Proving that $g(x)$ defined as $x^2$ on the rationals and $x^4$ on irrationals, is discontinuous at $2$ The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Continuity of a function questionProve continuity on a function at every irrational point and discontinuity at every rational point.Is the following function continuous at $x = 0$?Proofs regarding Continuous functions 2Proving continuity at each irrational on the Modified Dirichlet functionEstablishing the existence of a strictly increasing real function, discontinuous at all rationals and continuous at all irrationalsShow that the function $f$ is continuous only at the irrational pointsContinuity of function varying rationals and irrationalsProve that the function $ f : Bbb R to Bbb R$ is continuous at $ x = 0$ and discontinuous at every $x ne 0$.Increasing function on R that is discontinuous on the rationals

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

60's-70's movie: home appliances revolting against the owners

Do I have Disadvantage attacking with an off-hand weapon?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

Can a flute soloist sit?

Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?

Do warforged have souls?

Is there a way to generate uniformly distributed points on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers per point?

What happens to a Warlock's expended Spell Slots when they gain a Level?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

What's the point in a preamp?

Huge performance difference of the command find with and without using %M option to show permissions

Can the DM override racial traits?

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

One-dimensional Japanese puzzle

Is 'stolen' appropriate word?

Using dividends to reduce short term capital gains?

Simulating Exploding Dice

Do ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN effectively differ, and is there a "canonical" specification of the naturals?

How do spell lists change if the party levels up without taking a long rest?

Are there continuous functions who are the same in an interval but differ in at least one other point?

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

My body leaves; my core can stay



Proving that $g(x)$ defined as $x^2$ on the rationals and $x^4$ on irrationals, is discontinuous at $2$



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Continuity of a function questionProve continuity on a function at every irrational point and discontinuity at every rational point.Is the following function continuous at $x = 0$?Proofs regarding Continuous functions 2Proving continuity at each irrational on the Modified Dirichlet functionEstablishing the existence of a strictly increasing real function, discontinuous at all rationals and continuous at all irrationalsShow that the function $f$ is continuous only at the irrational pointsContinuity of function varying rationals and irrationalsProve that the function $ f : Bbb R to Bbb R$ is continuous at $ x = 0$ and discontinuous at every $x ne 0$.Increasing function on R that is discontinuous on the rationals










1












$begingroup$


Define $g: mathbbR to mathbbR$ by $$g(x) =begincases x^2 & textif x text is rational, \\ x^4 & textif x text is irrational. endcases$$ Prove that $g$ is discontinuous at $x = 2$.



Solution Attempt:



Assume instead that $g$ is continuous at 2. Then since $g(2)= 4$, $;;displaystyle lim_xto2g(x)=4$;



so taking $epsilon=1$, there is a $delta>0$ such that if $0<|x-2|<delta$, then $big|g(x)-4big|<1$.



Therefore if $x$ is irrational and $2-delta<x<2$, then
$big|x^4-4big|<1$



$-1 <x^4-4<1implies 3<x^4<5implies x^4>3 implies x = 3^frac14 implies x < 2$ Contradiction










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




SHajs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Instead of delta-epsilon definition. See the definition using limit of sequences. Note that if you approximate 2 by a sequence of rational numbers you get g(x) approaches 2^2=4. But if you approximate 2 by a sequence of irrational numbers then g(x) approaches 2^4=16. Since the limits of g(x) w.r.t. these sequences don't match then g is discontinuous at 2. (In fact same argument proves that g is discontinuous everywhere, except at 0)
    $endgroup$
    – Julian Mejia
    Apr 7 at 6:03







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x<2$ is not a contradiction. What you should note is that you can choose $delta$ arbitrarily small, so choose $delta$ such that $3^1/4<2-delta$. Then you get a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Julian Mejia
    Apr 7 at 6:07















1












$begingroup$


Define $g: mathbbR to mathbbR$ by $$g(x) =begincases x^2 & textif x text is rational, \\ x^4 & textif x text is irrational. endcases$$ Prove that $g$ is discontinuous at $x = 2$.



Solution Attempt:



Assume instead that $g$ is continuous at 2. Then since $g(2)= 4$, $;;displaystyle lim_xto2g(x)=4$;



so taking $epsilon=1$, there is a $delta>0$ such that if $0<|x-2|<delta$, then $big|g(x)-4big|<1$.



Therefore if $x$ is irrational and $2-delta<x<2$, then
$big|x^4-4big|<1$



$-1 <x^4-4<1implies 3<x^4<5implies x^4>3 implies x = 3^frac14 implies x < 2$ Contradiction










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




SHajs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Instead of delta-epsilon definition. See the definition using limit of sequences. Note that if you approximate 2 by a sequence of rational numbers you get g(x) approaches 2^2=4. But if you approximate 2 by a sequence of irrational numbers then g(x) approaches 2^4=16. Since the limits of g(x) w.r.t. these sequences don't match then g is discontinuous at 2. (In fact same argument proves that g is discontinuous everywhere, except at 0)
    $endgroup$
    – Julian Mejia
    Apr 7 at 6:03







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x<2$ is not a contradiction. What you should note is that you can choose $delta$ arbitrarily small, so choose $delta$ such that $3^1/4<2-delta$. Then you get a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Julian Mejia
    Apr 7 at 6:07













1












1








1





$begingroup$


Define $g: mathbbR to mathbbR$ by $$g(x) =begincases x^2 & textif x text is rational, \\ x^4 & textif x text is irrational. endcases$$ Prove that $g$ is discontinuous at $x = 2$.



Solution Attempt:



Assume instead that $g$ is continuous at 2. Then since $g(2)= 4$, $;;displaystyle lim_xto2g(x)=4$;



so taking $epsilon=1$, there is a $delta>0$ such that if $0<|x-2|<delta$, then $big|g(x)-4big|<1$.



Therefore if $x$ is irrational and $2-delta<x<2$, then
$big|x^4-4big|<1$



$-1 <x^4-4<1implies 3<x^4<5implies x^4>3 implies x = 3^frac14 implies x < 2$ Contradiction










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




SHajs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Define $g: mathbbR to mathbbR$ by $$g(x) =begincases x^2 & textif x text is rational, \\ x^4 & textif x text is irrational. endcases$$ Prove that $g$ is discontinuous at $x = 2$.



Solution Attempt:



Assume instead that $g$ is continuous at 2. Then since $g(2)= 4$, $;;displaystyle lim_xto2g(x)=4$;



so taking $epsilon=1$, there is a $delta>0$ such that if $0<|x-2|<delta$, then $big|g(x)-4big|<1$.



Therefore if $x$ is irrational and $2-delta<x<2$, then
$big|x^4-4big|<1$



$-1 <x^4-4<1implies 3<x^4<5implies x^4>3 implies x = 3^frac14 implies x < 2$ Contradiction







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




SHajs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




SHajs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 7 at 7:41









Asaf Karagila

308k33441775




308k33441775






New contributor




SHajs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 7 at 5:55









SHajsSHajs

162




162




New contributor




SHajs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





SHajs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






SHajs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Instead of delta-epsilon definition. See the definition using limit of sequences. Note that if you approximate 2 by a sequence of rational numbers you get g(x) approaches 2^2=4. But if you approximate 2 by a sequence of irrational numbers then g(x) approaches 2^4=16. Since the limits of g(x) w.r.t. these sequences don't match then g is discontinuous at 2. (In fact same argument proves that g is discontinuous everywhere, except at 0)
    $endgroup$
    – Julian Mejia
    Apr 7 at 6:03







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x<2$ is not a contradiction. What you should note is that you can choose $delta$ arbitrarily small, so choose $delta$ such that $3^1/4<2-delta$. Then you get a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Julian Mejia
    Apr 7 at 6:07












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Instead of delta-epsilon definition. See the definition using limit of sequences. Note that if you approximate 2 by a sequence of rational numbers you get g(x) approaches 2^2=4. But if you approximate 2 by a sequence of irrational numbers then g(x) approaches 2^4=16. Since the limits of g(x) w.r.t. these sequences don't match then g is discontinuous at 2. (In fact same argument proves that g is discontinuous everywhere, except at 0)
    $endgroup$
    – Julian Mejia
    Apr 7 at 6:03







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x<2$ is not a contradiction. What you should note is that you can choose $delta$ arbitrarily small, so choose $delta$ such that $3^1/4<2-delta$. Then you get a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Julian Mejia
    Apr 7 at 6:07







1




1




$begingroup$
Instead of delta-epsilon definition. See the definition using limit of sequences. Note that if you approximate 2 by a sequence of rational numbers you get g(x) approaches 2^2=4. But if you approximate 2 by a sequence of irrational numbers then g(x) approaches 2^4=16. Since the limits of g(x) w.r.t. these sequences don't match then g is discontinuous at 2. (In fact same argument proves that g is discontinuous everywhere, except at 0)
$endgroup$
– Julian Mejia
Apr 7 at 6:03





$begingroup$
Instead of delta-epsilon definition. See the definition using limit of sequences. Note that if you approximate 2 by a sequence of rational numbers you get g(x) approaches 2^2=4. But if you approximate 2 by a sequence of irrational numbers then g(x) approaches 2^4=16. Since the limits of g(x) w.r.t. these sequences don't match then g is discontinuous at 2. (In fact same argument proves that g is discontinuous everywhere, except at 0)
$endgroup$
– Julian Mejia
Apr 7 at 6:03





1




1




$begingroup$
$x<2$ is not a contradiction. What you should note is that you can choose $delta$ arbitrarily small, so choose $delta$ such that $3^1/4<2-delta$. Then you get a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Julian Mejia
Apr 7 at 6:07




$begingroup$
$x<2$ is not a contradiction. What you should note is that you can choose $delta$ arbitrarily small, so choose $delta$ such that $3^1/4<2-delta$. Then you get a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Julian Mejia
Apr 7 at 6:07










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Rather than $x^4 > 3$, instead conclude that $x^4 < 5$, or equivalently,
$$-sqrt[4]5 < x < sqrt[4]5.$$
If you had chosen instead an irrational $x$ such that
$$2 - mindelta, 2 - sqrt[4]5 < x < 2,$$
then you'd have $x > 2 - (2 - sqrt[4]5) = sqrt[4]5$, a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    I think a simpe way is to construct two sequences $a_n$ and $b_n$, where $a_n$ are rational and $b_n$ are irrational, such that $lim_ntoinftyg(a_n)=2^2$ and $lim_ntoinftyg(b_n)=2^4$.



    Then we can say $lim_xto2^+g(x)$ does not exist. Hence $g$ is discontinuous at $x=2$.




    Put $a_n = 2 + frac1n$ and $b_n=2+fracpin$.







    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      An option?



      Sequential definition of continuity .



      $x_n=2(4n)^(1/(4n)).$



      $lim_n rightarrow inftyx_n=2.$



      $lim_n rightarrow inftyg(x_n)=$



      $lim_n rightarrow infty 2^4(4n)^(1/n)=$



      $lim_n rightarrow infty2^4 cdot 4^(1/n) cdot n^(1/n)=$



      $=2^4 not =g(2)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$




















        0












        $begingroup$

        You haven't reached a contradiction, as commented...but the general idea is correct. Try this, instead: take



        $$lefta_n:=2pifrac npi n+1right_ninBbb N$$



        Observe the above sequence is irrational:



        $$a_nnotinBbb Qimplies g(a_n)=a_n^4,,,,textso;;lim_ntoinftyg(a_n)=lim_ntoinfty16pi^4fracn^4(npi+1)^4=16pi^4frac1pi^4=16$$



        yet $;g(2)=2^2=4;$ , so the function is not continuous at $;2;$ ...






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          SHajs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177808%2fproving-that-gx-defined-as-x2-on-the-rationals-and-x4-on-irrationals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Rather than $x^4 > 3$, instead conclude that $x^4 < 5$, or equivalently,
          $$-sqrt[4]5 < x < sqrt[4]5.$$
          If you had chosen instead an irrational $x$ such that
          $$2 - mindelta, 2 - sqrt[4]5 < x < 2,$$
          then you'd have $x > 2 - (2 - sqrt[4]5) = sqrt[4]5$, a contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$

















            1












            $begingroup$

            Rather than $x^4 > 3$, instead conclude that $x^4 < 5$, or equivalently,
            $$-sqrt[4]5 < x < sqrt[4]5.$$
            If you had chosen instead an irrational $x$ such that
            $$2 - mindelta, 2 - sqrt[4]5 < x < 2,$$
            then you'd have $x > 2 - (2 - sqrt[4]5) = sqrt[4]5$, a contradiction.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$















              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              Rather than $x^4 > 3$, instead conclude that $x^4 < 5$, or equivalently,
              $$-sqrt[4]5 < x < sqrt[4]5.$$
              If you had chosen instead an irrational $x$ such that
              $$2 - mindelta, 2 - sqrt[4]5 < x < 2,$$
              then you'd have $x > 2 - (2 - sqrt[4]5) = sqrt[4]5$, a contradiction.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Rather than $x^4 > 3$, instead conclude that $x^4 < 5$, or equivalently,
              $$-sqrt[4]5 < x < sqrt[4]5.$$
              If you had chosen instead an irrational $x$ such that
              $$2 - mindelta, 2 - sqrt[4]5 < x < 2,$$
              then you'd have $x > 2 - (2 - sqrt[4]5) = sqrt[4]5$, a contradiction.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Apr 7 at 6:02









              Theo BenditTheo Bendit

              20.9k12355




              20.9k12355





















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  I think a simpe way is to construct two sequences $a_n$ and $b_n$, where $a_n$ are rational and $b_n$ are irrational, such that $lim_ntoinftyg(a_n)=2^2$ and $lim_ntoinftyg(b_n)=2^4$.



                  Then we can say $lim_xto2^+g(x)$ does not exist. Hence $g$ is discontinuous at $x=2$.




                  Put $a_n = 2 + frac1n$ and $b_n=2+fracpin$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$

















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    I think a simpe way is to construct two sequences $a_n$ and $b_n$, where $a_n$ are rational and $b_n$ are irrational, such that $lim_ntoinftyg(a_n)=2^2$ and $lim_ntoinftyg(b_n)=2^4$.



                    Then we can say $lim_xto2^+g(x)$ does not exist. Hence $g$ is discontinuous at $x=2$.




                    Put $a_n = 2 + frac1n$ and $b_n=2+fracpin$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$















                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      I think a simpe way is to construct two sequences $a_n$ and $b_n$, where $a_n$ are rational and $b_n$ are irrational, such that $lim_ntoinftyg(a_n)=2^2$ and $lim_ntoinftyg(b_n)=2^4$.



                      Then we can say $lim_xto2^+g(x)$ does not exist. Hence $g$ is discontinuous at $x=2$.




                      Put $a_n = 2 + frac1n$ and $b_n=2+fracpin$.







                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      I think a simpe way is to construct two sequences $a_n$ and $b_n$, where $a_n$ are rational and $b_n$ are irrational, such that $lim_ntoinftyg(a_n)=2^2$ and $lim_ntoinftyg(b_n)=2^4$.



                      Then we can say $lim_xto2^+g(x)$ does not exist. Hence $g$ is discontinuous at $x=2$.




                      Put $a_n = 2 + frac1n$ and $b_n=2+fracpin$.








                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Apr 7 at 6:26









                      zongxiang yizongxiang yi

                      352110




                      352110





















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          An option?



                          Sequential definition of continuity .



                          $x_n=2(4n)^(1/(4n)).$



                          $lim_n rightarrow inftyx_n=2.$



                          $lim_n rightarrow inftyg(x_n)=$



                          $lim_n rightarrow infty 2^4(4n)^(1/n)=$



                          $lim_n rightarrow infty2^4 cdot 4^(1/n) cdot n^(1/n)=$



                          $=2^4 not =g(2)$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$

















                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            An option?



                            Sequential definition of continuity .



                            $x_n=2(4n)^(1/(4n)).$



                            $lim_n rightarrow inftyx_n=2.$



                            $lim_n rightarrow inftyg(x_n)=$



                            $lim_n rightarrow infty 2^4(4n)^(1/n)=$



                            $lim_n rightarrow infty2^4 cdot 4^(1/n) cdot n^(1/n)=$



                            $=2^4 not =g(2)$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$















                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              An option?



                              Sequential definition of continuity .



                              $x_n=2(4n)^(1/(4n)).$



                              $lim_n rightarrow inftyx_n=2.$



                              $lim_n rightarrow inftyg(x_n)=$



                              $lim_n rightarrow infty 2^4(4n)^(1/n)=$



                              $lim_n rightarrow infty2^4 cdot 4^(1/n) cdot n^(1/n)=$



                              $=2^4 not =g(2)$.






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$



                              An option?



                              Sequential definition of continuity .



                              $x_n=2(4n)^(1/(4n)).$



                              $lim_n rightarrow inftyx_n=2.$



                              $lim_n rightarrow inftyg(x_n)=$



                              $lim_n rightarrow infty 2^4(4n)^(1/n)=$



                              $lim_n rightarrow infty2^4 cdot 4^(1/n) cdot n^(1/n)=$



                              $=2^4 not =g(2)$.







                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited Apr 7 at 6:40

























                              answered Apr 7 at 6:31









                              Peter SzilasPeter Szilas

                              12k2822




                              12k2822





















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  You haven't reached a contradiction, as commented...but the general idea is correct. Try this, instead: take



                                  $$lefta_n:=2pifrac npi n+1right_ninBbb N$$



                                  Observe the above sequence is irrational:



                                  $$a_nnotinBbb Qimplies g(a_n)=a_n^4,,,,textso;;lim_ntoinftyg(a_n)=lim_ntoinfty16pi^4fracn^4(npi+1)^4=16pi^4frac1pi^4=16$$



                                  yet $;g(2)=2^2=4;$ , so the function is not continuous at $;2;$ ...






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$

















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    You haven't reached a contradiction, as commented...but the general idea is correct. Try this, instead: take



                                    $$lefta_n:=2pifrac npi n+1right_ninBbb N$$



                                    Observe the above sequence is irrational:



                                    $$a_nnotinBbb Qimplies g(a_n)=a_n^4,,,,textso;;lim_ntoinftyg(a_n)=lim_ntoinfty16pi^4fracn^4(npi+1)^4=16pi^4frac1pi^4=16$$



                                    yet $;g(2)=2^2=4;$ , so the function is not continuous at $;2;$ ...






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      You haven't reached a contradiction, as commented...but the general idea is correct. Try this, instead: take



                                      $$lefta_n:=2pifrac npi n+1right_ninBbb N$$



                                      Observe the above sequence is irrational:



                                      $$a_nnotinBbb Qimplies g(a_n)=a_n^4,,,,textso;;lim_ntoinftyg(a_n)=lim_ntoinfty16pi^4fracn^4(npi+1)^4=16pi^4frac1pi^4=16$$



                                      yet $;g(2)=2^2=4;$ , so the function is not continuous at $;2;$ ...






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      You haven't reached a contradiction, as commented...but the general idea is correct. Try this, instead: take



                                      $$lefta_n:=2pifrac npi n+1right_ninBbb N$$



                                      Observe the above sequence is irrational:



                                      $$a_nnotinBbb Qimplies g(a_n)=a_n^4,,,,textso;;lim_ntoinftyg(a_n)=lim_ntoinfty16pi^4fracn^4(npi+1)^4=16pi^4frac1pi^4=16$$



                                      yet $;g(2)=2^2=4;$ , so the function is not continuous at $;2;$ ...







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Apr 7 at 6:30









                                      DonAntonioDonAntonio

                                      180k1495233




                                      180k1495233




















                                          SHajs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded


















                                          SHajs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                          SHajs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                          SHajs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177808%2fproving-that-gx-defined-as-x2-on-the-rationals-and-x4-on-irrationals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given

                                          រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

                                          Ромео және Джульетта Мазмұны Қысқаша сипаттамасы Кейіпкерлері Кино Дереккөздер Бағыттау мәзірі