What are the balance implications of using passive Arcana to identify spells for counterspell?What are the levels used for Cantrips learned with the “Magic Initiate” feat?How do Expertise and the Acrobat feat proficiency effects combine?Do the rules on counterspells make it possible to virtually ensure your spell is always cast?Can you Counterspell a caster who is under Invisibility?Is there a serious balance problem allowing all casters to use Arcana with their casting stat?What are the impacts of changing a Ranger's spellcasting ability?When can you counterspell a spell with long casting time?Does this change to Casting a Spell have balance complications?Does the Abjuration wizard's Improved Abjuration feature apply when casting sufficiently high-level spells from scrolls?Is it possible to counterspell the revised Artificer?

Rock identification in KY

Today is the Center

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

Horror movie about a virus at the prom; beginning and end are stylized as a cartoon

Can a vampire attack twice with their claws using Multiattack?

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

Are astronomers waiting to see something in an image from a gravitational lens that they've already seen in an adjacent image?

How to determine what difficulty is right for the game?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

Is it possible to run Internet Explorer on OS X El Capitan?

Unable to deploy metadata from Partner Developer scratch org because of extra fields

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

RSA: Danger of using p to create q

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Why is Minecraft giving an OpenGL error?

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?

Important Resources for Dark Age Civilizations?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

Do infinite dimensional systems make sense?



What are the balance implications of using passive Arcana to identify spells for counterspell?


What are the levels used for Cantrips learned with the “Magic Initiate” feat?How do Expertise and the Acrobat feat proficiency effects combine?Do the rules on counterspells make it possible to virtually ensure your spell is always cast?Can you Counterspell a caster who is under Invisibility?Is there a serious balance problem allowing all casters to use Arcana with their casting stat?What are the impacts of changing a Ranger's spellcasting ability?When can you counterspell a spell with long casting time?Does this change to Casting a Spell have balance complications?Does the Abjuration wizard's Improved Abjuration feature apply when casting sufficiently high-level spells from scrolls?Is it possible to counterspell the revised Artificer?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








7












$begingroup$


Xanathar's Guide to Everything (p. 85) gives an optional rule if a character wants to identify a spell:




Sometimes a character wants to identify a spell that someone else is casting or that was already cast. To do so, a character can use their reaction to identify a spell as it's being cast, or they can use an action on their turn to identify a spell by its effect after it is cast.



If the character perceived the casting, the spell's effect, or both, the character can make an Intelligence (Arcana) check with the reaction or action. The DC equals 15 + the spell's level. If the spell is cast as a class spell and the character is a member of that class, the check is made with advantage. For example, if the spellcaster casts a spell as a cleric, another cleric has advantage on the check to identify the spell. Some spells aren't associated with any class when they're cast, such as when a monster uses its Innate Spellcasting trait.




I'm thinking of completely replacing the check with comparing the passive Arcana score and the DC (15 + spell level). This would also not require a reaction to perform.



However, I'm not sure whether this will be balanced or not. The goal is to allow identifying spell before casting counterspell. The side goal is to reduce dice rolling.



One of my main concern is early level this would be useless, as even with proficiency in Arcana, you would only get at most +5 (+3 from INT and +2 from proficiency). Except if you have expertise, you will never be able to identify even 1st level spell. Without expertise, you will only be able to identify up to 5th level (10 +5 INT and +5 proficiency against DC 20 for 5th level spell).



Is this modification (completely replacing identification using passive score instead of actively rolling Arcana) underpowered? Can it be remedied by changing the base DC to 10 instead of 15? What are some other concern I might have missed?



This rule will also apply on other situations other than for counterspell.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Are you only afraid of it being underpowered? You are effectively giving a free reaction, so maybe it would be worth to ask if it isn't overpowered at some point, too?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 8:41










  • $begingroup$
    @Mołot no, I only mention underpowered because I feel this is underpowered because of the reason stated. I might be wrong and this is actually way overpowered. If it is overpowered, I'd be gladly to read what's the reason and learn balancing homebrewed rules.
    $endgroup$
    – Vylix
    Apr 2 at 8:47










  • $begingroup$
    What is the point of using your reaction to identify a spell as it's being cast? You still can't counterspell it, since reaction was already spent.
    $endgroup$
    – enkryptor
    Apr 2 at 9:52

















7












$begingroup$


Xanathar's Guide to Everything (p. 85) gives an optional rule if a character wants to identify a spell:




Sometimes a character wants to identify a spell that someone else is casting or that was already cast. To do so, a character can use their reaction to identify a spell as it's being cast, or they can use an action on their turn to identify a spell by its effect after it is cast.



If the character perceived the casting, the spell's effect, or both, the character can make an Intelligence (Arcana) check with the reaction or action. The DC equals 15 + the spell's level. If the spell is cast as a class spell and the character is a member of that class, the check is made with advantage. For example, if the spellcaster casts a spell as a cleric, another cleric has advantage on the check to identify the spell. Some spells aren't associated with any class when they're cast, such as when a monster uses its Innate Spellcasting trait.




I'm thinking of completely replacing the check with comparing the passive Arcana score and the DC (15 + spell level). This would also not require a reaction to perform.



However, I'm not sure whether this will be balanced or not. The goal is to allow identifying spell before casting counterspell. The side goal is to reduce dice rolling.



One of my main concern is early level this would be useless, as even with proficiency in Arcana, you would only get at most +5 (+3 from INT and +2 from proficiency). Except if you have expertise, you will never be able to identify even 1st level spell. Without expertise, you will only be able to identify up to 5th level (10 +5 INT and +5 proficiency against DC 20 for 5th level spell).



Is this modification (completely replacing identification using passive score instead of actively rolling Arcana) underpowered? Can it be remedied by changing the base DC to 10 instead of 15? What are some other concern I might have missed?



This rule will also apply on other situations other than for counterspell.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Are you only afraid of it being underpowered? You are effectively giving a free reaction, so maybe it would be worth to ask if it isn't overpowered at some point, too?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 8:41










  • $begingroup$
    @Mołot no, I only mention underpowered because I feel this is underpowered because of the reason stated. I might be wrong and this is actually way overpowered. If it is overpowered, I'd be gladly to read what's the reason and learn balancing homebrewed rules.
    $endgroup$
    – Vylix
    Apr 2 at 8:47










  • $begingroup$
    What is the point of using your reaction to identify a spell as it's being cast? You still can't counterspell it, since reaction was already spent.
    $endgroup$
    – enkryptor
    Apr 2 at 9:52













7












7








7


1



$begingroup$


Xanathar's Guide to Everything (p. 85) gives an optional rule if a character wants to identify a spell:




Sometimes a character wants to identify a spell that someone else is casting or that was already cast. To do so, a character can use their reaction to identify a spell as it's being cast, or they can use an action on their turn to identify a spell by its effect after it is cast.



If the character perceived the casting, the spell's effect, or both, the character can make an Intelligence (Arcana) check with the reaction or action. The DC equals 15 + the spell's level. If the spell is cast as a class spell and the character is a member of that class, the check is made with advantage. For example, if the spellcaster casts a spell as a cleric, another cleric has advantage on the check to identify the spell. Some spells aren't associated with any class when they're cast, such as when a monster uses its Innate Spellcasting trait.




I'm thinking of completely replacing the check with comparing the passive Arcana score and the DC (15 + spell level). This would also not require a reaction to perform.



However, I'm not sure whether this will be balanced or not. The goal is to allow identifying spell before casting counterspell. The side goal is to reduce dice rolling.



One of my main concern is early level this would be useless, as even with proficiency in Arcana, you would only get at most +5 (+3 from INT and +2 from proficiency). Except if you have expertise, you will never be able to identify even 1st level spell. Without expertise, you will only be able to identify up to 5th level (10 +5 INT and +5 proficiency against DC 20 for 5th level spell).



Is this modification (completely replacing identification using passive score instead of actively rolling Arcana) underpowered? Can it be remedied by changing the base DC to 10 instead of 15? What are some other concern I might have missed?



This rule will also apply on other situations other than for counterspell.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Xanathar's Guide to Everything (p. 85) gives an optional rule if a character wants to identify a spell:




Sometimes a character wants to identify a spell that someone else is casting or that was already cast. To do so, a character can use their reaction to identify a spell as it's being cast, or they can use an action on their turn to identify a spell by its effect after it is cast.



If the character perceived the casting, the spell's effect, or both, the character can make an Intelligence (Arcana) check with the reaction or action. The DC equals 15 + the spell's level. If the spell is cast as a class spell and the character is a member of that class, the check is made with advantage. For example, if the spellcaster casts a spell as a cleric, another cleric has advantage on the check to identify the spell. Some spells aren't associated with any class when they're cast, such as when a monster uses its Innate Spellcasting trait.




I'm thinking of completely replacing the check with comparing the passive Arcana score and the DC (15 + spell level). This would also not require a reaction to perform.



However, I'm not sure whether this will be balanced or not. The goal is to allow identifying spell before casting counterspell. The side goal is to reduce dice rolling.



One of my main concern is early level this would be useless, as even with proficiency in Arcana, you would only get at most +5 (+3 from INT and +2 from proficiency). Except if you have expertise, you will never be able to identify even 1st level spell. Without expertise, you will only be able to identify up to 5th level (10 +5 INT and +5 proficiency against DC 20 for 5th level spell).



Is this modification (completely replacing identification using passive score instead of actively rolling Arcana) underpowered? Can it be remedied by changing the base DC to 10 instead of 15? What are some other concern I might have missed?



This rule will also apply on other situations other than for counterspell.







dnd-5e skills balance house-rules






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 2 at 13:34









Rubiksmoose

60.7k10292448




60.7k10292448










asked Apr 2 at 7:25









VylixVylix

14.2k258163




14.2k258163











  • $begingroup$
    Are you only afraid of it being underpowered? You are effectively giving a free reaction, so maybe it would be worth to ask if it isn't overpowered at some point, too?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 8:41










  • $begingroup$
    @Mołot no, I only mention underpowered because I feel this is underpowered because of the reason stated. I might be wrong and this is actually way overpowered. If it is overpowered, I'd be gladly to read what's the reason and learn balancing homebrewed rules.
    $endgroup$
    – Vylix
    Apr 2 at 8:47










  • $begingroup$
    What is the point of using your reaction to identify a spell as it's being cast? You still can't counterspell it, since reaction was already spent.
    $endgroup$
    – enkryptor
    Apr 2 at 9:52
















  • $begingroup$
    Are you only afraid of it being underpowered? You are effectively giving a free reaction, so maybe it would be worth to ask if it isn't overpowered at some point, too?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 8:41










  • $begingroup$
    @Mołot no, I only mention underpowered because I feel this is underpowered because of the reason stated. I might be wrong and this is actually way overpowered. If it is overpowered, I'd be gladly to read what's the reason and learn balancing homebrewed rules.
    $endgroup$
    – Vylix
    Apr 2 at 8:47










  • $begingroup$
    What is the point of using your reaction to identify a spell as it's being cast? You still can't counterspell it, since reaction was already spent.
    $endgroup$
    – enkryptor
    Apr 2 at 9:52















$begingroup$
Are you only afraid of it being underpowered? You are effectively giving a free reaction, so maybe it would be worth to ask if it isn't overpowered at some point, too?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Apr 2 at 8:41




$begingroup$
Are you only afraid of it being underpowered? You are effectively giving a free reaction, so maybe it would be worth to ask if it isn't overpowered at some point, too?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Apr 2 at 8:41












$begingroup$
@Mołot no, I only mention underpowered because I feel this is underpowered because of the reason stated. I might be wrong and this is actually way overpowered. If it is overpowered, I'd be gladly to read what's the reason and learn balancing homebrewed rules.
$endgroup$
– Vylix
Apr 2 at 8:47




$begingroup$
@Mołot no, I only mention underpowered because I feel this is underpowered because of the reason stated. I might be wrong and this is actually way overpowered. If it is overpowered, I'd be gladly to read what's the reason and learn balancing homebrewed rules.
$endgroup$
– Vylix
Apr 2 at 8:47












$begingroup$
What is the point of using your reaction to identify a spell as it's being cast? You still can't counterspell it, since reaction was already spent.
$endgroup$
– enkryptor
Apr 2 at 9:52




$begingroup$
What is the point of using your reaction to identify a spell as it's being cast? You still can't counterspell it, since reaction was already spent.
$endgroup$
– enkryptor
Apr 2 at 9:52










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

I use this, with DC = 10 + the spell's level



And I have used it since before I read the rules in XGtE with absolutely no problems at all and my group really appreciated it.



This is also exactly what passive checks are for. If you notice something your brain immediately makes the link to your knowledge and you just know, you don't need to stop and concentrate to know something, you either know it, or you don't.



Notes



This makes Counterspell more powerful than it seems to be intended in XGtE, but I think that rule sucks and having a spell countered, or countering a spell is more fun than wasting a counterspell. But then as a GM I am on the players side and like them being informed about anything and everything.



If using DC10 as the base drop the advantage rule, because that boils down to +5 and means you start on a base of 15 passively so pretty much recognise everything.



I did try DC = 15 + the spells level, and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter. I didn't like this personally, but it can be a flavourful touch. The DC15 is essentially taking into account that you have advantage on your own type of spells. I think here it is a group preference thing.



TL/DR



I find that more information in the hands of the PCs is better than less information, and any clever use of a passive skill such as this is very much within my style of DMing, but each to their own and this is steering away from RAW.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter." - isn't this just as difficult, on average, as original rule in XGE?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 10:12










  • $begingroup$
    @Mołot I was referring to the comparison to DC10, but yes. The difference with XGtE would be action economy.
    $endgroup$
    – SeriousBri
    Apr 2 at 10:27










  • $begingroup$
    I think this answer can be improved by explaining at the top explicitly what "this" is that you use. OP suggests multiple rules in their part and it's not clear exactly what rules you are agreeing with.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Apr 2 at 12:00










  • $begingroup$
    Does this all mean that as a side effect if the spell level is outside their passive then they know it's above a certain level? They still gain information even when they fail, right?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 2 at 13:21











  • $begingroup$
    What is "this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter" supposed to mean? The Arcana skill is magic in general, not arcane magic specifically. Why would the source of the spell matter?
    $endgroup$
    – T.J.L.
    Apr 2 at 13:37


















-5












$begingroup$

It makes Counterspell too powerful



Under the current rules you can either identify it or Counterspell because both use your singular Reaction.



Most simply explained with an example:



Current Rule



DM: “The lich is casting a spell.”



Me: (Internal monologue) Jeez, it’s a lich, those guys know Power Word, Kill and I don’t want that coming my way. Do I use Counterspell? Best to be safe. But at what level? To be sure I have to use my only 9th level slot. But what if he’s going for a 5th level AoE? Then I’ve wasted my slot and he can Power Word, Kill next turn. What to do?



DM: Are you going to do something?



Me: Yeah. Counterspell at 5th level.



Your rule



DM: “The lich is casting Ice Storm.”



Me: Counterspell at 5th level.



Where’s the fun in that?






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where is the fun in wasting a 5th level slot against Power Word Kill if Counterspell in a 3rd level slot would have the same chance of countering it? This is the opposite of what I would call fun.
    $endgroup$
    – András
    Apr 2 at 8:14






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Explaining changes in action economy etc would be far more useful than opinion about totally relative feeling of fun.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 8:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Me: (Internal monologue)" That can take a large amount of time, the proposed rule greatly increases the pace of the fight.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre Cathé
    Apr 2 at 8:16






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I think counterspell is nerfed into oblivion by the XGtE rule which is an amazing book, but the spell identification rule is by far the worst imho.
    $endgroup$
    – SeriousBri
    Apr 2 at 9:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Mołot so, write that answer
    $endgroup$
    – Dale M
    Apr 2 at 11:52











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144329%2fwhat-are-the-balance-implications-of-using-passive-arcana-to-identify-spells-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









11












$begingroup$

I use this, with DC = 10 + the spell's level



And I have used it since before I read the rules in XGtE with absolutely no problems at all and my group really appreciated it.



This is also exactly what passive checks are for. If you notice something your brain immediately makes the link to your knowledge and you just know, you don't need to stop and concentrate to know something, you either know it, or you don't.



Notes



This makes Counterspell more powerful than it seems to be intended in XGtE, but I think that rule sucks and having a spell countered, or countering a spell is more fun than wasting a counterspell. But then as a GM I am on the players side and like them being informed about anything and everything.



If using DC10 as the base drop the advantage rule, because that boils down to +5 and means you start on a base of 15 passively so pretty much recognise everything.



I did try DC = 15 + the spells level, and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter. I didn't like this personally, but it can be a flavourful touch. The DC15 is essentially taking into account that you have advantage on your own type of spells. I think here it is a group preference thing.



TL/DR



I find that more information in the hands of the PCs is better than less information, and any clever use of a passive skill such as this is very much within my style of DMing, but each to their own and this is steering away from RAW.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter." - isn't this just as difficult, on average, as original rule in XGE?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 10:12










  • $begingroup$
    @Mołot I was referring to the comparison to DC10, but yes. The difference with XGtE would be action economy.
    $endgroup$
    – SeriousBri
    Apr 2 at 10:27










  • $begingroup$
    I think this answer can be improved by explaining at the top explicitly what "this" is that you use. OP suggests multiple rules in their part and it's not clear exactly what rules you are agreeing with.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Apr 2 at 12:00










  • $begingroup$
    Does this all mean that as a side effect if the spell level is outside their passive then they know it's above a certain level? They still gain information even when they fail, right?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 2 at 13:21











  • $begingroup$
    What is "this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter" supposed to mean? The Arcana skill is magic in general, not arcane magic specifically. Why would the source of the spell matter?
    $endgroup$
    – T.J.L.
    Apr 2 at 13:37















11












$begingroup$

I use this, with DC = 10 + the spell's level



And I have used it since before I read the rules in XGtE with absolutely no problems at all and my group really appreciated it.



This is also exactly what passive checks are for. If you notice something your brain immediately makes the link to your knowledge and you just know, you don't need to stop and concentrate to know something, you either know it, or you don't.



Notes



This makes Counterspell more powerful than it seems to be intended in XGtE, but I think that rule sucks and having a spell countered, or countering a spell is more fun than wasting a counterspell. But then as a GM I am on the players side and like them being informed about anything and everything.



If using DC10 as the base drop the advantage rule, because that boils down to +5 and means you start on a base of 15 passively so pretty much recognise everything.



I did try DC = 15 + the spells level, and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter. I didn't like this personally, but it can be a flavourful touch. The DC15 is essentially taking into account that you have advantage on your own type of spells. I think here it is a group preference thing.



TL/DR



I find that more information in the hands of the PCs is better than less information, and any clever use of a passive skill such as this is very much within my style of DMing, but each to their own and this is steering away from RAW.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter." - isn't this just as difficult, on average, as original rule in XGE?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 10:12










  • $begingroup$
    @Mołot I was referring to the comparison to DC10, but yes. The difference with XGtE would be action economy.
    $endgroup$
    – SeriousBri
    Apr 2 at 10:27










  • $begingroup$
    I think this answer can be improved by explaining at the top explicitly what "this" is that you use. OP suggests multiple rules in their part and it's not clear exactly what rules you are agreeing with.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Apr 2 at 12:00










  • $begingroup$
    Does this all mean that as a side effect if the spell level is outside their passive then they know it's above a certain level? They still gain information even when they fail, right?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 2 at 13:21











  • $begingroup$
    What is "this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter" supposed to mean? The Arcana skill is magic in general, not arcane magic specifically. Why would the source of the spell matter?
    $endgroup$
    – T.J.L.
    Apr 2 at 13:37













11












11








11





$begingroup$

I use this, with DC = 10 + the spell's level



And I have used it since before I read the rules in XGtE with absolutely no problems at all and my group really appreciated it.



This is also exactly what passive checks are for. If you notice something your brain immediately makes the link to your knowledge and you just know, you don't need to stop and concentrate to know something, you either know it, or you don't.



Notes



This makes Counterspell more powerful than it seems to be intended in XGtE, but I think that rule sucks and having a spell countered, or countering a spell is more fun than wasting a counterspell. But then as a GM I am on the players side and like them being informed about anything and everything.



If using DC10 as the base drop the advantage rule, because that boils down to +5 and means you start on a base of 15 passively so pretty much recognise everything.



I did try DC = 15 + the spells level, and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter. I didn't like this personally, but it can be a flavourful touch. The DC15 is essentially taking into account that you have advantage on your own type of spells. I think here it is a group preference thing.



TL/DR



I find that more information in the hands of the PCs is better than less information, and any clever use of a passive skill such as this is very much within my style of DMing, but each to their own and this is steering away from RAW.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



I use this, with DC = 10 + the spell's level



And I have used it since before I read the rules in XGtE with absolutely no problems at all and my group really appreciated it.



This is also exactly what passive checks are for. If you notice something your brain immediately makes the link to your knowledge and you just know, you don't need to stop and concentrate to know something, you either know it, or you don't.



Notes



This makes Counterspell more powerful than it seems to be intended in XGtE, but I think that rule sucks and having a spell countered, or countering a spell is more fun than wasting a counterspell. But then as a GM I am on the players side and like them being informed about anything and everything.



If using DC10 as the base drop the advantage rule, because that boils down to +5 and means you start on a base of 15 passively so pretty much recognise everything.



I did try DC = 15 + the spells level, and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter. I didn't like this personally, but it can be a flavourful touch. The DC15 is essentially taking into account that you have advantage on your own type of spells. I think here it is a group preference thing.



TL/DR



I find that more information in the hands of the PCs is better than less information, and any clever use of a passive skill such as this is very much within my style of DMing, but each to their own and this is steering away from RAW.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 2 at 11:52









Rubiksmoose

60.7k10292448




60.7k10292448










answered Apr 2 at 9:48









SeriousBriSeriousBri

6,47121753




6,47121753











  • $begingroup$
    "and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter." - isn't this just as difficult, on average, as original rule in XGE?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 10:12










  • $begingroup$
    @Mołot I was referring to the comparison to DC10, but yes. The difference with XGtE would be action economy.
    $endgroup$
    – SeriousBri
    Apr 2 at 10:27










  • $begingroup$
    I think this answer can be improved by explaining at the top explicitly what "this" is that you use. OP suggests multiple rules in their part and it's not clear exactly what rules you are agreeing with.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Apr 2 at 12:00










  • $begingroup$
    Does this all mean that as a side effect if the spell level is outside their passive then they know it's above a certain level? They still gain information even when they fail, right?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 2 at 13:21











  • $begingroup$
    What is "this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter" supposed to mean? The Arcana skill is magic in general, not arcane magic specifically. Why would the source of the spell matter?
    $endgroup$
    – T.J.L.
    Apr 2 at 13:37
















  • $begingroup$
    "and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter." - isn't this just as difficult, on average, as original rule in XGE?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 10:12










  • $begingroup$
    @Mołot I was referring to the comparison to DC10, but yes. The difference with XGtE would be action economy.
    $endgroup$
    – SeriousBri
    Apr 2 at 10:27










  • $begingroup$
    I think this answer can be improved by explaining at the top explicitly what "this" is that you use. OP suggests multiple rules in their part and it's not clear exactly what rules you are agreeing with.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Apr 2 at 12:00










  • $begingroup$
    Does this all mean that as a side effect if the spell level is outside their passive then they know it's above a certain level? They still gain information even when they fail, right?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 2 at 13:21











  • $begingroup$
    What is "this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter" supposed to mean? The Arcana skill is magic in general, not arcane magic specifically. Why would the source of the spell matter?
    $endgroup$
    – T.J.L.
    Apr 2 at 13:37















$begingroup$
"and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter." - isn't this just as difficult, on average, as original rule in XGE?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Apr 2 at 10:12




$begingroup$
"and this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter." - isn't this just as difficult, on average, as original rule in XGE?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Apr 2 at 10:12












$begingroup$
@Mołot I was referring to the comparison to DC10, but yes. The difference with XGtE would be action economy.
$endgroup$
– SeriousBri
Apr 2 at 10:27




$begingroup$
@Mołot I was referring to the comparison to DC10, but yes. The difference with XGtE would be action economy.
$endgroup$
– SeriousBri
Apr 2 at 10:27












$begingroup$
I think this answer can be improved by explaining at the top explicitly what "this" is that you use. OP suggests multiple rules in their part and it's not clear exactly what rules you are agreeing with.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Apr 2 at 12:00




$begingroup$
I think this answer can be improved by explaining at the top explicitly what "this" is that you use. OP suggests multiple rules in their part and it's not clear exactly what rules you are agreeing with.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Apr 2 at 12:00












$begingroup$
Does this all mean that as a side effect if the spell level is outside their passive then they know it's above a certain level? They still gain information even when they fail, right?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 2 at 13:21





$begingroup$
Does this all mean that as a side effect if the spell level is outside their passive then they know it's above a certain level? They still gain information even when they fail, right?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 2 at 13:21













$begingroup$
What is "this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter" supposed to mean? The Arcana skill is magic in general, not arcane magic specifically. Why would the source of the spell matter?
$endgroup$
– T.J.L.
Apr 2 at 13:37




$begingroup$
What is "this has the effect of making non-arcane spells more difficult to counter" supposed to mean? The Arcana skill is magic in general, not arcane magic specifically. Why would the source of the spell matter?
$endgroup$
– T.J.L.
Apr 2 at 13:37













-5












$begingroup$

It makes Counterspell too powerful



Under the current rules you can either identify it or Counterspell because both use your singular Reaction.



Most simply explained with an example:



Current Rule



DM: “The lich is casting a spell.”



Me: (Internal monologue) Jeez, it’s a lich, those guys know Power Word, Kill and I don’t want that coming my way. Do I use Counterspell? Best to be safe. But at what level? To be sure I have to use my only 9th level slot. But what if he’s going for a 5th level AoE? Then I’ve wasted my slot and he can Power Word, Kill next turn. What to do?



DM: Are you going to do something?



Me: Yeah. Counterspell at 5th level.



Your rule



DM: “The lich is casting Ice Storm.”



Me: Counterspell at 5th level.



Where’s the fun in that?






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where is the fun in wasting a 5th level slot against Power Word Kill if Counterspell in a 3rd level slot would have the same chance of countering it? This is the opposite of what I would call fun.
    $endgroup$
    – András
    Apr 2 at 8:14






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Explaining changes in action economy etc would be far more useful than opinion about totally relative feeling of fun.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 8:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Me: (Internal monologue)" That can take a large amount of time, the proposed rule greatly increases the pace of the fight.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre Cathé
    Apr 2 at 8:16






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I think counterspell is nerfed into oblivion by the XGtE rule which is an amazing book, but the spell identification rule is by far the worst imho.
    $endgroup$
    – SeriousBri
    Apr 2 at 9:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Mołot so, write that answer
    $endgroup$
    – Dale M
    Apr 2 at 11:52















-5












$begingroup$

It makes Counterspell too powerful



Under the current rules you can either identify it or Counterspell because both use your singular Reaction.



Most simply explained with an example:



Current Rule



DM: “The lich is casting a spell.”



Me: (Internal monologue) Jeez, it’s a lich, those guys know Power Word, Kill and I don’t want that coming my way. Do I use Counterspell? Best to be safe. But at what level? To be sure I have to use my only 9th level slot. But what if he’s going for a 5th level AoE? Then I’ve wasted my slot and he can Power Word, Kill next turn. What to do?



DM: Are you going to do something?



Me: Yeah. Counterspell at 5th level.



Your rule



DM: “The lich is casting Ice Storm.”



Me: Counterspell at 5th level.



Where’s the fun in that?






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where is the fun in wasting a 5th level slot against Power Word Kill if Counterspell in a 3rd level slot would have the same chance of countering it? This is the opposite of what I would call fun.
    $endgroup$
    – András
    Apr 2 at 8:14






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Explaining changes in action economy etc would be far more useful than opinion about totally relative feeling of fun.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 8:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Me: (Internal monologue)" That can take a large amount of time, the proposed rule greatly increases the pace of the fight.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre Cathé
    Apr 2 at 8:16






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I think counterspell is nerfed into oblivion by the XGtE rule which is an amazing book, but the spell identification rule is by far the worst imho.
    $endgroup$
    – SeriousBri
    Apr 2 at 9:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Mołot so, write that answer
    $endgroup$
    – Dale M
    Apr 2 at 11:52













-5












-5








-5





$begingroup$

It makes Counterspell too powerful



Under the current rules you can either identify it or Counterspell because both use your singular Reaction.



Most simply explained with an example:



Current Rule



DM: “The lich is casting a spell.”



Me: (Internal monologue) Jeez, it’s a lich, those guys know Power Word, Kill and I don’t want that coming my way. Do I use Counterspell? Best to be safe. But at what level? To be sure I have to use my only 9th level slot. But what if he’s going for a 5th level AoE? Then I’ve wasted my slot and he can Power Word, Kill next turn. What to do?



DM: Are you going to do something?



Me: Yeah. Counterspell at 5th level.



Your rule



DM: “The lich is casting Ice Storm.”



Me: Counterspell at 5th level.



Where’s the fun in that?






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



It makes Counterspell too powerful



Under the current rules you can either identify it or Counterspell because both use your singular Reaction.



Most simply explained with an example:



Current Rule



DM: “The lich is casting a spell.”



Me: (Internal monologue) Jeez, it’s a lich, those guys know Power Word, Kill and I don’t want that coming my way. Do I use Counterspell? Best to be safe. But at what level? To be sure I have to use my only 9th level slot. But what if he’s going for a 5th level AoE? Then I’ve wasted my slot and he can Power Word, Kill next turn. What to do?



DM: Are you going to do something?



Me: Yeah. Counterspell at 5th level.



Your rule



DM: “The lich is casting Ice Storm.”



Me: Counterspell at 5th level.



Where’s the fun in that?







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 2 at 7:42









Dale MDale M

111k24287490




111k24287490







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where is the fun in wasting a 5th level slot against Power Word Kill if Counterspell in a 3rd level slot would have the same chance of countering it? This is the opposite of what I would call fun.
    $endgroup$
    – András
    Apr 2 at 8:14






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Explaining changes in action economy etc would be far more useful than opinion about totally relative feeling of fun.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 8:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Me: (Internal monologue)" That can take a large amount of time, the proposed rule greatly increases the pace of the fight.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre Cathé
    Apr 2 at 8:16






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I think counterspell is nerfed into oblivion by the XGtE rule which is an amazing book, but the spell identification rule is by far the worst imho.
    $endgroup$
    – SeriousBri
    Apr 2 at 9:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Mołot so, write that answer
    $endgroup$
    – Dale M
    Apr 2 at 11:52












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where is the fun in wasting a 5th level slot against Power Word Kill if Counterspell in a 3rd level slot would have the same chance of countering it? This is the opposite of what I would call fun.
    $endgroup$
    – András
    Apr 2 at 8:14






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Explaining changes in action economy etc would be far more useful than opinion about totally relative feeling of fun.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 2 at 8:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Me: (Internal monologue)" That can take a large amount of time, the proposed rule greatly increases the pace of the fight.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre Cathé
    Apr 2 at 8:16






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I think counterspell is nerfed into oblivion by the XGtE rule which is an amazing book, but the spell identification rule is by far the worst imho.
    $endgroup$
    – SeriousBri
    Apr 2 at 9:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Mołot so, write that answer
    $endgroup$
    – Dale M
    Apr 2 at 11:52







1




1




$begingroup$
Where is the fun in wasting a 5th level slot against Power Word Kill if Counterspell in a 3rd level slot would have the same chance of countering it? This is the opposite of what I would call fun.
$endgroup$
– András
Apr 2 at 8:14




$begingroup$
Where is the fun in wasting a 5th level slot against Power Word Kill if Counterspell in a 3rd level slot would have the same chance of countering it? This is the opposite of what I would call fun.
$endgroup$
– András
Apr 2 at 8:14




10




10




$begingroup$
Explaining changes in action economy etc would be far more useful than opinion about totally relative feeling of fun.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Apr 2 at 8:15




$begingroup$
Explaining changes in action economy etc would be far more useful than opinion about totally relative feeling of fun.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Apr 2 at 8:15




1




1




$begingroup$
"Me: (Internal monologue)" That can take a large amount of time, the proposed rule greatly increases the pace of the fight.
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
Apr 2 at 8:16




$begingroup$
"Me: (Internal monologue)" That can take a large amount of time, the proposed rule greatly increases the pace of the fight.
$endgroup$
– Pierre Cathé
Apr 2 at 8:16




5




5




$begingroup$
I think counterspell is nerfed into oblivion by the XGtE rule which is an amazing book, but the spell identification rule is by far the worst imho.
$endgroup$
– SeriousBri
Apr 2 at 9:49




$begingroup$
I think counterspell is nerfed into oblivion by the XGtE rule which is an amazing book, but the spell identification rule is by far the worst imho.
$endgroup$
– SeriousBri
Apr 2 at 9:49




1




1




$begingroup$
@Mołot so, write that answer
$endgroup$
– Dale M
Apr 2 at 11:52




$begingroup$
@Mołot so, write that answer
$endgroup$
– Dale M
Apr 2 at 11:52

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144329%2fwhat-are-the-balance-implications-of-using-passive-arcana-to-identify-spells-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given

Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221