Reclassifying rasterstack in R?Reclassifying Rasters Error 001100 Failed because no statistics are availableReclassifying rasters using GDAL and Python?Getting aspect and reclassifying raster files using Python in a loopReclassifying rasters to two values (1 and NODATA)?R: Error when stacking multiple raster filesUsing spei() function on time series from rasterstack in R?Rasterize shapefile according to another big raster using gdal_rasterizeExtract values from large rasterstack, RConditional mean of rasterstackCalculating Median/Quantile of Rasterstack and converting Results to Data Frame in R

Cross compiling for RPi - error while loading shared libraries

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?

How to format long polynomial?

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Is it possible to run Internet Explorer on OS X El Capitan?

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

Unable to deploy metadata from Partner Developer scratch org because of extra fields

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

Codimension of non-flat locus

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?

Theorems that impeded progress

Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?

meaning of に in 本当に?

Do infinite dimensional systems make sense?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

dbcc cleantable batch size explanation



Reclassifying rasterstack in R?


Reclassifying Rasters Error 001100 Failed because no statistics are availableReclassifying rasters using GDAL and Python?Getting aspect and reclassifying raster files using Python in a loopReclassifying rasters to two values (1 and NODATA)?R: Error when stacking multiple raster filesUsing spei() function on time series from rasterstack in R?Rasterize shapefile according to another big raster using gdal_rasterizeExtract values from large rasterstack, RConditional mean of rasterstackCalculating Median/Quantile of Rasterstack and converting Results to Data Frame in R






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















I have a very large raster stack of 6253 raster layers and I want to reclassify it.
For the reclass, I have tried the following but with no success:



my_rules <- c(-0.500, -0.251, 1, -0.251, -0.101, 2, -0.101,0.99,3, 0.99,0.269,4, 0.269,0.439,5, 0.439,0.659,6, 0.659,1.300,7, 1.300,2,NA)
reclmat <- matrix(my_rules, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE)
my_stack<- reclassify(my_stack, reclmat,right=FALSE)

Error in .local(x, rcl, ...) : all(rcl[, 2] >= rcl[, 1]) is not TRUE


Is this the wrong way to approach this?










share|improve this question






























    0















    I have a very large raster stack of 6253 raster layers and I want to reclassify it.
    For the reclass, I have tried the following but with no success:



    my_rules <- c(-0.500, -0.251, 1, -0.251, -0.101, 2, -0.101,0.99,3, 0.99,0.269,4, 0.269,0.439,5, 0.439,0.659,6, 0.659,1.300,7, 1.300,2,NA)
    reclmat <- matrix(my_rules, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE)
    my_stack<- reclassify(my_stack, reclmat,right=FALSE)

    Error in .local(x, rcl, ...) : all(rcl[, 2] >= rcl[, 1]) is not TRUE


    Is this the wrong way to approach this?










    share|improve this question


























      0












      0








      0








      I have a very large raster stack of 6253 raster layers and I want to reclassify it.
      For the reclass, I have tried the following but with no success:



      my_rules <- c(-0.500, -0.251, 1, -0.251, -0.101, 2, -0.101,0.99,3, 0.99,0.269,4, 0.269,0.439,5, 0.439,0.659,6, 0.659,1.300,7, 1.300,2,NA)
      reclmat <- matrix(my_rules, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE)
      my_stack<- reclassify(my_stack, reclmat,right=FALSE)

      Error in .local(x, rcl, ...) : all(rcl[, 2] >= rcl[, 1]) is not TRUE


      Is this the wrong way to approach this?










      share|improve this question
















      I have a very large raster stack of 6253 raster layers and I want to reclassify it.
      For the reclass, I have tried the following but with no success:



      my_rules <- c(-0.500, -0.251, 1, -0.251, -0.101, 2, -0.101,0.99,3, 0.99,0.269,4, 0.269,0.439,5, 0.439,0.659,6, 0.659,1.300,7, 1.300,2,NA)
      reclmat <- matrix(my_rules, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE)
      my_stack<- reclassify(my_stack, reclmat,right=FALSE)

      Error in .local(x, rcl, ...) : all(rcl[, 2] >= rcl[, 1]) is not TRUE


      Is this the wrong way to approach this?







      r reclassify rasterstack






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 2 at 11:24









      PolyGeo

      53.9k1781245




      53.9k1781245










      asked Apr 2 at 6:49









      foofoo

      555




      555




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Your reclassification matrix isn't right - I suspect the 0.990 on rows 3 and 4 should be 0.099 - as it is the rows make up overlapping classes so the function throws an error:



          > reclmat
          [,1] [,2] [,3]
          [1,] -0.500 -0.251 1
          [2,] -0.251 -0.101 2
          [3,] -0.101 0.990 3
          [4,] 0.990 0.269 4
          [5,] 0.269 0.439 5
          [6,] 0.439 0.659 6
          [7,] 0.659 1.300 7
          [8,] 1.300 2.000 NA


          Its nothing to do with the size of the stack - you should always test things first on small examples. I duplicated your error with:



          > r = raster()
          > r[] = runif(ncell(r),-0.5,2)
          > reclassify(r,reclmat)
          Error: all(rcl[, 2] >= rcl[, 1]) is not TRUE


          Change the 0.990 to 0.099 and it works:



          > my_rules <- c(-0.500, -0.251, 1, -0.251, -0.101, 2, -0.101,0.099,3, 0.099,0.269,4, 0.269,0.439,5, 0.439,0.659,6, 0.659,1.300,7, 1.300,2,NA)
          > reclmat <- matrix(my_rules, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE)
          > reclassify(r,reclmat)
          class : RasterLayer
          dimensions : 180, 360, 64800 (nrow, ncol, ncell)
          resolution : 1, 1 (x, y)





          share|improve this answer























          • Such a stupid mistake from me. Thank you for the notice @Spacedman!

            – foo
            Apr 2 at 7:31











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "79"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f317445%2freclassifying-rasterstack-in-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          Your reclassification matrix isn't right - I suspect the 0.990 on rows 3 and 4 should be 0.099 - as it is the rows make up overlapping classes so the function throws an error:



          > reclmat
          [,1] [,2] [,3]
          [1,] -0.500 -0.251 1
          [2,] -0.251 -0.101 2
          [3,] -0.101 0.990 3
          [4,] 0.990 0.269 4
          [5,] 0.269 0.439 5
          [6,] 0.439 0.659 6
          [7,] 0.659 1.300 7
          [8,] 1.300 2.000 NA


          Its nothing to do with the size of the stack - you should always test things first on small examples. I duplicated your error with:



          > r = raster()
          > r[] = runif(ncell(r),-0.5,2)
          > reclassify(r,reclmat)
          Error: all(rcl[, 2] >= rcl[, 1]) is not TRUE


          Change the 0.990 to 0.099 and it works:



          > my_rules <- c(-0.500, -0.251, 1, -0.251, -0.101, 2, -0.101,0.099,3, 0.099,0.269,4, 0.269,0.439,5, 0.439,0.659,6, 0.659,1.300,7, 1.300,2,NA)
          > reclmat <- matrix(my_rules, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE)
          > reclassify(r,reclmat)
          class : RasterLayer
          dimensions : 180, 360, 64800 (nrow, ncol, ncell)
          resolution : 1, 1 (x, y)





          share|improve this answer























          • Such a stupid mistake from me. Thank you for the notice @Spacedman!

            – foo
            Apr 2 at 7:31















          3














          Your reclassification matrix isn't right - I suspect the 0.990 on rows 3 and 4 should be 0.099 - as it is the rows make up overlapping classes so the function throws an error:



          > reclmat
          [,1] [,2] [,3]
          [1,] -0.500 -0.251 1
          [2,] -0.251 -0.101 2
          [3,] -0.101 0.990 3
          [4,] 0.990 0.269 4
          [5,] 0.269 0.439 5
          [6,] 0.439 0.659 6
          [7,] 0.659 1.300 7
          [8,] 1.300 2.000 NA


          Its nothing to do with the size of the stack - you should always test things first on small examples. I duplicated your error with:



          > r = raster()
          > r[] = runif(ncell(r),-0.5,2)
          > reclassify(r,reclmat)
          Error: all(rcl[, 2] >= rcl[, 1]) is not TRUE


          Change the 0.990 to 0.099 and it works:



          > my_rules <- c(-0.500, -0.251, 1, -0.251, -0.101, 2, -0.101,0.099,3, 0.099,0.269,4, 0.269,0.439,5, 0.439,0.659,6, 0.659,1.300,7, 1.300,2,NA)
          > reclmat <- matrix(my_rules, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE)
          > reclassify(r,reclmat)
          class : RasterLayer
          dimensions : 180, 360, 64800 (nrow, ncol, ncell)
          resolution : 1, 1 (x, y)





          share|improve this answer























          • Such a stupid mistake from me. Thank you for the notice @Spacedman!

            – foo
            Apr 2 at 7:31













          3












          3








          3







          Your reclassification matrix isn't right - I suspect the 0.990 on rows 3 and 4 should be 0.099 - as it is the rows make up overlapping classes so the function throws an error:



          > reclmat
          [,1] [,2] [,3]
          [1,] -0.500 -0.251 1
          [2,] -0.251 -0.101 2
          [3,] -0.101 0.990 3
          [4,] 0.990 0.269 4
          [5,] 0.269 0.439 5
          [6,] 0.439 0.659 6
          [7,] 0.659 1.300 7
          [8,] 1.300 2.000 NA


          Its nothing to do with the size of the stack - you should always test things first on small examples. I duplicated your error with:



          > r = raster()
          > r[] = runif(ncell(r),-0.5,2)
          > reclassify(r,reclmat)
          Error: all(rcl[, 2] >= rcl[, 1]) is not TRUE


          Change the 0.990 to 0.099 and it works:



          > my_rules <- c(-0.500, -0.251, 1, -0.251, -0.101, 2, -0.101,0.099,3, 0.099,0.269,4, 0.269,0.439,5, 0.439,0.659,6, 0.659,1.300,7, 1.300,2,NA)
          > reclmat <- matrix(my_rules, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE)
          > reclassify(r,reclmat)
          class : RasterLayer
          dimensions : 180, 360, 64800 (nrow, ncol, ncell)
          resolution : 1, 1 (x, y)





          share|improve this answer













          Your reclassification matrix isn't right - I suspect the 0.990 on rows 3 and 4 should be 0.099 - as it is the rows make up overlapping classes so the function throws an error:



          > reclmat
          [,1] [,2] [,3]
          [1,] -0.500 -0.251 1
          [2,] -0.251 -0.101 2
          [3,] -0.101 0.990 3
          [4,] 0.990 0.269 4
          [5,] 0.269 0.439 5
          [6,] 0.439 0.659 6
          [7,] 0.659 1.300 7
          [8,] 1.300 2.000 NA


          Its nothing to do with the size of the stack - you should always test things first on small examples. I duplicated your error with:



          > r = raster()
          > r[] = runif(ncell(r),-0.5,2)
          > reclassify(r,reclmat)
          Error: all(rcl[, 2] >= rcl[, 1]) is not TRUE


          Change the 0.990 to 0.099 and it works:



          > my_rules <- c(-0.500, -0.251, 1, -0.251, -0.101, 2, -0.101,0.099,3, 0.099,0.269,4, 0.269,0.439,5, 0.439,0.659,6, 0.659,1.300,7, 1.300,2,NA)
          > reclmat <- matrix(my_rules, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE)
          > reclassify(r,reclmat)
          class : RasterLayer
          dimensions : 180, 360, 64800 (nrow, ncol, ncell)
          resolution : 1, 1 (x, y)






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 2 at 7:24









          SpacedmanSpacedman

          24.8k23551




          24.8k23551












          • Such a stupid mistake from me. Thank you for the notice @Spacedman!

            – foo
            Apr 2 at 7:31

















          • Such a stupid mistake from me. Thank you for the notice @Spacedman!

            – foo
            Apr 2 at 7:31
















          Such a stupid mistake from me. Thank you for the notice @Spacedman!

          – foo
          Apr 2 at 7:31





          Such a stupid mistake from me. Thank you for the notice @Spacedman!

          – foo
          Apr 2 at 7:31

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f317445%2freclassifying-rasterstack-in-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

          Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given

          Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221