all of the land with city then that raises a lot of questions as to the specifics which depending on their answer will lead to dramatically different climates. For one there's the question of what the cities are actually made of since if you are covering all the landmass then you're likely to have moved beyond concrete (plus you may be deliberately using paint to alter albedo). There's also the question of how dense the city is. Plus of course co2 levels may be different in this sort of scenario.
$endgroup$
– Vakus Drake
Apr 2 at 19:16
1
$begingroup$
We need a lot more detail to be able to provide an answer. What have your city builders done about mountains, oceans, and rivers? What is the city made out of? How are they converting all that CO2 back into O2 without any plants? What kind of pollution is being created? There's just... thousands of different ways this could go depending on the details.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
Apr 2 at 19:56