Operational amplifier as a comparator at high frequency The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InReasons not to use a 741 op-amp?Can I use LM324 as a Schmitt trigger?Comparing sine wave and triangular for spwm using comparatorSimple op-amp differential amplifierOp amp has a biased outputReduced output of op amp peak detection and hold circuitHow to select the right Operational Amplifier as an impedance converter?Bias voltage of non-inverting op amplifier drops to 0 when input signal connectedHigh negative voltages with op-ampopamp output unstableComparator circuit undesirable fluctuations20kHz sine wave signal amplificationIf there exists a cascade of op amps, does the previous op amp's slew rate affect the later op amp's slew rates?
Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
How to manage monthly salary
Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?
Lightning Grid - Columns and Rows?
What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?
Is there a symbol for a right arrow with a square in the middle?
Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?
What is the closest word meaning "respect for time / mindful"
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Aging parents with no investments
What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
How technical should a Scrum Master be to effectively remove impediments?
One word riddle: Vowel in the middle
Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?
Why can Shazam fly?
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
How to save as into a customized destination on macOS?
Operational amplifier as a comparator at high frequency
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InReasons not to use a 741 op-amp?Can I use LM324 as a Schmitt trigger?Comparing sine wave and triangular for spwm using comparatorSimple op-amp differential amplifierOp amp has a biased outputReduced output of op amp peak detection and hold circuitHow to select the right Operational Amplifier as an impedance converter?Bias voltage of non-inverting op amplifier drops to 0 when input signal connectedHigh negative voltages with op-ampopamp output unstableComparator circuit undesirable fluctuations20kHz sine wave signal amplificationIf there exists a cascade of op amps, does the previous op amp's slew rate affect the later op amp's slew rates?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I am trying to generate a sinusoidal PWM signal using analog circuits.
I want to compare my sine wave and triangular wave using an operational amplifier (LM741) which has a rise time of 0.3 µs and slew rate 0.5 V/µs, which will good at 5 kHz theoretically. But I am not getting a good PWM output.
So I first tried to compare the sine wave with a reference voltage (2.2 volt). Sine wave amplitude = 2.5 volt (5 V peak to peak) and frequency 100 Hz and 5 kHz.
- At low frequency (say 100 Hz), the output is good
- At high frequency (say 5 kHz), the output is too bad.
What will be the problem...
If the response is the problem of the comparator, but the slew rate is 0.5 V/µs.
Calculation of slew rate for a sinusoidal signal...
Slew rate= Vm * 2pi * Frequency
= 5 V * 2pi* 5000 Hz
= 1570796 volt per second or 0.15 V/µs
Theoretically the slew rate of 0.5 V/µs will be OK for a sinusoidal signal of 5 kHz and 5 volt peak to peak. But in my case the signal is distorted.
Where am I wrong?
operational-amplifier comparator
edited Apr 5 at 19:15
Peter Mortensen
1,60031422
asked Apr 5 at 10:51
NihalNihal
638
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I am trying to generate a sinusoidal PWM signal using analog circuits.
I want to compare my sine wave and triangular wave using an operational amplifier (LM741) which has a rise time of 0.3 µs and slew rate 0.5 V/µs, which will good at 5 kHz theoretically. But I am not getting a good PWM output.
So I first tried to compare the sine wave with a reference voltage (2.2 volt). Sine wave amplitude = 2.5 volt (5 V peak to peak) and frequency 100 Hz and 5 kHz.
- At low frequency (say 100 Hz), the output is good
- At high frequency (say 5 kHz), the output is too bad.
What will be the problem...
If the response is the problem of the comparator, but the slew rate is 0.5 V/µs.
Calculation of slew rate for a sinusoidal signal...
Slew rate= Vm * 2pi * Frequency
= 5 V * 2pi* 5000 Hz
= 1570796 volt per second or 0.15 V/µs
Theoretically the slew rate of 0.5 V/µs will be OK for a sinusoidal signal of 5 kHz and 5 volt peak to peak. But in my case the signal is distorted.
Where am I wrong?
operational-amplifier comparator
edited Apr 5 at 19:15
Peter Mortensen
1,60031422
asked Apr 5 at 10:51
NihalNihal
638
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It looks like there's a significant lag/delay in the output's response w.r.t. the input signal (~30µs?). What may be causing this? What's connected to the output? 'Scope probe only?
$endgroup$
– JimmyB
Apr 5 at 11:00
5
$begingroup$
Why you shouldn't use the 741.
$endgroup$
– JRE
Apr 5 at 11:16
$begingroup$
For 5Khz i thought 741 will be ok, for what i calculated .Orelse sure i will change the opp amp which having high slew rate and i will update it.......@JRE
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:26
1
$begingroup$
You're latching up.
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
Apr 5 at 12:34
2
$begingroup$
Note that this question is about the theory behind the calculations. Telling OP to change his OP-amp does nothing to answer the question. It just solves the problem without OP knowing why.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Apr 5 at 19:58
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I am trying to generate a sinusoidal PWM signal using analog circuits.
I want to compare my sine wave and triangular wave using an operational amplifier (LM741) which has a rise time of 0.3 µs and slew rate 0.5 V/µs, which will good at 5 kHz theoretically. But I am not getting a good PWM output.
So I first tried to compare the sine wave with a reference voltage (2.2 volt). Sine wave amplitude = 2.5 volt (5 V peak to peak) and frequency 100 Hz and 5 kHz.
- At low frequency (say 100 Hz), the output is good
- At high frequency (say 5 kHz), the output is too bad.
What will be the problem...
If the response is the problem of the comparator, but the slew rate is 0.5 V/µs.
Calculation of slew rate for a sinusoidal signal...
Slew rate= Vm * 2pi * Frequency
= 5 V * 2pi* 5000 Hz
= 1570796 volt per second or 0.15 V/µs
Theoretically the slew rate of 0.5 V/µs will be OK for a sinusoidal signal of 5 kHz and 5 volt peak to peak. But in my case the signal is distorted.
Where am I wrong?
operational-amplifier comparator
edited Apr 5 at 19:15
Peter Mortensen
1,60031422
asked Apr 5 at 10:51
NihalNihal
638
$endgroup$
I am trying to generate a sinusoidal PWM signal using analog circuits.
I want to compare my sine wave and triangular wave using an operational amplifier (LM741) which has a rise time of 0.3 µs and slew rate 0.5 V/µs, which will good at 5 kHz theoretically. But I am not getting a good PWM output.
So I first tried to compare the sine wave with a reference voltage (2.2 volt). Sine wave amplitude = 2.5 volt (5 V peak to peak) and frequency 100 Hz and 5 kHz.
- At low frequency (say 100 Hz), the output is good
- At high frequency (say 5 kHz), the output is too bad.
What will be the problem...
If the response is the problem of the comparator, but the slew rate is 0.5 V/µs.
Calculation of slew rate for a sinusoidal signal...
Slew rate= Vm * 2pi * Frequency
= 5 V * 2pi* 5000 Hz
= 1570796 volt per second or 0.15 V/µs
Theoretically the slew rate of 0.5 V/µs will be OK for a sinusoidal signal of 5 kHz and 5 volt peak to peak. But in my case the signal is distorted.
Where am I wrong?
operational-amplifier comparator
operational-amplifier comparator
edited Apr 5 at 19:15
Peter Mortensen
1,60031422
asked Apr 5 at 10:51
NihalNihal
638
edited Apr 5 at 19:15
Peter Mortensen
1,60031422
asked Apr 5 at 10:51
NihalNihal
638
edited Apr 5 at 19:15
Peter Mortensen
1,60031422
edited Apr 5 at 19:15
Peter Mortensen
1,60031422
edited Apr 5 at 19:15
Peter Mortensen
1,60031422
1,60031422
asked Apr 5 at 10:51
NihalNihal
638
asked Apr 5 at 10:51
NihalNihal
638
asked Apr 5 at 10:51
NihalNihal
638
638
$begingroup$
It looks like there's a significant lag/delay in the output's response w.r.t. the input signal (~30µs?). What may be causing this? What's connected to the output? 'Scope probe only?
$endgroup$
– JimmyB
Apr 5 at 11:00
5
$begingroup$
Why you shouldn't use the 741.
$endgroup$
– JRE
Apr 5 at 11:16
$begingroup$
For 5Khz i thought 741 will be ok, for what i calculated .Orelse sure i will change the opp amp which having high slew rate and i will update it.......@JRE
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:26
1
$begingroup$
You're latching up.
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
Apr 5 at 12:34
2
$begingroup$
Note that this question is about the theory behind the calculations. Telling OP to change his OP-amp does nothing to answer the question. It just solves the problem without OP knowing why.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Apr 5 at 19:58
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
It looks like there's a significant lag/delay in the output's response w.r.t. the input signal (~30µs?). What may be causing this? What's connected to the output? 'Scope probe only?
$endgroup$
– JimmyB
Apr 5 at 11:00
5
$begingroup$
Why you shouldn't use the 741.
$endgroup$
– JRE
Apr 5 at 11:16
$begingroup$
For 5Khz i thought 741 will be ok, for what i calculated .Orelse sure i will change the opp amp which having high slew rate and i will update it.......@JRE
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:26
1
$begingroup$
You're latching up.
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
Apr 5 at 12:34
2
$begingroup$
Note that this question is about the theory behind the calculations. Telling OP to change his OP-amp does nothing to answer the question. It just solves the problem without OP knowing why.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Apr 5 at 19:58
$begingroup$
It looks like there's a significant lag/delay in the output's response w.r.t. the input signal (~30µs?). What may be causing this? What's connected to the output? 'Scope probe only?
$endgroup$
– JimmyB
Apr 5 at 11:00
$begingroup$
It looks like there's a significant lag/delay in the output's response w.r.t. the input signal (~30µs?). What may be causing this? What's connected to the output? 'Scope probe only?
$endgroup$
– JimmyB
Apr 5 at 11:00
5
5
$begingroup$
Why you shouldn't use the 741.
$endgroup$
– JRE
Apr 5 at 11:16
$begingroup$
Why you shouldn't use the 741.
$endgroup$
– JRE
Apr 5 at 11:16
$begingroup$
For 5Khz i thought 741 will be ok, for what i calculated .Orelse sure i will change the opp amp which having high slew rate and i will update it.......@JRE
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:26
$begingroup$
For 5Khz i thought 741 will be ok, for what i calculated .Orelse sure i will change the opp amp which having high slew rate and i will update it.......@JRE
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:26
1
1
$begingroup$
You're latching up.
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
Apr 5 at 12:34
$begingroup$
You're latching up.
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
Apr 5 at 12:34
2
2
$begingroup$
Note that this question is about the theory behind the calculations. Telling OP to change his OP-amp does nothing to answer the question. It just solves the problem without OP knowing why.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Apr 5 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Note that this question is about the theory behind the calculations. Telling OP to change his OP-amp does nothing to answer the question. It just solves the problem without OP knowing why.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Apr 5 at 19:58
|
show 3 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The recommendations for you are very simple.
Use a comparator for this application instead of an opamp.
Select a newer part that operates with orders of magnitude faster response time.
It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth.
Here is what can be achieved with the venerable LM393 at 5kHz. The shown circuit will work even up to about 50kHz before the delay of the LM393 starts to distort the PWM duty cycle.
answered Apr 5 at 11:03
Michael KarasMichael Karas
45.2k348105
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sure friend i will change the opp amp or by using comparator, i will update the data soon.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:33
1
$begingroup$
@Nihal - If you show some new results in the question do not delete your original material, Instead add it as an update at the end. The reason for this is that hopefully this question can be a reference to future readers that are looking for information as being discussed here. If you delete the original material the answers here would no longer make much sense to a future reader.
$endgroup$
– Michael Karas
Apr 5 at 11:47
1
$begingroup$
"It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth." ok - I'll bite. what's your reasons?
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
Apr 5 at 15:35
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey the 741 was first released in 1968. And while it was a fantastic IC at the time, there are vastly superior op-amps available with lower input offset voltage, higher bandwidth, higher input impedance, etc. Most people lean the "ideal op-amp" first, and then immediately jump to one of the most non-ideal op-amps in practice, and wonder why their design doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– CurtisHx
Apr 5 at 16:10
$begingroup$
LM741 might still be in the textbooks...
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:19
|
show 8 more comments
$begingroup$
Opamps work slowly with low power supply voltages. In addition they are designed to work in linear region. As saturated, like in your application, the response has an unpredictable dead time. before the internal saturation is vanished.
I can only repeat what's already said: Get a comparator. 741 was a remarkable step forward half a century ago, but things have developed better since those days.
answered Apr 5 at 11:09
user287001user287001
9,7391517
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response friend, i will update it after changing the opp amp.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:29
2
$begingroup$
@Nihal Comparators have other precautions. They are high speed circuits like logic parts. You must have acceptably short wires and coupling capacitors between supply voltage inputs. Making the circuit with 0,5 meter long wires onto a breadboard without coupling caps (I have seen those attempts) will be useless.
$endgroup$
– user287001
Apr 5 at 11:39
$begingroup$
Ok friend I will even buy a comparator and I will check with it.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 18:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Op-amps are susceptible to latch-up. Recovering from saturation at the rails is not an automatic thing. The ratings you are reading a for the op amp working in a feedback mode, not an open loop mode. You would need to find an op amp designed to minimize latch-up, or better yet, when you need a comparator, buy a comparator.
answered Apr 5 at 12:33
Scott SeidmanScott Seidman
22.7k43286
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yes, and/or phase inversion, depending on the op-amp type.
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 17:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
[modified to run on +9/-6 volt rails]
You may try this, if you want a discrete solution. The delay, without input protection resistor, should be about 20 nanoseconds.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
The speed will be limited by Rin (10Kohm) and a minimal Miller Effect Cin (20pF?), thus propagation delay will be about 0.2 us (200 nanosecond).
answered Apr 5 at 15:59
analogsystemsrfanalogsystemsrf
16.1k2822
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is it? A Schmitt trigger?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:21
$begingroup$
The differential pair is biased at VDD/2. R8 does provide 1% positive feedback, to reduce the risk of oscillation during the linear region. Notice I included over-voltage protection.
$endgroup$
– analogsystemsrf
Apr 6 at 3:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most garden variety op-amps have internal compensation in the form of a chip capacitor.
This makes them very slow, but more stable in analog circuits.
Why not use a cheap comparator like LM393?
edited Apr 5 at 14:25
Renan
4,32222244
answered Apr 5 at 11:04
AutisticAutistic
7,50921633
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you friend it works good while using comparator LM339.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f430885%2foperational-amplifier-as-a-comparator-at-high-frequency%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The recommendations for you are very simple.
Use a comparator for this application instead of an opamp.
Select a newer part that operates with orders of magnitude faster response time.
It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth.
Here is what can be achieved with the venerable LM393 at 5kHz. The shown circuit will work even up to about 50kHz before the delay of the LM393 starts to distort the PWM duty cycle.
answered Apr 5 at 11:03
Michael KarasMichael Karas
45.2k348105
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sure friend i will change the opp amp or by using comparator, i will update the data soon.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:33
1
$begingroup$
@Nihal - If you show some new results in the question do not delete your original material, Instead add it as an update at the end. The reason for this is that hopefully this question can be a reference to future readers that are looking for information as being discussed here. If you delete the original material the answers here would no longer make much sense to a future reader.
$endgroup$
– Michael Karas
Apr 5 at 11:47
1
$begingroup$
"It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth." ok - I'll bite. what's your reasons?
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
Apr 5 at 15:35
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey the 741 was first released in 1968. And while it was a fantastic IC at the time, there are vastly superior op-amps available with lower input offset voltage, higher bandwidth, higher input impedance, etc. Most people lean the "ideal op-amp" first, and then immediately jump to one of the most non-ideal op-amps in practice, and wonder why their design doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– CurtisHx
Apr 5 at 16:10
$begingroup$
LM741 might still be in the textbooks...
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:19
|
show 8 more comments
$begingroup$
The recommendations for you are very simple.
Use a comparator for this application instead of an opamp.
Select a newer part that operates with orders of magnitude faster response time.
It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth.
Here is what can be achieved with the venerable LM393 at 5kHz. The shown circuit will work even up to about 50kHz before the delay of the LM393 starts to distort the PWM duty cycle.
answered Apr 5 at 11:03
Michael KarasMichael Karas
45.2k348105
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sure friend i will change the opp amp or by using comparator, i will update the data soon.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:33
1
$begingroup$
@Nihal - If you show some new results in the question do not delete your original material, Instead add it as an update at the end. The reason for this is that hopefully this question can be a reference to future readers that are looking for information as being discussed here. If you delete the original material the answers here would no longer make much sense to a future reader.
$endgroup$
– Michael Karas
Apr 5 at 11:47
1
$begingroup$
"It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth." ok - I'll bite. what's your reasons?
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
Apr 5 at 15:35
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey the 741 was first released in 1968. And while it was a fantastic IC at the time, there are vastly superior op-amps available with lower input offset voltage, higher bandwidth, higher input impedance, etc. Most people lean the "ideal op-amp" first, and then immediately jump to one of the most non-ideal op-amps in practice, and wonder why their design doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– CurtisHx
Apr 5 at 16:10
$begingroup$
LM741 might still be in the textbooks...
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:19
|
show 8 more comments
$begingroup$
The recommendations for you are very simple.
Use a comparator for this application instead of an opamp.
Select a newer part that operates with orders of magnitude faster response time.
It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth.
Here is what can be achieved with the venerable LM393 at 5kHz. The shown circuit will work even up to about 50kHz before the delay of the LM393 starts to distort the PWM duty cycle.
answered Apr 5 at 11:03
Michael KarasMichael Karas
45.2k348105
$endgroup$
The recommendations for you are very simple.
Use a comparator for this application instead of an opamp.
Select a newer part that operates with orders of magnitude faster response time.
It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth.
Here is what can be achieved with the venerable LM393 at 5kHz. The shown circuit will work even up to about 50kHz before the delay of the LM393 starts to distort the PWM duty cycle.
answered Apr 5 at 11:03
Michael KarasMichael Karas
45.2k348105
edited Apr 5 at 11:52
answered Apr 5 at 11:03
Michael KarasMichael Karas
45.2k348105
answered Apr 5 at 11:03
Michael KarasMichael Karas
45.2k348105
answered Apr 5 at 11:03
Michael KarasMichael Karas
45.2k348105
45.2k348105
$begingroup$
Sure friend i will change the opp amp or by using comparator, i will update the data soon.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:33
1
$begingroup$
@Nihal - If you show some new results in the question do not delete your original material, Instead add it as an update at the end. The reason for this is that hopefully this question can be a reference to future readers that are looking for information as being discussed here. If you delete the original material the answers here would no longer make much sense to a future reader.
$endgroup$
– Michael Karas
Apr 5 at 11:47
1
$begingroup$
"It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth." ok - I'll bite. what's your reasons?
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
Apr 5 at 15:35
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey the 741 was first released in 1968. And while it was a fantastic IC at the time, there are vastly superior op-amps available with lower input offset voltage, higher bandwidth, higher input impedance, etc. Most people lean the "ideal op-amp" first, and then immediately jump to one of the most non-ideal op-amps in practice, and wonder why their design doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– CurtisHx
Apr 5 at 16:10
$begingroup$
LM741 might still be in the textbooks...
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:19
|
show 8 more comments
$begingroup$
Sure friend i will change the opp amp or by using comparator, i will update the data soon.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:33
1
$begingroup$
@Nihal - If you show some new results in the question do not delete your original material, Instead add it as an update at the end. The reason for this is that hopefully this question can be a reference to future readers that are looking for information as being discussed here. If you delete the original material the answers here would no longer make much sense to a future reader.
$endgroup$
– Michael Karas
Apr 5 at 11:47
1
$begingroup$
"It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth." ok - I'll bite. what's your reasons?
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
Apr 5 at 15:35
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey the 741 was first released in 1968. And while it was a fantastic IC at the time, there are vastly superior op-amps available with lower input offset voltage, higher bandwidth, higher input impedance, etc. Most people lean the "ideal op-amp" first, and then immediately jump to one of the most non-ideal op-amps in practice, and wonder why their design doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– CurtisHx
Apr 5 at 16:10
$begingroup$
LM741 might still be in the textbooks...
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:19
$begingroup$
Sure friend i will change the opp amp or by using comparator, i will update the data soon.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:33
$begingroup$
Sure friend i will change the opp amp or by using comparator, i will update the data soon.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:33
1
1
$begingroup$
@Nihal - If you show some new results in the question do not delete your original material, Instead add it as an update at the end. The reason for this is that hopefully this question can be a reference to future readers that are looking for information as being discussed here. If you delete the original material the answers here would no longer make much sense to a future reader.
$endgroup$
– Michael Karas
Apr 5 at 11:47
$begingroup$
@Nihal - If you show some new results in the question do not delete your original material, Instead add it as an update at the end. The reason for this is that hopefully this question can be a reference to future readers that are looking for information as being discussed here. If you delete the original material the answers here would no longer make much sense to a future reader.
$endgroup$
– Michael Karas
Apr 5 at 11:47
1
1
$begingroup$
"It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth." ok - I'll bite. what's your reasons?
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
Apr 5 at 15:35
$begingroup$
"It would be the very best thing if the 741 could be eradicated from face of the earth." ok - I'll bite. what's your reasons?
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
Apr 5 at 15:35
2
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey the 741 was first released in 1968. And while it was a fantastic IC at the time, there are vastly superior op-amps available with lower input offset voltage, higher bandwidth, higher input impedance, etc. Most people lean the "ideal op-amp" first, and then immediately jump to one of the most non-ideal op-amps in practice, and wonder why their design doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– CurtisHx
Apr 5 at 16:10
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey the 741 was first released in 1968. And while it was a fantastic IC at the time, there are vastly superior op-amps available with lower input offset voltage, higher bandwidth, higher input impedance, etc. Most people lean the "ideal op-amp" first, and then immediately jump to one of the most non-ideal op-amps in practice, and wonder why their design doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– CurtisHx
Apr 5 at 16:10
$begingroup$
LM741 might still be in the textbooks...
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:19
$begingroup$
LM741 might still be in the textbooks...
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:19
|
show 8 more comments
$begingroup$
Opamps work slowly with low power supply voltages. In addition they are designed to work in linear region. As saturated, like in your application, the response has an unpredictable dead time. before the internal saturation is vanished.
I can only repeat what's already said: Get a comparator. 741 was a remarkable step forward half a century ago, but things have developed better since those days.
answered Apr 5 at 11:09
user287001user287001
9,7391517
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response friend, i will update it after changing the opp amp.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:29
2
$begingroup$
@Nihal Comparators have other precautions. They are high speed circuits like logic parts. You must have acceptably short wires and coupling capacitors between supply voltage inputs. Making the circuit with 0,5 meter long wires onto a breadboard without coupling caps (I have seen those attempts) will be useless.
$endgroup$
– user287001
Apr 5 at 11:39
$begingroup$
Ok friend I will even buy a comparator and I will check with it.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 18:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Opamps work slowly with low power supply voltages. In addition they are designed to work in linear region. As saturated, like in your application, the response has an unpredictable dead time. before the internal saturation is vanished.
I can only repeat what's already said: Get a comparator. 741 was a remarkable step forward half a century ago, but things have developed better since those days.
answered Apr 5 at 11:09
user287001user287001
9,7391517
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response friend, i will update it after changing the opp amp.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:29
2
$begingroup$
@Nihal Comparators have other precautions. They are high speed circuits like logic parts. You must have acceptably short wires and coupling capacitors between supply voltage inputs. Making the circuit with 0,5 meter long wires onto a breadboard without coupling caps (I have seen those attempts) will be useless.
$endgroup$
– user287001
Apr 5 at 11:39
$begingroup$
Ok friend I will even buy a comparator and I will check with it.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 18:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Opamps work slowly with low power supply voltages. In addition they are designed to work in linear region. As saturated, like in your application, the response has an unpredictable dead time. before the internal saturation is vanished.
I can only repeat what's already said: Get a comparator. 741 was a remarkable step forward half a century ago, but things have developed better since those days.
answered Apr 5 at 11:09
user287001user287001
9,7391517
$endgroup$
Opamps work slowly with low power supply voltages. In addition they are designed to work in linear region. As saturated, like in your application, the response has an unpredictable dead time. before the internal saturation is vanished.
I can only repeat what's already said: Get a comparator. 741 was a remarkable step forward half a century ago, but things have developed better since those days.
answered Apr 5 at 11:09
user287001user287001
9,7391517
answered Apr 5 at 11:09
user287001user287001
9,7391517
answered Apr 5 at 11:09
user287001user287001
9,7391517
answered Apr 5 at 11:09
user287001user287001
9,7391517
9,7391517
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response friend, i will update it after changing the opp amp.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:29
2
$begingroup$
@Nihal Comparators have other precautions. They are high speed circuits like logic parts. You must have acceptably short wires and coupling capacitors between supply voltage inputs. Making the circuit with 0,5 meter long wires onto a breadboard without coupling caps (I have seen those attempts) will be useless.
$endgroup$
– user287001
Apr 5 at 11:39
$begingroup$
Ok friend I will even buy a comparator and I will check with it.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 18:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response friend, i will update it after changing the opp amp.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:29
2
$begingroup$
@Nihal Comparators have other precautions. They are high speed circuits like logic parts. You must have acceptably short wires and coupling capacitors between supply voltage inputs. Making the circuit with 0,5 meter long wires onto a breadboard without coupling caps (I have seen those attempts) will be useless.
$endgroup$
– user287001
Apr 5 at 11:39
$begingroup$
Ok friend I will even buy a comparator and I will check with it.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 18:34
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response friend, i will update it after changing the opp amp.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:29
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response friend, i will update it after changing the opp amp.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:29
2
2
$begingroup$
@Nihal Comparators have other precautions. They are high speed circuits like logic parts. You must have acceptably short wires and coupling capacitors between supply voltage inputs. Making the circuit with 0,5 meter long wires onto a breadboard without coupling caps (I have seen those attempts) will be useless.
$endgroup$
– user287001
Apr 5 at 11:39
$begingroup$
@Nihal Comparators have other precautions. They are high speed circuits like logic parts. You must have acceptably short wires and coupling capacitors between supply voltage inputs. Making the circuit with 0,5 meter long wires onto a breadboard without coupling caps (I have seen those attempts) will be useless.
$endgroup$
– user287001
Apr 5 at 11:39
$begingroup$
Ok friend I will even buy a comparator and I will check with it.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 18:34
$begingroup$
Ok friend I will even buy a comparator and I will check with it.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 18:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Op-amps are susceptible to latch-up. Recovering from saturation at the rails is not an automatic thing. The ratings you are reading a for the op amp working in a feedback mode, not an open loop mode. You would need to find an op amp designed to minimize latch-up, or better yet, when you need a comparator, buy a comparator.
answered Apr 5 at 12:33
Scott SeidmanScott Seidman
22.7k43286
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yes, and/or phase inversion, depending on the op-amp type.
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 17:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Op-amps are susceptible to latch-up. Recovering from saturation at the rails is not an automatic thing. The ratings you are reading a for the op amp working in a feedback mode, not an open loop mode. You would need to find an op amp designed to minimize latch-up, or better yet, when you need a comparator, buy a comparator.
answered Apr 5 at 12:33
Scott SeidmanScott Seidman
22.7k43286
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yes, and/or phase inversion, depending on the op-amp type.
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 17:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Op-amps are susceptible to latch-up. Recovering from saturation at the rails is not an automatic thing. The ratings you are reading a for the op amp working in a feedback mode, not an open loop mode. You would need to find an op amp designed to minimize latch-up, or better yet, when you need a comparator, buy a comparator.
answered Apr 5 at 12:33
Scott SeidmanScott Seidman
22.7k43286
$endgroup$
Op-amps are susceptible to latch-up. Recovering from saturation at the rails is not an automatic thing. The ratings you are reading a for the op amp working in a feedback mode, not an open loop mode. You would need to find an op amp designed to minimize latch-up, or better yet, when you need a comparator, buy a comparator.
answered Apr 5 at 12:33
Scott SeidmanScott Seidman
22.7k43286
answered Apr 5 at 12:33
Scott SeidmanScott Seidman
22.7k43286
answered Apr 5 at 12:33
Scott SeidmanScott Seidman
22.7k43286
answered Apr 5 at 12:33
Scott SeidmanScott Seidman
22.7k43286
22.7k43286
1
$begingroup$
Yes, and/or phase inversion, depending on the op-amp type.
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 17:10
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Yes, and/or phase inversion, depending on the op-amp type.
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 17:10
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes, and/or phase inversion, depending on the op-amp type.
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 17:10
$begingroup$
Yes, and/or phase inversion, depending on the op-amp type.
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 17:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
[modified to run on +9/-6 volt rails]
You may try this, if you want a discrete solution. The delay, without input protection resistor, should be about 20 nanoseconds.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
The speed will be limited by Rin (10Kohm) and a minimal Miller Effect Cin (20pF?), thus propagation delay will be about 0.2 us (200 nanosecond).
answered Apr 5 at 15:59
analogsystemsrfanalogsystemsrf
16.1k2822
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is it? A Schmitt trigger?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:21
$begingroup$
The differential pair is biased at VDD/2. R8 does provide 1% positive feedback, to reduce the risk of oscillation during the linear region. Notice I included over-voltage protection.
$endgroup$
– analogsystemsrf
Apr 6 at 3:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
[modified to run on +9/-6 volt rails]
You may try this, if you want a discrete solution. The delay, without input protection resistor, should be about 20 nanoseconds.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
The speed will be limited by Rin (10Kohm) and a minimal Miller Effect Cin (20pF?), thus propagation delay will be about 0.2 us (200 nanosecond).
answered Apr 5 at 15:59
analogsystemsrfanalogsystemsrf
16.1k2822
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is it? A Schmitt trigger?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:21
$begingroup$
The differential pair is biased at VDD/2. R8 does provide 1% positive feedback, to reduce the risk of oscillation during the linear region. Notice I included over-voltage protection.
$endgroup$
– analogsystemsrf
Apr 6 at 3:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
[modified to run on +9/-6 volt rails]
You may try this, if you want a discrete solution. The delay, without input protection resistor, should be about 20 nanoseconds.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
The speed will be limited by Rin (10Kohm) and a minimal Miller Effect Cin (20pF?), thus propagation delay will be about 0.2 us (200 nanosecond).
answered Apr 5 at 15:59
analogsystemsrfanalogsystemsrf
16.1k2822
$endgroup$
[modified to run on +9/-6 volt rails]
You may try this, if you want a discrete solution. The delay, without input protection resistor, should be about 20 nanoseconds.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
The speed will be limited by Rin (10Kohm) and a minimal Miller Effect Cin (20pF?), thus propagation delay will be about 0.2 us (200 nanosecond).
answered Apr 5 at 15:59
analogsystemsrfanalogsystemsrf
16.1k2822
edited 2 days ago
answered Apr 5 at 15:59
analogsystemsrfanalogsystemsrf
16.1k2822
answered Apr 5 at 15:59
analogsystemsrfanalogsystemsrf
16.1k2822
answered Apr 5 at 15:59
analogsystemsrfanalogsystemsrf
16.1k2822
16.1k2822
$begingroup$
What is it? A Schmitt trigger?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:21
$begingroup$
The differential pair is biased at VDD/2. R8 does provide 1% positive feedback, to reduce the risk of oscillation during the linear region. Notice I included over-voltage protection.
$endgroup$
– analogsystemsrf
Apr 6 at 3:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is it? A Schmitt trigger?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:21
$begingroup$
The differential pair is biased at VDD/2. R8 does provide 1% positive feedback, to reduce the risk of oscillation during the linear region. Notice I included over-voltage protection.
$endgroup$
– analogsystemsrf
Apr 6 at 3:28
$begingroup$
What is it? A Schmitt trigger?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:21
$begingroup$
What is it? A Schmitt trigger?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Apr 5 at 16:21
$begingroup$
The differential pair is biased at VDD/2. R8 does provide 1% positive feedback, to reduce the risk of oscillation during the linear region. Notice I included over-voltage protection.
$endgroup$
– analogsystemsrf
Apr 6 at 3:28
$begingroup$
The differential pair is biased at VDD/2. R8 does provide 1% positive feedback, to reduce the risk of oscillation during the linear region. Notice I included over-voltage protection.
$endgroup$
– analogsystemsrf
Apr 6 at 3:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most garden variety op-amps have internal compensation in the form of a chip capacitor.
This makes them very slow, but more stable in analog circuits.
Why not use a cheap comparator like LM393?
edited Apr 5 at 14:25
Renan
4,32222244
answered Apr 5 at 11:04
AutisticAutistic
7,50921633
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you friend it works good while using comparator LM339.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most garden variety op-amps have internal compensation in the form of a chip capacitor.
This makes them very slow, but more stable in analog circuits.
Why not use a cheap comparator like LM393?
edited Apr 5 at 14:25
Renan
4,32222244
answered Apr 5 at 11:04
AutisticAutistic
7,50921633
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you friend it works good while using comparator LM339.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most garden variety op-amps have internal compensation in the form of a chip capacitor.
This makes them very slow, but more stable in analog circuits.
Why not use a cheap comparator like LM393?
edited Apr 5 at 14:25
Renan
4,32222244
answered Apr 5 at 11:04
AutisticAutistic
7,50921633
$endgroup$
Most garden variety op-amps have internal compensation in the form of a chip capacitor.
This makes them very slow, but more stable in analog circuits.
Why not use a cheap comparator like LM393?
edited Apr 5 at 14:25
Renan
4,32222244
answered Apr 5 at 11:04
AutisticAutistic
7,50921633
edited Apr 5 at 14:25
Renan
4,32222244
edited Apr 5 at 14:25
Renan
4,32222244
edited Apr 5 at 14:25
Renan
4,32222244
4,32222244
answered Apr 5 at 11:04
AutisticAutistic
7,50921633
answered Apr 5 at 11:04
AutisticAutistic
7,50921633
answered Apr 5 at 11:04
AutisticAutistic
7,50921633
7,50921633
$begingroup$
Thank you friend it works good while using comparator LM339.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you friend it works good while using comparator LM339.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you friend it works good while using comparator LM339.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you friend it works good while using comparator LM339.
$endgroup$
– Nihal
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f430885%2foperational-amplifier-as-a-comparator-at-high-frequency%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
It looks like there's a significant lag/delay in the output's response w.r.t. the input signal (~30µs?). What may be causing this? What's connected to the output? 'Scope probe only?
$endgroup$
– JimmyB
Apr 5 at 11:00
5
$begingroup$
Why you shouldn't use the 741.
$endgroup$
– JRE
Apr 5 at 11:16
$begingroup$
For 5Khz i thought 741 will be ok, for what i calculated .Orelse sure i will change the opp amp which having high slew rate and i will update it.......@JRE
$endgroup$
– Nihal
Apr 5 at 11:26
1
$begingroup$
You're latching up.
$endgroup$
– Scott Seidman
Apr 5 at 12:34
2
$begingroup$
Note that this question is about the theory behind the calculations. Telling OP to change his OP-amp does nothing to answer the question. It just solves the problem without OP knowing why.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Apr 5 at 19:58