I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told him about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize? [closed] Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Should a year of Americorps service be listed as “professional experience” or “volunteering” on a resume and LinkedIn?Boss didn't give me a w-4 to fill out before I started working and now I can't get paidHow long should I wait before networking on LinkedIn with coworkers at a new job?How much information about my job should I reveal on my LinkedIn profile?Manager reveals private information about other employees offhandedly: best way to approach?Recommending a current co-workerShould I tell my coworker that someone has made a fake Linkedin account of him?What to do about unethical or possibly illegal behavior at work?How to describe a job on linkedin without overinflating and underselling it?Owner of company practicing unethical behavior
Irreducible of finite Krull dimension implies quasi-compact?
Generate an RGB colour grid
How to Make a Beautiful Stacked 3D Plot
Is there any way for the UK Prime Minister to make a motion directly dependent on Government confidence?
Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation
What causes the direction of lightning flashes?
Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages
Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?
Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?
Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?
How would a mousetrap for use in space work?
What does できなさすぎる means?
2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?
Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?
Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author
Fantasy story; one type of magic grows in power with use, but the more powerful they are, they more they are drawn to travel to their source
Can a party unilaterally change candidates in preparation for a General election?
If a VARCHAR(MAX) column is included in an index, is the entire value always stored in the index page(s)?
Is safe to use va_start macro with this as parameter?
Wu formula for manifolds with boundary
If my PI received research grants from a company to be able to pay my postdoc salary, did I have a potential conflict interest too?
Is CEO the profession with the most psychopaths?
Why didn't Eitri join the fight?
Is there such thing as an Availability Group failover trigger?
I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told him about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize? [closed]
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Should a year of Americorps service be listed as “professional experience” or “volunteering” on a resume and LinkedIn?Boss didn't give me a w-4 to fill out before I started working and now I can't get paidHow long should I wait before networking on LinkedIn with coworkers at a new job?How much information about my job should I reveal on my LinkedIn profile?Manager reveals private information about other employees offhandedly: best way to approach?Recommending a current co-workerShould I tell my coworker that someone has made a fake Linkedin account of him?What to do about unethical or possibly illegal behavior at work?How to describe a job on linkedin without overinflating and underselling it?Owner of company practicing unethical behavior
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I was thinking about this and was wondering if my behavior is unethical - the information was public, and I didn't think much of doing so at the time.
ethics linkedin
edited Apr 10 at 12:43
Community♦
1
asked Apr 9 at 17:20
M VM V
267124
closed as primarily opinion-based by sf02, gnat, yoozer8, MonkeyZeus, Jenny D Apr 10 at 16:27
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 5 more comments
I was thinking about this and was wondering if my behavior is unethical - the information was public, and I didn't think much of doing so at the time.
ethics linkedin
edited Apr 10 at 12:43
Community♦
1
asked Apr 9 at 17:20
M VM V
267124
closed as primarily opinion-based by sf02, gnat, yoozer8, MonkeyZeus, Jenny D Apr 10 at 16:27
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Snow♦
Apr 10 at 9:23
5
Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.
– Nelson
Apr 10 at 9:29
6
I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.
– Lukali
Apr 10 at 10:26
1
Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?
– Lamar Latrell
Apr 10 at 11:36
1
As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.
– teego1967
Apr 10 at 12:09
|
show 5 more comments
I was thinking about this and was wondering if my behavior is unethical - the information was public, and I didn't think much of doing so at the time.
ethics linkedin
edited Apr 10 at 12:43
Community♦
1
asked Apr 9 at 17:20
M VM V
267124
I was thinking about this and was wondering if my behavior is unethical - the information was public, and I didn't think much of doing so at the time.
ethics linkedin
ethics linkedin
edited Apr 10 at 12:43
Community♦
1
asked Apr 9 at 17:20
M VM V
267124
edited Apr 10 at 12:43
Community♦
1
asked Apr 9 at 17:20
M VM V
267124
edited Apr 10 at 12:43
Community♦
1
edited Apr 10 at 12:43
Community♦
1
edited Apr 10 at 12:43
Community♦
1
1
asked Apr 9 at 17:20
M VM V
267124
asked Apr 9 at 17:20
M VM V
267124
asked Apr 9 at 17:20
M VM V
267124
267124
closed as primarily opinion-based by sf02, gnat, yoozer8, MonkeyZeus, Jenny D Apr 10 at 16:27
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as primarily opinion-based by sf02, gnat, yoozer8, MonkeyZeus, Jenny D Apr 10 at 16:27
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Snow♦
Apr 10 at 9:23
5
Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.
– Nelson
Apr 10 at 9:29
6
I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.
– Lukali
Apr 10 at 10:26
1
Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?
– Lamar Latrell
Apr 10 at 11:36
1
As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.
– teego1967
Apr 10 at 12:09
|
show 5 more comments
1
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Snow♦
Apr 10 at 9:23
5
Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.
– Nelson
Apr 10 at 9:29
6
I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.
– Lukali
Apr 10 at 10:26
1
Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?
– Lamar Latrell
Apr 10 at 11:36
1
As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.
– teego1967
Apr 10 at 12:09
1
1
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Snow♦
Apr 10 at 9:23
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Snow♦
Apr 10 at 9:23
5
5
Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.
– Nelson
Apr 10 at 9:29
Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.
– Nelson
Apr 10 at 9:29
6
6
I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.
– Lukali
Apr 10 at 10:26
I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.
– Lukali
Apr 10 at 10:26
1
1
Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?
– Lamar Latrell
Apr 10 at 11:36
Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?
– Lamar Latrell
Apr 10 at 11:36
1
1
As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.
– teego1967
Apr 10 at 12:09
As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.
– teego1967
Apr 10 at 12:09
|
show 5 more comments
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
No. Don't apologize.
Had it happen to me, and I've done it myself. If a person doesn't want their profile accessed, they shouldn't make it publicly available. There is nothing wrong with that.
edited Apr 10 at 13:44
JakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 9 at 17:21
KeithKeith
3,9713722
120
Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.
– dwizum
Apr 9 at 17:38
11
@Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:30
20
@sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:41
22
@sf02 yes of course it is.
– edc65
Apr 9 at 20:51
23
Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Apr 10 at 0:44
|
show 6 more comments
I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
I suggest you ask him, e.g.
"I noticed you seemed surprised when I said I'd looked you up on LinkedIn. I've been feeling bad about it in case it upset you in any way. *Are you okay about it?"
Note
I have edited the last part of my answer in response to valid comments. I feel that a final question is needed in order to encourage the other person to have their say. I'm open to other suggestions.
As Ister suggests, "I hope you weren't offended" is another good possibility to finish with.
answered Apr 10 at 11:37
chasly from UKchasly from UK
513212
3
I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.
– Ister
Apr 10 at 13:28
1
I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.
– aslum
Apr 10 at 13:35
@Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.
– chasly from UK
Apr 10 at 15:26
add a comment |
Other answers are fairly blunt in the “No…” category, but I believe there is subtlety here:
If you feel you need to apologize, then you should apologize…
But don’t feel bad about it.
Yes, if a LinkedIn profile is made public then people can view that profile and then (based on their level of access in LinkedIn) they can see they viewed your profile. All fair.
And yes, you can lock down your LinkedIn profile so you can only allow people you are connected to to view that profile. That is fair.
But at the end of the day there is human etiquette. And if you feel that you might have offended someone by simply looking at their profile, you should apologize.
You should not recommend that they lock down their profile because why should they? Because ultimately if the profile is public, they might have a good reason to do so and not really want to alter their online presence for the needs of one random person they just met.
In general think about public online profiles like mail: You know, I can see my neighbors ordered items from Amazon. And many packages have tracking numbers right on them. There is technically nothing stopping me from making note of that tracking number and then—the next time I saw my neighbor—say something like, “Boy! That Amazon package you just got took a long time to get to you!” I mean, that’s prying and kinda crazy, right?
Ditto with online public profiles.
In the case of your co-worker, if they were stunned by what you did just say something like:
“Well, sorry about that. But since I was starting this job and just wanted to get to know my co-workers. My apologizes if that was an indirect way of going about it.”
The reality is that technical boundaries—such as blocking access to a profile—and human etiquette are two different things.
answered Apr 10 at 13:58
JakeGouldJakeGould
8,81812343
add a comment |
There's no need for an apology.
If someone creates a profile on LinkedIn, then they should expect that people will be looking at it, whether it be potential employers, peers or anyone using the site. I wouldn't even bring it up again, unless it seems like there's some unspoken tension over it.
edited Apr 10 at 13:45
JakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 10 at 12:56
Tom GalloTom Gallo
1072
add a comment |
I told him about it and he seemed surprised.
^^ So what??
When I see acquaintances shopping at the same store as me I get surprised too. It doesn't mean that they should apologize.
Stop overthinking and don't make things weird by apologizing. Move on with your life.
answered Apr 10 at 16:19
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,31011130
add a comment |
NOTE: reviewing the answer I changed the usage of "creepy" to "weird, strange"
I agree with two points made by participants in answers and comments:
- You shouldn't apologize
- It's weird, strange
why?
As stated previously, once you open a public profile (in any site, FB, LI, etc) you should be aware that you could be contacted by people you don't know, so it is something expected, thus, I think there is no need for apologizing
I infer from OP's words ("future colleague") that he/she does not even know the OP. So for me is weird, strange to see the 3rd item of this sequence in my timeline:
- OP has viewed your profile (Ok, it's expected)
- OP wants to connect (Let see if industry or people in common)
- OP says "Hi, you don't know me but I will be working with you soon. I will start this date" (weird, strange)
But...
If that was the approach of the OP, it's weird, strange enough for me. I would say something like "mmm, ok congrats".
However, if the message is more like:
"Hi, I am OP, I have been working as XXX and I will be starting soon at THE COMPANY in your department. I saw that you are working there, Could I ask YYYY if you don't mind? I would like to know more about the workplace/tools/procedures/advice etc"
I think that is more professional and I will be eager to help, verifying first that this is true or redirecting to the relevant area (HR, manager) if there are some information concerns.
My point is that I wouldn't be offended or scared, just a bit uncomfortable with someone trying approach me in a non-professional way
answered Apr 10 at 8:51
gustavovelascohgustavovelascoh
934
6
The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.
– Voo
Apr 10 at 9:20
23
Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:24
1
Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:30
1
Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.
– gustavovelascoh
Apr 10 at 9:34
5
It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.
– StarWeaver
Apr 10 at 9:44
|
show 3 more comments
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No. Don't apologize.
Had it happen to me, and I've done it myself. If a person doesn't want their profile accessed, they shouldn't make it publicly available. There is nothing wrong with that.
edited Apr 10 at 13:44
JakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 9 at 17:21
KeithKeith
3,9713722
120
Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.
– dwizum
Apr 9 at 17:38
11
@Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:30
20
@sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:41
22
@sf02 yes of course it is.
– edc65
Apr 9 at 20:51
23
Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Apr 10 at 0:44
|
show 6 more comments
No. Don't apologize.
Had it happen to me, and I've done it myself. If a person doesn't want their profile accessed, they shouldn't make it publicly available. There is nothing wrong with that.
edited Apr 10 at 13:44
JakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 9 at 17:21
KeithKeith
3,9713722
120
Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.
– dwizum
Apr 9 at 17:38
11
@Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:30
20
@sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:41
22
@sf02 yes of course it is.
– edc65
Apr 9 at 20:51
23
Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Apr 10 at 0:44
|
show 6 more comments
No. Don't apologize.
Had it happen to me, and I've done it myself. If a person doesn't want their profile accessed, they shouldn't make it publicly available. There is nothing wrong with that.
edited Apr 10 at 13:44
JakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 9 at 17:21
KeithKeith
3,9713722
No. Don't apologize.
Had it happen to me, and I've done it myself. If a person doesn't want their profile accessed, they shouldn't make it publicly available. There is nothing wrong with that.
edited Apr 10 at 13:44
JakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 9 at 17:21
KeithKeith
3,9713722
edited Apr 10 at 13:44
JakeGould
8,81812343
edited Apr 10 at 13:44
JakeGould
8,81812343
edited Apr 10 at 13:44
JakeGould
8,81812343
8,81812343
answered Apr 9 at 17:21
KeithKeith
3,9713722
answered Apr 9 at 17:21
KeithKeith
3,9713722
answered Apr 9 at 17:21
KeithKeith
3,9713722
3,9713722
120
Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.
– dwizum
Apr 9 at 17:38
11
@Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:30
20
@sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:41
22
@sf02 yes of course it is.
– edc65
Apr 9 at 20:51
23
Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Apr 10 at 0:44
|
show 6 more comments
120
Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.
– dwizum
Apr 9 at 17:38
11
@Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:30
20
@sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:41
22
@sf02 yes of course it is.
– edc65
Apr 9 at 20:51
23
Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Apr 10 at 0:44
120
120
Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.
– dwizum
Apr 9 at 17:38
Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.
– dwizum
Apr 9 at 17:38
11
11
@Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:30
@Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:30
20
20
@sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:41
@sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?
– mkennedy
Apr 9 at 20:41
22
22
@sf02 yes of course it is.
– edc65
Apr 9 at 20:51
@sf02 yes of course it is.
– edc65
Apr 9 at 20:51
23
23
Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Apr 10 at 0:44
Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Apr 10 at 0:44
|
show 6 more comments
I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
I suggest you ask him, e.g.
"I noticed you seemed surprised when I said I'd looked you up on LinkedIn. I've been feeling bad about it in case it upset you in any way. *Are you okay about it?"
Note
I have edited the last part of my answer in response to valid comments. I feel that a final question is needed in order to encourage the other person to have their say. I'm open to other suggestions.
As Ister suggests, "I hope you weren't offended" is another good possibility to finish with.
answered Apr 10 at 11:37
chasly from UKchasly from UK
513212
3
I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.
– Ister
Apr 10 at 13:28
1
I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.
– aslum
Apr 10 at 13:35
@Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.
– chasly from UK
Apr 10 at 15:26
add a comment |
I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
I suggest you ask him, e.g.
"I noticed you seemed surprised when I said I'd looked you up on LinkedIn. I've been feeling bad about it in case it upset you in any way. *Are you okay about it?"
Note
I have edited the last part of my answer in response to valid comments. I feel that a final question is needed in order to encourage the other person to have their say. I'm open to other suggestions.
As Ister suggests, "I hope you weren't offended" is another good possibility to finish with.
answered Apr 10 at 11:37
chasly from UKchasly from UK
513212
3
I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.
– Ister
Apr 10 at 13:28
1
I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.
– aslum
Apr 10 at 13:35
@Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.
– chasly from UK
Apr 10 at 15:26
add a comment |
I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
I suggest you ask him, e.g.
"I noticed you seemed surprised when I said I'd looked you up on LinkedIn. I've been feeling bad about it in case it upset you in any way. *Are you okay about it?"
Note
I have edited the last part of my answer in response to valid comments. I feel that a final question is needed in order to encourage the other person to have their say. I'm open to other suggestions.
As Ister suggests, "I hope you weren't offended" is another good possibility to finish with.
answered Apr 10 at 11:37
chasly from UKchasly from UK
513212
I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
I suggest you ask him, e.g.
"I noticed you seemed surprised when I said I'd looked you up on LinkedIn. I've been feeling bad about it in case it upset you in any way. *Are you okay about it?"
Note
I have edited the last part of my answer in response to valid comments. I feel that a final question is needed in order to encourage the other person to have their say. I'm open to other suggestions.
As Ister suggests, "I hope you weren't offended" is another good possibility to finish with.
answered Apr 10 at 11:37
chasly from UKchasly from UK
513212
edited Apr 10 at 15:32
answered Apr 10 at 11:37
chasly from UKchasly from UK
513212
answered Apr 10 at 11:37
chasly from UKchasly from UK
513212
answered Apr 10 at 11:37
chasly from UKchasly from UK
513212
513212
3
I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.
– Ister
Apr 10 at 13:28
1
I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.
– aslum
Apr 10 at 13:35
@Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.
– chasly from UK
Apr 10 at 15:26
add a comment |
3
I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.
– Ister
Apr 10 at 13:28
1
I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.
– aslum
Apr 10 at 13:35
@Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.
– chasly from UK
Apr 10 at 15:26
3
3
I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.
– Ister
Apr 10 at 13:28
I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.
– Ister
Apr 10 at 13:28
1
1
I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.
– aslum
Apr 10 at 13:35
I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.
– aslum
Apr 10 at 13:35
@Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.
– chasly from UK
Apr 10 at 15:26
@Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.
– chasly from UK
Apr 10 at 15:26
add a comment |
Other answers are fairly blunt in the “No…” category, but I believe there is subtlety here:
If you feel you need to apologize, then you should apologize…
But don’t feel bad about it.
Yes, if a LinkedIn profile is made public then people can view that profile and then (based on their level of access in LinkedIn) they can see they viewed your profile. All fair.
And yes, you can lock down your LinkedIn profile so you can only allow people you are connected to to view that profile. That is fair.
But at the end of the day there is human etiquette. And if you feel that you might have offended someone by simply looking at their profile, you should apologize.
You should not recommend that they lock down their profile because why should they? Because ultimately if the profile is public, they might have a good reason to do so and not really want to alter their online presence for the needs of one random person they just met.
In general think about public online profiles like mail: You know, I can see my neighbors ordered items from Amazon. And many packages have tracking numbers right on them. There is technically nothing stopping me from making note of that tracking number and then—the next time I saw my neighbor—say something like, “Boy! That Amazon package you just got took a long time to get to you!” I mean, that’s prying and kinda crazy, right?
Ditto with online public profiles.
In the case of your co-worker, if they were stunned by what you did just say something like:
“Well, sorry about that. But since I was starting this job and just wanted to get to know my co-workers. My apologizes if that was an indirect way of going about it.”
The reality is that technical boundaries—such as blocking access to a profile—and human etiquette are two different things.
answered Apr 10 at 13:58
JakeGouldJakeGould
8,81812343
add a comment |
Other answers are fairly blunt in the “No…” category, but I believe there is subtlety here:
If you feel you need to apologize, then you should apologize…
But don’t feel bad about it.
Yes, if a LinkedIn profile is made public then people can view that profile and then (based on their level of access in LinkedIn) they can see they viewed your profile. All fair.
And yes, you can lock down your LinkedIn profile so you can only allow people you are connected to to view that profile. That is fair.
But at the end of the day there is human etiquette. And if you feel that you might have offended someone by simply looking at their profile, you should apologize.
You should not recommend that they lock down their profile because why should they? Because ultimately if the profile is public, they might have a good reason to do so and not really want to alter their online presence for the needs of one random person they just met.
In general think about public online profiles like mail: You know, I can see my neighbors ordered items from Amazon. And many packages have tracking numbers right on them. There is technically nothing stopping me from making note of that tracking number and then—the next time I saw my neighbor—say something like, “Boy! That Amazon package you just got took a long time to get to you!” I mean, that’s prying and kinda crazy, right?
Ditto with online public profiles.
In the case of your co-worker, if they were stunned by what you did just say something like:
“Well, sorry about that. But since I was starting this job and just wanted to get to know my co-workers. My apologizes if that was an indirect way of going about it.”
The reality is that technical boundaries—such as blocking access to a profile—and human etiquette are two different things.
answered Apr 10 at 13:58
JakeGouldJakeGould
8,81812343
add a comment |
Other answers are fairly blunt in the “No…” category, but I believe there is subtlety here:
If you feel you need to apologize, then you should apologize…
But don’t feel bad about it.
Yes, if a LinkedIn profile is made public then people can view that profile and then (based on their level of access in LinkedIn) they can see they viewed your profile. All fair.
And yes, you can lock down your LinkedIn profile so you can only allow people you are connected to to view that profile. That is fair.
But at the end of the day there is human etiquette. And if you feel that you might have offended someone by simply looking at their profile, you should apologize.
You should not recommend that they lock down their profile because why should they? Because ultimately if the profile is public, they might have a good reason to do so and not really want to alter their online presence for the needs of one random person they just met.
In general think about public online profiles like mail: You know, I can see my neighbors ordered items from Amazon. And many packages have tracking numbers right on them. There is technically nothing stopping me from making note of that tracking number and then—the next time I saw my neighbor—say something like, “Boy! That Amazon package you just got took a long time to get to you!” I mean, that’s prying and kinda crazy, right?
Ditto with online public profiles.
In the case of your co-worker, if they were stunned by what you did just say something like:
“Well, sorry about that. But since I was starting this job and just wanted to get to know my co-workers. My apologizes if that was an indirect way of going about it.”
The reality is that technical boundaries—such as blocking access to a profile—and human etiquette are two different things.
answered Apr 10 at 13:58
JakeGouldJakeGould
8,81812343
Other answers are fairly blunt in the “No…” category, but I believe there is subtlety here:
If you feel you need to apologize, then you should apologize…
But don’t feel bad about it.
Yes, if a LinkedIn profile is made public then people can view that profile and then (based on their level of access in LinkedIn) they can see they viewed your profile. All fair.
And yes, you can lock down your LinkedIn profile so you can only allow people you are connected to to view that profile. That is fair.
But at the end of the day there is human etiquette. And if you feel that you might have offended someone by simply looking at their profile, you should apologize.
You should not recommend that they lock down their profile because why should they? Because ultimately if the profile is public, they might have a good reason to do so and not really want to alter their online presence for the needs of one random person they just met.
In general think about public online profiles like mail: You know, I can see my neighbors ordered items from Amazon. And many packages have tracking numbers right on them. There is technically nothing stopping me from making note of that tracking number and then—the next time I saw my neighbor—say something like, “Boy! That Amazon package you just got took a long time to get to you!” I mean, that’s prying and kinda crazy, right?
Ditto with online public profiles.
In the case of your co-worker, if they were stunned by what you did just say something like:
“Well, sorry about that. But since I was starting this job and just wanted to get to know my co-workers. My apologizes if that was an indirect way of going about it.”
The reality is that technical boundaries—such as blocking access to a profile—and human etiquette are two different things.
answered Apr 10 at 13:58
JakeGouldJakeGould
8,81812343
edited Apr 10 at 15:07
answered Apr 10 at 13:58
JakeGouldJakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 10 at 13:58
JakeGouldJakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 10 at 13:58
JakeGouldJakeGould
8,81812343
8,81812343
add a comment |
add a comment |
There's no need for an apology.
If someone creates a profile on LinkedIn, then they should expect that people will be looking at it, whether it be potential employers, peers or anyone using the site. I wouldn't even bring it up again, unless it seems like there's some unspoken tension over it.
edited Apr 10 at 13:45
JakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 10 at 12:56
Tom GalloTom Gallo
1072
add a comment |
There's no need for an apology.
If someone creates a profile on LinkedIn, then they should expect that people will be looking at it, whether it be potential employers, peers or anyone using the site. I wouldn't even bring it up again, unless it seems like there's some unspoken tension over it.
edited Apr 10 at 13:45
JakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 10 at 12:56
Tom GalloTom Gallo
1072
add a comment |
There's no need for an apology.
If someone creates a profile on LinkedIn, then they should expect that people will be looking at it, whether it be potential employers, peers or anyone using the site. I wouldn't even bring it up again, unless it seems like there's some unspoken tension over it.
edited Apr 10 at 13:45
JakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 10 at 12:56
Tom GalloTom Gallo
1072
There's no need for an apology.
If someone creates a profile on LinkedIn, then they should expect that people will be looking at it, whether it be potential employers, peers or anyone using the site. I wouldn't even bring it up again, unless it seems like there's some unspoken tension over it.
edited Apr 10 at 13:45
JakeGould
8,81812343
answered Apr 10 at 12:56
Tom GalloTom Gallo
1072
edited Apr 10 at 13:45
JakeGould
8,81812343
edited Apr 10 at 13:45
JakeGould
8,81812343
edited Apr 10 at 13:45
JakeGould
8,81812343
8,81812343
answered Apr 10 at 12:56
Tom GalloTom Gallo
1072
answered Apr 10 at 12:56
Tom GalloTom Gallo
1072
answered Apr 10 at 12:56
Tom GalloTom Gallo
1072
1072
add a comment |
add a comment |
I told him about it and he seemed surprised.
^^ So what??
When I see acquaintances shopping at the same store as me I get surprised too. It doesn't mean that they should apologize.
Stop overthinking and don't make things weird by apologizing. Move on with your life.
answered Apr 10 at 16:19
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,31011130
add a comment |
I told him about it and he seemed surprised.
^^ So what??
When I see acquaintances shopping at the same store as me I get surprised too. It doesn't mean that they should apologize.
Stop overthinking and don't make things weird by apologizing. Move on with your life.
answered Apr 10 at 16:19
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,31011130
add a comment |
I told him about it and he seemed surprised.
^^ So what??
When I see acquaintances shopping at the same store as me I get surprised too. It doesn't mean that they should apologize.
Stop overthinking and don't make things weird by apologizing. Move on with your life.
answered Apr 10 at 16:19
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,31011130
I told him about it and he seemed surprised.
^^ So what??
When I see acquaintances shopping at the same store as me I get surprised too. It doesn't mean that they should apologize.
Stop overthinking and don't make things weird by apologizing. Move on with your life.
answered Apr 10 at 16:19
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,31011130
answered Apr 10 at 16:19
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,31011130
answered Apr 10 at 16:19
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,31011130
answered Apr 10 at 16:19
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,31011130
4,31011130
add a comment |
add a comment |
NOTE: reviewing the answer I changed the usage of "creepy" to "weird, strange"
I agree with two points made by participants in answers and comments:
- You shouldn't apologize
- It's weird, strange
why?
As stated previously, once you open a public profile (in any site, FB, LI, etc) you should be aware that you could be contacted by people you don't know, so it is something expected, thus, I think there is no need for apologizing
I infer from OP's words ("future colleague") that he/she does not even know the OP. So for me is weird, strange to see the 3rd item of this sequence in my timeline:
- OP has viewed your profile (Ok, it's expected)
- OP wants to connect (Let see if industry or people in common)
- OP says "Hi, you don't know me but I will be working with you soon. I will start this date" (weird, strange)
But...
If that was the approach of the OP, it's weird, strange enough for me. I would say something like "mmm, ok congrats".
However, if the message is more like:
"Hi, I am OP, I have been working as XXX and I will be starting soon at THE COMPANY in your department. I saw that you are working there, Could I ask YYYY if you don't mind? I would like to know more about the workplace/tools/procedures/advice etc"
I think that is more professional and I will be eager to help, verifying first that this is true or redirecting to the relevant area (HR, manager) if there are some information concerns.
My point is that I wouldn't be offended or scared, just a bit uncomfortable with someone trying approach me in a non-professional way
answered Apr 10 at 8:51
gustavovelascohgustavovelascoh
934
6
The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.
– Voo
Apr 10 at 9:20
23
Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:24
1
Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:30
1
Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.
– gustavovelascoh
Apr 10 at 9:34
5
It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.
– StarWeaver
Apr 10 at 9:44
|
show 3 more comments
NOTE: reviewing the answer I changed the usage of "creepy" to "weird, strange"
I agree with two points made by participants in answers and comments:
- You shouldn't apologize
- It's weird, strange
why?
As stated previously, once you open a public profile (in any site, FB, LI, etc) you should be aware that you could be contacted by people you don't know, so it is something expected, thus, I think there is no need for apologizing
I infer from OP's words ("future colleague") that he/she does not even know the OP. So for me is weird, strange to see the 3rd item of this sequence in my timeline:
- OP has viewed your profile (Ok, it's expected)
- OP wants to connect (Let see if industry or people in common)
- OP says "Hi, you don't know me but I will be working with you soon. I will start this date" (weird, strange)
But...
If that was the approach of the OP, it's weird, strange enough for me. I would say something like "mmm, ok congrats".
However, if the message is more like:
"Hi, I am OP, I have been working as XXX and I will be starting soon at THE COMPANY in your department. I saw that you are working there, Could I ask YYYY if you don't mind? I would like to know more about the workplace/tools/procedures/advice etc"
I think that is more professional and I will be eager to help, verifying first that this is true or redirecting to the relevant area (HR, manager) if there are some information concerns.
My point is that I wouldn't be offended or scared, just a bit uncomfortable with someone trying approach me in a non-professional way
answered Apr 10 at 8:51
gustavovelascohgustavovelascoh
934
6
The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.
– Voo
Apr 10 at 9:20
23
Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:24
1
Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:30
1
Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.
– gustavovelascoh
Apr 10 at 9:34
5
It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.
– StarWeaver
Apr 10 at 9:44
|
show 3 more comments
NOTE: reviewing the answer I changed the usage of "creepy" to "weird, strange"
I agree with two points made by participants in answers and comments:
- You shouldn't apologize
- It's weird, strange
why?
As stated previously, once you open a public profile (in any site, FB, LI, etc) you should be aware that you could be contacted by people you don't know, so it is something expected, thus, I think there is no need for apologizing
I infer from OP's words ("future colleague") that he/she does not even know the OP. So for me is weird, strange to see the 3rd item of this sequence in my timeline:
- OP has viewed your profile (Ok, it's expected)
- OP wants to connect (Let see if industry or people in common)
- OP says "Hi, you don't know me but I will be working with you soon. I will start this date" (weird, strange)
But...
If that was the approach of the OP, it's weird, strange enough for me. I would say something like "mmm, ok congrats".
However, if the message is more like:
"Hi, I am OP, I have been working as XXX and I will be starting soon at THE COMPANY in your department. I saw that you are working there, Could I ask YYYY if you don't mind? I would like to know more about the workplace/tools/procedures/advice etc"
I think that is more professional and I will be eager to help, verifying first that this is true or redirecting to the relevant area (HR, manager) if there are some information concerns.
My point is that I wouldn't be offended or scared, just a bit uncomfortable with someone trying approach me in a non-professional way
answered Apr 10 at 8:51
gustavovelascohgustavovelascoh
934
NOTE: reviewing the answer I changed the usage of "creepy" to "weird, strange"
I agree with two points made by participants in answers and comments:
- You shouldn't apologize
- It's weird, strange
why?
As stated previously, once you open a public profile (in any site, FB, LI, etc) you should be aware that you could be contacted by people you don't know, so it is something expected, thus, I think there is no need for apologizing
I infer from OP's words ("future colleague") that he/she does not even know the OP. So for me is weird, strange to see the 3rd item of this sequence in my timeline:
- OP has viewed your profile (Ok, it's expected)
- OP wants to connect (Let see if industry or people in common)
- OP says "Hi, you don't know me but I will be working with you soon. I will start this date" (weird, strange)
But...
If that was the approach of the OP, it's weird, strange enough for me. I would say something like "mmm, ok congrats".
However, if the message is more like:
"Hi, I am OP, I have been working as XXX and I will be starting soon at THE COMPANY in your department. I saw that you are working there, Could I ask YYYY if you don't mind? I would like to know more about the workplace/tools/procedures/advice etc"
I think that is more professional and I will be eager to help, verifying first that this is true or redirecting to the relevant area (HR, manager) if there are some information concerns.
My point is that I wouldn't be offended or scared, just a bit uncomfortable with someone trying approach me in a non-professional way
answered Apr 10 at 8:51
gustavovelascohgustavovelascoh
934
edited Apr 10 at 9:40
answered Apr 10 at 8:51
gustavovelascohgustavovelascoh
934
answered Apr 10 at 8:51
gustavovelascohgustavovelascoh
934
answered Apr 10 at 8:51
gustavovelascohgustavovelascoh
934
934
6
The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.
– Voo
Apr 10 at 9:20
23
Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:24
1
Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:30
1
Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.
– gustavovelascoh
Apr 10 at 9:34
5
It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.
– StarWeaver
Apr 10 at 9:44
|
show 3 more comments
6
The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.
– Voo
Apr 10 at 9:20
23
Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:24
1
Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:30
1
Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.
– gustavovelascoh
Apr 10 at 9:34
5
It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.
– StarWeaver
Apr 10 at 9:44
6
6
The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.
– Voo
Apr 10 at 9:20
The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.
– Voo
Apr 10 at 9:20
23
23
Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:24
Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:24
1
1
Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:30
Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!
– virolino
Apr 10 at 9:30
1
1
Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.
– gustavovelascoh
Apr 10 at 9:34
Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.
– gustavovelascoh
Apr 10 at 9:34
5
5
It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.
– StarWeaver
Apr 10 at 9:44
It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.
– StarWeaver
Apr 10 at 9:44
|
show 3 more comments
1
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Snow♦
Apr 10 at 9:23
5
Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.
– Nelson
Apr 10 at 9:29
6
I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.
– Lukali
Apr 10 at 10:26
1
Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?
– Lamar Latrell
Apr 10 at 11:36
1
As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.
– teego1967
Apr 10 at 12:09