UK: Is there precedent for the government's e-petition site changing the direction of a government decision? [duplicate] The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhich, if any, UK parliament petitions have ever succeeded?In models of income distribution, is inequality a natural outcome?Have any of the “We the People” petitions ever resulted in policy changes?Any online petition platform that will deliver signatures to target only?Which, if any, UK parliament petitions have ever succeeded?Is there a name for a voting system that is based on issues rather than people?Has the Trump administration so far responded to any of the “We the people” petitions?What is the US 'Deep State' and what evidence is there for it?Does this European Citizen's Initiative have any chance of success?Does “government” mean something different in British and American English?What is the most effective way to participate democratically as a regular citizen in a stable parliamentary democracy?

"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"

How come people say “Would of”?

What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?

How to create dashed lines/arrows in Illustrator

Why could you hear an Amstrad CPC working?

How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?

Why Did Howard Stark Use All The Vibranium They Had On A Prototype Shield?

Can we apply L'Hospital's rule where the derivative is not continuous?

Spanish for "widget"

Pristine Bit Checking

Should I write numbers in words or as numerals when there are multiple next to each other?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Why is it "Tumoren" and not "Tumore"?

Why don't Unix/Linux systems traverse through directories until they find the required version of a linked library?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?

How to change the limits of integration

Is it possible for the two major parties in the UK to form a coalition with each other instead of a much smaller party?

Patience, young "Padovan"

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

Carnot-Caratheodory metric

What is this 4-propeller plane?

Why is the maximum length of openwrt’s root password 8 characters?



UK: Is there precedent for the government's e-petition site changing the direction of a government decision? [duplicate]



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhich, if any, UK parliament petitions have ever succeeded?In models of income distribution, is inequality a natural outcome?Have any of the “We the People” petitions ever resulted in policy changes?Any online petition platform that will deliver signatures to target only?Which, if any, UK parliament petitions have ever succeeded?Is there a name for a voting system that is based on issues rather than people?Has the Trump administration so far responded to any of the “We the people” petitions?What is the US 'Deep State' and what evidence is there for it?Does this European Citizen's Initiative have any chance of success?Does “government” mean something different in British and American English?What is the most effective way to participate democratically as a regular citizen in a stable parliamentary democracy?










14
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Which, if any, UK parliament petitions have ever succeeded?

    3 answers



In 2006 the UK government implemented a website for 'e-petitions' to streamline the process of petitioning the government on specific issues.



The problem I have with this system is that the most signed petitions in history have all failed to produce a change of direction by the government.



They are listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_Parliament_petitions_website



It appears, from a few years' experience with this system, and some research into it, that the only way for a petition to be successful is for the government to have already decided to take the course of action being petitioned for.



Is there any recorded instances of an e-petition changing the government's policy on a specific issue?



Note: I'm not asking if petitions have been responded to, or debated in parliament. I'm asking for instances of a petition precipitating a change in policy.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by David Grinberg, JJJ, bytebuster, John, Brythan Apr 5 at 2:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 6





    "The problem I have with this system is that the most signed petitions in history have all been ignored by the government." - Do you mean "ignored" as in "didn't do what the petition demanded"? Aside from the question of false signatures, why should the Government do what a petition demands? People have false expectations of the petitions system - they seem to expect something like Swiss popular initiatives (not Swiss petitions, which operate similarly to the UK's).

    – Lag
    Apr 4 at 14:21












  • That said, the Hansard Society has a good article hansardsociety.org.uk/blog/… (found at your Wikipedia link)

    – Lag
    Apr 4 at 14:21












  • @DavidGrinberg at the time the accepted answer for that question was written, only 9 of the 59 parliamentary debates that have been held on petitions to date had already taken place. The earliest of the three policy changes that I've identified here as coming after such a debate wasn't made until a couple of months after that. What's the policy here for questions that become out-of-date? Should the answers be updated or is a duplicate question posed at a different time considered appropriate?

    – Will
    Apr 5 at 1:54















14
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Which, if any, UK parliament petitions have ever succeeded?

    3 answers



In 2006 the UK government implemented a website for 'e-petitions' to streamline the process of petitioning the government on specific issues.



The problem I have with this system is that the most signed petitions in history have all failed to produce a change of direction by the government.



They are listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_Parliament_petitions_website



It appears, from a few years' experience with this system, and some research into it, that the only way for a petition to be successful is for the government to have already decided to take the course of action being petitioned for.



Is there any recorded instances of an e-petition changing the government's policy on a specific issue?



Note: I'm not asking if petitions have been responded to, or debated in parliament. I'm asking for instances of a petition precipitating a change in policy.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by David Grinberg, JJJ, bytebuster, John, Brythan Apr 5 at 2:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 6





    "The problem I have with this system is that the most signed petitions in history have all been ignored by the government." - Do you mean "ignored" as in "didn't do what the petition demanded"? Aside from the question of false signatures, why should the Government do what a petition demands? People have false expectations of the petitions system - they seem to expect something like Swiss popular initiatives (not Swiss petitions, which operate similarly to the UK's).

    – Lag
    Apr 4 at 14:21












  • That said, the Hansard Society has a good article hansardsociety.org.uk/blog/… (found at your Wikipedia link)

    – Lag
    Apr 4 at 14:21












  • @DavidGrinberg at the time the accepted answer for that question was written, only 9 of the 59 parliamentary debates that have been held on petitions to date had already taken place. The earliest of the three policy changes that I've identified here as coming after such a debate wasn't made until a couple of months after that. What's the policy here for questions that become out-of-date? Should the answers be updated or is a duplicate question posed at a different time considered appropriate?

    – Will
    Apr 5 at 1:54













14












14








14


1







This question already has an answer here:



  • Which, if any, UK parliament petitions have ever succeeded?

    3 answers



In 2006 the UK government implemented a website for 'e-petitions' to streamline the process of petitioning the government on specific issues.



The problem I have with this system is that the most signed petitions in history have all failed to produce a change of direction by the government.



They are listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_Parliament_petitions_website



It appears, from a few years' experience with this system, and some research into it, that the only way for a petition to be successful is for the government to have already decided to take the course of action being petitioned for.



Is there any recorded instances of an e-petition changing the government's policy on a specific issue?



Note: I'm not asking if petitions have been responded to, or debated in parliament. I'm asking for instances of a petition precipitating a change in policy.










share|improve this question

















This question already has an answer here:



  • Which, if any, UK parliament petitions have ever succeeded?

    3 answers



In 2006 the UK government implemented a website for 'e-petitions' to streamline the process of petitioning the government on specific issues.



The problem I have with this system is that the most signed petitions in history have all failed to produce a change of direction by the government.



They are listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_Parliament_petitions_website



It appears, from a few years' experience with this system, and some research into it, that the only way for a petition to be successful is for the government to have already decided to take the course of action being petitioned for.



Is there any recorded instances of an e-petition changing the government's policy on a specific issue?



Note: I'm not asking if petitions have been responded to, or debated in parliament. I'm asking for instances of a petition precipitating a change in policy.





This question already has an answer here:



  • Which, if any, UK parliament petitions have ever succeeded?

    3 answers







united-kingdom democracy petition






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 5 at 2:02









Brythan

70.3k8147237




70.3k8147237










asked Apr 4 at 13:05









AJFaradayAJFaraday

6851823




6851823




marked as duplicate by David Grinberg, JJJ, bytebuster, John, Brythan Apr 5 at 2:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by David Grinberg, JJJ, bytebuster, John, Brythan Apr 5 at 2:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 6





    "The problem I have with this system is that the most signed petitions in history have all been ignored by the government." - Do you mean "ignored" as in "didn't do what the petition demanded"? Aside from the question of false signatures, why should the Government do what a petition demands? People have false expectations of the petitions system - they seem to expect something like Swiss popular initiatives (not Swiss petitions, which operate similarly to the UK's).

    – Lag
    Apr 4 at 14:21












  • That said, the Hansard Society has a good article hansardsociety.org.uk/blog/… (found at your Wikipedia link)

    – Lag
    Apr 4 at 14:21












  • @DavidGrinberg at the time the accepted answer for that question was written, only 9 of the 59 parliamentary debates that have been held on petitions to date had already taken place. The earliest of the three policy changes that I've identified here as coming after such a debate wasn't made until a couple of months after that. What's the policy here for questions that become out-of-date? Should the answers be updated or is a duplicate question posed at a different time considered appropriate?

    – Will
    Apr 5 at 1:54












  • 6





    "The problem I have with this system is that the most signed petitions in history have all been ignored by the government." - Do you mean "ignored" as in "didn't do what the petition demanded"? Aside from the question of false signatures, why should the Government do what a petition demands? People have false expectations of the petitions system - they seem to expect something like Swiss popular initiatives (not Swiss petitions, which operate similarly to the UK's).

    – Lag
    Apr 4 at 14:21












  • That said, the Hansard Society has a good article hansardsociety.org.uk/blog/… (found at your Wikipedia link)

    – Lag
    Apr 4 at 14:21












  • @DavidGrinberg at the time the accepted answer for that question was written, only 9 of the 59 parliamentary debates that have been held on petitions to date had already taken place. The earliest of the three policy changes that I've identified here as coming after such a debate wasn't made until a couple of months after that. What's the policy here for questions that become out-of-date? Should the answers be updated or is a duplicate question posed at a different time considered appropriate?

    – Will
    Apr 5 at 1:54







6




6





"The problem I have with this system is that the most signed petitions in history have all been ignored by the government." - Do you mean "ignored" as in "didn't do what the petition demanded"? Aside from the question of false signatures, why should the Government do what a petition demands? People have false expectations of the petitions system - they seem to expect something like Swiss popular initiatives (not Swiss petitions, which operate similarly to the UK's).

– Lag
Apr 4 at 14:21






"The problem I have with this system is that the most signed petitions in history have all been ignored by the government." - Do you mean "ignored" as in "didn't do what the petition demanded"? Aside from the question of false signatures, why should the Government do what a petition demands? People have false expectations of the petitions system - they seem to expect something like Swiss popular initiatives (not Swiss petitions, which operate similarly to the UK's).

– Lag
Apr 4 at 14:21














That said, the Hansard Society has a good article hansardsociety.org.uk/blog/… (found at your Wikipedia link)

– Lag
Apr 4 at 14:21






That said, the Hansard Society has a good article hansardsociety.org.uk/blog/… (found at your Wikipedia link)

– Lag
Apr 4 at 14:21














@DavidGrinberg at the time the accepted answer for that question was written, only 9 of the 59 parliamentary debates that have been held on petitions to date had already taken place. The earliest of the three policy changes that I've identified here as coming after such a debate wasn't made until a couple of months after that. What's the policy here for questions that become out-of-date? Should the answers be updated or is a duplicate question posed at a different time considered appropriate?

– Will
Apr 5 at 1:54





@DavidGrinberg at the time the accepted answer for that question was written, only 9 of the 59 parliamentary debates that have been held on petitions to date had already taken place. The earliest of the three policy changes that I've identified here as coming after such a debate wasn't made until a couple of months after that. What's the policy here for questions that become out-of-date? Should the answers be updated or is a duplicate question posed at a different time considered appropriate?

– Will
Apr 5 at 1:54










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11














Not Directly



I can find no record of a petition from this source precipitating a clear change in government policy. That said, they can have more indirect effects. Anecdotally, far more politicians seemed comfortable speaking about directly revoking Article 50 after the recent popular petition on the subject.

While it is difficult to assess every factor in this (or any) situation, it seems plausible that knowing the extent of public support contributed.



Essentially, I do not know of any clear change in policy caused through the e-petition site, but these petitions can still shape the conversation and affect public opinion, changing the policies of the current and future governments more subtly.






share|improve this answer






























    4














    This depends on the test you apply to a given petition to decide if it's resulted in a policy change of the type you're searching for.



    Has a government ever directly attributed its policy changes to a petition on Parliament's website? Not to my knowledge. But this test is a distortion of the purpose of petitions in general.



    The indirect goal of a petition might be to change a policy, but its more direct objective is to produce quantifiable evidence of the strength of public opinion in favour of that change. Petitioners have reasonable hope that this will indirectly accomplish the greater goal because governments do care about public opinion, and so a successful petition may contribute to a chain of events:



    1. The government sees the petition and perceives that public opinion is stronger than if nobody had bothered to create or sign one.

    2. The government perceives that opposing public opinion on this issue will be harmful to their electoral chances in future.

    3. The government is more sympathetic to a change of policy because future electoral success always features highly on their list of priorities.

    Even setting aside the question of the role of petitions in assessing public opinion, it's very difficult to find a government making any acknowledgement of the influence of public opinion on their decision. They will always prefer to claim that the new policy is the natural conclusion of the policy they had all along, or that they thought very carefully on principled grounds and arrived at the same conclusion as the public, or that the facts changed and the new policy is now the obvious choice. But it's universally understood that politicians make their decisions on more self-serving grounds than they let on, and pleasing a soon-to-be-voting-again public is one of those grounds.



    With this in mind, the closest we can really get to testing the effectiveness of a petition is whether the government eventually changed its policy in the petition's favour. We will never know if the same decisions would have been made without the petition, but we can also say for certain that there was some reflection about public opinion involved (because the same is true for every political decision) and be reasonably confident that the petition makes some sort of difference to the government's perception of that public opinion.



    So which petitions have preceded a government policy change in their favour? I thumbed through the full list of 59 petitions that have been debated in Parliament and there are three that I think can be said to meet this test:




    • Scrap the pay cap and give public servants a meaningful pay rise (debated December 2017, first pay increases in excess of the cap approved March 2017)


    • Ban the sale of puppies by pet shops & all commercial 3rd party dealers. (debated May 2018, announced as Government policy December 2018)


    • Increase funding for schools (not exactly very specific, but the Government is able to claim they have done this to at least some extent)

    Additionally, Make Orkambi available on the NHS for people with Cystic Fibrosis is the subject of an ongoing parliamentary inquiry so could join this list in the course of time.



    An incredible number of the remaining are either Brexit-related demands (generally either completely opposing each other or duplicating similar demands) or request things that aren't obviously opposed to existing Government policy or that are outside the Government's remit. Yet by my count there are still about 20 petitions out of the remaining 53 with specific demands that have been given a firm "no" by the Government. Petitions which are followed by change in their favour are still well in the minority.



    But this is in the nature of petitions. While they can play a role in illustrating the weight of public opinion when government policy shows resistance to yielding to it, if the electoral pressure is too intense it's in the interests of governments to get out ahead of that public opinion and buy an easy win; and there are plenty of other ways to keep tabs on public opinion. Petitions naturally occupy the margin of ideas where it's arguable exactly how much public support there is for an idea and so there's an incentive for its adherents to demonstrate they exist in meaningful numbers. Occasionally this probably does have some effect in politics.






    share|improve this answer





























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      11














      Not Directly



      I can find no record of a petition from this source precipitating a clear change in government policy. That said, they can have more indirect effects. Anecdotally, far more politicians seemed comfortable speaking about directly revoking Article 50 after the recent popular petition on the subject.

      While it is difficult to assess every factor in this (or any) situation, it seems plausible that knowing the extent of public support contributed.



      Essentially, I do not know of any clear change in policy caused through the e-petition site, but these petitions can still shape the conversation and affect public opinion, changing the policies of the current and future governments more subtly.






      share|improve this answer



























        11














        Not Directly



        I can find no record of a petition from this source precipitating a clear change in government policy. That said, they can have more indirect effects. Anecdotally, far more politicians seemed comfortable speaking about directly revoking Article 50 after the recent popular petition on the subject.

        While it is difficult to assess every factor in this (or any) situation, it seems plausible that knowing the extent of public support contributed.



        Essentially, I do not know of any clear change in policy caused through the e-petition site, but these petitions can still shape the conversation and affect public opinion, changing the policies of the current and future governments more subtly.






        share|improve this answer

























          11












          11








          11







          Not Directly



          I can find no record of a petition from this source precipitating a clear change in government policy. That said, they can have more indirect effects. Anecdotally, far more politicians seemed comfortable speaking about directly revoking Article 50 after the recent popular petition on the subject.

          While it is difficult to assess every factor in this (or any) situation, it seems plausible that knowing the extent of public support contributed.



          Essentially, I do not know of any clear change in policy caused through the e-petition site, but these petitions can still shape the conversation and affect public opinion, changing the policies of the current and future governments more subtly.






          share|improve this answer













          Not Directly



          I can find no record of a petition from this source precipitating a clear change in government policy. That said, they can have more indirect effects. Anecdotally, far more politicians seemed comfortable speaking about directly revoking Article 50 after the recent popular petition on the subject.

          While it is difficult to assess every factor in this (or any) situation, it seems plausible that knowing the extent of public support contributed.



          Essentially, I do not know of any clear change in policy caused through the e-petition site, but these petitions can still shape the conversation and affect public opinion, changing the policies of the current and future governments more subtly.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 4 at 13:15









          CoedRhyfelwrCoedRhyfelwr

          2,23121024




          2,23121024





















              4














              This depends on the test you apply to a given petition to decide if it's resulted in a policy change of the type you're searching for.



              Has a government ever directly attributed its policy changes to a petition on Parliament's website? Not to my knowledge. But this test is a distortion of the purpose of petitions in general.



              The indirect goal of a petition might be to change a policy, but its more direct objective is to produce quantifiable evidence of the strength of public opinion in favour of that change. Petitioners have reasonable hope that this will indirectly accomplish the greater goal because governments do care about public opinion, and so a successful petition may contribute to a chain of events:



              1. The government sees the petition and perceives that public opinion is stronger than if nobody had bothered to create or sign one.

              2. The government perceives that opposing public opinion on this issue will be harmful to their electoral chances in future.

              3. The government is more sympathetic to a change of policy because future electoral success always features highly on their list of priorities.

              Even setting aside the question of the role of petitions in assessing public opinion, it's very difficult to find a government making any acknowledgement of the influence of public opinion on their decision. They will always prefer to claim that the new policy is the natural conclusion of the policy they had all along, or that they thought very carefully on principled grounds and arrived at the same conclusion as the public, or that the facts changed and the new policy is now the obvious choice. But it's universally understood that politicians make their decisions on more self-serving grounds than they let on, and pleasing a soon-to-be-voting-again public is one of those grounds.



              With this in mind, the closest we can really get to testing the effectiveness of a petition is whether the government eventually changed its policy in the petition's favour. We will never know if the same decisions would have been made without the petition, but we can also say for certain that there was some reflection about public opinion involved (because the same is true for every political decision) and be reasonably confident that the petition makes some sort of difference to the government's perception of that public opinion.



              So which petitions have preceded a government policy change in their favour? I thumbed through the full list of 59 petitions that have been debated in Parliament and there are three that I think can be said to meet this test:




              • Scrap the pay cap and give public servants a meaningful pay rise (debated December 2017, first pay increases in excess of the cap approved March 2017)


              • Ban the sale of puppies by pet shops & all commercial 3rd party dealers. (debated May 2018, announced as Government policy December 2018)


              • Increase funding for schools (not exactly very specific, but the Government is able to claim they have done this to at least some extent)

              Additionally, Make Orkambi available on the NHS for people with Cystic Fibrosis is the subject of an ongoing parliamentary inquiry so could join this list in the course of time.



              An incredible number of the remaining are either Brexit-related demands (generally either completely opposing each other or duplicating similar demands) or request things that aren't obviously opposed to existing Government policy or that are outside the Government's remit. Yet by my count there are still about 20 petitions out of the remaining 53 with specific demands that have been given a firm "no" by the Government. Petitions which are followed by change in their favour are still well in the minority.



              But this is in the nature of petitions. While they can play a role in illustrating the weight of public opinion when government policy shows resistance to yielding to it, if the electoral pressure is too intense it's in the interests of governments to get out ahead of that public opinion and buy an easy win; and there are plenty of other ways to keep tabs on public opinion. Petitions naturally occupy the margin of ideas where it's arguable exactly how much public support there is for an idea and so there's an incentive for its adherents to demonstrate they exist in meaningful numbers. Occasionally this probably does have some effect in politics.






              share|improve this answer



























                4














                This depends on the test you apply to a given petition to decide if it's resulted in a policy change of the type you're searching for.



                Has a government ever directly attributed its policy changes to a petition on Parliament's website? Not to my knowledge. But this test is a distortion of the purpose of petitions in general.



                The indirect goal of a petition might be to change a policy, but its more direct objective is to produce quantifiable evidence of the strength of public opinion in favour of that change. Petitioners have reasonable hope that this will indirectly accomplish the greater goal because governments do care about public opinion, and so a successful petition may contribute to a chain of events:



                1. The government sees the petition and perceives that public opinion is stronger than if nobody had bothered to create or sign one.

                2. The government perceives that opposing public opinion on this issue will be harmful to their electoral chances in future.

                3. The government is more sympathetic to a change of policy because future electoral success always features highly on their list of priorities.

                Even setting aside the question of the role of petitions in assessing public opinion, it's very difficult to find a government making any acknowledgement of the influence of public opinion on their decision. They will always prefer to claim that the new policy is the natural conclusion of the policy they had all along, or that they thought very carefully on principled grounds and arrived at the same conclusion as the public, or that the facts changed and the new policy is now the obvious choice. But it's universally understood that politicians make their decisions on more self-serving grounds than they let on, and pleasing a soon-to-be-voting-again public is one of those grounds.



                With this in mind, the closest we can really get to testing the effectiveness of a petition is whether the government eventually changed its policy in the petition's favour. We will never know if the same decisions would have been made without the petition, but we can also say for certain that there was some reflection about public opinion involved (because the same is true for every political decision) and be reasonably confident that the petition makes some sort of difference to the government's perception of that public opinion.



                So which petitions have preceded a government policy change in their favour? I thumbed through the full list of 59 petitions that have been debated in Parliament and there are three that I think can be said to meet this test:




                • Scrap the pay cap and give public servants a meaningful pay rise (debated December 2017, first pay increases in excess of the cap approved March 2017)


                • Ban the sale of puppies by pet shops & all commercial 3rd party dealers. (debated May 2018, announced as Government policy December 2018)


                • Increase funding for schools (not exactly very specific, but the Government is able to claim they have done this to at least some extent)

                Additionally, Make Orkambi available on the NHS for people with Cystic Fibrosis is the subject of an ongoing parliamentary inquiry so could join this list in the course of time.



                An incredible number of the remaining are either Brexit-related demands (generally either completely opposing each other or duplicating similar demands) or request things that aren't obviously opposed to existing Government policy or that are outside the Government's remit. Yet by my count there are still about 20 petitions out of the remaining 53 with specific demands that have been given a firm "no" by the Government. Petitions which are followed by change in their favour are still well in the minority.



                But this is in the nature of petitions. While they can play a role in illustrating the weight of public opinion when government policy shows resistance to yielding to it, if the electoral pressure is too intense it's in the interests of governments to get out ahead of that public opinion and buy an easy win; and there are plenty of other ways to keep tabs on public opinion. Petitions naturally occupy the margin of ideas where it's arguable exactly how much public support there is for an idea and so there's an incentive for its adherents to demonstrate they exist in meaningful numbers. Occasionally this probably does have some effect in politics.






                share|improve this answer

























                  4












                  4








                  4







                  This depends on the test you apply to a given petition to decide if it's resulted in a policy change of the type you're searching for.



                  Has a government ever directly attributed its policy changes to a petition on Parliament's website? Not to my knowledge. But this test is a distortion of the purpose of petitions in general.



                  The indirect goal of a petition might be to change a policy, but its more direct objective is to produce quantifiable evidence of the strength of public opinion in favour of that change. Petitioners have reasonable hope that this will indirectly accomplish the greater goal because governments do care about public opinion, and so a successful petition may contribute to a chain of events:



                  1. The government sees the petition and perceives that public opinion is stronger than if nobody had bothered to create or sign one.

                  2. The government perceives that opposing public opinion on this issue will be harmful to their electoral chances in future.

                  3. The government is more sympathetic to a change of policy because future electoral success always features highly on their list of priorities.

                  Even setting aside the question of the role of petitions in assessing public opinion, it's very difficult to find a government making any acknowledgement of the influence of public opinion on their decision. They will always prefer to claim that the new policy is the natural conclusion of the policy they had all along, or that they thought very carefully on principled grounds and arrived at the same conclusion as the public, or that the facts changed and the new policy is now the obvious choice. But it's universally understood that politicians make their decisions on more self-serving grounds than they let on, and pleasing a soon-to-be-voting-again public is one of those grounds.



                  With this in mind, the closest we can really get to testing the effectiveness of a petition is whether the government eventually changed its policy in the petition's favour. We will never know if the same decisions would have been made without the petition, but we can also say for certain that there was some reflection about public opinion involved (because the same is true for every political decision) and be reasonably confident that the petition makes some sort of difference to the government's perception of that public opinion.



                  So which petitions have preceded a government policy change in their favour? I thumbed through the full list of 59 petitions that have been debated in Parliament and there are three that I think can be said to meet this test:




                  • Scrap the pay cap and give public servants a meaningful pay rise (debated December 2017, first pay increases in excess of the cap approved March 2017)


                  • Ban the sale of puppies by pet shops & all commercial 3rd party dealers. (debated May 2018, announced as Government policy December 2018)


                  • Increase funding for schools (not exactly very specific, but the Government is able to claim they have done this to at least some extent)

                  Additionally, Make Orkambi available on the NHS for people with Cystic Fibrosis is the subject of an ongoing parliamentary inquiry so could join this list in the course of time.



                  An incredible number of the remaining are either Brexit-related demands (generally either completely opposing each other or duplicating similar demands) or request things that aren't obviously opposed to existing Government policy or that are outside the Government's remit. Yet by my count there are still about 20 petitions out of the remaining 53 with specific demands that have been given a firm "no" by the Government. Petitions which are followed by change in their favour are still well in the minority.



                  But this is in the nature of petitions. While they can play a role in illustrating the weight of public opinion when government policy shows resistance to yielding to it, if the electoral pressure is too intense it's in the interests of governments to get out ahead of that public opinion and buy an easy win; and there are plenty of other ways to keep tabs on public opinion. Petitions naturally occupy the margin of ideas where it's arguable exactly how much public support there is for an idea and so there's an incentive for its adherents to demonstrate they exist in meaningful numbers. Occasionally this probably does have some effect in politics.






                  share|improve this answer













                  This depends on the test you apply to a given petition to decide if it's resulted in a policy change of the type you're searching for.



                  Has a government ever directly attributed its policy changes to a petition on Parliament's website? Not to my knowledge. But this test is a distortion of the purpose of petitions in general.



                  The indirect goal of a petition might be to change a policy, but its more direct objective is to produce quantifiable evidence of the strength of public opinion in favour of that change. Petitioners have reasonable hope that this will indirectly accomplish the greater goal because governments do care about public opinion, and so a successful petition may contribute to a chain of events:



                  1. The government sees the petition and perceives that public opinion is stronger than if nobody had bothered to create or sign one.

                  2. The government perceives that opposing public opinion on this issue will be harmful to their electoral chances in future.

                  3. The government is more sympathetic to a change of policy because future electoral success always features highly on their list of priorities.

                  Even setting aside the question of the role of petitions in assessing public opinion, it's very difficult to find a government making any acknowledgement of the influence of public opinion on their decision. They will always prefer to claim that the new policy is the natural conclusion of the policy they had all along, or that they thought very carefully on principled grounds and arrived at the same conclusion as the public, or that the facts changed and the new policy is now the obvious choice. But it's universally understood that politicians make their decisions on more self-serving grounds than they let on, and pleasing a soon-to-be-voting-again public is one of those grounds.



                  With this in mind, the closest we can really get to testing the effectiveness of a petition is whether the government eventually changed its policy in the petition's favour. We will never know if the same decisions would have been made without the petition, but we can also say for certain that there was some reflection about public opinion involved (because the same is true for every political decision) and be reasonably confident that the petition makes some sort of difference to the government's perception of that public opinion.



                  So which petitions have preceded a government policy change in their favour? I thumbed through the full list of 59 petitions that have been debated in Parliament and there are three that I think can be said to meet this test:




                  • Scrap the pay cap and give public servants a meaningful pay rise (debated December 2017, first pay increases in excess of the cap approved March 2017)


                  • Ban the sale of puppies by pet shops & all commercial 3rd party dealers. (debated May 2018, announced as Government policy December 2018)


                  • Increase funding for schools (not exactly very specific, but the Government is able to claim they have done this to at least some extent)

                  Additionally, Make Orkambi available on the NHS for people with Cystic Fibrosis is the subject of an ongoing parliamentary inquiry so could join this list in the course of time.



                  An incredible number of the remaining are either Brexit-related demands (generally either completely opposing each other or duplicating similar demands) or request things that aren't obviously opposed to existing Government policy or that are outside the Government's remit. Yet by my count there are still about 20 petitions out of the remaining 53 with specific demands that have been given a firm "no" by the Government. Petitions which are followed by change in their favour are still well in the minority.



                  But this is in the nature of petitions. While they can play a role in illustrating the weight of public opinion when government policy shows resistance to yielding to it, if the electoral pressure is too intense it's in the interests of governments to get out ahead of that public opinion and buy an easy win; and there are plenty of other ways to keep tabs on public opinion. Petitions naturally occupy the margin of ideas where it's arguable exactly how much public support there is for an idea and so there's an incentive for its adherents to demonstrate they exist in meaningful numbers. Occasionally this probably does have some effect in politics.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 4 at 18:45









                  WillWill

                  25615




                  25615













                      Popular posts from this blog

                      រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

                      Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given

                      Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221