Workaholic Formal/Informal The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFormal and informal letters formatIs tricky a formal word?Formal words for “can”A formal way to request for updated information in business email writing“Is it okay for you?” Is this phrase considered formal in school/college setting?Have the newspapers started using Informal Language?Literary words vs Formal English and ArchaismsFormal word/phrase for the informal question tag “right?”Can I use “so on” in formal writing?“out and out, all in all” are they formal or informal?
Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?
What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?
From jafe to El-Guest
How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?
Can I use the word “Senior” as part of a job title directly in German?
0-rank tensor vs vector in 1D
Can I add a classname to CSS variable?
Traduction de « Life is a roller coaster »
Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?
(How) Could a medieval fantasy world survive a magic-induced "nuclear winter"?
Towers in the ocean; How deep can they be built?
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
What's the meaning of this line: Chicken, egg
Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?
Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?
How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
Is there such a thing as never melting snow?
What day is it again?
Define command that accepts \ in arguments
How to get the last not-null value in an ordered column of a huge table?
What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?
Is the D&D universe the same as the Forgotten Realms universe?
What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?
Workaholic Formal/Informal
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFormal and informal letters formatIs tricky a formal word?Formal words for “can”A formal way to request for updated information in business email writing“Is it okay for you?” Is this phrase considered formal in school/college setting?Have the newspapers started using Informal Language?Literary words vs Formal English and ArchaismsFormal word/phrase for the informal question tag “right?”Can I use “so on” in formal writing?“out and out, all in all” are they formal or informal?
Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?
for example:
Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.
formal-language
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?
for example:
Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.
formal-language
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?
for example:
Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.
formal-language
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?
for example:
Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.
formal-language
formal-language
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Lutfur RahmanLutfur Rahman
1057
1057
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.
What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:
So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.
It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.
Alternatively, be more descriptive:
Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
I think it’s an informal term.
There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.
hard worker
hard-working person
(very/extremely) diligent worker
industrious worker
They all have a positive connotation.
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
yesterday
add a comment |
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202984%2fworkaholic-formal-informal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.
What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:
So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.
It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.
Alternatively, be more descriptive:
Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.
What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:
So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.
It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.
Alternatively, be more descriptive:
Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.
What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:
So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.
It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.
Alternatively, be more descriptive:
Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.
It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.
What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:
So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.
It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.
Alternatively, be more descriptive:
Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.
answered 2 days ago
DanDan
1,828412
1,828412
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
I think it’s an informal term.
There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.
hard worker
hard-working person
(very/extremely) diligent worker
industrious worker
They all have a positive connotation.
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
yesterday
add a comment |
I think it’s an informal term.
There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.
hard worker
hard-working person
(very/extremely) diligent worker
industrious worker
They all have a positive connotation.
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
yesterday
add a comment |
I think it’s an informal term.
There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.
hard worker
hard-working person
(very/extremely) diligent worker
industrious worker
They all have a positive connotation.
I think it’s an informal term.
There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.
hard worker
hard-working person
(very/extremely) diligent worker
industrious worker
They all have a positive connotation.
answered 2 days ago
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
2,339624
2,339624
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
yesterday
add a comment |
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
yesterday
5
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
yesterday
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
yesterday
add a comment |
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202984%2fworkaholic-formal-informal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
