Hfrhyu

New order #4: World

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

aging parents with no investments

Is Social Media Science Fiction?

Crop image to path created in TikZ?

Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?

What is it called when oen voice type sings a 'solo?'

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Why do we use polarized capacitors?

What is GPS' 19 year rollover and does it present a cybersecurity issue?

How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it

Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?

extract characters between two commas?

"My colleague's body is amazing"

What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?

Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Is every set a filtered colimit of finite sets?

Why is the ratio of two extensive quantities always intensive?

Definition of “intensive” and “extensive” propertiesAre $G$, $F$ and $H$ (thermodynamics potentials) extensive quantities?Is speed an intensive property?Why is density an intensive property?Extensive variables in thermodynamicsPressure: extensive or intensive property?Is heat an extensive or intensive property?Why we can't multiply two extensive quantities together?Is length an extensive property?Rigorous definition of intensive and extensive quantities in thermodynamics

12

1

$begingroup$

Is this something that we observe that always happens or is there some fundamental reason for two extensive quantities to give an intensive when divided?

thermodynamics definition volume scaling

share|cite|improve this question

edited Apr 4 at 11:04

David Z♦

63.9k23136252

asked Apr 4 at 6:19

paokara moupaokara mou

1587

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

12

1

$begingroup$

Is this something that we observe that always happens or is there some fundamental reason for two extensive quantities to give an intensive when divided?

thermodynamics definition volume scaling

share|cite|improve this question

edited Apr 4 at 11:04

David Z♦

63.9k23136252

asked Apr 4 at 6:19

paokara moupaokara mou

1587

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Is this something that we observe that always happens or is there some fundamental reason for two extensive quantities to give an intensive when divided?

thermodynamics definition volume scaling

share|cite|improve this question

edited Apr 4 at 11:04

David Z♦

63.9k23136252

asked Apr 4 at 6:19

paokara moupaokara mou

1587

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

edited Apr 4 at 11:04

David Z♦

63.9k23136252

asked Apr 4 at 6:19

paokara moupaokara mou

1587

share|cite|improve this question

edited Apr 4 at 11:04

David Z♦

63.9k23136252

asked Apr 4 at 6:19

paokara moupaokara mou

1587

edited Apr 4 at 11:04

David Z♦

63.9k23136252

edited Apr 4 at 11:04

David Z♦

63.9k23136252

asked Apr 4 at 6:19

paokara moupaokara mou

1587

asked Apr 4 at 6:19

paokara moupaokara mou

1587

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

18

$begingroup$

It is mainly a mathematical reason. Extensive quantities grow with system size. If two quantities scale in the same way with a variable (in this case system size), it cancels out in the division.

Mini-example: $A$ and $B$ are extensive physical quantities both dependent on $n$. Their ratio is called $C = A / B$. If you scale the system up, $A$ and $B$ grow by a factor of $n$. What happens to $C$?

$fracA cdot nB cdot n = fracAB$

$C$ stays the same, irrespective of $n$. Hence, $C$ is intensive. The most common physical example is mass and volume, which scale with system size and still exhibit the same ratio, the density.

EDIT including the comment of probably_someone: The argumentation is particularly true since by definition an extensive quantity grows linearly with system size. This justifies the proportionality that I presented in the mini-example.

share|cite|improve this answer

edited Apr 4 at 10:49

answered Apr 4 at 6:27

lmrlmr

1,072520

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  8
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  In particular, this is true because "extensive" is specifically defined as growing linearly with system size (see e.g. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties), which raises the question: what do we call a property that grows nonlinearly with system size (for example, as the square of the volume)?
  $endgroup$
  – probably_someone
  Apr 4 at 10:21
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Yeah, I did not point this out explicitly. I added a few sentences to include the linearity.
  $endgroup$
  – lmr
  Apr 4 at 10:50
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Technically couldn't the linear relations have different "slopes", so that the part dependant on the size still cancels, but there will be some extra constant factor multiplying your ratio there?
  $endgroup$
  – Aaron Stevens
  Apr 4 at 11:32
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @AaronStevens Well mathematically, it is definitely possible. I can't think of a suitable example right now though. But as you pointed out yourself, the ratio will still remain intensive.
  $endgroup$
  – lmr
  Apr 4 at 12:04
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @AaronStevens Whatever the factor is is already included in $A$ and $B$ in this answer. And in particular, if the quantities have different units then not only are the slopes different, they have different units so they are clearly very different, but all that is automatically accounted for in the division. Having the same unit but different magnitude is no different.
  $endgroup$
  – JiK
  Apr 4 at 12:51
  
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470452%2fwhy-is-the-ratio-of-two-extensive-quantities-always-intensive%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

18

$begingroup$

It is mainly a mathematical reason. Extensive quantities grow with system size. If two quantities scale in the same way with a variable (in this case system size), it cancels out in the division.

Mini-example: $A$ and $B$ are extensive physical quantities both dependent on $n$. Their ratio is called $C = A / B$. If you scale the system up, $A$ and $B$ grow by a factor of $n$. What happens to $C$?

$fracA cdot nB cdot n = fracAB$

$C$ stays the same, irrespective of $n$. Hence, $C$ is intensive. The most common physical example is mass and volume, which scale with system size and still exhibit the same ratio, the density.

EDIT including the comment of probably_someone: The argumentation is particularly true since by definition an extensive quantity grows linearly with system size. This justifies the proportionality that I presented in the mini-example.

share|cite|improve this answer

edited Apr 4 at 10:49

answered Apr 4 at 6:27

lmrlmr

1,072520

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  8
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  In particular, this is true because "extensive" is specifically defined as growing linearly with system size (see e.g. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties), which raises the question: what do we call a property that grows nonlinearly with system size (for example, as the square of the volume)?
  $endgroup$
  – probably_someone
  Apr 4 at 10:21
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Yeah, I did not point this out explicitly. I added a few sentences to include the linearity.
  $endgroup$
  – lmr
  Apr 4 at 10:50
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Technically couldn't the linear relations have different "slopes", so that the part dependant on the size still cancels, but there will be some extra constant factor multiplying your ratio there?
  $endgroup$
  – Aaron Stevens
  Apr 4 at 11:32
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @AaronStevens Well mathematically, it is definitely possible. I can't think of a suitable example right now though. But as you pointed out yourself, the ratio will still remain intensive.
  $endgroup$
  – lmr
  Apr 4 at 12:04
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @AaronStevens Whatever the factor is is already included in $A$ and $B$ in this answer. And in particular, if the quantities have different units then not only are the slopes different, they have different units so they are clearly very different, but all that is automatically accounted for in the division. Having the same unit but different magnitude is no different.
  $endgroup$
  – JiK
  Apr 4 at 12:51
  
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 2 more comments

18

$begingroup$

It is mainly a mathematical reason. Extensive quantities grow with system size. If two quantities scale in the same way with a variable (in this case system size), it cancels out in the division.

Mini-example: $A$ and $B$ are extensive physical quantities both dependent on $n$. Their ratio is called $C = A / B$. If you scale the system up, $A$ and $B$ grow by a factor of $n$. What happens to $C$?

$fracA cdot nB cdot n = fracAB$

$C$ stays the same, irrespective of $n$. Hence, $C$ is intensive. The most common physical example is mass and volume, which scale with system size and still exhibit the same ratio, the density.

EDIT including the comment of probably_someone: The argumentation is particularly true since by definition an extensive quantity grows linearly with system size. This justifies the proportionality that I presented in the mini-example.

share|cite|improve this answer

edited Apr 4 at 10:49

answered Apr 4 at 6:27

lmrlmr

1,072520

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  8
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  In particular, this is true because "extensive" is specifically defined as growing linearly with system size (see e.g. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties), which raises the question: what do we call a property that grows nonlinearly with system size (for example, as the square of the volume)?
  $endgroup$
  – probably_someone
  Apr 4 at 10:21
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Yeah, I did not point this out explicitly. I added a few sentences to include the linearity.
  $endgroup$
  – lmr
  Apr 4 at 10:50
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Technically couldn't the linear relations have different "slopes", so that the part dependant on the size still cancels, but there will be some extra constant factor multiplying your ratio there?
  $endgroup$
  – Aaron Stevens
  Apr 4 at 11:32
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @AaronStevens Well mathematically, it is definitely possible. I can't think of a suitable example right now though. But as you pointed out yourself, the ratio will still remain intensive.
  $endgroup$
  – lmr
  Apr 4 at 12:04
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @AaronStevens Whatever the factor is is already included in $A$ and $B$ in this answer. And in particular, if the quantities have different units then not only are the slopes different, they have different units so they are clearly very different, but all that is automatically accounted for in the division. Having the same unit but different magnitude is no different.
  $endgroup$
  – JiK
  Apr 4 at 12:51
  
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 2 more comments

$begingroup$

It is mainly a mathematical reason. Extensive quantities grow with system size. If two quantities scale in the same way with a variable (in this case system size), it cancels out in the division.

Mini-example: $A$ and $B$ are extensive physical quantities both dependent on $n$. Their ratio is called $C = A / B$. If you scale the system up, $A$ and $B$ grow by a factor of $n$. What happens to $C$?

$fracA cdot nB cdot n = fracAB$

$C$ stays the same, irrespective of $n$. Hence, $C$ is intensive. The most common physical example is mass and volume, which scale with system size and still exhibit the same ratio, the density.

EDIT including the comment of probably_someone: The argumentation is particularly true since by definition an extensive quantity grows linearly with system size. This justifies the proportionality that I presented in the mini-example.

share|cite|improve this answer

edited Apr 4 at 10:49

answered Apr 4 at 6:27

lmrlmr

1,072520

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

edited Apr 4 at 10:49

answered Apr 4 at 6:27

lmrlmr

1,072520

answered Apr 4 at 6:27

lmrlmr

1,072520

answered Apr 4 at 6:27

lmrlmr

1,072520