Hfrhyu

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Weird behaviour when using querySelector

Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore

Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?

What to wear for invited talk in Canada

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?

Why do we use polarized capacitors?

Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?

Input two commands to a new terminal?

Is Fable (1996) connected in any way to the Fable franchise from Lionhead Studios?

Wild Shape Centaur Into a Giant Elk: do their Charges stack?

Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?

Imbalanced dataset binary classification

OA final episode explanation

How to manage monthly salary

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

aging parents with no investments

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Symmetry in quantum mechanics

How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?

How many letters suffice to construct words with no repetition?

Why are the 737's rear doors unusable in a water landing?

Why evacuate wing at the front side after water landing?Can water landing be simulated?Why is the rear seat ejected before the front one?Why are 737-200 engines more susceptible to separation?Why evacuate wing at the front side after water landing?Are tail strike landings preferable for an emergency landing on water?Why Boeing 737 main landing gear wells have no doors?Why would landing the space shuttle on water have been unsurvivable?Why do the 737-100/200’s thrust reversers blow fully open if hydraulic pressure is removed while the reversers are partly open?Why do newer 737s use two different styles of split winglets?Why can’t more older 737s be retrofitted with more newer winglets?

13

$begingroup$

The 737's rear exit doors cannot be used to evacuate the aircraft in the event of a water landing, as shown, for example, in this safety card:

(Image from flight-report, via Jordy here at AvSE.)

In contrast, the rear doors on (for instance) the A320 series can be used for a water evacuation:

(Image by Czechnology here at AvSE.)

Why can't the 737's rear doors be used during a water landing?

boeing-737 evacuation ditching

share|improve this question

asked Apr 4 at 0:28

SeanSean

5,89232872

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  13
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I like the optimism of these "safety cards" showing a pristine aircraft floating nicely on the water after a ditching. Statistically unlikely but makes for a pleasant looking card.
  $endgroup$
  – Ron Beyer
  Apr 4 at 2:55
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  12
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  There was that time a guy with a lot of glider experience landed an airliner in the Hudson River a few years back, after the engines died right after he took off from the airport.
  $endgroup$
  – nick012000
  Apr 4 at 3:55
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  12
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Yeah, and they couldn't use the rear doors. Know why? They were underwater... This was an A320.
  $endgroup$
  – Harper
  Apr 4 at 4:00
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  6
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @nick012000 and they call it "The Miracle on the Hudson" for a reason.
  $endgroup$
  – Arcanist Lupus
  Apr 4 at 6:02
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Looks like Airbus tell you to check, but Boeing reckon it's not even worth checking. In the one photo I can find of a successful Airbus landing on water, you wouldn't open the rear doors anyway... home.bt.com/images/…
  $endgroup$
  – Jason
  Apr 4 at 7:13
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

13

$begingroup$

The 737's rear exit doors cannot be used to evacuate the aircraft in the event of a water landing, as shown, for example, in this safety card:

(Image from flight-report, via Jordy here at AvSE.)

In contrast, the rear doors on (for instance) the A320 series can be used for a water evacuation:

(Image by Czechnology here at AvSE.)

Why can't the 737's rear doors be used during a water landing?

boeing-737 evacuation ditching

share|improve this question

asked Apr 4 at 0:28

SeanSean

5,89232872

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  13
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I like the optimism of these "safety cards" showing a pristine aircraft floating nicely on the water after a ditching. Statistically unlikely but makes for a pleasant looking card.
  $endgroup$
  – Ron Beyer
  Apr 4 at 2:55
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  12
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  There was that time a guy with a lot of glider experience landed an airliner in the Hudson River a few years back, after the engines died right after he took off from the airport.
  $endgroup$
  – nick012000
  Apr 4 at 3:55
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  12
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Yeah, and they couldn't use the rear doors. Know why? They were underwater... This was an A320.
  $endgroup$
  – Harper
  Apr 4 at 4:00
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  6
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @nick012000 and they call it "The Miracle on the Hudson" for a reason.
  $endgroup$
  – Arcanist Lupus
  Apr 4 at 6:02
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Looks like Airbus tell you to check, but Boeing reckon it's not even worth checking. In the one photo I can find of a successful Airbus landing on water, you wouldn't open the rear doors anyway... home.bt.com/images/…
  $endgroup$
  – Jason
  Apr 4 at 7:13
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The 737's rear exit doors cannot be used to evacuate the aircraft in the event of a water landing, as shown, for example, in this safety card:

(Image from flight-report, via Jordy here at AvSE.)

In contrast, the rear doors on (for instance) the A320 series can be used for a water evacuation:

(Image by Czechnology here at AvSE.)

Why can't the 737's rear doors be used during a water landing?

boeing-737 evacuation ditching

share|improve this question

asked Apr 4 at 0:28

SeanSean

5,89232872

$endgroup$

share|improve this question

asked Apr 4 at 0:28

SeanSean

5,89232872

share|improve this question

asked Apr 4 at 0:28

SeanSean

5,89232872

asked Apr 4 at 0:28

SeanSean

5,89232872

asked Apr 4 at 0:28

SeanSean

5,89232872

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

14

$begingroup$

The bottom of the door opening sits too close to, or below, the water line when the airplane is floating.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 4 at 0:34

John KJohn K

24.6k13674

$endgroup$

We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
  $endgroup$
  – Jamiec♦
  Apr 5 at 12:37
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

10

$begingroup$

It all goes back to how the aircraft is designed; the ways different planes float vary.
when the 737 ditches on water the tail-section of the plane is deeper in the water than front of it, because the wings are a huge floating point and support most of the weight of the aircraft when afloat, and the bigger front of the airplane contains more air so when floating it will be lighter hence pitching the nose up, causing the tail and the rear doors to be below or very close to the water. this is why these doors remain shut in the event of evacuating after an emergency water landing so that water doesn't get in any faster, giving the plane and its passengers and the crew more time to evacuate and stay afloat longer until help arrives.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 4 at 1:56

AndroidSmoker74AndroidSmoker74

23910

New contributor

AndroidSmoker74 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  "[T]he bigger front of the airplane contains more air so when floating it will be lighter" and, by the same argument, a big empty box weighs less than a small empty box because it contains more air! You've forgotten that the bigger container also has bigger walls, which weigh more.
  $endgroup$
  – David Richerby
  Apr 4 at 10:23
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby You're forgetting the square-cube law.
  $endgroup$
  – Katastic Voyage
  Apr 4 at 12:03
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby - Yes, bigger empty boxes weight less than smaller empty boxes when both are submerged in water.
  $endgroup$
  – Pere
  Apr 4 at 15:18
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby You are the one introducing the interpretation of "lighter" in the answer as meaning less weight rather than more buoyancy. The answer did not say the former, and clearly meant the latter. If you really want to nitpick, it is the wording, not the concept.
  $endgroup$
  – Backgammon
  Apr 4 at 17:12
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby, the tail is a pointy cone with a bunch of thin bits of metal sticking off of it. It's got a lot of metal and only a little air. The nose is a rounded object containing a whole lot of air and only a little metal. It's not surprising that the nose floats higher than the tail.
  $endgroup$
  – Mark
  Apr 4 at 22:17
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 6 more comments

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61987%2fwhy-are-the-737s-rear-doors-unusable-in-a-water-landing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

14

$begingroup$

The bottom of the door opening sits too close to, or below, the water line when the airplane is floating.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 4 at 0:34

John KJohn K

24.6k13674

$endgroup$

We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
  $endgroup$
  – Jamiec♦
  Apr 5 at 12:37
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

14

$begingroup$

The bottom of the door opening sits too close to, or below, the water line when the airplane is floating.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 4 at 0:34

John KJohn K

24.6k13674

$endgroup$

We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
  $endgroup$
  – Jamiec♦
  Apr 5 at 12:37
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The bottom of the door opening sits too close to, or below, the water line when the airplane is floating.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 4 at 0:34

John KJohn K

24.6k13674

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 4 at 0:34

John KJohn K

24.6k13674

answered Apr 4 at 0:34

John KJohn K

24.6k13674

answered Apr 4 at 0:34

John KJohn K

24.6k13674

10

$begingroup$

It all goes back to how the aircraft is designed; the ways different planes float vary.
when the 737 ditches on water the tail-section of the plane is deeper in the water than front of it, because the wings are a huge floating point and support most of the weight of the aircraft when afloat, and the bigger front of the airplane contains more air so when floating it will be lighter hence pitching the nose up, causing the tail and the rear doors to be below or very close to the water. this is why these doors remain shut in the event of evacuating after an emergency water landing so that water doesn't get in any faster, giving the plane and its passengers and the crew more time to evacuate and stay afloat longer until help arrives.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 4 at 1:56

AndroidSmoker74AndroidSmoker74

23910

New contributor

AndroidSmoker74 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  "[T]he bigger front of the airplane contains more air so when floating it will be lighter" and, by the same argument, a big empty box weighs less than a small empty box because it contains more air! You've forgotten that the bigger container also has bigger walls, which weigh more.
  $endgroup$
  – David Richerby
  Apr 4 at 10:23
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby You're forgetting the square-cube law.
  $endgroup$
  – Katastic Voyage
  Apr 4 at 12:03
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby - Yes, bigger empty boxes weight less than smaller empty boxes when both are submerged in water.
  $endgroup$
  – Pere
  Apr 4 at 15:18
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby You are the one introducing the interpretation of "lighter" in the answer as meaning less weight rather than more buoyancy. The answer did not say the former, and clearly meant the latter. If you really want to nitpick, it is the wording, not the concept.
  $endgroup$
  – Backgammon
  Apr 4 at 17:12
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby, the tail is a pointy cone with a bunch of thin bits of metal sticking off of it. It's got a lot of metal and only a little air. The nose is a rounded object containing a whole lot of air and only a little metal. It's not surprising that the nose floats higher than the tail.
  $endgroup$
  – Mark
  Apr 4 at 22:17
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 6 more comments

10

$begingroup$

It all goes back to how the aircraft is designed; the ways different planes float vary.
when the 737 ditches on water the tail-section of the plane is deeper in the water than front of it, because the wings are a huge floating point and support most of the weight of the aircraft when afloat, and the bigger front of the airplane contains more air so when floating it will be lighter hence pitching the nose up, causing the tail and the rear doors to be below or very close to the water. this is why these doors remain shut in the event of evacuating after an emergency water landing so that water doesn't get in any faster, giving the plane and its passengers and the crew more time to evacuate and stay afloat longer until help arrives.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 4 at 1:56

AndroidSmoker74AndroidSmoker74

23910

New contributor

AndroidSmoker74 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  "[T]he bigger front of the airplane contains more air so when floating it will be lighter" and, by the same argument, a big empty box weighs less than a small empty box because it contains more air! You've forgotten that the bigger container also has bigger walls, which weigh more.
  $endgroup$
  – David Richerby
  Apr 4 at 10:23
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby You're forgetting the square-cube law.
  $endgroup$
  – Katastic Voyage
  Apr 4 at 12:03
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby - Yes, bigger empty boxes weight less than smaller empty boxes when both are submerged in water.
  $endgroup$
  – Pere
  Apr 4 at 15:18
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby You are the one introducing the interpretation of "lighter" in the answer as meaning less weight rather than more buoyancy. The answer did not say the former, and clearly meant the latter. If you really want to nitpick, it is the wording, not the concept.
  $endgroup$
  – Backgammon
  Apr 4 at 17:12
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @DavidRicherby, the tail is a pointy cone with a bunch of thin bits of metal sticking off of it. It's got a lot of metal and only a little air. The nose is a rounded object containing a whole lot of air and only a little metal. It's not surprising that the nose floats higher than the tail.
  $endgroup$
  – Mark
  Apr 4 at 22:17
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 6 more comments

$begingroup$

It all goes back to how the aircraft is designed; the ways different planes float vary.
when the 737 ditches on water the tail-section of the plane is deeper in the water than front of it, because the wings are a huge floating point and support most of the weight of the aircraft when afloat, and the bigger front of the airplane contains more air so when floating it will be lighter hence pitching the nose up, causing the tail and the rear doors to be below or very close to the water. this is why these doors remain shut in the event of evacuating after an emergency water landing so that water doesn't get in any faster, giving the plane and its passengers and the crew more time to evacuate and stay afloat longer until help arrives.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 4 at 1:56

AndroidSmoker74AndroidSmoker74

23910

New contributor

AndroidSmoker74 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 4 at 1:56

AndroidSmoker74AndroidSmoker74

23910

New contributor

AndroidSmoker74 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

answered Apr 4 at 1:56

AndroidSmoker74AndroidSmoker74

23910

New contributor

AndroidSmoker74 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

answered Apr 4 at 1:56

AndroidSmoker74AndroidSmoker74

23910