Solving system of ODEs with extra parameter The Next CEO of Stack OverflowTransforming ParametricFunction in expression depending on the parameterSolving a system of ODEs with the Runge-Kutta methodTips for efficiently solving large system coupled (nonlinear) ODEsHow do I pull from a data list for parameter values in a system of ODEs and then solve and plot?Solving PDEs with complicated boundary conditionsSolving Differential Algebraic Equations as BVPSolving a system of coupled Nonlinear ODEs using numeric and get `ndnum` errorIssues to modelize a system of differential equation (NDSolve)Solving PDEs over a region in different co-ordinate system?Error when solving 't Hooft-Polyakov radial equations using NDSolveHow to apply NIntegrate three times

Can Sri Krishna be called 'a person'?

Physiological effects of huge anime eyes

Noise during hard braking

Shortening a title without changing its meaning

subequations: How to continue numbering while considering scrbook numbering scheme?

Can I cast Thunderwave and be at the center of its bottom face, but not be affected by it?

How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?

What day is it again?

Salesforce opportunity stages

forward revert message from low level solidity call

Can a PhD from a non-TU9 German university become a professor in a TU9 university?

Strange use of "whether ... than ..." in official text

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

Cannot restore registry to default in Windows 10?

Is it possible to make a 9x9 table fit within the default margins?

Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico

Free fall ellipse or parabola?

Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?

Creating a script with console commands

How does a dynamic QR code work?

How should I connect my cat5 cable to connectors having an orange-green line?

Calculating discount not working

DISTINCT column combination with permutations

What difference does it make matching a word with/without a trailing whitespace?



Solving system of ODEs with extra parameter



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowTransforming ParametricFunction in expression depending on the parameterSolving a system of ODEs with the Runge-Kutta methodTips for efficiently solving large system coupled (nonlinear) ODEsHow do I pull from a data list for parameter values in a system of ODEs and then solve and plot?Solving PDEs with complicated boundary conditionsSolving Differential Algebraic Equations as BVPSolving a system of coupled Nonlinear ODEs using numeric and get `ndnum` errorIssues to modelize a system of differential equation (NDSolve)Solving PDEs over a region in different co-ordinate system?Error when solving 't Hooft-Polyakov radial equations using NDSolveHow to apply NIntegrate three times










3












$begingroup$


I would like to solve a $2times 2$ system of the form
$$fracddthetaT=TA,quad T(0)=Id$$
where $theta$ is real and $A$ is of the form
$$A=beginpmatrix 0 & frace^-i thetalambda\ frac136e^-ithetaleft(9lambda + 2(lambda-1)^2 (6costheta + cos2theta + 6)right) & 0endpmatrix,$$
with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle.



In particular I'm interested in obtaining numeric solutions at $theta=2pi$ depending on the extra parameter $lambda$. I'm fairly new using Mathematica, and this is what I have tried so far:



T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
A[θ_] =
0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
;
sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];


The previous code sets the system that I want to solve and now I try to solve numerically. First I've tried



NSol = NDSolve[
sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ],
θ,
θ, 0, 2 Pi
];


which gives me the output



NDSolve::dupv: "Duplicate variable θ found in NDSolve[<<1>>]."


I have also tried



Nsol2 = ParametricNDSolve[
sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11, T12, T21, T22,
θ, 0, 2 Pi,
λ
];


which gives me as output $T_11,dots,T_22$ as ParametricFunctions depending on each other and on $lambda$.



I don't know if this is the right approach and, if so, how to extract a numeric expression depending on $lambda$ from the last output - all that I've seen in the documentation are examples that are plotted for specific values of the parameter. Any help is much appreciated.



EDIT




Following the comments in one of the answers I'd like to explain further: the output that I would like to obtain is some sort of function depending of the parameter $lambda$ that I can manipulate afterwards. Say for instance, computing the series expansion of powers of $lambda$ of my solution. I don't know how to treat the ParametricFunction that I obtain to do such computations.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    I would like to solve a $2times 2$ system of the form
    $$fracddthetaT=TA,quad T(0)=Id$$
    where $theta$ is real and $A$ is of the form
    $$A=beginpmatrix 0 & frace^-i thetalambda\ frac136e^-ithetaleft(9lambda + 2(lambda-1)^2 (6costheta + cos2theta + 6)right) & 0endpmatrix,$$
    with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle.



    In particular I'm interested in obtaining numeric solutions at $theta=2pi$ depending on the extra parameter $lambda$. I'm fairly new using Mathematica, and this is what I have tried so far:



    T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
    A[θ_] =
    0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
    1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
    ;
    sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];


    The previous code sets the system that I want to solve and now I try to solve numerically. First I've tried



    NSol = NDSolve[
    sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
    T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ],
    θ,
    θ, 0, 2 Pi
    ];


    which gives me the output



    NDSolve::dupv: "Duplicate variable θ found in NDSolve[<<1>>]."


    I have also tried



    Nsol2 = ParametricNDSolve[
    sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
    T11, T12, T21, T22,
    θ, 0, 2 Pi,
    λ
    ];


    which gives me as output $T_11,dots,T_22$ as ParametricFunctions depending on each other and on $lambda$.



    I don't know if this is the right approach and, if so, how to extract a numeric expression depending on $lambda$ from the last output - all that I've seen in the documentation are examples that are plotted for specific values of the parameter. Any help is much appreciated.



    EDIT




    Following the comments in one of the answers I'd like to explain further: the output that I would like to obtain is some sort of function depending of the parameter $lambda$ that I can manipulate afterwards. Say for instance, computing the series expansion of powers of $lambda$ of my solution. I don't know how to treat the ParametricFunction that I obtain to do such computations.











    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I would like to solve a $2times 2$ system of the form
      $$fracddthetaT=TA,quad T(0)=Id$$
      where $theta$ is real and $A$ is of the form
      $$A=beginpmatrix 0 & frace^-i thetalambda\ frac136e^-ithetaleft(9lambda + 2(lambda-1)^2 (6costheta + cos2theta + 6)right) & 0endpmatrix,$$
      with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle.



      In particular I'm interested in obtaining numeric solutions at $theta=2pi$ depending on the extra parameter $lambda$. I'm fairly new using Mathematica, and this is what I have tried so far:



      T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
      A[θ_] =
      0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
      1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
      ;
      sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];


      The previous code sets the system that I want to solve and now I try to solve numerically. First I've tried



      NSol = NDSolve[
      sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
      T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ],
      θ,
      θ, 0, 2 Pi
      ];


      which gives me the output



      NDSolve::dupv: "Duplicate variable θ found in NDSolve[<<1>>]."


      I have also tried



      Nsol2 = ParametricNDSolve[
      sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
      T11, T12, T21, T22,
      θ, 0, 2 Pi,
      λ
      ];


      which gives me as output $T_11,dots,T_22$ as ParametricFunctions depending on each other and on $lambda$.



      I don't know if this is the right approach and, if so, how to extract a numeric expression depending on $lambda$ from the last output - all that I've seen in the documentation are examples that are plotted for specific values of the parameter. Any help is much appreciated.



      EDIT




      Following the comments in one of the answers I'd like to explain further: the output that I would like to obtain is some sort of function depending of the parameter $lambda$ that I can manipulate afterwards. Say for instance, computing the series expansion of powers of $lambda$ of my solution. I don't know how to treat the ParametricFunction that I obtain to do such computations.











      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I would like to solve a $2times 2$ system of the form
      $$fracddthetaT=TA,quad T(0)=Id$$
      where $theta$ is real and $A$ is of the form
      $$A=beginpmatrix 0 & frace^-i thetalambda\ frac136e^-ithetaleft(9lambda + 2(lambda-1)^2 (6costheta + cos2theta + 6)right) & 0endpmatrix,$$
      with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle.



      In particular I'm interested in obtaining numeric solutions at $theta=2pi$ depending on the extra parameter $lambda$. I'm fairly new using Mathematica, and this is what I have tried so far:



      T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
      A[θ_] =
      0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
      1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
      ;
      sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];


      The previous code sets the system that I want to solve and now I try to solve numerically. First I've tried



      NSol = NDSolve[
      sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
      T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ],
      θ,
      θ, 0, 2 Pi
      ];


      which gives me the output



      NDSolve::dupv: "Duplicate variable θ found in NDSolve[<<1>>]."


      I have also tried



      Nsol2 = ParametricNDSolve[
      sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
      T11, T12, T21, T22,
      θ, 0, 2 Pi,
      λ
      ];


      which gives me as output $T_11,dots,T_22$ as ParametricFunctions depending on each other and on $lambda$.



      I don't know if this is the right approach and, if so, how to extract a numeric expression depending on $lambda$ from the last output - all that I've seen in the documentation are examples that are plotted for specific values of the parameter. Any help is much appreciated.



      EDIT




      Following the comments in one of the answers I'd like to explain further: the output that I would like to obtain is some sort of function depending of the parameter $lambda$ that I can manipulate afterwards. Say for instance, computing the series expansion of powers of $lambda$ of my solution. I don't know how to treat the ParametricFunction that I obtain to do such computations.








      differential-equations numerical-integration






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Carl Woll

      72.2k395186




      72.2k395186










      asked 2 days ago









      EduEdu

      1476




      1476




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Here is how to obtain the series expansion of the matrix components. First, using a tweaked version (solving for t[2π] instead of t) of JM's formulation:



          A[θ_] = 
          0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
          1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
          ;

          pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[

          t'[θ] == t[θ].A[θ], t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2]
          ,
          t[2π],
          θ, 0, 2π,
          λ
          ];


          Then, pf will return the matrix value at $theta = 2 pi$. For example:



          pf[1]
          pf[Exp[I Pi/3]]



          1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I,
          6.82646*10^-8 - 5.73536*10^-9 I, 1.70661*10^-8 - 1.43384*10^-9 I,
          1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I



          0.985595 + 1.17074 I, -0.425572 + 0.737112 I, -0.788363 - 1.36549 I,
          0.985595 - 1.17074 I




          Finding the series expansion is simple:



          DecimalForm[Series[pf[λ], λ, 1, 5], 4,4] //TeXForm



          $left(
          beginarraycc
          1.0000 & 6.2830 \
          1.5710 & 1.0000 \
          endarray
          right)+left(
          beginarraycc
          0.0000+0.0000 i & -6.2830+0.0000 i \
          1.5710+0.0000 i & 0.0000+0.0000 i \
          endarray
          right) (lambda -1)+left(
          beginarraycc
          0.0000-0.7869 i & 0.6691-0.0000 i \
          0.8799+0.0000 i & -0.0000+0.7869 i \
          endarray
          right) (lambda -1)^2+left(
          beginarraycc
          0.0000+0.7869 i & -1.3380+0.0000 i \
          0.0000+0.0000 i & 0.0000-0.7869 i \
          endarray
          right) (lambda -1)^3+left(
          beginarraycc
          -0.0152-0.4524 i & 1.8410-0.0000 i \
          -0.5708-0.0000 i & -0.0152+0.4524 i \
          endarray
          right) (lambda -1)^4+left(
          beginarraycc
          0.0305+0.1179 i & -2.1780+0.0000 i \
          0.5708-0.0000 i & 0.0305-0.1179 i \
          endarray
          right) (lambda -1)^5+Oleft((lambda -1)^6right)$







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            4












            $begingroup$

            As far as I can tell, you did everything right in your second approach. Classically, Mathematica returns lists of rules as results of solving functions, but in this case, I find this tradition rather confusing and prefer to use ParametricNDSolveValue; it returns a ParametricFunction object that, when applied to a numerical parameter, returns a list of 4 InterpolatingFunction for your 4 functions.



            T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
            A[θ_] = 0, E^(-I θ)/λ, 1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0;
            sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];

            Tsol = ParametricNDSolveValue[sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0,
            T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
            T11, T12, T21, T22,
            θ, 0, 2 Pi,
            λ
            ];


            In order to obtain the numerical values for all the solutions at θ = 2 Pi for a given parameter, say λ = 0.1, you may use Through:



            Through[Tsol[0.1][2. Pi]]



            -0.545795 + 1.00532 I, -1.43497 - 7.95125*10^-7 I, -0.215035 -
            2.80298*10^-8 I, -0.545795 - 1.00532 I




            In order to make that into a function, you may use



            f = λ [Function] Through[Tsol[λ][2. Pi]]





            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
              $endgroup$
              – Edu
              2 days ago


















            3












            $begingroup$

            For this case, you don't even need to write out the components of your matrix function:



            pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[t'[θ] == t[θ].0, Exp[-I θ]/λ,
            Exp[-I θ] (9 λ + 2 (λ - 1)^2
            (6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ] + 6))/36, 0,
            t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2], t, θ, 0, 2 π, λ,
            Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"];

            sol = pf[(3 + 4 I)/5];

            ParametricPlot[ReIm[Tr[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]


            some curve



            ParametricPlot[ReIm[Det[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]


            some other curve



            You can even make a plot where the parameter is varying:



            Plot[Re[Tr[pf[Exp[I ϕ]][2 π]]], ϕ, 0, 2 π]


            yet another curve






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
              $endgroup$
              – Edu
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is slightly pensive
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
              $endgroup$
              – Edu
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is slightly pensive
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
              $endgroup$
              – Edu
              2 days ago











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "387"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194251%2fsolving-system-of-odes-with-extra-parameter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Here is how to obtain the series expansion of the matrix components. First, using a tweaked version (solving for t[2π] instead of t) of JM's formulation:



            A[θ_] = 
            0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
            1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
            ;

            pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[

            t'[θ] == t[θ].A[θ], t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2]
            ,
            t[2π],
            θ, 0, 2π,
            λ
            ];


            Then, pf will return the matrix value at $theta = 2 pi$. For example:



            pf[1]
            pf[Exp[I Pi/3]]



            1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I,
            6.82646*10^-8 - 5.73536*10^-9 I, 1.70661*10^-8 - 1.43384*10^-9 I,
            1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I



            0.985595 + 1.17074 I, -0.425572 + 0.737112 I, -0.788363 - 1.36549 I,
            0.985595 - 1.17074 I




            Finding the series expansion is simple:



            DecimalForm[Series[pf[λ], λ, 1, 5], 4,4] //TeXForm



            $left(
            beginarraycc
            1.0000 & 6.2830 \
            1.5710 & 1.0000 \
            endarray
            right)+left(
            beginarraycc
            0.0000+0.0000 i & -6.2830+0.0000 i \
            1.5710+0.0000 i & 0.0000+0.0000 i \
            endarray
            right) (lambda -1)+left(
            beginarraycc
            0.0000-0.7869 i & 0.6691-0.0000 i \
            0.8799+0.0000 i & -0.0000+0.7869 i \
            endarray
            right) (lambda -1)^2+left(
            beginarraycc
            0.0000+0.7869 i & -1.3380+0.0000 i \
            0.0000+0.0000 i & 0.0000-0.7869 i \
            endarray
            right) (lambda -1)^3+left(
            beginarraycc
            -0.0152-0.4524 i & 1.8410-0.0000 i \
            -0.5708-0.0000 i & -0.0152+0.4524 i \
            endarray
            right) (lambda -1)^4+left(
            beginarraycc
            0.0305+0.1179 i & -2.1780+0.0000 i \
            0.5708-0.0000 i & 0.0305-0.1179 i \
            endarray
            right) (lambda -1)^5+Oleft((lambda -1)^6right)$







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              Here is how to obtain the series expansion of the matrix components. First, using a tweaked version (solving for t[2π] instead of t) of JM's formulation:



              A[θ_] = 
              0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
              1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
              ;

              pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[

              t'[θ] == t[θ].A[θ], t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2]
              ,
              t[2π],
              θ, 0, 2π,
              λ
              ];


              Then, pf will return the matrix value at $theta = 2 pi$. For example:



              pf[1]
              pf[Exp[I Pi/3]]



              1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I,
              6.82646*10^-8 - 5.73536*10^-9 I, 1.70661*10^-8 - 1.43384*10^-9 I,
              1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I



              0.985595 + 1.17074 I, -0.425572 + 0.737112 I, -0.788363 - 1.36549 I,
              0.985595 - 1.17074 I




              Finding the series expansion is simple:



              DecimalForm[Series[pf[λ], λ, 1, 5], 4,4] //TeXForm



              $left(
              beginarraycc
              1.0000 & 6.2830 \
              1.5710 & 1.0000 \
              endarray
              right)+left(
              beginarraycc
              0.0000+0.0000 i & -6.2830+0.0000 i \
              1.5710+0.0000 i & 0.0000+0.0000 i \
              endarray
              right) (lambda -1)+left(
              beginarraycc
              0.0000-0.7869 i & 0.6691-0.0000 i \
              0.8799+0.0000 i & -0.0000+0.7869 i \
              endarray
              right) (lambda -1)^2+left(
              beginarraycc
              0.0000+0.7869 i & -1.3380+0.0000 i \
              0.0000+0.0000 i & 0.0000-0.7869 i \
              endarray
              right) (lambda -1)^3+left(
              beginarraycc
              -0.0152-0.4524 i & 1.8410-0.0000 i \
              -0.5708-0.0000 i & -0.0152+0.4524 i \
              endarray
              right) (lambda -1)^4+left(
              beginarraycc
              0.0305+0.1179 i & -2.1780+0.0000 i \
              0.5708-0.0000 i & 0.0305-0.1179 i \
              endarray
              right) (lambda -1)^5+Oleft((lambda -1)^6right)$







              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Here is how to obtain the series expansion of the matrix components. First, using a tweaked version (solving for t[2π] instead of t) of JM's formulation:



                A[θ_] = 
                0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
                1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
                ;

                pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[

                t'[θ] == t[θ].A[θ], t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2]
                ,
                t[2π],
                θ, 0, 2π,
                λ
                ];


                Then, pf will return the matrix value at $theta = 2 pi$. For example:



                pf[1]
                pf[Exp[I Pi/3]]



                1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I,
                6.82646*10^-8 - 5.73536*10^-9 I, 1.70661*10^-8 - 1.43384*10^-9 I,
                1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I



                0.985595 + 1.17074 I, -0.425572 + 0.737112 I, -0.788363 - 1.36549 I,
                0.985595 - 1.17074 I




                Finding the series expansion is simple:



                DecimalForm[Series[pf[λ], λ, 1, 5], 4,4] //TeXForm



                $left(
                beginarraycc
                1.0000 & 6.2830 \
                1.5710 & 1.0000 \
                endarray
                right)+left(
                beginarraycc
                0.0000+0.0000 i & -6.2830+0.0000 i \
                1.5710+0.0000 i & 0.0000+0.0000 i \
                endarray
                right) (lambda -1)+left(
                beginarraycc
                0.0000-0.7869 i & 0.6691-0.0000 i \
                0.8799+0.0000 i & -0.0000+0.7869 i \
                endarray
                right) (lambda -1)^2+left(
                beginarraycc
                0.0000+0.7869 i & -1.3380+0.0000 i \
                0.0000+0.0000 i & 0.0000-0.7869 i \
                endarray
                right) (lambda -1)^3+left(
                beginarraycc
                -0.0152-0.4524 i & 1.8410-0.0000 i \
                -0.5708-0.0000 i & -0.0152+0.4524 i \
                endarray
                right) (lambda -1)^4+left(
                beginarraycc
                0.0305+0.1179 i & -2.1780+0.0000 i \
                0.5708-0.0000 i & 0.0305-0.1179 i \
                endarray
                right) (lambda -1)^5+Oleft((lambda -1)^6right)$







                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Here is how to obtain the series expansion of the matrix components. First, using a tweaked version (solving for t[2π] instead of t) of JM's formulation:



                A[θ_] = 
                0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
                1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
                ;

                pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[

                t'[θ] == t[θ].A[θ], t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2]
                ,
                t[2π],
                θ, 0, 2π,
                λ
                ];


                Then, pf will return the matrix value at $theta = 2 pi$. For example:



                pf[1]
                pf[Exp[I Pi/3]]



                1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I,
                6.82646*10^-8 - 5.73536*10^-9 I, 1.70661*10^-8 - 1.43384*10^-9 I,
                1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I



                0.985595 + 1.17074 I, -0.425572 + 0.737112 I, -0.788363 - 1.36549 I,
                0.985595 - 1.17074 I




                Finding the series expansion is simple:



                DecimalForm[Series[pf[λ], λ, 1, 5], 4,4] //TeXForm



                $left(
                beginarraycc
                1.0000 & 6.2830 \
                1.5710 & 1.0000 \
                endarray
                right)+left(
                beginarraycc
                0.0000+0.0000 i & -6.2830+0.0000 i \
                1.5710+0.0000 i & 0.0000+0.0000 i \
                endarray
                right) (lambda -1)+left(
                beginarraycc
                0.0000-0.7869 i & 0.6691-0.0000 i \
                0.8799+0.0000 i & -0.0000+0.7869 i \
                endarray
                right) (lambda -1)^2+left(
                beginarraycc
                0.0000+0.7869 i & -1.3380+0.0000 i \
                0.0000+0.0000 i & 0.0000-0.7869 i \
                endarray
                right) (lambda -1)^3+left(
                beginarraycc
                -0.0152-0.4524 i & 1.8410-0.0000 i \
                -0.5708-0.0000 i & -0.0152+0.4524 i \
                endarray
                right) (lambda -1)^4+left(
                beginarraycc
                0.0305+0.1179 i & -2.1780+0.0000 i \
                0.5708-0.0000 i & 0.0305-0.1179 i \
                endarray
                right) (lambda -1)^5+Oleft((lambda -1)^6right)$








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                Carl WollCarl Woll

                72.2k395186




                72.2k395186





















                    4












                    $begingroup$

                    As far as I can tell, you did everything right in your second approach. Classically, Mathematica returns lists of rules as results of solving functions, but in this case, I find this tradition rather confusing and prefer to use ParametricNDSolveValue; it returns a ParametricFunction object that, when applied to a numerical parameter, returns a list of 4 InterpolatingFunction for your 4 functions.



                    T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
                    A[θ_] = 0, E^(-I θ)/λ, 1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0;
                    sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];

                    Tsol = ParametricNDSolveValue[sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0,
                    T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
                    T11, T12, T21, T22,
                    θ, 0, 2 Pi,
                    λ
                    ];


                    In order to obtain the numerical values for all the solutions at θ = 2 Pi for a given parameter, say λ = 0.1, you may use Through:



                    Through[Tsol[0.1][2. Pi]]



                    -0.545795 + 1.00532 I, -1.43497 - 7.95125*10^-7 I, -0.215035 -
                    2.80298*10^-8 I, -0.545795 - 1.00532 I




                    In order to make that into a function, you may use



                    f = λ [Function] Through[Tsol[λ][2. Pi]]





                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago















                    4












                    $begingroup$

                    As far as I can tell, you did everything right in your second approach. Classically, Mathematica returns lists of rules as results of solving functions, but in this case, I find this tradition rather confusing and prefer to use ParametricNDSolveValue; it returns a ParametricFunction object that, when applied to a numerical parameter, returns a list of 4 InterpolatingFunction for your 4 functions.



                    T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
                    A[θ_] = 0, E^(-I θ)/λ, 1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0;
                    sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];

                    Tsol = ParametricNDSolveValue[sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0,
                    T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
                    T11, T12, T21, T22,
                    θ, 0, 2 Pi,
                    λ
                    ];


                    In order to obtain the numerical values for all the solutions at θ = 2 Pi for a given parameter, say λ = 0.1, you may use Through:



                    Through[Tsol[0.1][2. Pi]]



                    -0.545795 + 1.00532 I, -1.43497 - 7.95125*10^-7 I, -0.215035 -
                    2.80298*10^-8 I, -0.545795 - 1.00532 I




                    In order to make that into a function, you may use



                    f = λ [Function] Through[Tsol[λ][2. Pi]]





                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago













                    4












                    4








                    4





                    $begingroup$

                    As far as I can tell, you did everything right in your second approach. Classically, Mathematica returns lists of rules as results of solving functions, but in this case, I find this tradition rather confusing and prefer to use ParametricNDSolveValue; it returns a ParametricFunction object that, when applied to a numerical parameter, returns a list of 4 InterpolatingFunction for your 4 functions.



                    T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
                    A[θ_] = 0, E^(-I θ)/λ, 1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0;
                    sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];

                    Tsol = ParametricNDSolveValue[sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0,
                    T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
                    T11, T12, T21, T22,
                    θ, 0, 2 Pi,
                    λ
                    ];


                    In order to obtain the numerical values for all the solutions at θ = 2 Pi for a given parameter, say λ = 0.1, you may use Through:



                    Through[Tsol[0.1][2. Pi]]



                    -0.545795 + 1.00532 I, -1.43497 - 7.95125*10^-7 I, -0.215035 -
                    2.80298*10^-8 I, -0.545795 - 1.00532 I




                    In order to make that into a function, you may use



                    f = λ [Function] Through[Tsol[λ][2. Pi]]





                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    As far as I can tell, you did everything right in your second approach. Classically, Mathematica returns lists of rules as results of solving functions, but in this case, I find this tradition rather confusing and prefer to use ParametricNDSolveValue; it returns a ParametricFunction object that, when applied to a numerical parameter, returns a list of 4 InterpolatingFunction for your 4 functions.



                    T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
                    A[θ_] = 0, E^(-I θ)/λ, 1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0;
                    sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];

                    Tsol = ParametricNDSolveValue[sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0,
                    T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
                    T11, T12, T21, T22,
                    θ, 0, 2 Pi,
                    λ
                    ];


                    In order to obtain the numerical values for all the solutions at θ = 2 Pi for a given parameter, say λ = 0.1, you may use Through:



                    Through[Tsol[0.1][2. Pi]]



                    -0.545795 + 1.00532 I, -1.43497 - 7.95125*10^-7 I, -0.215035 -
                    2.80298*10^-8 I, -0.545795 - 1.00532 I




                    In order to make that into a function, you may use



                    f = λ [Function] Through[Tsol[λ][2. Pi]]






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 2 days ago

























                    answered 2 days ago









                    Henrik SchumacherHenrik Schumacher

                    58.7k581162




                    58.7k581162











                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago















                    $begingroup$
                    Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Edu
                    2 days ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Edu
                    2 days ago











                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    For this case, you don't even need to write out the components of your matrix function:



                    pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[t'[θ] == t[θ].0, Exp[-I θ]/λ,
                    Exp[-I θ] (9 λ + 2 (λ - 1)^2
                    (6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ] + 6))/36, 0,
                    t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2], t, θ, 0, 2 π, λ,
                    Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"];

                    sol = pf[(3 + 4 I)/5];

                    ParametricPlot[ReIm[Tr[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]


                    some curve



                    ParametricPlot[ReIm[Det[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]


                    some other curve



                    You can even make a plot where the parameter is varying:



                    Plot[Re[Tr[pf[Exp[I ϕ]][2 π]]], ϕ, 0, 2 π]


                    yet another curve






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. M. is slightly pensive
                      2 days ago











                    • $begingroup$
                      Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. M. is slightly pensive
                      2 days ago











                    • $begingroup$
                      For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago















                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    For this case, you don't even need to write out the components of your matrix function:



                    pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[t'[θ] == t[θ].0, Exp[-I θ]/λ,
                    Exp[-I θ] (9 λ + 2 (λ - 1)^2
                    (6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ] + 6))/36, 0,
                    t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2], t, θ, 0, 2 π, λ,
                    Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"];

                    sol = pf[(3 + 4 I)/5];

                    ParametricPlot[ReIm[Tr[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]


                    some curve



                    ParametricPlot[ReIm[Det[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]


                    some other curve



                    You can even make a plot where the parameter is varying:



                    Plot[Re[Tr[pf[Exp[I ϕ]][2 π]]], ϕ, 0, 2 π]


                    yet another curve






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. M. is slightly pensive
                      2 days ago











                    • $begingroup$
                      Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. M. is slightly pensive
                      2 days ago











                    • $begingroup$
                      For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago













                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    For this case, you don't even need to write out the components of your matrix function:



                    pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[t'[θ] == t[θ].0, Exp[-I θ]/λ,
                    Exp[-I θ] (9 λ + 2 (λ - 1)^2
                    (6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ] + 6))/36, 0,
                    t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2], t, θ, 0, 2 π, λ,
                    Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"];

                    sol = pf[(3 + 4 I)/5];

                    ParametricPlot[ReIm[Tr[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]


                    some curve



                    ParametricPlot[ReIm[Det[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]


                    some other curve



                    You can even make a plot where the parameter is varying:



                    Plot[Re[Tr[pf[Exp[I ϕ]][2 π]]], ϕ, 0, 2 π]


                    yet another curve






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    For this case, you don't even need to write out the components of your matrix function:



                    pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[t'[θ] == t[θ].0, Exp[-I θ]/λ,
                    Exp[-I θ] (9 λ + 2 (λ - 1)^2
                    (6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ] + 6))/36, 0,
                    t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2], t, θ, 0, 2 π, λ,
                    Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"];

                    sol = pf[(3 + 4 I)/5];

                    ParametricPlot[ReIm[Tr[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]


                    some curve



                    ParametricPlot[ReIm[Det[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]


                    some other curve



                    You can even make a plot where the parameter is varying:



                    Plot[Re[Tr[pf[Exp[I ϕ]][2 π]]], ϕ, 0, 2 π]


                    yet another curve







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    answered 2 days ago


























                    community wiki





                    J. M. is slightly pensive












                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. M. is slightly pensive
                      2 days ago











                    • $begingroup$
                      Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. M. is slightly pensive
                      2 days ago











                    • $begingroup$
                      For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. M. is slightly pensive
                      2 days ago











                    • $begingroup$
                      Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
                      $endgroup$
                      – J. M. is slightly pensive
                      2 days ago











                    • $begingroup$
                      For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Edu
                      2 days ago















                    $begingroup$
                    Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
                    $endgroup$
                    – Edu
                    2 days ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
                    $endgroup$
                    – Edu
                    2 days ago












                    $begingroup$
                    That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
                    $endgroup$
                    – J. M. is slightly pensive
                    2 days ago





                    $begingroup$
                    That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
                    $endgroup$
                    – J. M. is slightly pensive
                    2 days ago













                    $begingroup$
                    Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Edu
                    2 days ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Edu
                    2 days ago












                    $begingroup$
                    You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
                    $endgroup$
                    – J. M. is slightly pensive
                    2 days ago





                    $begingroup$
                    You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
                    $endgroup$
                    – J. M. is slightly pensive
                    2 days ago













                    $begingroup$
                    For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Edu
                    2 days ago




                    $begingroup$
                    For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Edu
                    2 days ago

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194251%2fsolving-system-of-odes-with-extra-parameter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221

                    Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given

                    Creating closest line along the point''s azimuth using PostgreSQL Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Drawing line between points at specific distance in PostGIS?How to efficiently find the closest point over the dateline?How to find the nearest point by using PostGIS function?PostGIS nearest point with LATERAL JOIN in PostgreSQL 9.3+Creating a table and inserting selected streets using plpgsql functionsCreating a table that stores Distances and other columnSaving select query results (year wise) from PostgreSQL/PostGIS to text filesWhat is the information behind this geometry?How to give start and end vertex ids dynamically in pgr_dijkstra?Point to Polygon nearest distance DS_distance is not using geography index & knn <-> or <#> does not give result in orderLine to point conversion with start point and end point detection?