files created then deleted at every second in tmp directoryHow is the /tmp directory cleaned up?How do I encrypt my /tmp directory?Accidentally deleted tmp folderCorrupt /tmp directoryfound maas user directory in tmp?what directory is the tmp file inCan I delete /var/tmp/mkinitramfs-* files?Is it possible to delete files in the /tmp directory once a certain directory size is exceeded?Systemd files appearing in /tmp folderCan I delete cnijpwgtmp files in /var/tmp?
Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?
Watching something be written to a file live with tail
When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?
How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?
1 as a common root of a quadratic equation
How to draw a waving flag in TikZ
Schoenfled Residua test shows proportionality hazard assumptions holds but Kaplan-Meier plots intersect
Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?
Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)
Is every diagonalizable matrix is an exponential
Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?
Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?
Theorems that impeded progress
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
Pattern match does not work in bash script
Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?
The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server
Compress a signal by storing signal diff instead of actual samples - is there such a thing?
In Japanese, what’s the difference between “Tonari ni” (となりに) and “Tsugi” (つぎ)? When would you use one over the other?
What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?
Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free
How to calculate partition Start End Sector?
files created then deleted at every second in tmp directory
How is the /tmp directory cleaned up?How do I encrypt my /tmp directory?Accidentally deleted tmp folderCorrupt /tmp directoryfound maas user directory in tmp?what directory is the tmp file inCan I delete /var/tmp/mkinitramfs-* files?Is it possible to delete files in the /tmp directory once a certain directory size is exceeded?Systemd files appearing in /tmp folderCan I delete cnijpwgtmp files in /var/tmp?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
By mistake I noticed that in /tmp directory are continuously created some files then immediately deleted. Using a succession of ls -l /tmp I managed to catch the created files:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 YlOmPA069G
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 l74jZzbcs6
or another example:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 AwVhWakvQ_
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 RpRGl__cIM
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 S0e72nkpBl
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 emxIQQMSy2
It's about Ubuntu 18.10 with 4.18.0-16-generic. This is an almost fresh install: I added some server software (nginx, mysql, php7.2-fpm) but even with those closed the problem persists.
What are the files created and why?
How would I stop this behaviour? a very undesirable one on a SSD
Thank you!
UPDATE
The question is about when not having /tmp in RAM (no tmpfs).
The guilty software is x2goserver.service otherwise a must have one.
files tmp
|
show 6 more comments
By mistake I noticed that in /tmp directory are continuously created some files then immediately deleted. Using a succession of ls -l /tmp I managed to catch the created files:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 YlOmPA069G
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 l74jZzbcs6
or another example:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 AwVhWakvQ_
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 RpRGl__cIM
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 S0e72nkpBl
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 emxIQQMSy2
It's about Ubuntu 18.10 with 4.18.0-16-generic. This is an almost fresh install: I added some server software (nginx, mysql, php7.2-fpm) but even with those closed the problem persists.
What are the files created and why?
How would I stop this behaviour? a very undesirable one on a SSD
Thank you!
UPDATE
The question is about when not having /tmp in RAM (no tmpfs).
The guilty software is x2goserver.service otherwise a must have one.
files tmp
2
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
Apr 2 at 16:54
2
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
Apr 2 at 16:56
2
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why/tmpis normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.
– Peter Cordes
Apr 2 at 19:07
1
great - it’s a must have
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 5:54
2
@PeterCordes I'm not sure that the statement "/tmpis normally on tmpfs" is valid for a normal Ubuntu user - Just using the default Ubuntu install,/tmpis on disk and the OP would need to create the appropriate fstab entries to put it into a tmpfs
– Charles Green
2 days ago
|
show 6 more comments
By mistake I noticed that in /tmp directory are continuously created some files then immediately deleted. Using a succession of ls -l /tmp I managed to catch the created files:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 YlOmPA069G
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 l74jZzbcs6
or another example:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 AwVhWakvQ_
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 RpRGl__cIM
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 S0e72nkpBl
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 emxIQQMSy2
It's about Ubuntu 18.10 with 4.18.0-16-generic. This is an almost fresh install: I added some server software (nginx, mysql, php7.2-fpm) but even with those closed the problem persists.
What are the files created and why?
How would I stop this behaviour? a very undesirable one on a SSD
Thank you!
UPDATE
The question is about when not having /tmp in RAM (no tmpfs).
The guilty software is x2goserver.service otherwise a must have one.
files tmp
By mistake I noticed that in /tmp directory are continuously created some files then immediately deleted. Using a succession of ls -l /tmp I managed to catch the created files:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 YlOmPA069G
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 l74jZzbcs6
or another example:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 AwVhWakvQ_
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 RpRGl__cIM
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 S0e72nkpBl
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 emxIQQMSy2
It's about Ubuntu 18.10 with 4.18.0-16-generic. This is an almost fresh install: I added some server software (nginx, mysql, php7.2-fpm) but even with those closed the problem persists.
What are the files created and why?
How would I stop this behaviour? a very undesirable one on a SSD
Thank you!
UPDATE
The question is about when not having /tmp in RAM (no tmpfs).
The guilty software is x2goserver.service otherwise a must have one.
files tmp
files tmp
edited 2 days ago
adrhc
asked Apr 2 at 16:43
adrhcadrhc
16517
16517
2
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
Apr 2 at 16:54
2
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
Apr 2 at 16:56
2
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why/tmpis normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.
– Peter Cordes
Apr 2 at 19:07
1
great - it’s a must have
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 5:54
2
@PeterCordes I'm not sure that the statement "/tmpis normally on tmpfs" is valid for a normal Ubuntu user - Just using the default Ubuntu install,/tmpis on disk and the OP would need to create the appropriate fstab entries to put it into a tmpfs
– Charles Green
2 days ago
|
show 6 more comments
2
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
Apr 2 at 16:54
2
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
Apr 2 at 16:56
2
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why/tmpis normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.
– Peter Cordes
Apr 2 at 19:07
1
great - it’s a must have
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 5:54
2
@PeterCordes I'm not sure that the statement "/tmpis normally on tmpfs" is valid for a normal Ubuntu user - Just using the default Ubuntu install,/tmpis on disk and the OP would need to create the appropriate fstab entries to put it into a tmpfs
– Charles Green
2 days ago
2
2
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
Apr 2 at 16:54
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
Apr 2 at 16:54
2
2
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
Apr 2 at 16:56
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
Apr 2 at 16:56
2
2
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why
/tmp is normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.– Peter Cordes
Apr 2 at 19:07
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why
/tmp is normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.– Peter Cordes
Apr 2 at 19:07
1
1
great - it’s a must have
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 5:54
great - it’s a must have
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 5:54
2
2
@PeterCordes I'm not sure that the statement "
/tmp is normally on tmpfs" is valid for a normal Ubuntu user - Just using the default Ubuntu install, /tmp is on disk and the OP would need to create the appropriate fstab entries to put it into a tmpfs– Charles Green
2 days ago
@PeterCordes I'm not sure that the statement "
/tmp is normally on tmpfs" is valid for a normal Ubuntu user - Just using the default Ubuntu install, /tmp is on disk and the OP would need to create the appropriate fstab entries to put it into a tmpfs– Charles Green
2 days ago
|
show 6 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
I suggest installing and running fnotifystat to detect the process that is creating these files:
sudo apt-get install fnotifystat
sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
You will see process that is doing the open/close/read/write activity something like the following:
Total Open Close Read Write PID Process Pathname
3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-input (deleted)
2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 18135 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1
Postscript: I'm the author of this tool: kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/fnotifystat
– Colin Ian King
Apr 3 at 8:12
1
And you are also the first who answered the question (though no longer visible that). It's a good tool by the way.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 13:51
add a comment |
Determine which program/process is touching files
You can use tools such as lsof to determine which processes and binaries are touching/opening which files. This could become troublesome if the files change frequently, so you can instead set up a watch to notify you:
$ sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
Sometimes, simply looking at the user or group owner gives you a good hint (ie: ls -lsha).
Put /tmp into RAM instead of disk
If you desire, you can put your /tmp directory into RAM. You will have to determine if this is a smart move based on available RAM, as well as the size and frequency of read/writes.
$ sudo vim /etc/fstab
...
# tmpfs in RAM
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
...
$ sudo mount /tmp
$ mount | grep tmp # Check /tmp is in RAM
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,noatime)
If you have enough RAM, this can be considered a very good thing to do for both the longevity of your SSD, as well as the speed of your system. You can even accomplish this with smaller amounts of RAM if you tweak tmpreaper (sometimes tmpwatch) to be more aggressive.
add a comment |
very undesirable one on a SSD
You tagged your question with tmpfs, so it is not quite clear to me how this relates to SSD at all. Tmpfs is an in-memory (or more precisely, in-block-cache) filesystem, so it will never hit a physical disk.
Furthermore, even if you had a physical backing store for your /tmp filesystem, unless you have a system with only a couple of kilobytes of RAM, those short-lived files will never hit the disk, all operations will happen in the cache.
So, in other words, there is nothing to worry about since you are using tmpfs, and if you weren't, there still would be nothing to worry about.
I keep the /tmp in RAM so by mistake I tagged also with my current fs type (tmpfs). I removed it now but I find you're answer useful too so 1 up from me.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 16:23
@adrhc: If your/tmpis in RAM, then it has nothing whatsoever to do with your SSD, so it is neither desirable nor undesirable but actually completely unrelated.
– Jörg W Mittag
2 days ago
I agree but the question is about when not having /tmp in RAM. It just happened that I had /tmp in RAM; still, the problem intrigued me.
– adrhc
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1130673%2ffiles-created-then-deleted-at-every-second-in-tmp-directory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I suggest installing and running fnotifystat to detect the process that is creating these files:
sudo apt-get install fnotifystat
sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
You will see process that is doing the open/close/read/write activity something like the following:
Total Open Close Read Write PID Process Pathname
3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-input (deleted)
2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 18135 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1
Postscript: I'm the author of this tool: kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/fnotifystat
– Colin Ian King
Apr 3 at 8:12
1
And you are also the first who answered the question (though no longer visible that). It's a good tool by the way.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 13:51
add a comment |
I suggest installing and running fnotifystat to detect the process that is creating these files:
sudo apt-get install fnotifystat
sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
You will see process that is doing the open/close/read/write activity something like the following:
Total Open Close Read Write PID Process Pathname
3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-input (deleted)
2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 18135 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1
Postscript: I'm the author of this tool: kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/fnotifystat
– Colin Ian King
Apr 3 at 8:12
1
And you are also the first who answered the question (though no longer visible that). It's a good tool by the way.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 13:51
add a comment |
I suggest installing and running fnotifystat to detect the process that is creating these files:
sudo apt-get install fnotifystat
sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
You will see process that is doing the open/close/read/write activity something like the following:
Total Open Close Read Write PID Process Pathname
3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-input (deleted)
2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 18135 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
I suggest installing and running fnotifystat to detect the process that is creating these files:
sudo apt-get install fnotifystat
sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
You will see process that is doing the open/close/read/write activity something like the following:
Total Open Close Read Write PID Process Pathname
3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-input (deleted)
2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 18135 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
answered Apr 2 at 16:55
Colin Ian KingColin Ian King
12.6k13848
12.6k13848
1
Postscript: I'm the author of this tool: kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/fnotifystat
– Colin Ian King
Apr 3 at 8:12
1
And you are also the first who answered the question (though no longer visible that). It's a good tool by the way.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 13:51
add a comment |
1
Postscript: I'm the author of this tool: kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/fnotifystat
– Colin Ian King
Apr 3 at 8:12
1
And you are also the first who answered the question (though no longer visible that). It's a good tool by the way.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 13:51
1
1
Postscript: I'm the author of this tool: kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/fnotifystat
– Colin Ian King
Apr 3 at 8:12
Postscript: I'm the author of this tool: kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/fnotifystat
– Colin Ian King
Apr 3 at 8:12
1
1
And you are also the first who answered the question (though no longer visible that). It's a good tool by the way.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 13:51
And you are also the first who answered the question (though no longer visible that). It's a good tool by the way.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 13:51
add a comment |
Determine which program/process is touching files
You can use tools such as lsof to determine which processes and binaries are touching/opening which files. This could become troublesome if the files change frequently, so you can instead set up a watch to notify you:
$ sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
Sometimes, simply looking at the user or group owner gives you a good hint (ie: ls -lsha).
Put /tmp into RAM instead of disk
If you desire, you can put your /tmp directory into RAM. You will have to determine if this is a smart move based on available RAM, as well as the size and frequency of read/writes.
$ sudo vim /etc/fstab
...
# tmpfs in RAM
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
...
$ sudo mount /tmp
$ mount | grep tmp # Check /tmp is in RAM
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,noatime)
If you have enough RAM, this can be considered a very good thing to do for both the longevity of your SSD, as well as the speed of your system. You can even accomplish this with smaller amounts of RAM if you tweak tmpreaper (sometimes tmpwatch) to be more aggressive.
add a comment |
Determine which program/process is touching files
You can use tools such as lsof to determine which processes and binaries are touching/opening which files. This could become troublesome if the files change frequently, so you can instead set up a watch to notify you:
$ sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
Sometimes, simply looking at the user or group owner gives you a good hint (ie: ls -lsha).
Put /tmp into RAM instead of disk
If you desire, you can put your /tmp directory into RAM. You will have to determine if this is a smart move based on available RAM, as well as the size and frequency of read/writes.
$ sudo vim /etc/fstab
...
# tmpfs in RAM
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
...
$ sudo mount /tmp
$ mount | grep tmp # Check /tmp is in RAM
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,noatime)
If you have enough RAM, this can be considered a very good thing to do for both the longevity of your SSD, as well as the speed of your system. You can even accomplish this with smaller amounts of RAM if you tweak tmpreaper (sometimes tmpwatch) to be more aggressive.
add a comment |
Determine which program/process is touching files
You can use tools such as lsof to determine which processes and binaries are touching/opening which files. This could become troublesome if the files change frequently, so you can instead set up a watch to notify you:
$ sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
Sometimes, simply looking at the user or group owner gives you a good hint (ie: ls -lsha).
Put /tmp into RAM instead of disk
If you desire, you can put your /tmp directory into RAM. You will have to determine if this is a smart move based on available RAM, as well as the size and frequency of read/writes.
$ sudo vim /etc/fstab
...
# tmpfs in RAM
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
...
$ sudo mount /tmp
$ mount | grep tmp # Check /tmp is in RAM
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,noatime)
If you have enough RAM, this can be considered a very good thing to do for both the longevity of your SSD, as well as the speed of your system. You can even accomplish this with smaller amounts of RAM if you tweak tmpreaper (sometimes tmpwatch) to be more aggressive.
Determine which program/process is touching files
You can use tools such as lsof to determine which processes and binaries are touching/opening which files. This could become troublesome if the files change frequently, so you can instead set up a watch to notify you:
$ sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
Sometimes, simply looking at the user or group owner gives you a good hint (ie: ls -lsha).
Put /tmp into RAM instead of disk
If you desire, you can put your /tmp directory into RAM. You will have to determine if this is a smart move based on available RAM, as well as the size and frequency of read/writes.
$ sudo vim /etc/fstab
...
# tmpfs in RAM
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
...
$ sudo mount /tmp
$ mount | grep tmp # Check /tmp is in RAM
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,noatime)
If you have enough RAM, this can be considered a very good thing to do for both the longevity of your SSD, as well as the speed of your system. You can even accomplish this with smaller amounts of RAM if you tweak tmpreaper (sometimes tmpwatch) to be more aggressive.
edited Apr 2 at 17:02
answered Apr 2 at 16:57
earthmeLonearthmeLon
6,6281951
6,6281951
add a comment |
add a comment |
very undesirable one on a SSD
You tagged your question with tmpfs, so it is not quite clear to me how this relates to SSD at all. Tmpfs is an in-memory (or more precisely, in-block-cache) filesystem, so it will never hit a physical disk.
Furthermore, even if you had a physical backing store for your /tmp filesystem, unless you have a system with only a couple of kilobytes of RAM, those short-lived files will never hit the disk, all operations will happen in the cache.
So, in other words, there is nothing to worry about since you are using tmpfs, and if you weren't, there still would be nothing to worry about.
I keep the /tmp in RAM so by mistake I tagged also with my current fs type (tmpfs). I removed it now but I find you're answer useful too so 1 up from me.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 16:23
@adrhc: If your/tmpis in RAM, then it has nothing whatsoever to do with your SSD, so it is neither desirable nor undesirable but actually completely unrelated.
– Jörg W Mittag
2 days ago
I agree but the question is about when not having /tmp in RAM. It just happened that I had /tmp in RAM; still, the problem intrigued me.
– adrhc
2 days ago
add a comment |
very undesirable one on a SSD
You tagged your question with tmpfs, so it is not quite clear to me how this relates to SSD at all. Tmpfs is an in-memory (or more precisely, in-block-cache) filesystem, so it will never hit a physical disk.
Furthermore, even if you had a physical backing store for your /tmp filesystem, unless you have a system with only a couple of kilobytes of RAM, those short-lived files will never hit the disk, all operations will happen in the cache.
So, in other words, there is nothing to worry about since you are using tmpfs, and if you weren't, there still would be nothing to worry about.
I keep the /tmp in RAM so by mistake I tagged also with my current fs type (tmpfs). I removed it now but I find you're answer useful too so 1 up from me.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 16:23
@adrhc: If your/tmpis in RAM, then it has nothing whatsoever to do with your SSD, so it is neither desirable nor undesirable but actually completely unrelated.
– Jörg W Mittag
2 days ago
I agree but the question is about when not having /tmp in RAM. It just happened that I had /tmp in RAM; still, the problem intrigued me.
– adrhc
2 days ago
add a comment |
very undesirable one on a SSD
You tagged your question with tmpfs, so it is not quite clear to me how this relates to SSD at all. Tmpfs is an in-memory (or more precisely, in-block-cache) filesystem, so it will never hit a physical disk.
Furthermore, even if you had a physical backing store for your /tmp filesystem, unless you have a system with only a couple of kilobytes of RAM, those short-lived files will never hit the disk, all operations will happen in the cache.
So, in other words, there is nothing to worry about since you are using tmpfs, and if you weren't, there still would be nothing to worry about.
very undesirable one on a SSD
You tagged your question with tmpfs, so it is not quite clear to me how this relates to SSD at all. Tmpfs is an in-memory (or more precisely, in-block-cache) filesystem, so it will never hit a physical disk.
Furthermore, even if you had a physical backing store for your /tmp filesystem, unless you have a system with only a couple of kilobytes of RAM, those short-lived files will never hit the disk, all operations will happen in the cache.
So, in other words, there is nothing to worry about since you are using tmpfs, and if you weren't, there still would be nothing to worry about.
answered Apr 3 at 7:14
Jörg W MittagJörg W Mittag
1786
1786
I keep the /tmp in RAM so by mistake I tagged also with my current fs type (tmpfs). I removed it now but I find you're answer useful too so 1 up from me.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 16:23
@adrhc: If your/tmpis in RAM, then it has nothing whatsoever to do with your SSD, so it is neither desirable nor undesirable but actually completely unrelated.
– Jörg W Mittag
2 days ago
I agree but the question is about when not having /tmp in RAM. It just happened that I had /tmp in RAM; still, the problem intrigued me.
– adrhc
2 days ago
add a comment |
I keep the /tmp in RAM so by mistake I tagged also with my current fs type (tmpfs). I removed it now but I find you're answer useful too so 1 up from me.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 16:23
@adrhc: If your/tmpis in RAM, then it has nothing whatsoever to do with your SSD, so it is neither desirable nor undesirable but actually completely unrelated.
– Jörg W Mittag
2 days ago
I agree but the question is about when not having /tmp in RAM. It just happened that I had /tmp in RAM; still, the problem intrigued me.
– adrhc
2 days ago
I keep the /tmp in RAM so by mistake I tagged also with my current fs type (tmpfs). I removed it now but I find you're answer useful too so 1 up from me.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 16:23
I keep the /tmp in RAM so by mistake I tagged also with my current fs type (tmpfs). I removed it now but I find you're answer useful too so 1 up from me.
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 16:23
@adrhc: If your
/tmp is in RAM, then it has nothing whatsoever to do with your SSD, so it is neither desirable nor undesirable but actually completely unrelated.– Jörg W Mittag
2 days ago
@adrhc: If your
/tmp is in RAM, then it has nothing whatsoever to do with your SSD, so it is neither desirable nor undesirable but actually completely unrelated.– Jörg W Mittag
2 days ago
I agree but the question is about when not having /tmp in RAM. It just happened that I had /tmp in RAM; still, the problem intrigued me.
– adrhc
2 days ago
I agree but the question is about when not having /tmp in RAM. It just happened that I had /tmp in RAM; still, the problem intrigued me.
– adrhc
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1130673%2ffiles-created-then-deleted-at-every-second-in-tmp-directory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
Apr 2 at 16:54
2
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
Apr 2 at 16:56
2
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why
/tmpis normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.– Peter Cordes
Apr 2 at 19:07
1
great - it’s a must have
– adrhc
Apr 3 at 5:54
2
@PeterCordes I'm not sure that the statement "
/tmpis normally on tmpfs" is valid for a normal Ubuntu user - Just using the default Ubuntu install,/tmpis on disk and the OP would need to create the appropriate fstab entries to put it into a tmpfs– Charles Green
2 days ago