Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat does this component do in this series pass regulatorSeries and Parallel CircuitSimplifying Series/ Parallel RC circuitled wont turn on in series circuitHow to determine total circuit voltage and individual component resistance for a series circuitSeries parallel resistor. Circuit redrawCircuit redraw. Series and parallel resistors240v Split phase series circuitSeries RL Circuit Transient AnalysisIf the order of any component is altered in a series circuit, will the total voltage be affected?
How to unfasten electrical subpanel attached with ramset
That's an odd coin - I wonder why
Create custom note boxes
Why was Sir Cadogan fired?
Which acid/base does a strong base/acid react when added to a buffer solution?
Ising model simulation
Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?
Find a path from s to t using as few red nodes as possible
Could you use a laser beam as a modulated carrier wave for radio signal?
Free fall ellipse or parabola?
Why can't we say "I have been having a dog"?
Compensation for working overtime on Saturdays
How dangerous is XSS
What difference does it make matching a word with/without a trailing whitespace?
Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees?
pgfplots: How to draw a tangent graph below two others?
What does this strange code stamp on my passport mean?
Is there a rule of thumb for determining the amount one should accept for a settlement offer?
Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed, considered Gaussian?
Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact
Is the offspring between a demon and a celestial possible? If so what is it called and is it in a book somewhere?
Car headlights in a world without electricity
Is it correct to say moon starry nights?
logical reads on global temp table, but not on session-level temp table
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat does this component do in this series pass regulatorSeries and Parallel CircuitSimplifying Series/ Parallel RC circuitled wont turn on in series circuitHow to determine total circuit voltage and individual component resistance for a series circuitSeries parallel resistor. Circuit redrawCircuit redraw. Series and parallel resistors240v Split phase series circuitSeries RL Circuit Transient AnalysisIf the order of any component is altered in a series circuit, will the total voltage be affected?
$begingroup$
Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.
(just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)
series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.
(just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)
series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.
(just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)
series
$endgroup$
Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.
(just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)
series
series
asked 2 days ago
InTheMoodForNowInTheMoodForNow
203
203
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.
There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.
- mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.
- battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.
- some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.
- "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure
- AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions
- The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.
Yes/No/Maybe
That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.
What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?
Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse
Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass
Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?
What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?
What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?
What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.
Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:
[Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.
Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.
Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.
In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429801%2fis-there-a-way-to-bypass-a-component-in-series-in-a-circuit-if-that-component-fa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.
There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.
- mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.
- battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.
- some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.
- "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure
- AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions
- The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.
Yes/No/Maybe
That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.
What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?
Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse
Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass
Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?
What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?
What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?
What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.
There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.
- mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.
- battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.
- some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.
- "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure
- AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions
- The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.
Yes/No/Maybe
That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.
What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?
Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse
Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass
Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?
What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?
What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?
What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.
There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.
- mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.
- battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.
- some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.
- "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure
- AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions
- The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.
Yes/No/Maybe
That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.
What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?
Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse
Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass
Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?
What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?
What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?
What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?
$endgroup$
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.
There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.
- mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.
- battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.
- some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.
- "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure
- AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions
- The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.
Yes/No/Maybe
That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.
What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?
Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse
Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass
Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?
What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?
What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?
What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?
answered 2 days ago
Sunnyskyguy EE75Sunnyskyguy EE75
70k225101
70k225101
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.
Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:
[Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.
Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.
Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.
In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.
Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:
[Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.
Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.
Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.
In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.
Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:
[Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.
Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.
Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.
In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.
$endgroup$
It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.
Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:
[Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.
Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.
Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.
In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.
answered 2 days ago
TransistorTransistor
88k785189
88k785189
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
2 days ago
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
2 days ago
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.
$endgroup$
Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Sim SonSim Son
12310
12310
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429801%2fis-there-a-way-to-bypass-a-component-in-series-in-a-circuit-if-that-component-fa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown