How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How can I update this very stubborn antique bed frame so the mattress fits properly?Have our worktops been fitted wrong?Can I build a vanity, or am I in over my head?Built-in bookshelf questionsHow to connect two bed legs to make a bunk bed from two regular beds?How can I find the part to fix this bookshelf?Will 1x4's and 1x6's be enough for an aquarium stand?How to build a removable bench for a sit-in window?What's the right type of lumber to construct a small TV platform?Which insulation for gap between plasterboard and subfloor?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?

Difference between "generating set" and free product?

Scientific Reports - Significant Figures

Can a novice safely splice in wire to lengthen 5V charging cable?

Arduino Pro Micro - switch off LEDs

Finding the path in a graph from A to B then back to A with a minimum of shared edges

How can I protect witches in combat who wear limited clothing?

Create an outline of font

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?

Install many applications using one command

Can the DM override racial traits?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

He got a vote 80% that of Emmanuel Macron’s

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

Did God make two great lights or did He make the great light two?

Would it be possible to rearrange a dragon's flight muscle to somewhat circumvent the square-cube law?

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

Why did all the guest students take carriages to the Yule Ball?

What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?

Change bounding box of math glyphs in LuaTeX

How many people can fit inside Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?



How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How can I update this very stubborn antique bed frame so the mattress fits properly?Have our worktops been fitted wrong?Can I build a vanity, or am I in over my head?Built-in bookshelf questionsHow to connect two bed legs to make a bunk bed from two regular beds?How can I find the part to fix this bookshelf?Will 1x4's and 1x6's be enough for an aquarium stand?How to build a removable bench for a sit-in window?What's the right type of lumber to construct a small TV platform?Which insulation for gap between plasterboard and subfloor?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








21















I just built two bookcases to line the wall of a room in my house and apparently didn't build them square enough so, when I put them next to each other, I get this giant gap. (I think the one on the right is pretty square but the one on the left appears to lean to the left at the top.)



Any suggestions on how I can make this look better? The shelves are going to be sanded, spackled, caulked, and painted. One thought I had would be to remove the vertical strips of molding where the two bookcases meet (there is 3/4" square molding on all the edges) and make one custom piece that attaches to both. This piece would be wider at the top and taper at the bottom. Maybe that would look bad--I don't know. It also wouldn't address the gap on the top horizontal surface.



enter image description here



Any suggestions would be appreciated!










share|improve this question



















  • 29





    Is it possible that some portion of the gap is due to variation of the floor?

    – Michael Karas
    Apr 7 at 14:15






  • 19





    You should get a tool called a framing square so that you can check squareness rather than guess. Maybe it is possible for you to remove the back of one unit and spring the shelves into square and reattach the back to hold it in the square shape. It is not quite clear how the backs are fabricated and the worst could be that you would have to make a new back.

    – Michael Karas
    Apr 7 at 14:19






  • 3





    @MichaelKaras -- Your comments would make a good answer.

    – Jasper
    Apr 8 at 0:45











  • @MichaelKaras: This is good advice, but I would add: check the framing square for squareness! I once spent a frustrating hour trying to figure out why no matter how I tried, the jig I was building would not come out square. I realized eventually that I was not crazy, it was the square that was wrong. A solid steel square presumably made by professionals was 89 degrees.

    – Eric Lippert
    Apr 9 at 0:57






  • 2





    Now that you've fixed it, please post an updated picture so we can all sleep at night.

    – DavidS
    Apr 9 at 16:58

















21















I just built two bookcases to line the wall of a room in my house and apparently didn't build them square enough so, when I put them next to each other, I get this giant gap. (I think the one on the right is pretty square but the one on the left appears to lean to the left at the top.)



Any suggestions on how I can make this look better? The shelves are going to be sanded, spackled, caulked, and painted. One thought I had would be to remove the vertical strips of molding where the two bookcases meet (there is 3/4" square molding on all the edges) and make one custom piece that attaches to both. This piece would be wider at the top and taper at the bottom. Maybe that would look bad--I don't know. It also wouldn't address the gap on the top horizontal surface.



enter image description here



Any suggestions would be appreciated!










share|improve this question



















  • 29





    Is it possible that some portion of the gap is due to variation of the floor?

    – Michael Karas
    Apr 7 at 14:15






  • 19





    You should get a tool called a framing square so that you can check squareness rather than guess. Maybe it is possible for you to remove the back of one unit and spring the shelves into square and reattach the back to hold it in the square shape. It is not quite clear how the backs are fabricated and the worst could be that you would have to make a new back.

    – Michael Karas
    Apr 7 at 14:19






  • 3





    @MichaelKaras -- Your comments would make a good answer.

    – Jasper
    Apr 8 at 0:45











  • @MichaelKaras: This is good advice, but I would add: check the framing square for squareness! I once spent a frustrating hour trying to figure out why no matter how I tried, the jig I was building would not come out square. I realized eventually that I was not crazy, it was the square that was wrong. A solid steel square presumably made by professionals was 89 degrees.

    – Eric Lippert
    Apr 9 at 0:57






  • 2





    Now that you've fixed it, please post an updated picture so we can all sleep at night.

    – DavidS
    Apr 9 at 16:58













21












21








21


1






I just built two bookcases to line the wall of a room in my house and apparently didn't build them square enough so, when I put them next to each other, I get this giant gap. (I think the one on the right is pretty square but the one on the left appears to lean to the left at the top.)



Any suggestions on how I can make this look better? The shelves are going to be sanded, spackled, caulked, and painted. One thought I had would be to remove the vertical strips of molding where the two bookcases meet (there is 3/4" square molding on all the edges) and make one custom piece that attaches to both. This piece would be wider at the top and taper at the bottom. Maybe that would look bad--I don't know. It also wouldn't address the gap on the top horizontal surface.



enter image description here



Any suggestions would be appreciated!










share|improve this question
















I just built two bookcases to line the wall of a room in my house and apparently didn't build them square enough so, when I put them next to each other, I get this giant gap. (I think the one on the right is pretty square but the one on the left appears to lean to the left at the top.)



Any suggestions on how I can make this look better? The shelves are going to be sanded, spackled, caulked, and painted. One thought I had would be to remove the vertical strips of molding where the two bookcases meet (there is 3/4" square molding on all the edges) and make one custom piece that attaches to both. This piece would be wider at the top and taper at the bottom. Maybe that would look bad--I don't know. It also wouldn't address the gap on the top horizontal surface.



enter image description here



Any suggestions would be appreciated!







woodworking furniture carpentry






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 10 at 22:32









dotancohen

1697




1697










asked Apr 7 at 14:10









johnnyb1970johnnyb1970

613513




613513







  • 29





    Is it possible that some portion of the gap is due to variation of the floor?

    – Michael Karas
    Apr 7 at 14:15






  • 19





    You should get a tool called a framing square so that you can check squareness rather than guess. Maybe it is possible for you to remove the back of one unit and spring the shelves into square and reattach the back to hold it in the square shape. It is not quite clear how the backs are fabricated and the worst could be that you would have to make a new back.

    – Michael Karas
    Apr 7 at 14:19






  • 3





    @MichaelKaras -- Your comments would make a good answer.

    – Jasper
    Apr 8 at 0:45











  • @MichaelKaras: This is good advice, but I would add: check the framing square for squareness! I once spent a frustrating hour trying to figure out why no matter how I tried, the jig I was building would not come out square. I realized eventually that I was not crazy, it was the square that was wrong. A solid steel square presumably made by professionals was 89 degrees.

    – Eric Lippert
    Apr 9 at 0:57






  • 2





    Now that you've fixed it, please post an updated picture so we can all sleep at night.

    – DavidS
    Apr 9 at 16:58












  • 29





    Is it possible that some portion of the gap is due to variation of the floor?

    – Michael Karas
    Apr 7 at 14:15






  • 19





    You should get a tool called a framing square so that you can check squareness rather than guess. Maybe it is possible for you to remove the back of one unit and spring the shelves into square and reattach the back to hold it in the square shape. It is not quite clear how the backs are fabricated and the worst could be that you would have to make a new back.

    – Michael Karas
    Apr 7 at 14:19






  • 3





    @MichaelKaras -- Your comments would make a good answer.

    – Jasper
    Apr 8 at 0:45











  • @MichaelKaras: This is good advice, but I would add: check the framing square for squareness! I once spent a frustrating hour trying to figure out why no matter how I tried, the jig I was building would not come out square. I realized eventually that I was not crazy, it was the square that was wrong. A solid steel square presumably made by professionals was 89 degrees.

    – Eric Lippert
    Apr 9 at 0:57






  • 2





    Now that you've fixed it, please post an updated picture so we can all sleep at night.

    – DavidS
    Apr 9 at 16:58







29




29





Is it possible that some portion of the gap is due to variation of the floor?

– Michael Karas
Apr 7 at 14:15





Is it possible that some portion of the gap is due to variation of the floor?

– Michael Karas
Apr 7 at 14:15




19




19





You should get a tool called a framing square so that you can check squareness rather than guess. Maybe it is possible for you to remove the back of one unit and spring the shelves into square and reattach the back to hold it in the square shape. It is not quite clear how the backs are fabricated and the worst could be that you would have to make a new back.

– Michael Karas
Apr 7 at 14:19





You should get a tool called a framing square so that you can check squareness rather than guess. Maybe it is possible for you to remove the back of one unit and spring the shelves into square and reattach the back to hold it in the square shape. It is not quite clear how the backs are fabricated and the worst could be that you would have to make a new back.

– Michael Karas
Apr 7 at 14:19




3




3





@MichaelKaras -- Your comments would make a good answer.

– Jasper
Apr 8 at 0:45





@MichaelKaras -- Your comments would make a good answer.

– Jasper
Apr 8 at 0:45













@MichaelKaras: This is good advice, but I would add: check the framing square for squareness! I once spent a frustrating hour trying to figure out why no matter how I tried, the jig I was building would not come out square. I realized eventually that I was not crazy, it was the square that was wrong. A solid steel square presumably made by professionals was 89 degrees.

– Eric Lippert
Apr 9 at 0:57





@MichaelKaras: This is good advice, but I would add: check the framing square for squareness! I once spent a frustrating hour trying to figure out why no matter how I tried, the jig I was building would not come out square. I realized eventually that I was not crazy, it was the square that was wrong. A solid steel square presumably made by professionals was 89 degrees.

– Eric Lippert
Apr 9 at 0:57




2




2





Now that you've fixed it, please post an updated picture so we can all sleep at night.

– DavidS
Apr 9 at 16:58





Now that you've fixed it, please post an updated picture so we can all sleep at night.

– DavidS
Apr 9 at 16:58










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















64














Swap their positions.



Place the bookcases so that they lean into each other instead of away from each other. This will eliminate the gap between the tops.



Bookcase contents are usually quite heavy. Once the cases are filled, you will probably find that you can force the bottoms together and the weight of the contents will distort the shape of the cases so the gap disappears.



If an unsightly gap remains visible then you will need to resort to a decorative molding.






share|improve this answer


















  • 31





    Another benefit to swapping them is you can see if the problem is actually caused by an uneven floor.

    – bitsmack
    Apr 8 at 6:39






  • 1





    It's funny that the best solution (in my opinion) is a quick bodge.

    – Ismael Miguel
    Apr 8 at 18:03






  • 2





    Or flip them upside down, they look like they would go either way

    – Luke McGregor
    Apr 9 at 9:09






  • 1





    @LukeMcGregor even if they go either way, flipping them will either point the opening against the wall or rotate them so that the long diagonal is in the same position it was before. Right now the long diagonals look like this: [][/] Flip them 180 degrees and they look exactly the same.

    – candied_orange
    Apr 9 at 17:38



















38














Thanks everyone; I figured it out and came back here to update my post and noticed that Michael Karas said the same thing I realized (although it was a comment, so I couldn't mark it as the correct answer): I had to pop the back off the left unit (which was actually quite easy because it was just 1/4" plywood attached with brads and no glue), re-rack the unit into square, and then reattach the back. Thanks for the input!






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Yes - this is certainly the correct answer. It is not a huge gap and the force required to push the backless bookcase into a cuboid is unlikely to be too great to be held by a few panel pins once you put the back back on. They look like nice bookcases, and good luck!

    – ruffle
    Apr 7 at 23:51







  • 4





    Still, it is often the case in older houses (and sometimes in new ones) that the floor is not flat. You need to level them with a spirit level and some kind of shims so they are perfectly level. Then you could consider screwing them together top and bottom.

    – RedSonja
    Apr 8 at 7:00






  • 1





    So you had frame square or went and bought one?

    – Solar Mike
    Apr 8 at 7:49






  • 1





    I didn't buy a framing square (although it's on my list--I used to have one but it's disappeared). But I used my smallish rafter square on the corner of the left bookcase and it looked out of square. I then made an ad-hoc plumb line and used that to verify that the left bookcase was indeed racked to the left. The right one was square.

    – johnnyb1970
    Apr 8 at 20:52


















35














You don't have to buy or get a framing square : just measure the diagonals... That will tell you if either or both units are out of square.



If they are both ok, then look to the floor - small change in the floor will make a large gap at the top... Then you need some adjustable feet of some sort.






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    Well, yes they won't. That's my point. Neither for a parallelogram, a trapezoid, ... The diagonals will be equal, like for a square.

    – WoJ
    Apr 8 at 13:24







  • 5





    @WoJ a parallogram does not have equal diagonals, but they do bisect each other... So, the method I suggested is still valid. You may find this helpful : mathplanet.com/education/geometry/quadrilaterals/…

    – Solar Mike
    Apr 8 at 13:31







  • 1





    (a parallelogram having equal length diagonals ... pfff ... the shame ...) :)

    – WoJ
    Apr 8 at 13:37






  • 1





    @WoJ I think we can assume that the top and bottom are the same length, and the left and right sides are the same length, so it is a parallelogram and the trick with the diagonals works.

    – David Richerby
    Apr 8 at 14:55






  • 3





    @WoJ - "a parallelogram having equal length diagonals", yeah, I've heard of them, they are called rectangles.

    – Glen Yates
    Apr 8 at 21:57


















8














I have used interscrews (e.g. from screwfix) in the past to join units together to make them line up nice and tight.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Doris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Thanks--those look like they would be helpful.

    – johnnyb1970
    Apr 8 at 20:54


















5














If the shelves are sturdy, just get some molding and cover the junction of the two units. Nail the molding to only one unit so they can be easily separated if you want to move them.






share|improve this answer






























    0














    I would turn the left bookcase upside down. If the other side of the left bookcase is more square, or slants to the right, this will fix your problem.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "73"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f161575%2fhow-can-i-fix-this-gap-between-bookcases-i-made%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes








      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      64














      Swap their positions.



      Place the bookcases so that they lean into each other instead of away from each other. This will eliminate the gap between the tops.



      Bookcase contents are usually quite heavy. Once the cases are filled, you will probably find that you can force the bottoms together and the weight of the contents will distort the shape of the cases so the gap disappears.



      If an unsightly gap remains visible then you will need to resort to a decorative molding.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 31





        Another benefit to swapping them is you can see if the problem is actually caused by an uneven floor.

        – bitsmack
        Apr 8 at 6:39






      • 1





        It's funny that the best solution (in my opinion) is a quick bodge.

        – Ismael Miguel
        Apr 8 at 18:03






      • 2





        Or flip them upside down, they look like they would go either way

        – Luke McGregor
        Apr 9 at 9:09






      • 1





        @LukeMcGregor even if they go either way, flipping them will either point the opening against the wall or rotate them so that the long diagonal is in the same position it was before. Right now the long diagonals look like this: [][/] Flip them 180 degrees and they look exactly the same.

        – candied_orange
        Apr 9 at 17:38
















      64














      Swap their positions.



      Place the bookcases so that they lean into each other instead of away from each other. This will eliminate the gap between the tops.



      Bookcase contents are usually quite heavy. Once the cases are filled, you will probably find that you can force the bottoms together and the weight of the contents will distort the shape of the cases so the gap disappears.



      If an unsightly gap remains visible then you will need to resort to a decorative molding.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 31





        Another benefit to swapping them is you can see if the problem is actually caused by an uneven floor.

        – bitsmack
        Apr 8 at 6:39






      • 1





        It's funny that the best solution (in my opinion) is a quick bodge.

        – Ismael Miguel
        Apr 8 at 18:03






      • 2





        Or flip them upside down, they look like they would go either way

        – Luke McGregor
        Apr 9 at 9:09






      • 1





        @LukeMcGregor even if they go either way, flipping them will either point the opening against the wall or rotate them so that the long diagonal is in the same position it was before. Right now the long diagonals look like this: [][/] Flip them 180 degrees and they look exactly the same.

        – candied_orange
        Apr 9 at 17:38














      64












      64








      64







      Swap their positions.



      Place the bookcases so that they lean into each other instead of away from each other. This will eliminate the gap between the tops.



      Bookcase contents are usually quite heavy. Once the cases are filled, you will probably find that you can force the bottoms together and the weight of the contents will distort the shape of the cases so the gap disappears.



      If an unsightly gap remains visible then you will need to resort to a decorative molding.






      share|improve this answer













      Swap their positions.



      Place the bookcases so that they lean into each other instead of away from each other. This will eliminate the gap between the tops.



      Bookcase contents are usually quite heavy. Once the cases are filled, you will probably find that you can force the bottoms together and the weight of the contents will distort the shape of the cases so the gap disappears.



      If an unsightly gap remains visible then you will need to resort to a decorative molding.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Apr 7 at 14:58









      A. I. BreveleriA. I. Breveleri

      7,8771924




      7,8771924







      • 31





        Another benefit to swapping them is you can see if the problem is actually caused by an uneven floor.

        – bitsmack
        Apr 8 at 6:39






      • 1





        It's funny that the best solution (in my opinion) is a quick bodge.

        – Ismael Miguel
        Apr 8 at 18:03






      • 2





        Or flip them upside down, they look like they would go either way

        – Luke McGregor
        Apr 9 at 9:09






      • 1





        @LukeMcGregor even if they go either way, flipping them will either point the opening against the wall or rotate them so that the long diagonal is in the same position it was before. Right now the long diagonals look like this: [][/] Flip them 180 degrees and they look exactly the same.

        – candied_orange
        Apr 9 at 17:38













      • 31





        Another benefit to swapping them is you can see if the problem is actually caused by an uneven floor.

        – bitsmack
        Apr 8 at 6:39






      • 1





        It's funny that the best solution (in my opinion) is a quick bodge.

        – Ismael Miguel
        Apr 8 at 18:03






      • 2





        Or flip them upside down, they look like they would go either way

        – Luke McGregor
        Apr 9 at 9:09






      • 1





        @LukeMcGregor even if they go either way, flipping them will either point the opening against the wall or rotate them so that the long diagonal is in the same position it was before. Right now the long diagonals look like this: [][/] Flip them 180 degrees and they look exactly the same.

        – candied_orange
        Apr 9 at 17:38








      31




      31





      Another benefit to swapping them is you can see if the problem is actually caused by an uneven floor.

      – bitsmack
      Apr 8 at 6:39





      Another benefit to swapping them is you can see if the problem is actually caused by an uneven floor.

      – bitsmack
      Apr 8 at 6:39




      1




      1





      It's funny that the best solution (in my opinion) is a quick bodge.

      – Ismael Miguel
      Apr 8 at 18:03





      It's funny that the best solution (in my opinion) is a quick bodge.

      – Ismael Miguel
      Apr 8 at 18:03




      2




      2





      Or flip them upside down, they look like they would go either way

      – Luke McGregor
      Apr 9 at 9:09





      Or flip them upside down, they look like they would go either way

      – Luke McGregor
      Apr 9 at 9:09




      1




      1





      @LukeMcGregor even if they go either way, flipping them will either point the opening against the wall or rotate them so that the long diagonal is in the same position it was before. Right now the long diagonals look like this: [][/] Flip them 180 degrees and they look exactly the same.

      – candied_orange
      Apr 9 at 17:38






      @LukeMcGregor even if they go either way, flipping them will either point the opening against the wall or rotate them so that the long diagonal is in the same position it was before. Right now the long diagonals look like this: [][/] Flip them 180 degrees and they look exactly the same.

      – candied_orange
      Apr 9 at 17:38














      38














      Thanks everyone; I figured it out and came back here to update my post and noticed that Michael Karas said the same thing I realized (although it was a comment, so I couldn't mark it as the correct answer): I had to pop the back off the left unit (which was actually quite easy because it was just 1/4" plywood attached with brads and no glue), re-rack the unit into square, and then reattach the back. Thanks for the input!






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        Yes - this is certainly the correct answer. It is not a huge gap and the force required to push the backless bookcase into a cuboid is unlikely to be too great to be held by a few panel pins once you put the back back on. They look like nice bookcases, and good luck!

        – ruffle
        Apr 7 at 23:51







      • 4





        Still, it is often the case in older houses (and sometimes in new ones) that the floor is not flat. You need to level them with a spirit level and some kind of shims so they are perfectly level. Then you could consider screwing them together top and bottom.

        – RedSonja
        Apr 8 at 7:00






      • 1





        So you had frame square or went and bought one?

        – Solar Mike
        Apr 8 at 7:49






      • 1





        I didn't buy a framing square (although it's on my list--I used to have one but it's disappeared). But I used my smallish rafter square on the corner of the left bookcase and it looked out of square. I then made an ad-hoc plumb line and used that to verify that the left bookcase was indeed racked to the left. The right one was square.

        – johnnyb1970
        Apr 8 at 20:52















      38














      Thanks everyone; I figured it out and came back here to update my post and noticed that Michael Karas said the same thing I realized (although it was a comment, so I couldn't mark it as the correct answer): I had to pop the back off the left unit (which was actually quite easy because it was just 1/4" plywood attached with brads and no glue), re-rack the unit into square, and then reattach the back. Thanks for the input!






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        Yes - this is certainly the correct answer. It is not a huge gap and the force required to push the backless bookcase into a cuboid is unlikely to be too great to be held by a few panel pins once you put the back back on. They look like nice bookcases, and good luck!

        – ruffle
        Apr 7 at 23:51







      • 4





        Still, it is often the case in older houses (and sometimes in new ones) that the floor is not flat. You need to level them with a spirit level and some kind of shims so they are perfectly level. Then you could consider screwing them together top and bottom.

        – RedSonja
        Apr 8 at 7:00






      • 1





        So you had frame square or went and bought one?

        – Solar Mike
        Apr 8 at 7:49






      • 1





        I didn't buy a framing square (although it's on my list--I used to have one but it's disappeared). But I used my smallish rafter square on the corner of the left bookcase and it looked out of square. I then made an ad-hoc plumb line and used that to verify that the left bookcase was indeed racked to the left. The right one was square.

        – johnnyb1970
        Apr 8 at 20:52













      38












      38








      38







      Thanks everyone; I figured it out and came back here to update my post and noticed that Michael Karas said the same thing I realized (although it was a comment, so I couldn't mark it as the correct answer): I had to pop the back off the left unit (which was actually quite easy because it was just 1/4" plywood attached with brads and no glue), re-rack the unit into square, and then reattach the back. Thanks for the input!






      share|improve this answer













      Thanks everyone; I figured it out and came back here to update my post and noticed that Michael Karas said the same thing I realized (although it was a comment, so I couldn't mark it as the correct answer): I had to pop the back off the left unit (which was actually quite easy because it was just 1/4" plywood attached with brads and no glue), re-rack the unit into square, and then reattach the back. Thanks for the input!







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Apr 7 at 15:21









      johnnyb1970johnnyb1970

      613513




      613513







      • 1





        Yes - this is certainly the correct answer. It is not a huge gap and the force required to push the backless bookcase into a cuboid is unlikely to be too great to be held by a few panel pins once you put the back back on. They look like nice bookcases, and good luck!

        – ruffle
        Apr 7 at 23:51







      • 4





        Still, it is often the case in older houses (and sometimes in new ones) that the floor is not flat. You need to level them with a spirit level and some kind of shims so they are perfectly level. Then you could consider screwing them together top and bottom.

        – RedSonja
        Apr 8 at 7:00






      • 1





        So you had frame square or went and bought one?

        – Solar Mike
        Apr 8 at 7:49






      • 1





        I didn't buy a framing square (although it's on my list--I used to have one but it's disappeared). But I used my smallish rafter square on the corner of the left bookcase and it looked out of square. I then made an ad-hoc plumb line and used that to verify that the left bookcase was indeed racked to the left. The right one was square.

        – johnnyb1970
        Apr 8 at 20:52












      • 1





        Yes - this is certainly the correct answer. It is not a huge gap and the force required to push the backless bookcase into a cuboid is unlikely to be too great to be held by a few panel pins once you put the back back on. They look like nice bookcases, and good luck!

        – ruffle
        Apr 7 at 23:51







      • 4





        Still, it is often the case in older houses (and sometimes in new ones) that the floor is not flat. You need to level them with a spirit level and some kind of shims so they are perfectly level. Then you could consider screwing them together top and bottom.

        – RedSonja
        Apr 8 at 7:00






      • 1





        So you had frame square or went and bought one?

        – Solar Mike
        Apr 8 at 7:49






      • 1





        I didn't buy a framing square (although it's on my list--I used to have one but it's disappeared). But I used my smallish rafter square on the corner of the left bookcase and it looked out of square. I then made an ad-hoc plumb line and used that to verify that the left bookcase was indeed racked to the left. The right one was square.

        – johnnyb1970
        Apr 8 at 20:52







      1




      1





      Yes - this is certainly the correct answer. It is not a huge gap and the force required to push the backless bookcase into a cuboid is unlikely to be too great to be held by a few panel pins once you put the back back on. They look like nice bookcases, and good luck!

      – ruffle
      Apr 7 at 23:51






      Yes - this is certainly the correct answer. It is not a huge gap and the force required to push the backless bookcase into a cuboid is unlikely to be too great to be held by a few panel pins once you put the back back on. They look like nice bookcases, and good luck!

      – ruffle
      Apr 7 at 23:51





      4




      4





      Still, it is often the case in older houses (and sometimes in new ones) that the floor is not flat. You need to level them with a spirit level and some kind of shims so they are perfectly level. Then you could consider screwing them together top and bottom.

      – RedSonja
      Apr 8 at 7:00





      Still, it is often the case in older houses (and sometimes in new ones) that the floor is not flat. You need to level them with a spirit level and some kind of shims so they are perfectly level. Then you could consider screwing them together top and bottom.

      – RedSonja
      Apr 8 at 7:00




      1




      1





      So you had frame square or went and bought one?

      – Solar Mike
      Apr 8 at 7:49





      So you had frame square or went and bought one?

      – Solar Mike
      Apr 8 at 7:49




      1




      1





      I didn't buy a framing square (although it's on my list--I used to have one but it's disappeared). But I used my smallish rafter square on the corner of the left bookcase and it looked out of square. I then made an ad-hoc plumb line and used that to verify that the left bookcase was indeed racked to the left. The right one was square.

      – johnnyb1970
      Apr 8 at 20:52





      I didn't buy a framing square (although it's on my list--I used to have one but it's disappeared). But I used my smallish rafter square on the corner of the left bookcase and it looked out of square. I then made an ad-hoc plumb line and used that to verify that the left bookcase was indeed racked to the left. The right one was square.

      – johnnyb1970
      Apr 8 at 20:52











      35














      You don't have to buy or get a framing square : just measure the diagonals... That will tell you if either or both units are out of square.



      If they are both ok, then look to the floor - small change in the floor will make a large gap at the top... Then you need some adjustable feet of some sort.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 3





        Well, yes they won't. That's my point. Neither for a parallelogram, a trapezoid, ... The diagonals will be equal, like for a square.

        – WoJ
        Apr 8 at 13:24







      • 5





        @WoJ a parallogram does not have equal diagonals, but they do bisect each other... So, the method I suggested is still valid. You may find this helpful : mathplanet.com/education/geometry/quadrilaterals/…

        – Solar Mike
        Apr 8 at 13:31







      • 1





        (a parallelogram having equal length diagonals ... pfff ... the shame ...) :)

        – WoJ
        Apr 8 at 13:37






      • 1





        @WoJ I think we can assume that the top and bottom are the same length, and the left and right sides are the same length, so it is a parallelogram and the trick with the diagonals works.

        – David Richerby
        Apr 8 at 14:55






      • 3





        @WoJ - "a parallelogram having equal length diagonals", yeah, I've heard of them, they are called rectangles.

        – Glen Yates
        Apr 8 at 21:57















      35














      You don't have to buy or get a framing square : just measure the diagonals... That will tell you if either or both units are out of square.



      If they are both ok, then look to the floor - small change in the floor will make a large gap at the top... Then you need some adjustable feet of some sort.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 3





        Well, yes they won't. That's my point. Neither for a parallelogram, a trapezoid, ... The diagonals will be equal, like for a square.

        – WoJ
        Apr 8 at 13:24







      • 5





        @WoJ a parallogram does not have equal diagonals, but they do bisect each other... So, the method I suggested is still valid. You may find this helpful : mathplanet.com/education/geometry/quadrilaterals/…

        – Solar Mike
        Apr 8 at 13:31







      • 1





        (a parallelogram having equal length diagonals ... pfff ... the shame ...) :)

        – WoJ
        Apr 8 at 13:37






      • 1





        @WoJ I think we can assume that the top and bottom are the same length, and the left and right sides are the same length, so it is a parallelogram and the trick with the diagonals works.

        – David Richerby
        Apr 8 at 14:55






      • 3





        @WoJ - "a parallelogram having equal length diagonals", yeah, I've heard of them, they are called rectangles.

        – Glen Yates
        Apr 8 at 21:57













      35












      35








      35







      You don't have to buy or get a framing square : just measure the diagonals... That will tell you if either or both units are out of square.



      If they are both ok, then look to the floor - small change in the floor will make a large gap at the top... Then you need some adjustable feet of some sort.






      share|improve this answer













      You don't have to buy or get a framing square : just measure the diagonals... That will tell you if either or both units are out of square.



      If they are both ok, then look to the floor - small change in the floor will make a large gap at the top... Then you need some adjustable feet of some sort.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Apr 7 at 14:56









      Solar MikeSolar Mike

      1,19329




      1,19329







      • 3





        Well, yes they won't. That's my point. Neither for a parallelogram, a trapezoid, ... The diagonals will be equal, like for a square.

        – WoJ
        Apr 8 at 13:24







      • 5





        @WoJ a parallogram does not have equal diagonals, but they do bisect each other... So, the method I suggested is still valid. You may find this helpful : mathplanet.com/education/geometry/quadrilaterals/…

        – Solar Mike
        Apr 8 at 13:31







      • 1





        (a parallelogram having equal length diagonals ... pfff ... the shame ...) :)

        – WoJ
        Apr 8 at 13:37






      • 1





        @WoJ I think we can assume that the top and bottom are the same length, and the left and right sides are the same length, so it is a parallelogram and the trick with the diagonals works.

        – David Richerby
        Apr 8 at 14:55






      • 3





        @WoJ - "a parallelogram having equal length diagonals", yeah, I've heard of them, they are called rectangles.

        – Glen Yates
        Apr 8 at 21:57












      • 3





        Well, yes they won't. That's my point. Neither for a parallelogram, a trapezoid, ... The diagonals will be equal, like for a square.

        – WoJ
        Apr 8 at 13:24







      • 5





        @WoJ a parallogram does not have equal diagonals, but they do bisect each other... So, the method I suggested is still valid. You may find this helpful : mathplanet.com/education/geometry/quadrilaterals/…

        – Solar Mike
        Apr 8 at 13:31







      • 1





        (a parallelogram having equal length diagonals ... pfff ... the shame ...) :)

        – WoJ
        Apr 8 at 13:37






      • 1





        @WoJ I think we can assume that the top and bottom are the same length, and the left and right sides are the same length, so it is a parallelogram and the trick with the diagonals works.

        – David Richerby
        Apr 8 at 14:55






      • 3





        @WoJ - "a parallelogram having equal length diagonals", yeah, I've heard of them, they are called rectangles.

        – Glen Yates
        Apr 8 at 21:57







      3




      3





      Well, yes they won't. That's my point. Neither for a parallelogram, a trapezoid, ... The diagonals will be equal, like for a square.

      – WoJ
      Apr 8 at 13:24






      Well, yes they won't. That's my point. Neither for a parallelogram, a trapezoid, ... The diagonals will be equal, like for a square.

      – WoJ
      Apr 8 at 13:24





      5




      5





      @WoJ a parallogram does not have equal diagonals, but they do bisect each other... So, the method I suggested is still valid. You may find this helpful : mathplanet.com/education/geometry/quadrilaterals/…

      – Solar Mike
      Apr 8 at 13:31






      @WoJ a parallogram does not have equal diagonals, but they do bisect each other... So, the method I suggested is still valid. You may find this helpful : mathplanet.com/education/geometry/quadrilaterals/…

      – Solar Mike
      Apr 8 at 13:31





      1




      1





      (a parallelogram having equal length diagonals ... pfff ... the shame ...) :)

      – WoJ
      Apr 8 at 13:37





      (a parallelogram having equal length diagonals ... pfff ... the shame ...) :)

      – WoJ
      Apr 8 at 13:37




      1




      1





      @WoJ I think we can assume that the top and bottom are the same length, and the left and right sides are the same length, so it is a parallelogram and the trick with the diagonals works.

      – David Richerby
      Apr 8 at 14:55





      @WoJ I think we can assume that the top and bottom are the same length, and the left and right sides are the same length, so it is a parallelogram and the trick with the diagonals works.

      – David Richerby
      Apr 8 at 14:55




      3




      3





      @WoJ - "a parallelogram having equal length diagonals", yeah, I've heard of them, they are called rectangles.

      – Glen Yates
      Apr 8 at 21:57





      @WoJ - "a parallelogram having equal length diagonals", yeah, I've heard of them, they are called rectangles.

      – Glen Yates
      Apr 8 at 21:57











      8














      I have used interscrews (e.g. from screwfix) in the past to join units together to make them line up nice and tight.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Doris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















      • Thanks--those look like they would be helpful.

        – johnnyb1970
        Apr 8 at 20:54















      8














      I have used interscrews (e.g. from screwfix) in the past to join units together to make them line up nice and tight.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Doris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















      • Thanks--those look like they would be helpful.

        – johnnyb1970
        Apr 8 at 20:54













      8












      8








      8







      I have used interscrews (e.g. from screwfix) in the past to join units together to make them line up nice and tight.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Doris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      I have used interscrews (e.g. from screwfix) in the past to join units together to make them line up nice and tight.







      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Doris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer






      New contributor




      Doris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered Apr 8 at 7:31









      DorisDoris

      1812




      1812




      New contributor




      Doris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Doris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Doris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      • Thanks--those look like they would be helpful.

        – johnnyb1970
        Apr 8 at 20:54

















      • Thanks--those look like they would be helpful.

        – johnnyb1970
        Apr 8 at 20:54
















      Thanks--those look like they would be helpful.

      – johnnyb1970
      Apr 8 at 20:54





      Thanks--those look like they would be helpful.

      – johnnyb1970
      Apr 8 at 20:54











      5














      If the shelves are sturdy, just get some molding and cover the junction of the two units. Nail the molding to only one unit so they can be easily separated if you want to move them.






      share|improve this answer



























        5














        If the shelves are sturdy, just get some molding and cover the junction of the two units. Nail the molding to only one unit so they can be easily separated if you want to move them.






        share|improve this answer

























          5












          5








          5







          If the shelves are sturdy, just get some molding and cover the junction of the two units. Nail the molding to only one unit so they can be easily separated if you want to move them.






          share|improve this answer













          If the shelves are sturdy, just get some molding and cover the junction of the two units. Nail the molding to only one unit so they can be easily separated if you want to move them.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 7 at 14:37









          Jim StewartJim Stewart

          11.9k11332




          11.9k11332





















              0














              I would turn the left bookcase upside down. If the other side of the left bookcase is more square, or slants to the right, this will fix your problem.






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                I would turn the left bookcase upside down. If the other side of the left bookcase is more square, or slants to the right, this will fix your problem.






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  I would turn the left bookcase upside down. If the other side of the left bookcase is more square, or slants to the right, this will fix your problem.






                  share|improve this answer













                  I would turn the left bookcase upside down. If the other side of the left bookcase is more square, or slants to the right, this will fix your problem.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 10 at 5:18









                  spacetyperspacetyper

                  14318




                  14318



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Home Improvement Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f161575%2fhow-can-i-fix-this-gap-between-bookcases-i-made%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

                      QGIS export composer to PDF scale the map [closed] Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Print Composer QGIS 2.6, how to export image?QGIS 2.8.1 print composer won't export all OpenCycleMap base layer tilesSave Print/Map QGIS composer view as PNG/PDF using Python (without changing anything in visible layout)?Export QGIS Print Composer PDF with searchable text labelsQGIS Print Composer does not change from landscape to portrait orientation?How can I avoid map size and scale changes in print composer?Fuzzy PDF export in QGIS running on macSierra OSExport the legend into its 100% size using Print ComposerScale-dependent rendering in QGIS PDF output

                      PDF-ში გადმოწერა სანავიგაციო მენიუproject page