Why partial fraction decomposition of $frac1s^2(s+2)$ is $fracAs+fracBs^2+fracC(s+2)$?Derivation of the general forms of partial fractionsWhy do you need two fractions for partial fraction decomposition with repeated factors?How can the correct form of the partial fractions decomposition be found for arbitrary rational functions?Integration - Partial Fraction DecompositionPartial Fraction Expansion of Transfer FunctionThe logic behind partial fraction decompositionFast partial-fraction decompositionHelp with partial fraction decompositionPartial fraction decomposition helpPartial fraction decomposition of a rational functionPartial Fraction Decomposition ProblemFind the Partial Fraction DecompositionPartial Fraction Decomposition for Inverse Laplace Transform

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

Modeling an IPv4 Address

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

How to format long polynomial?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

How to find program name(s) of an installed package?

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

Font hinting is lost in Chrome-like browsers (for some languages )

Test whether all array elements are factors of a number

What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

How could an uplifted falcon's brain work?

Expeditious Retreat

Which models of the Boeing 737 are still in production?

Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?

Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation

Adding span tags within wp_list_pages list items

Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, with equal bases have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?



Why partial fraction decomposition of $frac1s^2(s+2)$ is $fracAs+fracBs^2+fracC(s+2)$?


Derivation of the general forms of partial fractionsWhy do you need two fractions for partial fraction decomposition with repeated factors?How can the correct form of the partial fractions decomposition be found for arbitrary rational functions?Integration - Partial Fraction DecompositionPartial Fraction Expansion of Transfer FunctionThe logic behind partial fraction decompositionFast partial-fraction decompositionHelp with partial fraction decompositionPartial fraction decomposition helpPartial fraction decomposition of a rational functionPartial Fraction Decomposition ProblemFind the Partial Fraction DecompositionPartial Fraction Decomposition for Inverse Laplace Transform













1












$begingroup$


Can someone please explain why: $$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs+fracBs^2+fracC(s+2)$$



And not:$$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs^2+fracB(s+2)$$



I'm a bit confused where the extra s term comes from in the first equation.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Apr 3 at 1:09










  • $begingroup$
    More answers here too
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Apr 3 at 2:43















1












$begingroup$


Can someone please explain why: $$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs+fracBs^2+fracC(s+2)$$



And not:$$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs^2+fracB(s+2)$$



I'm a bit confused where the extra s term comes from in the first equation.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Apr 3 at 1:09










  • $begingroup$
    More answers here too
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Apr 3 at 2:43













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Can someone please explain why: $$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs+fracBs^2+fracC(s+2)$$



And not:$$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs^2+fracB(s+2)$$



I'm a bit confused where the extra s term comes from in the first equation.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Can someone please explain why: $$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs+fracBs^2+fracC(s+2)$$



And not:$$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs^2+fracB(s+2)$$



I'm a bit confused where the extra s term comes from in the first equation.







algebra-precalculus partial-fractions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 3 at 3:15









user21820

40k544161




40k544161










asked Apr 3 at 0:58









stuartstuart

1968




1968











  • $begingroup$
    There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Apr 3 at 1:09










  • $begingroup$
    More answers here too
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Apr 3 at 2:43
















  • $begingroup$
    There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Apr 3 at 1:09










  • $begingroup$
    More answers here too
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Apr 3 at 2:43















$begingroup$
There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 3 at 1:09




$begingroup$
There are many answers available on MSE, i.e. here and here
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 3 at 1:09












$begingroup$
More answers here too
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:43




$begingroup$
More answers here too
$endgroup$
– David K
Apr 3 at 2:43










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

The general result is the following.




Suppose that the degree of $p(s)$ is less than the degree of $q(s)$, and that $q(s)=q_1(s)q_2(s)$ where $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ have no common factor. Then there exist polynomials $r_1(s)$ and $r_2(s)$, with degrees less than $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ respectively, such that
$$fracp(s)q(s)=fracr_1(s)q_1(s)+fracr_2(s)q_2(s) .$$




In your case the denominator factorises as $s^2$ times $s+2$ so you have
$$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs+Bs^2+fracCs+2 .$$
It is then usually more convenient (though not obligatory) to split up the first fraction, which gives your answer.



Note that you cannot, for the purposes of the above result, regard the denominator as $s$ times $s(s+2)$, because these polynomials do have a common factor.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    That is because for
    $$fracas^2+bs+cs^2(s+2)=fracAs^2+fracB(s+2),$$
    the left hand side has three parameters $a,b,c$, but the right hand side only has two parameters $a,b$. And if you try to solve TWO values from THREE equations, it will usually lead to a contradiction. So a third term of the right is needed. Even though this is not obvious in your question, you should think 1 as a degree 2 polynomial.



    Or more simply, consider the example
    $$
    fracs+1s^2=frac1s^2+frac1s
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      2












      $begingroup$

      If your denominator has a factor of the form $(as+b)^n$ then to write partial fractions you should write all the powers up to $n$, i.e. $fracAas+b+fracB(as+b)^2+cdots+fracZ(as+b)^n$. In the case you showed, you have that $s^2$ is a factor of the denominator and that's why in partial fractions you should write the terms $fracAs+fracBs^2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
        $endgroup$
        – David K
        Apr 3 at 2:45










      • $begingroup$
        @user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
        $endgroup$
        – David K
        Apr 3 at 3:21










      • $begingroup$
        @DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
        $endgroup$
        – user21820
        Apr 3 at 3:50


















      1












      $begingroup$

      One can immediately see why in this case the partial fraction expansion will lead to a nonzero coefficient for the $1/s$ term. The asymptotic behavior of the fraction for large $s$ is $sim 1/s^3$. The singularity at $s = -2$ contributes a term proportional to $1/(s+2)$ to the partial fraction expansion, which for large $s$ behaves like $sim 1/s$. This $sim 1/s$ must be canceled out by the partial fraction expansion terms coming from the singularity at $s = 0$, this requires the presence of a contribution proportional to $1/s$.



      By making this reasoning more precise we can get to the complete partial fraction expansion using only the contribution from the singularity at $s = -2$. The amplitude of the $1/(s+2)$ term in the partial fraction expansion is given by the factor that multiplies it in the fraction evaluated at $s = -2$, this is therefore equal to $1/4$. So the contribution to the partial fraction expansion coming from the singularity at $s = -2$ is:



      $$frac14(s+2)$$



      For large $s$ we can expand this in powers of $1/s$:



      $$frac14(s+2) = frac14 sfrac11+frac2s = frac14s - frac12 s^2 + mathcalOleft(frac1s^3right)$$



      The singularity at $s = 0$ will contribute terms to the partial fraction expansion whose large $s$ behavior will have to cancel out these first two terms, this means that this contribution to the partial fraction expansion is:



      $$frac12 s^2-frac14s $$



      The complete partial fraction expansion is thus given by:



      $$frac12 s^2-frac14s + frac14(s+2) $$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        0












        $begingroup$

        Suppose we multiplied both sides of the second equation by $s^2(s-2)$, giving us the equivalent equation:
        $$1 = 0s^2 + 0s + 1= A(s+2) + Bs^2 = Bs^2 + As + 2A$$
        Notice that on the RHS of this equation, that the constant term is not independent of the coefficient of the $s$ term. This dependency, in turn, causes a contradiction.



        Now let's try the same thing with your first equation. This generates the equivalent equation, whose coefficients can be uniquely determined:
        $$beginalign
        1 &= As(s+2) + B(s+2)+Cs^2\
        0s^2+0s+1 &= (A+C)s^2+(2A+B)s+2B\
        endalign$$



        The reason, of course, is because $1,s,s^2 $ represents an independent set that spans the set of all polynomials up to degree two, requiring three parameters to determine its coefficients uniquely.



        I hope this helps.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




















          0












          $begingroup$

          You can do it step-by-step:
          $$beginalignfrac1s^2(s+2)&=frac1scdot frac1scdot (s+2)=\
          &=frac1scdot left(frac As+fracBs+2right)=\
          &=frac As^2+frac1scdot frac Bs+2=\
          &=fracAs^2+fracCs+fracDs+2.endalign$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172683%2fwhy-partial-fraction-decomposition-of-frac1s2s2-is-fracas-frac%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes








            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            The general result is the following.




            Suppose that the degree of $p(s)$ is less than the degree of $q(s)$, and that $q(s)=q_1(s)q_2(s)$ where $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ have no common factor. Then there exist polynomials $r_1(s)$ and $r_2(s)$, with degrees less than $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ respectively, such that
            $$fracp(s)q(s)=fracr_1(s)q_1(s)+fracr_2(s)q_2(s) .$$




            In your case the denominator factorises as $s^2$ times $s+2$ so you have
            $$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs+Bs^2+fracCs+2 .$$
            It is then usually more convenient (though not obligatory) to split up the first fraction, which gives your answer.



            Note that you cannot, for the purposes of the above result, regard the denominator as $s$ times $s(s+2)$, because these polynomials do have a common factor.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              5












              $begingroup$

              The general result is the following.




              Suppose that the degree of $p(s)$ is less than the degree of $q(s)$, and that $q(s)=q_1(s)q_2(s)$ where $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ have no common factor. Then there exist polynomials $r_1(s)$ and $r_2(s)$, with degrees less than $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ respectively, such that
              $$fracp(s)q(s)=fracr_1(s)q_1(s)+fracr_2(s)q_2(s) .$$




              In your case the denominator factorises as $s^2$ times $s+2$ so you have
              $$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs+Bs^2+fracCs+2 .$$
              It is then usually more convenient (though not obligatory) to split up the first fraction, which gives your answer.



              Note that you cannot, for the purposes of the above result, regard the denominator as $s$ times $s(s+2)$, because these polynomials do have a common factor.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                5












                5








                5





                $begingroup$

                The general result is the following.




                Suppose that the degree of $p(s)$ is less than the degree of $q(s)$, and that $q(s)=q_1(s)q_2(s)$ where $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ have no common factor. Then there exist polynomials $r_1(s)$ and $r_2(s)$, with degrees less than $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ respectively, such that
                $$fracp(s)q(s)=fracr_1(s)q_1(s)+fracr_2(s)q_2(s) .$$




                In your case the denominator factorises as $s^2$ times $s+2$ so you have
                $$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs+Bs^2+fracCs+2 .$$
                It is then usually more convenient (though not obligatory) to split up the first fraction, which gives your answer.



                Note that you cannot, for the purposes of the above result, regard the denominator as $s$ times $s(s+2)$, because these polynomials do have a common factor.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The general result is the following.




                Suppose that the degree of $p(s)$ is less than the degree of $q(s)$, and that $q(s)=q_1(s)q_2(s)$ where $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ have no common factor. Then there exist polynomials $r_1(s)$ and $r_2(s)$, with degrees less than $q_1(s)$ and $q_2(s)$ respectively, such that
                $$fracp(s)q(s)=fracr_1(s)q_1(s)+fracr_2(s)q_2(s) .$$




                In your case the denominator factorises as $s^2$ times $s+2$ so you have
                $$frac1s^2(s+2)=fracAs+Bs^2+fracCs+2 .$$
                It is then usually more convenient (though not obligatory) to split up the first fraction, which gives your answer.



                Note that you cannot, for the purposes of the above result, regard the denominator as $s$ times $s(s+2)$, because these polynomials do have a common factor.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 3 at 1:17









                DavidDavid

                69.7k668131




                69.7k668131





















                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    That is because for
                    $$fracas^2+bs+cs^2(s+2)=fracAs^2+fracB(s+2),$$
                    the left hand side has three parameters $a,b,c$, but the right hand side only has two parameters $a,b$. And if you try to solve TWO values from THREE equations, it will usually lead to a contradiction. So a third term of the right is needed. Even though this is not obvious in your question, you should think 1 as a degree 2 polynomial.



                    Or more simply, consider the example
                    $$
                    fracs+1s^2=frac1s^2+frac1s
                    $$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$

















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      That is because for
                      $$fracas^2+bs+cs^2(s+2)=fracAs^2+fracB(s+2),$$
                      the left hand side has three parameters $a,b,c$, but the right hand side only has two parameters $a,b$. And if you try to solve TWO values from THREE equations, it will usually lead to a contradiction. So a third term of the right is needed. Even though this is not obvious in your question, you should think 1 as a degree 2 polynomial.



                      Or more simply, consider the example
                      $$
                      fracs+1s^2=frac1s^2+frac1s
                      $$






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$















                        3












                        3








                        3





                        $begingroup$

                        That is because for
                        $$fracas^2+bs+cs^2(s+2)=fracAs^2+fracB(s+2),$$
                        the left hand side has three parameters $a,b,c$, but the right hand side only has two parameters $a,b$. And if you try to solve TWO values from THREE equations, it will usually lead to a contradiction. So a third term of the right is needed. Even though this is not obvious in your question, you should think 1 as a degree 2 polynomial.



                        Or more simply, consider the example
                        $$
                        fracs+1s^2=frac1s^2+frac1s
                        $$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        That is because for
                        $$fracas^2+bs+cs^2(s+2)=fracAs^2+fracB(s+2),$$
                        the left hand side has three parameters $a,b,c$, but the right hand side only has two parameters $a,b$. And if you try to solve TWO values from THREE equations, it will usually lead to a contradiction. So a third term of the right is needed. Even though this is not obvious in your question, you should think 1 as a degree 2 polynomial.



                        Or more simply, consider the example
                        $$
                        fracs+1s^2=frac1s^2+frac1s
                        $$







                        share|cite|improve this answer












                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        answered Apr 3 at 1:10









                        Holding ArthurHolding Arthur

                        1,451417




                        1,451417





















                            2












                            $begingroup$

                            If your denominator has a factor of the form $(as+b)^n$ then to write partial fractions you should write all the powers up to $n$, i.e. $fracAas+b+fracB(as+b)^2+cdots+fracZ(as+b)^n$. In the case you showed, you have that $s^2$ is a factor of the denominator and that's why in partial fractions you should write the terms $fracAs+fracBs^2$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$








                            • 1




                              $begingroup$
                              That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
                              $endgroup$
                              – David K
                              Apr 3 at 2:45










                            • $begingroup$
                              @user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
                              $endgroup$
                              – David K
                              Apr 3 at 3:21










                            • $begingroup$
                              @DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
                              $endgroup$
                              – user21820
                              Apr 3 at 3:50















                            2












                            $begingroup$

                            If your denominator has a factor of the form $(as+b)^n$ then to write partial fractions you should write all the powers up to $n$, i.e. $fracAas+b+fracB(as+b)^2+cdots+fracZ(as+b)^n$. In the case you showed, you have that $s^2$ is a factor of the denominator and that's why in partial fractions you should write the terms $fracAs+fracBs^2$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$








                            • 1




                              $begingroup$
                              That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
                              $endgroup$
                              – David K
                              Apr 3 at 2:45










                            • $begingroup$
                              @user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
                              $endgroup$
                              – David K
                              Apr 3 at 3:21










                            • $begingroup$
                              @DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
                              $endgroup$
                              – user21820
                              Apr 3 at 3:50













                            2












                            2








                            2





                            $begingroup$

                            If your denominator has a factor of the form $(as+b)^n$ then to write partial fractions you should write all the powers up to $n$, i.e. $fracAas+b+fracB(as+b)^2+cdots+fracZ(as+b)^n$. In the case you showed, you have that $s^2$ is a factor of the denominator and that's why in partial fractions you should write the terms $fracAs+fracBs^2$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            If your denominator has a factor of the form $(as+b)^n$ then to write partial fractions you should write all the powers up to $n$, i.e. $fracAas+b+fracB(as+b)^2+cdots+fracZ(as+b)^n$. In the case you showed, you have that $s^2$ is a factor of the denominator and that's why in partial fractions you should write the terms $fracAs+fracBs^2$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Apr 3 at 1:10









                            Julian MejiaJulian Mejia

                            46729




                            46729







                            • 1




                              $begingroup$
                              That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
                              $endgroup$
                              – David K
                              Apr 3 at 2:45










                            • $begingroup$
                              @user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
                              $endgroup$
                              – David K
                              Apr 3 at 3:21










                            • $begingroup$
                              @DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
                              $endgroup$
                              – user21820
                              Apr 3 at 3:50












                            • 1




                              $begingroup$
                              That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
                              $endgroup$
                              – David K
                              Apr 3 at 2:45










                            • $begingroup$
                              @user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
                              $endgroup$
                              – David K
                              Apr 3 at 3:21










                            • $begingroup$
                              @DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
                              $endgroup$
                              – user21820
                              Apr 3 at 3:50







                            1




                            1




                            $begingroup$
                            That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
                            $endgroup$
                            – David K
                            Apr 3 at 2:45




                            $begingroup$
                            That's the rule, but I think the question was asking why is that the rule.
                            $endgroup$
                            – David K
                            Apr 3 at 2:45












                            $begingroup$
                            @user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
                            $endgroup$
                            – David K
                            Apr 3 at 3:21




                            $begingroup$
                            @user21820 I didn't answer this question. What are you referring to?
                            $endgroup$
                            – David K
                            Apr 3 at 3:21












                            $begingroup$
                            @DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
                            $endgroup$
                            – user21820
                            Apr 3 at 3:50




                            $begingroup$
                            @DavidK: Oops sorry I thought you were the other David. Lol.
                            $endgroup$
                            – user21820
                            Apr 3 at 3:50











                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            One can immediately see why in this case the partial fraction expansion will lead to a nonzero coefficient for the $1/s$ term. The asymptotic behavior of the fraction for large $s$ is $sim 1/s^3$. The singularity at $s = -2$ contributes a term proportional to $1/(s+2)$ to the partial fraction expansion, which for large $s$ behaves like $sim 1/s$. This $sim 1/s$ must be canceled out by the partial fraction expansion terms coming from the singularity at $s = 0$, this requires the presence of a contribution proportional to $1/s$.



                            By making this reasoning more precise we can get to the complete partial fraction expansion using only the contribution from the singularity at $s = -2$. The amplitude of the $1/(s+2)$ term in the partial fraction expansion is given by the factor that multiplies it in the fraction evaluated at $s = -2$, this is therefore equal to $1/4$. So the contribution to the partial fraction expansion coming from the singularity at $s = -2$ is:



                            $$frac14(s+2)$$



                            For large $s$ we can expand this in powers of $1/s$:



                            $$frac14(s+2) = frac14 sfrac11+frac2s = frac14s - frac12 s^2 + mathcalOleft(frac1s^3right)$$



                            The singularity at $s = 0$ will contribute terms to the partial fraction expansion whose large $s$ behavior will have to cancel out these first two terms, this means that this contribution to the partial fraction expansion is:



                            $$frac12 s^2-frac14s $$



                            The complete partial fraction expansion is thus given by:



                            $$frac12 s^2-frac14s + frac14(s+2) $$






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$

















                              1












                              $begingroup$

                              One can immediately see why in this case the partial fraction expansion will lead to a nonzero coefficient for the $1/s$ term. The asymptotic behavior of the fraction for large $s$ is $sim 1/s^3$. The singularity at $s = -2$ contributes a term proportional to $1/(s+2)$ to the partial fraction expansion, which for large $s$ behaves like $sim 1/s$. This $sim 1/s$ must be canceled out by the partial fraction expansion terms coming from the singularity at $s = 0$, this requires the presence of a contribution proportional to $1/s$.



                              By making this reasoning more precise we can get to the complete partial fraction expansion using only the contribution from the singularity at $s = -2$. The amplitude of the $1/(s+2)$ term in the partial fraction expansion is given by the factor that multiplies it in the fraction evaluated at $s = -2$, this is therefore equal to $1/4$. So the contribution to the partial fraction expansion coming from the singularity at $s = -2$ is:



                              $$frac14(s+2)$$



                              For large $s$ we can expand this in powers of $1/s$:



                              $$frac14(s+2) = frac14 sfrac11+frac2s = frac14s - frac12 s^2 + mathcalOleft(frac1s^3right)$$



                              The singularity at $s = 0$ will contribute terms to the partial fraction expansion whose large $s$ behavior will have to cancel out these first two terms, this means that this contribution to the partial fraction expansion is:



                              $$frac12 s^2-frac14s $$



                              The complete partial fraction expansion is thus given by:



                              $$frac12 s^2-frac14s + frac14(s+2) $$






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$















                                1












                                1








                                1





                                $begingroup$

                                One can immediately see why in this case the partial fraction expansion will lead to a nonzero coefficient for the $1/s$ term. The asymptotic behavior of the fraction for large $s$ is $sim 1/s^3$. The singularity at $s = -2$ contributes a term proportional to $1/(s+2)$ to the partial fraction expansion, which for large $s$ behaves like $sim 1/s$. This $sim 1/s$ must be canceled out by the partial fraction expansion terms coming from the singularity at $s = 0$, this requires the presence of a contribution proportional to $1/s$.



                                By making this reasoning more precise we can get to the complete partial fraction expansion using only the contribution from the singularity at $s = -2$. The amplitude of the $1/(s+2)$ term in the partial fraction expansion is given by the factor that multiplies it in the fraction evaluated at $s = -2$, this is therefore equal to $1/4$. So the contribution to the partial fraction expansion coming from the singularity at $s = -2$ is:



                                $$frac14(s+2)$$



                                For large $s$ we can expand this in powers of $1/s$:



                                $$frac14(s+2) = frac14 sfrac11+frac2s = frac14s - frac12 s^2 + mathcalOleft(frac1s^3right)$$



                                The singularity at $s = 0$ will contribute terms to the partial fraction expansion whose large $s$ behavior will have to cancel out these first two terms, this means that this contribution to the partial fraction expansion is:



                                $$frac12 s^2-frac14s $$



                                The complete partial fraction expansion is thus given by:



                                $$frac12 s^2-frac14s + frac14(s+2) $$






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$



                                One can immediately see why in this case the partial fraction expansion will lead to a nonzero coefficient for the $1/s$ term. The asymptotic behavior of the fraction for large $s$ is $sim 1/s^3$. The singularity at $s = -2$ contributes a term proportional to $1/(s+2)$ to the partial fraction expansion, which for large $s$ behaves like $sim 1/s$. This $sim 1/s$ must be canceled out by the partial fraction expansion terms coming from the singularity at $s = 0$, this requires the presence of a contribution proportional to $1/s$.



                                By making this reasoning more precise we can get to the complete partial fraction expansion using only the contribution from the singularity at $s = -2$. The amplitude of the $1/(s+2)$ term in the partial fraction expansion is given by the factor that multiplies it in the fraction evaluated at $s = -2$, this is therefore equal to $1/4$. So the contribution to the partial fraction expansion coming from the singularity at $s = -2$ is:



                                $$frac14(s+2)$$



                                For large $s$ we can expand this in powers of $1/s$:



                                $$frac14(s+2) = frac14 sfrac11+frac2s = frac14s - frac12 s^2 + mathcalOleft(frac1s^3right)$$



                                The singularity at $s = 0$ will contribute terms to the partial fraction expansion whose large $s$ behavior will have to cancel out these first two terms, this means that this contribution to the partial fraction expansion is:



                                $$frac12 s^2-frac14s $$



                                The complete partial fraction expansion is thus given by:



                                $$frac12 s^2-frac14s + frac14(s+2) $$







                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                answered Apr 3 at 1:54









                                Count IblisCount Iblis

                                8,53221534




                                8,53221534





















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Suppose we multiplied both sides of the second equation by $s^2(s-2)$, giving us the equivalent equation:
                                    $$1 = 0s^2 + 0s + 1= A(s+2) + Bs^2 = Bs^2 + As + 2A$$
                                    Notice that on the RHS of this equation, that the constant term is not independent of the coefficient of the $s$ term. This dependency, in turn, causes a contradiction.



                                    Now let's try the same thing with your first equation. This generates the equivalent equation, whose coefficients can be uniquely determined:
                                    $$beginalign
                                    1 &= As(s+2) + B(s+2)+Cs^2\
                                    0s^2+0s+1 &= (A+C)s^2+(2A+B)s+2B\
                                    endalign$$



                                    The reason, of course, is because $1,s,s^2 $ represents an independent set that spans the set of all polynomials up to degree two, requiring three parameters to determine its coefficients uniquely.



                                    I hope this helps.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$

















                                      0












                                      $begingroup$

                                      Suppose we multiplied both sides of the second equation by $s^2(s-2)$, giving us the equivalent equation:
                                      $$1 = 0s^2 + 0s + 1= A(s+2) + Bs^2 = Bs^2 + As + 2A$$
                                      Notice that on the RHS of this equation, that the constant term is not independent of the coefficient of the $s$ term. This dependency, in turn, causes a contradiction.



                                      Now let's try the same thing with your first equation. This generates the equivalent equation, whose coefficients can be uniquely determined:
                                      $$beginalign
                                      1 &= As(s+2) + B(s+2)+Cs^2\
                                      0s^2+0s+1 &= (A+C)s^2+(2A+B)s+2B\
                                      endalign$$



                                      The reason, of course, is because $1,s,s^2 $ represents an independent set that spans the set of all polynomials up to degree two, requiring three parameters to determine its coefficients uniquely.



                                      I hope this helps.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$















                                        0












                                        0








                                        0





                                        $begingroup$

                                        Suppose we multiplied both sides of the second equation by $s^2(s-2)$, giving us the equivalent equation:
                                        $$1 = 0s^2 + 0s + 1= A(s+2) + Bs^2 = Bs^2 + As + 2A$$
                                        Notice that on the RHS of this equation, that the constant term is not independent of the coefficient of the $s$ term. This dependency, in turn, causes a contradiction.



                                        Now let's try the same thing with your first equation. This generates the equivalent equation, whose coefficients can be uniquely determined:
                                        $$beginalign
                                        1 &= As(s+2) + B(s+2)+Cs^2\
                                        0s^2+0s+1 &= (A+C)s^2+(2A+B)s+2B\
                                        endalign$$



                                        The reason, of course, is because $1,s,s^2 $ represents an independent set that spans the set of all polynomials up to degree two, requiring three parameters to determine its coefficients uniquely.



                                        I hope this helps.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer









                                        $endgroup$



                                        Suppose we multiplied both sides of the second equation by $s^2(s-2)$, giving us the equivalent equation:
                                        $$1 = 0s^2 + 0s + 1= A(s+2) + Bs^2 = Bs^2 + As + 2A$$
                                        Notice that on the RHS of this equation, that the constant term is not independent of the coefficient of the $s$ term. This dependency, in turn, causes a contradiction.



                                        Now let's try the same thing with your first equation. This generates the equivalent equation, whose coefficients can be uniquely determined:
                                        $$beginalign
                                        1 &= As(s+2) + B(s+2)+Cs^2\
                                        0s^2+0s+1 &= (A+C)s^2+(2A+B)s+2B\
                                        endalign$$



                                        The reason, of course, is because $1,s,s^2 $ represents an independent set that spans the set of all polynomials up to degree two, requiring three parameters to determine its coefficients uniquely.



                                        I hope this helps.







                                        share|cite|improve this answer












                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                        share|cite|improve this answer










                                        answered yesterday









                                        John JoyJohn Joy

                                        6,29911827




                                        6,29911827





















                                            0












                                            $begingroup$

                                            You can do it step-by-step:
                                            $$beginalignfrac1s^2(s+2)&=frac1scdot frac1scdot (s+2)=\
                                            &=frac1scdot left(frac As+fracBs+2right)=\
                                            &=frac As^2+frac1scdot frac Bs+2=\
                                            &=fracAs^2+fracCs+fracDs+2.endalign$$






                                            share|cite|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$

















                                              0












                                              $begingroup$

                                              You can do it step-by-step:
                                              $$beginalignfrac1s^2(s+2)&=frac1scdot frac1scdot (s+2)=\
                                              &=frac1scdot left(frac As+fracBs+2right)=\
                                              &=frac As^2+frac1scdot frac Bs+2=\
                                              &=fracAs^2+fracCs+fracDs+2.endalign$$






                                              share|cite|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$















                                                0












                                                0








                                                0





                                                $begingroup$

                                                You can do it step-by-step:
                                                $$beginalignfrac1s^2(s+2)&=frac1scdot frac1scdot (s+2)=\
                                                &=frac1scdot left(frac As+fracBs+2right)=\
                                                &=frac As^2+frac1scdot frac Bs+2=\
                                                &=fracAs^2+fracCs+fracDs+2.endalign$$






                                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                                $endgroup$



                                                You can do it step-by-step:
                                                $$beginalignfrac1s^2(s+2)&=frac1scdot frac1scdot (s+2)=\
                                                &=frac1scdot left(frac As+fracBs+2right)=\
                                                &=frac As^2+frac1scdot frac Bs+2=\
                                                &=fracAs^2+fracCs+fracDs+2.endalign$$







                                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                                answered yesterday









                                                farruhotafarruhota

                                                21.8k2842




                                                21.8k2842



























                                                    draft saved

                                                    draft discarded
















































                                                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                    But avoid


                                                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded














                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                    function ()
                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172683%2fwhy-partial-fraction-decomposition-of-frac1s2s2-is-fracas-frac%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                    );

                                                    Post as a guest















                                                    Required, but never shown





















































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown

































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

                                                    Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given

                                                    Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221