Using the “a” preposition with “echar de menos” and a personal objectWhen is the indirect object pronoun required in sentences with an indirect object?How to deal with personal direct object and indirect object?Indirect Object and neuter “lo” usage with inanimate objectsUsing “atrás” with “volver”Object pronouns with the subjunctivePreposition and direct objects which are personsUsing se with the first person singular conjugationLlevar + past participle: agreement with objectPassive voice with direct and indirect object pronounsUsing the imperfect indicative vs. subjunctive with “si”

Theorems that impeded progress

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

meaning of に in 本当に?

What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?

Can a vampire attack twice with their claws using Multiattack?

Could an aircraft fly or hover using only jets of compressed air?

Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?

Unable to deploy metadata from Partner Developer scratch org because of extra fields

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

dbcc cleantable batch size explanation

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

How does quantile regression compare to logistic regression with the variable split at the quantile?

Are astronomers waiting to see something in an image from a gravitational lens that they've already seen in an adjacent image?

High voltage LED indicator 40-1000 VDC without additional power supply

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

Arrow those variables!

Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

Rock identification in KY

What's the output of a record needle playing an out-of-speed record

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?



Using the “a” preposition with “echar de menos” and a personal object


When is the indirect object pronoun required in sentences with an indirect object?How to deal with personal direct object and indirect object?Indirect Object and neuter “lo” usage with inanimate objectsUsing “atrás” with “volver”Object pronouns with the subjunctivePreposition and direct objects which are personsUsing se with the first person singular conjugationLlevar + past participle: agreement with objectPassive voice with direct and indirect object pronounsUsing the imperfect indicative vs. subjunctive with “si”













5















I'm a bit fuzzy on how the "personal a" works in Spanish, for example in this passage from Harry Potter y la cámera secreta:




Nunca se había sentido tan solo. Antes que ninguna otra cosa de Hogwarts, antes incluso que jugar al quidditch, lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger.




I'm new to echar de menos too, so my understanding is that Harry is the subject of echar, and lo que is its direct object.



I'm a little surprised you wouldn't use a lo que here rather than just lo que, considering the a that follows. Would a lo que also be grammatical? What about if you reordered the clauses to A sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger, era (a?) lo que de verdad echaba de menos.?



A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish gives a related example: A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad.










share|improve this question




























    5















    I'm a bit fuzzy on how the "personal a" works in Spanish, for example in this passage from Harry Potter y la cámera secreta:




    Nunca se había sentido tan solo. Antes que ninguna otra cosa de Hogwarts, antes incluso que jugar al quidditch, lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger.




    I'm new to echar de menos too, so my understanding is that Harry is the subject of echar, and lo que is its direct object.



    I'm a little surprised you wouldn't use a lo que here rather than just lo que, considering the a that follows. Would a lo que also be grammatical? What about if you reordered the clauses to A sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger, era (a?) lo que de verdad echaba de menos.?



    A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish gives a related example: A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad.










    share|improve this question


























      5












      5








      5








      I'm a bit fuzzy on how the "personal a" works in Spanish, for example in this passage from Harry Potter y la cámera secreta:




      Nunca se había sentido tan solo. Antes que ninguna otra cosa de Hogwarts, antes incluso que jugar al quidditch, lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger.




      I'm new to echar de menos too, so my understanding is that Harry is the subject of echar, and lo que is its direct object.



      I'm a little surprised you wouldn't use a lo que here rather than just lo que, considering the a that follows. Would a lo que also be grammatical? What about if you reordered the clauses to A sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger, era (a?) lo que de verdad echaba de menos.?



      A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish gives a related example: A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad.










      share|improve this question
















      I'm a bit fuzzy on how the "personal a" works in Spanish, for example in this passage from Harry Potter y la cámera secreta:




      Nunca se había sentido tan solo. Antes que ninguna otra cosa de Hogwarts, antes incluso que jugar al quidditch, lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger.




      I'm new to echar de menos too, so my understanding is that Harry is the subject of echar, and lo que is its direct object.



      I'm a little surprised you wouldn't use a lo que here rather than just lo que, considering the a that follows. Would a lo que also be grammatical? What about if you reordered the clauses to A sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger, era (a?) lo que de verdad echaba de menos.?



      A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish gives a related example: A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad.







      gramática






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 2 at 6:44









      Charlie

      48.2k1088222




      48.2k1088222










      asked Apr 2 at 5:36









      Alan O'DonnellAlan O'Donnell

      1773




      1773




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          Note that the "related example" may not be as related as you think. In the sentence




          A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad




          the object ("casualidad") is not a person, and even so it carries an a. What happens here is that the verb temer, with the sense of "to fear something" can be used in Spanish both as a transitive or intransitive verb. In the latter case, you will always need the a preposition. You can tell if the verb is being used as transitive or intransitive by the use of la/le/lo:




          Temer(le) a los gatos.

          Temer(le) a la oscuridad.

          Temer(le) a la casualidad.




          But:




          Temer a los gatos > Temerlos.

          Temer la oscuridad > Temerla.

          Temer la casualidad > Temerla.




          The Harry Potter example, nonetheless, is different. The verbal locution echar de menos always acts as a transitive verb. So in this case you will need the personal a:




          Echo de menos a mi gato.

          Echo de menos la oscuridad.

          Echo de menos estar con mis amigos.




          But then, what happens with the Harry Potter example? Isn't it talking about his friends? Yes, but (as I hinted in a previous example) it happens that when the object is substituted with la or lo, you don't need the preposition any more:




          —¿Echas de menos a tus amigos?

          —Sí, los echo de menos.




          So, as the sentence starts with a lo, the preposition is not needed:




          Lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos.




          Finally, note that if you make sus mejores amigos the subject of the sentence, you don't need the preposition either:




          Sus mejores amigos eran lo que de verdad echaba de menos.







          share|improve this answer

























          • Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".

            – Alan O'Donnell
            Apr 2 at 12:50






          • 1





            @AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".

            – Charlie
            Apr 2 at 13:09












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "353"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspanish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29030%2fusing-the-a-preposition-with-echar-de-menos-and-a-personal-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          Note that the "related example" may not be as related as you think. In the sentence




          A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad




          the object ("casualidad") is not a person, and even so it carries an a. What happens here is that the verb temer, with the sense of "to fear something" can be used in Spanish both as a transitive or intransitive verb. In the latter case, you will always need the a preposition. You can tell if the verb is being used as transitive or intransitive by the use of la/le/lo:




          Temer(le) a los gatos.

          Temer(le) a la oscuridad.

          Temer(le) a la casualidad.




          But:




          Temer a los gatos > Temerlos.

          Temer la oscuridad > Temerla.

          Temer la casualidad > Temerla.




          The Harry Potter example, nonetheless, is different. The verbal locution echar de menos always acts as a transitive verb. So in this case you will need the personal a:




          Echo de menos a mi gato.

          Echo de menos la oscuridad.

          Echo de menos estar con mis amigos.




          But then, what happens with the Harry Potter example? Isn't it talking about his friends? Yes, but (as I hinted in a previous example) it happens that when the object is substituted with la or lo, you don't need the preposition any more:




          —¿Echas de menos a tus amigos?

          —Sí, los echo de menos.




          So, as the sentence starts with a lo, the preposition is not needed:




          Lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos.




          Finally, note that if you make sus mejores amigos the subject of the sentence, you don't need the preposition either:




          Sus mejores amigos eran lo que de verdad echaba de menos.







          share|improve this answer

























          • Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".

            – Alan O'Donnell
            Apr 2 at 12:50






          • 1





            @AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".

            – Charlie
            Apr 2 at 13:09
















          5














          Note that the "related example" may not be as related as you think. In the sentence




          A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad




          the object ("casualidad") is not a person, and even so it carries an a. What happens here is that the verb temer, with the sense of "to fear something" can be used in Spanish both as a transitive or intransitive verb. In the latter case, you will always need the a preposition. You can tell if the verb is being used as transitive or intransitive by the use of la/le/lo:




          Temer(le) a los gatos.

          Temer(le) a la oscuridad.

          Temer(le) a la casualidad.




          But:




          Temer a los gatos > Temerlos.

          Temer la oscuridad > Temerla.

          Temer la casualidad > Temerla.




          The Harry Potter example, nonetheless, is different. The verbal locution echar de menos always acts as a transitive verb. So in this case you will need the personal a:




          Echo de menos a mi gato.

          Echo de menos la oscuridad.

          Echo de menos estar con mis amigos.




          But then, what happens with the Harry Potter example? Isn't it talking about his friends? Yes, but (as I hinted in a previous example) it happens that when the object is substituted with la or lo, you don't need the preposition any more:




          —¿Echas de menos a tus amigos?

          —Sí, los echo de menos.




          So, as the sentence starts with a lo, the preposition is not needed:




          Lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos.




          Finally, note that if you make sus mejores amigos the subject of the sentence, you don't need the preposition either:




          Sus mejores amigos eran lo que de verdad echaba de menos.







          share|improve this answer

























          • Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".

            – Alan O'Donnell
            Apr 2 at 12:50






          • 1





            @AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".

            – Charlie
            Apr 2 at 13:09














          5












          5








          5







          Note that the "related example" may not be as related as you think. In the sentence




          A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad




          the object ("casualidad") is not a person, and even so it carries an a. What happens here is that the verb temer, with the sense of "to fear something" can be used in Spanish both as a transitive or intransitive verb. In the latter case, you will always need the a preposition. You can tell if the verb is being used as transitive or intransitive by the use of la/le/lo:




          Temer(le) a los gatos.

          Temer(le) a la oscuridad.

          Temer(le) a la casualidad.




          But:




          Temer a los gatos > Temerlos.

          Temer la oscuridad > Temerla.

          Temer la casualidad > Temerla.




          The Harry Potter example, nonetheless, is different. The verbal locution echar de menos always acts as a transitive verb. So in this case you will need the personal a:




          Echo de menos a mi gato.

          Echo de menos la oscuridad.

          Echo de menos estar con mis amigos.




          But then, what happens with the Harry Potter example? Isn't it talking about his friends? Yes, but (as I hinted in a previous example) it happens that when the object is substituted with la or lo, you don't need the preposition any more:




          —¿Echas de menos a tus amigos?

          —Sí, los echo de menos.




          So, as the sentence starts with a lo, the preposition is not needed:




          Lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos.




          Finally, note that if you make sus mejores amigos the subject of the sentence, you don't need the preposition either:




          Sus mejores amigos eran lo que de verdad echaba de menos.







          share|improve this answer















          Note that the "related example" may not be as related as you think. In the sentence




          A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad




          the object ("casualidad") is not a person, and even so it carries an a. What happens here is that the verb temer, with the sense of "to fear something" can be used in Spanish both as a transitive or intransitive verb. In the latter case, you will always need the a preposition. You can tell if the verb is being used as transitive or intransitive by the use of la/le/lo:




          Temer(le) a los gatos.

          Temer(le) a la oscuridad.

          Temer(le) a la casualidad.




          But:




          Temer a los gatos > Temerlos.

          Temer la oscuridad > Temerla.

          Temer la casualidad > Temerla.




          The Harry Potter example, nonetheless, is different. The verbal locution echar de menos always acts as a transitive verb. So in this case you will need the personal a:




          Echo de menos a mi gato.

          Echo de menos la oscuridad.

          Echo de menos estar con mis amigos.




          But then, what happens with the Harry Potter example? Isn't it talking about his friends? Yes, but (as I hinted in a previous example) it happens that when the object is substituted with la or lo, you don't need the preposition any more:




          —¿Echas de menos a tus amigos?

          —Sí, los echo de menos.




          So, as the sentence starts with a lo, the preposition is not needed:




          Lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos.




          Finally, note that if you make sus mejores amigos the subject of the sentence, you don't need the preposition either:




          Sus mejores amigos eran lo que de verdad echaba de menos.








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 2 at 13:00

























          answered Apr 2 at 6:42









          CharlieCharlie

          48.2k1088222




          48.2k1088222












          • Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".

            – Alan O'Donnell
            Apr 2 at 12:50






          • 1





            @AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".

            – Charlie
            Apr 2 at 13:09


















          • Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".

            – Alan O'Donnell
            Apr 2 at 12:50






          • 1





            @AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".

            – Charlie
            Apr 2 at 13:09

















          Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".

          – Alan O'Donnell
          Apr 2 at 12:50





          Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".

          – Alan O'Donnell
          Apr 2 at 12:50




          1




          1





          @AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".

          – Charlie
          Apr 2 at 13:09






          @AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".

          – Charlie
          Apr 2 at 13:09


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Spanish Language Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspanish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29030%2fusing-the-a-preposition-with-echar-de-menos-and-a-personal-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

          Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given

          Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221