Workaholic Formal/Informal The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFormal and informal letters formatIs tricky a formal word?Formal words for “can”A formal way to request for updated information in business email writing“Is it okay for you?” Is this phrase considered formal in school/college setting?Have the newspapers started using Informal Language?Literary words vs Formal English and ArchaismsFormal word/phrase for the informal question tag “right?”Can I use “so on” in formal writing?“out and out, all in all” are they formal or informal?

Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?

What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?

From jafe to El-Guest

How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?

Can I use the word “Senior” as part of a job title directly in German?

0-rank tensor vs vector in 1D

Can I add a classname to CSS variable?

Traduction de « Life is a roller coaster »

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

(How) Could a medieval fantasy world survive a magic-induced "nuclear winter"?

Towers in the ocean; How deep can they be built?

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

What's the meaning of this line: Chicken, egg

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?

How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

Is there such a thing as never melting snow?

What day is it again?

Define command that accepts \ in arguments

How to get the last not-null value in an ordered column of a huge table?

What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?

Is the D&D universe the same as the Forgotten Realms universe?

What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?



Workaholic Formal/Informal



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFormal and informal letters formatIs tricky a formal word?Formal words for “can”A formal way to request for updated information in business email writing“Is it okay for you?” Is this phrase considered formal in school/college setting?Have the newspapers started using Informal Language?Literary words vs Formal English and ArchaismsFormal word/phrase for the informal question tag “right?”Can I use “so on” in formal writing?“out and out, all in all” are they formal or informal?










3















Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?



for example:




Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    3















    Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?



    for example:




    Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.











    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      3












      3








      3


      1






      Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?



      for example:




      Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?



      for example:




      Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.








      formal-language






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      Lutfur RahmanLutfur Rahman

      1057




      1057




      New contributor




      Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.



          What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:




          So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.




          It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.



          Alternatively, be more descriptive:




          Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.







          share|improve this answer























          • thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?

            – Lutfur Rahman
            2 days ago







          • 1





            I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.

            – Dan
            2 days ago












          • @Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).

            – FumbleFingers
            2 days ago











          • I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)

            – J.R.
            2 days ago



















          2














          I think it’s an informal term.



          There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.




          hard worker



          hard-working person



          (very/extremely) diligent worker



          industrious worker




          They all have a positive connotation.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 5





            Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.

            – Dan
            2 days ago












          • I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.

            – David K
            yesterday











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "481"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202984%2fworkaholic-formal-informal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.



          What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:




          So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.




          It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.



          Alternatively, be more descriptive:




          Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.







          share|improve this answer























          • thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?

            – Lutfur Rahman
            2 days ago







          • 1





            I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.

            – Dan
            2 days ago












          • @Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).

            – FumbleFingers
            2 days ago











          • I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)

            – J.R.
            2 days ago
















          5














          It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.



          What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:




          So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.




          It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.



          Alternatively, be more descriptive:




          Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.







          share|improve this answer























          • thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?

            – Lutfur Rahman
            2 days ago







          • 1





            I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.

            – Dan
            2 days ago












          • @Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).

            – FumbleFingers
            2 days ago











          • I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)

            – J.R.
            2 days ago














          5












          5








          5







          It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.



          What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:




          So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.




          It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.



          Alternatively, be more descriptive:




          Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.







          share|improve this answer













          It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.



          What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:




          So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.




          It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.



          Alternatively, be more descriptive:




          Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          DanDan

          1,828412




          1,828412












          • thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?

            – Lutfur Rahman
            2 days ago







          • 1





            I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.

            – Dan
            2 days ago












          • @Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).

            – FumbleFingers
            2 days ago











          • I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)

            – J.R.
            2 days ago


















          • thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?

            – Lutfur Rahman
            2 days ago







          • 1





            I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.

            – Dan
            2 days ago












          • @Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).

            – FumbleFingers
            2 days ago











          • I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)

            – J.R.
            2 days ago

















          thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?

          – Lutfur Rahman
          2 days ago






          thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?

          – Lutfur Rahman
          2 days ago





          1




          1





          I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.

          – Dan
          2 days ago






          I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.

          – Dan
          2 days ago














          @Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).

          – FumbleFingers
          2 days ago





          @Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).

          – FumbleFingers
          2 days ago













          I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)

          – J.R.
          2 days ago






          I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)

          – J.R.
          2 days ago














          2














          I think it’s an informal term.



          There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.




          hard worker



          hard-working person



          (very/extremely) diligent worker



          industrious worker




          They all have a positive connotation.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 5





            Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.

            – Dan
            2 days ago












          • I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.

            – David K
            yesterday















          2














          I think it’s an informal term.



          There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.




          hard worker



          hard-working person



          (very/extremely) diligent worker



          industrious worker




          They all have a positive connotation.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 5





            Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.

            – Dan
            2 days ago












          • I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.

            – David K
            yesterday













          2












          2








          2







          I think it’s an informal term.



          There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.




          hard worker



          hard-working person



          (very/extremely) diligent worker



          industrious worker




          They all have a positive connotation.






          share|improve this answer













          I think it’s an informal term.



          There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.




          hard worker



          hard-working person



          (very/extremely) diligent worker



          industrious worker




          They all have a positive connotation.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

          2,339624




          2,339624







          • 5





            Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.

            – Dan
            2 days ago












          • I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.

            – David K
            yesterday












          • 5





            Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.

            – Dan
            2 days ago












          • I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.

            – David K
            yesterday







          5




          5





          Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.

          – Dan
          2 days ago






          Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.

          – Dan
          2 days ago














          I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.

          – David K
          yesterday





          I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.

          – David K
          yesterday










          Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202984%2fworkaholic-formal-informal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221

          Creating closest line along the point''s azimuth using PostgreSQL Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Drawing line between points at specific distance in PostGIS?How to efficiently find the closest point over the dateline?How to find the nearest point by using PostGIS function?PostGIS nearest point with LATERAL JOIN in PostgreSQL 9.3+Creating a table and inserting selected streets using plpgsql functionsCreating a table that stores Distances and other columnSaving select query results (year wise) from PostgreSQL/PostGIS to text filesWhat is the information behind this geometry?How to give start and end vertex ids dynamically in pgr_dijkstra?Point to Polygon nearest distance DS_distance is not using geography index & knn <-> or <#> does not give result in orderLine to point conversion with start point and end point detection?

          Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given