Is the myth that if you can play one instrument, you can learn another instrument with ease true?Problems With Learning a Second InstrumentTrumpet playing to clarinet playingSoftware that transposes music?Learning an instrument onlineNeed Help in Starting to Learn Guitars?Will learning to play another instrument help me to become a better guitarist?How do I learn proper breathing when teaching myself the flute?What instrument can an old guy learn if the main goal is to write musicWhy is the recorder a good instrument to start with?Why would expectations of students vary largely between instruments?Alto Flute KeyingCan one be too old to learn an instrument?

Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?

Is this relativistic mass?

What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?

COUNT(*) or MAX(id) - which is faster?

How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it

Prime joint compound before latex paint?

Ideas for 3rd eye abilities

Crop image to path created in TikZ?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money

New order #4: World

Copycat chess is back

Eliminate empty elements from a list with a specific pattern

What does "enim et" mean?

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?

I see my dog run

What does it exactly mean if a random variable follows a distribution

How many letters suffice to construct words with no repetition?

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?

extract characters between two commas?

Can the Produce Flame cantrip be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?



Is the myth that if you can play one instrument, you can learn another instrument with ease true?


Problems With Learning a Second InstrumentTrumpet playing to clarinet playingSoftware that transposes music?Learning an instrument onlineNeed Help in Starting to Learn Guitars?Will learning to play another instrument help me to become a better guitarist?How do I learn proper breathing when teaching myself the flute?What instrument can an old guy learn if the main goal is to write musicWhy is the recorder a good instrument to start with?Why would expectations of students vary largely between instruments?Alto Flute KeyingCan one be too old to learn an instrument?













4















I've heard many people say this:




"If you can play one instrument, other instruments will be easy to learn"




I just can't help but wonder if this is true. Suppose I'm a professional flute player. Would learning an instrument, suppose guitar (while being the professional flute player) be simpler to learn than if I didn't play the flute?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    I suggest clarifying the question. First, you ask whether the second instrument will be easy to learn, but later, whether it will be easier. These are quite different questions.

    – replete
    Apr 4 at 0:10











  • @replete Oops. I typed faster than I could think. I'll clarify.

    – Xilpex
    Apr 4 at 0:12







  • 2





    IMO, no dupe. It's close, but that one asks about a more specific scenario.

    – user45266
    Apr 4 at 4:43











  • With a little editing, this could stop being a dupe.

    – Tim
    Apr 4 at 7:58






  • 1





    Not a dupe. The other question regards a particular issue with learning a second instrument. This one is general. It’s also not really opinion-based; all 3 answers are in agreement.

    – trw
    Apr 4 at 13:35















4















I've heard many people say this:




"If you can play one instrument, other instruments will be easy to learn"




I just can't help but wonder if this is true. Suppose I'm a professional flute player. Would learning an instrument, suppose guitar (while being the professional flute player) be simpler to learn than if I didn't play the flute?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    I suggest clarifying the question. First, you ask whether the second instrument will be easy to learn, but later, whether it will be easier. These are quite different questions.

    – replete
    Apr 4 at 0:10











  • @replete Oops. I typed faster than I could think. I'll clarify.

    – Xilpex
    Apr 4 at 0:12







  • 2





    IMO, no dupe. It's close, but that one asks about a more specific scenario.

    – user45266
    Apr 4 at 4:43











  • With a little editing, this could stop being a dupe.

    – Tim
    Apr 4 at 7:58






  • 1





    Not a dupe. The other question regards a particular issue with learning a second instrument. This one is general. It’s also not really opinion-based; all 3 answers are in agreement.

    – trw
    Apr 4 at 13:35













4












4








4








I've heard many people say this:




"If you can play one instrument, other instruments will be easy to learn"




I just can't help but wonder if this is true. Suppose I'm a professional flute player. Would learning an instrument, suppose guitar (while being the professional flute player) be simpler to learn than if I didn't play the flute?










share|improve this question
















I've heard many people say this:




"If you can play one instrument, other instruments will be easy to learn"




I just can't help but wonder if this is true. Suppose I'm a professional flute player. Would learning an instrument, suppose guitar (while being the professional flute player) be simpler to learn than if I didn't play the flute?







guitar learning flute transition






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 4 at 0:22







Xilpex

















asked Apr 4 at 0:05









XilpexXilpex

1,066330




1,066330







  • 3





    I suggest clarifying the question. First, you ask whether the second instrument will be easy to learn, but later, whether it will be easier. These are quite different questions.

    – replete
    Apr 4 at 0:10











  • @replete Oops. I typed faster than I could think. I'll clarify.

    – Xilpex
    Apr 4 at 0:12







  • 2





    IMO, no dupe. It's close, but that one asks about a more specific scenario.

    – user45266
    Apr 4 at 4:43











  • With a little editing, this could stop being a dupe.

    – Tim
    Apr 4 at 7:58






  • 1





    Not a dupe. The other question regards a particular issue with learning a second instrument. This one is general. It’s also not really opinion-based; all 3 answers are in agreement.

    – trw
    Apr 4 at 13:35












  • 3





    I suggest clarifying the question. First, you ask whether the second instrument will be easy to learn, but later, whether it will be easier. These are quite different questions.

    – replete
    Apr 4 at 0:10











  • @replete Oops. I typed faster than I could think. I'll clarify.

    – Xilpex
    Apr 4 at 0:12







  • 2





    IMO, no dupe. It's close, but that one asks about a more specific scenario.

    – user45266
    Apr 4 at 4:43











  • With a little editing, this could stop being a dupe.

    – Tim
    Apr 4 at 7:58






  • 1





    Not a dupe. The other question regards a particular issue with learning a second instrument. This one is general. It’s also not really opinion-based; all 3 answers are in agreement.

    – trw
    Apr 4 at 13:35







3




3





I suggest clarifying the question. First, you ask whether the second instrument will be easy to learn, but later, whether it will be easier. These are quite different questions.

– replete
Apr 4 at 0:10





I suggest clarifying the question. First, you ask whether the second instrument will be easy to learn, but later, whether it will be easier. These are quite different questions.

– replete
Apr 4 at 0:10













@replete Oops. I typed faster than I could think. I'll clarify.

– Xilpex
Apr 4 at 0:12






@replete Oops. I typed faster than I could think. I'll clarify.

– Xilpex
Apr 4 at 0:12





2




2





IMO, no dupe. It's close, but that one asks about a more specific scenario.

– user45266
Apr 4 at 4:43





IMO, no dupe. It's close, but that one asks about a more specific scenario.

– user45266
Apr 4 at 4:43













With a little editing, this could stop being a dupe.

– Tim
Apr 4 at 7:58





With a little editing, this could stop being a dupe.

– Tim
Apr 4 at 7:58




1




1





Not a dupe. The other question regards a particular issue with learning a second instrument. This one is general. It’s also not really opinion-based; all 3 answers are in agreement.

– trw
Apr 4 at 13:35





Not a dupe. The other question regards a particular issue with learning a second instrument. This one is general. It’s also not really opinion-based; all 3 answers are in agreement.

– trw
Apr 4 at 13:35










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















12














You wouldn’t need to relearn theory or reading music. You wouldn’t need to learn to establish a practice regimen. You wouldn’t need to relearn to hear intervals or feel a beat.



Going from flute to guitar, you would need to memorize the positions of notes and chords. You would need to develop calluses. You would have to suffer the pain of learning to contort your hand to make barre chords. It would take a lot of practice to develop the muscle memory you need to play proficiently.



If you’re going between similar instruments—organ to piano, for example—you would certainly be influenced by the techniques of your original instrument. It could be an advantage. Chords are fingered the same on both instruments. But you’d have a set of disadvantages to overcome as well. In this example, you’d have to learn dynamic expression in a whole new way. Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!



The answer definitely depends on what instrument you’re coming from and what instrument you’re going to. But, in general, yes, as an experienced musician, you have a considerable advantage that an absolute beginner lacks.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    +1, but an extremely minor quibble: "Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!" It matters on the organ too, it is just that the result is different: a change in timbre versus a change in dynamic level.

    – replete
    Apr 4 at 0:55






  • 1





    Another disadvantage is that you are going from being able to play an instrument fluently to not really being able to speak, if you will. This can be quite frustrating and held me back from learning a second instrument for some time.

    – b3ko
    Apr 4 at 1:26






  • 2





    @replete You're saying that on an organ, if you press keys harder you get a change in timbre? I had no idea. Are there any videos out there that demonstrate that?

    – BobRodes
    Apr 4 at 4:29






  • 2





    @BobRodes This is true only of proper mechanical action or tracker organs. Many organs have an electric action reducing the keys to mindless on/off operation. Tracker organs are interesting because of a fellow named J. S. Bach who wrote good music for them. Yes my tongue is in my cheek. He did not write for mindless bloated electric action instruments which began to proliferate a century and a half ago. The mechanical action gives a direct connection to the pallet which allows air into the pipe, allowing the player to control the consonant somewhat like the tonguing of a wind player.

    – replete
    Apr 4 at 4:52












  • @replete Very interesting. Are there many of those organs still around, or are they all also of the type from the pre-electric days where someone had to work the bellows or whatever?

    – BobRodes
    Apr 4 at 5:01


















4














This is no myth!



  1. It is absolutely obvious that you won’t have to start at zero as you know already the basics and the grammar of music language, (notation system, staffs, chords, clefs and keys).


  2. Many related instruments of the same section have similar systems of construction and technics of playing.


  3. Mind that practicing a second instrument will be for benefit in any other direction of learning something new (look up “super learning” in my answer to the other question:


Problems With Learning a Second Instrument






share|improve this answer






























    4














    Well, it certainly won't be easy, but I think it'll be easier than starting as a complete beginner.



    For starters, you'll know the musical side of things. Everyone who's played an instrument knows music theory to some extent, and even if you just know what notes are in a scale, you'll have an advantage over a complete beginner. Any music theory knowledge will help one understand more what one is learning. It may seem like there's a longer way to go because you know from learning one instrument what it takes to learn another, but you're closer than you think, and closer than beginners.



    For some instruments, there is a bit of correlation in the actual playing. I imagine most keyboard instruments share similar technique and ergonomics, and instruments of the same family are similar to play (like saxophones). I wouldn't count on much of it for flute and guitar, though, besides maybe the fingering aspect being similar.



    I play a couple instruments (decently), and I think the most important thing to remember is that each instrument is different, and serves a different role. Keyboard instruments, like piano, can certainly be melodic, but flute is nearly always carrying the melody, and guitarists need to be able to create harmony in a way that flautists don't usually need to learn.



    Best of luck in this endeavor!






    share|improve this answer

























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "240"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82337%2fis-the-myth-that-if-you-can-play-one-instrument-you-can-learn-another-instrumen%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      12














      You wouldn’t need to relearn theory or reading music. You wouldn’t need to learn to establish a practice regimen. You wouldn’t need to relearn to hear intervals or feel a beat.



      Going from flute to guitar, you would need to memorize the positions of notes and chords. You would need to develop calluses. You would have to suffer the pain of learning to contort your hand to make barre chords. It would take a lot of practice to develop the muscle memory you need to play proficiently.



      If you’re going between similar instruments—organ to piano, for example—you would certainly be influenced by the techniques of your original instrument. It could be an advantage. Chords are fingered the same on both instruments. But you’d have a set of disadvantages to overcome as well. In this example, you’d have to learn dynamic expression in a whole new way. Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!



      The answer definitely depends on what instrument you’re coming from and what instrument you’re going to. But, in general, yes, as an experienced musician, you have a considerable advantage that an absolute beginner lacks.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        +1, but an extremely minor quibble: "Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!" It matters on the organ too, it is just that the result is different: a change in timbre versus a change in dynamic level.

        – replete
        Apr 4 at 0:55






      • 1





        Another disadvantage is that you are going from being able to play an instrument fluently to not really being able to speak, if you will. This can be quite frustrating and held me back from learning a second instrument for some time.

        – b3ko
        Apr 4 at 1:26






      • 2





        @replete You're saying that on an organ, if you press keys harder you get a change in timbre? I had no idea. Are there any videos out there that demonstrate that?

        – BobRodes
        Apr 4 at 4:29






      • 2





        @BobRodes This is true only of proper mechanical action or tracker organs. Many organs have an electric action reducing the keys to mindless on/off operation. Tracker organs are interesting because of a fellow named J. S. Bach who wrote good music for them. Yes my tongue is in my cheek. He did not write for mindless bloated electric action instruments which began to proliferate a century and a half ago. The mechanical action gives a direct connection to the pallet which allows air into the pipe, allowing the player to control the consonant somewhat like the tonguing of a wind player.

        – replete
        Apr 4 at 4:52












      • @replete Very interesting. Are there many of those organs still around, or are they all also of the type from the pre-electric days where someone had to work the bellows or whatever?

        – BobRodes
        Apr 4 at 5:01















      12














      You wouldn’t need to relearn theory or reading music. You wouldn’t need to learn to establish a practice regimen. You wouldn’t need to relearn to hear intervals or feel a beat.



      Going from flute to guitar, you would need to memorize the positions of notes and chords. You would need to develop calluses. You would have to suffer the pain of learning to contort your hand to make barre chords. It would take a lot of practice to develop the muscle memory you need to play proficiently.



      If you’re going between similar instruments—organ to piano, for example—you would certainly be influenced by the techniques of your original instrument. It could be an advantage. Chords are fingered the same on both instruments. But you’d have a set of disadvantages to overcome as well. In this example, you’d have to learn dynamic expression in a whole new way. Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!



      The answer definitely depends on what instrument you’re coming from and what instrument you’re going to. But, in general, yes, as an experienced musician, you have a considerable advantage that an absolute beginner lacks.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        +1, but an extremely minor quibble: "Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!" It matters on the organ too, it is just that the result is different: a change in timbre versus a change in dynamic level.

        – replete
        Apr 4 at 0:55






      • 1





        Another disadvantage is that you are going from being able to play an instrument fluently to not really being able to speak, if you will. This can be quite frustrating and held me back from learning a second instrument for some time.

        – b3ko
        Apr 4 at 1:26






      • 2





        @replete You're saying that on an organ, if you press keys harder you get a change in timbre? I had no idea. Are there any videos out there that demonstrate that?

        – BobRodes
        Apr 4 at 4:29






      • 2





        @BobRodes This is true only of proper mechanical action or tracker organs. Many organs have an electric action reducing the keys to mindless on/off operation. Tracker organs are interesting because of a fellow named J. S. Bach who wrote good music for them. Yes my tongue is in my cheek. He did not write for mindless bloated electric action instruments which began to proliferate a century and a half ago. The mechanical action gives a direct connection to the pallet which allows air into the pipe, allowing the player to control the consonant somewhat like the tonguing of a wind player.

        – replete
        Apr 4 at 4:52












      • @replete Very interesting. Are there many of those organs still around, or are they all also of the type from the pre-electric days where someone had to work the bellows or whatever?

        – BobRodes
        Apr 4 at 5:01













      12












      12








      12







      You wouldn’t need to relearn theory or reading music. You wouldn’t need to learn to establish a practice regimen. You wouldn’t need to relearn to hear intervals or feel a beat.



      Going from flute to guitar, you would need to memorize the positions of notes and chords. You would need to develop calluses. You would have to suffer the pain of learning to contort your hand to make barre chords. It would take a lot of practice to develop the muscle memory you need to play proficiently.



      If you’re going between similar instruments—organ to piano, for example—you would certainly be influenced by the techniques of your original instrument. It could be an advantage. Chords are fingered the same on both instruments. But you’d have a set of disadvantages to overcome as well. In this example, you’d have to learn dynamic expression in a whole new way. Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!



      The answer definitely depends on what instrument you’re coming from and what instrument you’re going to. But, in general, yes, as an experienced musician, you have a considerable advantage that an absolute beginner lacks.






      share|improve this answer















      You wouldn’t need to relearn theory or reading music. You wouldn’t need to learn to establish a practice regimen. You wouldn’t need to relearn to hear intervals or feel a beat.



      Going from flute to guitar, you would need to memorize the positions of notes and chords. You would need to develop calluses. You would have to suffer the pain of learning to contort your hand to make barre chords. It would take a lot of practice to develop the muscle memory you need to play proficiently.



      If you’re going between similar instruments—organ to piano, for example—you would certainly be influenced by the techniques of your original instrument. It could be an advantage. Chords are fingered the same on both instruments. But you’d have a set of disadvantages to overcome as well. In this example, you’d have to learn dynamic expression in a whole new way. Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!



      The answer definitely depends on what instrument you’re coming from and what instrument you’re going to. But, in general, yes, as an experienced musician, you have a considerable advantage that an absolute beginner lacks.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 4 at 0:35

























      answered Apr 4 at 0:29









      trwtrw

      3,4251529




      3,4251529







      • 1





        +1, but an extremely minor quibble: "Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!" It matters on the organ too, it is just that the result is different: a change in timbre versus a change in dynamic level.

        – replete
        Apr 4 at 0:55






      • 1





        Another disadvantage is that you are going from being able to play an instrument fluently to not really being able to speak, if you will. This can be quite frustrating and held me back from learning a second instrument for some time.

        – b3ko
        Apr 4 at 1:26






      • 2





        @replete You're saying that on an organ, if you press keys harder you get a change in timbre? I had no idea. Are there any videos out there that demonstrate that?

        – BobRodes
        Apr 4 at 4:29






      • 2





        @BobRodes This is true only of proper mechanical action or tracker organs. Many organs have an electric action reducing the keys to mindless on/off operation. Tracker organs are interesting because of a fellow named J. S. Bach who wrote good music for them. Yes my tongue is in my cheek. He did not write for mindless bloated electric action instruments which began to proliferate a century and a half ago. The mechanical action gives a direct connection to the pallet which allows air into the pipe, allowing the player to control the consonant somewhat like the tonguing of a wind player.

        – replete
        Apr 4 at 4:52












      • @replete Very interesting. Are there many of those organs still around, or are they all also of the type from the pre-electric days where someone had to work the bellows or whatever?

        – BobRodes
        Apr 4 at 5:01












      • 1





        +1, but an extremely minor quibble: "Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!" It matters on the organ too, it is just that the result is different: a change in timbre versus a change in dynamic level.

        – replete
        Apr 4 at 0:55






      • 1





        Another disadvantage is that you are going from being able to play an instrument fluently to not really being able to speak, if you will. This can be quite frustrating and held me back from learning a second instrument for some time.

        – b3ko
        Apr 4 at 1:26






      • 2





        @replete You're saying that on an organ, if you press keys harder you get a change in timbre? I had no idea. Are there any videos out there that demonstrate that?

        – BobRodes
        Apr 4 at 4:29






      • 2





        @BobRodes This is true only of proper mechanical action or tracker organs. Many organs have an electric action reducing the keys to mindless on/off operation. Tracker organs are interesting because of a fellow named J. S. Bach who wrote good music for them. Yes my tongue is in my cheek. He did not write for mindless bloated electric action instruments which began to proliferate a century and a half ago. The mechanical action gives a direct connection to the pallet which allows air into the pipe, allowing the player to control the consonant somewhat like the tonguing of a wind player.

        – replete
        Apr 4 at 4:52












      • @replete Very interesting. Are there many of those organs still around, or are they all also of the type from the pre-electric days where someone had to work the bellows or whatever?

        – BobRodes
        Apr 4 at 5:01







      1




      1





      +1, but an extremely minor quibble: "Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!" It matters on the organ too, it is just that the result is different: a change in timbre versus a change in dynamic level.

      – replete
      Apr 4 at 0:55





      +1, but an extremely minor quibble: "Suddenly, the force you put on the keys matters in a way it never did before!" It matters on the organ too, it is just that the result is different: a change in timbre versus a change in dynamic level.

      – replete
      Apr 4 at 0:55




      1




      1





      Another disadvantage is that you are going from being able to play an instrument fluently to not really being able to speak, if you will. This can be quite frustrating and held me back from learning a second instrument for some time.

      – b3ko
      Apr 4 at 1:26





      Another disadvantage is that you are going from being able to play an instrument fluently to not really being able to speak, if you will. This can be quite frustrating and held me back from learning a second instrument for some time.

      – b3ko
      Apr 4 at 1:26




      2




      2





      @replete You're saying that on an organ, if you press keys harder you get a change in timbre? I had no idea. Are there any videos out there that demonstrate that?

      – BobRodes
      Apr 4 at 4:29





      @replete You're saying that on an organ, if you press keys harder you get a change in timbre? I had no idea. Are there any videos out there that demonstrate that?

      – BobRodes
      Apr 4 at 4:29




      2




      2





      @BobRodes This is true only of proper mechanical action or tracker organs. Many organs have an electric action reducing the keys to mindless on/off operation. Tracker organs are interesting because of a fellow named J. S. Bach who wrote good music for them. Yes my tongue is in my cheek. He did not write for mindless bloated electric action instruments which began to proliferate a century and a half ago. The mechanical action gives a direct connection to the pallet which allows air into the pipe, allowing the player to control the consonant somewhat like the tonguing of a wind player.

      – replete
      Apr 4 at 4:52






      @BobRodes This is true only of proper mechanical action or tracker organs. Many organs have an electric action reducing the keys to mindless on/off operation. Tracker organs are interesting because of a fellow named J. S. Bach who wrote good music for them. Yes my tongue is in my cheek. He did not write for mindless bloated electric action instruments which began to proliferate a century and a half ago. The mechanical action gives a direct connection to the pallet which allows air into the pipe, allowing the player to control the consonant somewhat like the tonguing of a wind player.

      – replete
      Apr 4 at 4:52














      @replete Very interesting. Are there many of those organs still around, or are they all also of the type from the pre-electric days where someone had to work the bellows or whatever?

      – BobRodes
      Apr 4 at 5:01





      @replete Very interesting. Are there many of those organs still around, or are they all also of the type from the pre-electric days where someone had to work the bellows or whatever?

      – BobRodes
      Apr 4 at 5:01











      4














      This is no myth!



      1. It is absolutely obvious that you won’t have to start at zero as you know already the basics and the grammar of music language, (notation system, staffs, chords, clefs and keys).


      2. Many related instruments of the same section have similar systems of construction and technics of playing.


      3. Mind that practicing a second instrument will be for benefit in any other direction of learning something new (look up “super learning” in my answer to the other question:


      Problems With Learning a Second Instrument






      share|improve this answer



























        4














        This is no myth!



        1. It is absolutely obvious that you won’t have to start at zero as you know already the basics and the grammar of music language, (notation system, staffs, chords, clefs and keys).


        2. Many related instruments of the same section have similar systems of construction and technics of playing.


        3. Mind that practicing a second instrument will be for benefit in any other direction of learning something new (look up “super learning” in my answer to the other question:


        Problems With Learning a Second Instrument






        share|improve this answer

























          4












          4








          4







          This is no myth!



          1. It is absolutely obvious that you won’t have to start at zero as you know already the basics and the grammar of music language, (notation system, staffs, chords, clefs and keys).


          2. Many related instruments of the same section have similar systems of construction and technics of playing.


          3. Mind that practicing a second instrument will be for benefit in any other direction of learning something new (look up “super learning” in my answer to the other question:


          Problems With Learning a Second Instrument






          share|improve this answer













          This is no myth!



          1. It is absolutely obvious that you won’t have to start at zero as you know already the basics and the grammar of music language, (notation system, staffs, chords, clefs and keys).


          2. Many related instruments of the same section have similar systems of construction and technics of playing.


          3. Mind that practicing a second instrument will be for benefit in any other direction of learning something new (look up “super learning” in my answer to the other question:


          Problems With Learning a Second Instrument







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 4 at 5:16









          Albrecht HügliAlbrecht Hügli

          4,492320




          4,492320





















              4














              Well, it certainly won't be easy, but I think it'll be easier than starting as a complete beginner.



              For starters, you'll know the musical side of things. Everyone who's played an instrument knows music theory to some extent, and even if you just know what notes are in a scale, you'll have an advantage over a complete beginner. Any music theory knowledge will help one understand more what one is learning. It may seem like there's a longer way to go because you know from learning one instrument what it takes to learn another, but you're closer than you think, and closer than beginners.



              For some instruments, there is a bit of correlation in the actual playing. I imagine most keyboard instruments share similar technique and ergonomics, and instruments of the same family are similar to play (like saxophones). I wouldn't count on much of it for flute and guitar, though, besides maybe the fingering aspect being similar.



              I play a couple instruments (decently), and I think the most important thing to remember is that each instrument is different, and serves a different role. Keyboard instruments, like piano, can certainly be melodic, but flute is nearly always carrying the melody, and guitarists need to be able to create harmony in a way that flautists don't usually need to learn.



              Best of luck in this endeavor!






              share|improve this answer





























                4














                Well, it certainly won't be easy, but I think it'll be easier than starting as a complete beginner.



                For starters, you'll know the musical side of things. Everyone who's played an instrument knows music theory to some extent, and even if you just know what notes are in a scale, you'll have an advantage over a complete beginner. Any music theory knowledge will help one understand more what one is learning. It may seem like there's a longer way to go because you know from learning one instrument what it takes to learn another, but you're closer than you think, and closer than beginners.



                For some instruments, there is a bit of correlation in the actual playing. I imagine most keyboard instruments share similar technique and ergonomics, and instruments of the same family are similar to play (like saxophones). I wouldn't count on much of it for flute and guitar, though, besides maybe the fingering aspect being similar.



                I play a couple instruments (decently), and I think the most important thing to remember is that each instrument is different, and serves a different role. Keyboard instruments, like piano, can certainly be melodic, but flute is nearly always carrying the melody, and guitarists need to be able to create harmony in a way that flautists don't usually need to learn.



                Best of luck in this endeavor!






                share|improve this answer



























                  4












                  4








                  4







                  Well, it certainly won't be easy, but I think it'll be easier than starting as a complete beginner.



                  For starters, you'll know the musical side of things. Everyone who's played an instrument knows music theory to some extent, and even if you just know what notes are in a scale, you'll have an advantage over a complete beginner. Any music theory knowledge will help one understand more what one is learning. It may seem like there's a longer way to go because you know from learning one instrument what it takes to learn another, but you're closer than you think, and closer than beginners.



                  For some instruments, there is a bit of correlation in the actual playing. I imagine most keyboard instruments share similar technique and ergonomics, and instruments of the same family are similar to play (like saxophones). I wouldn't count on much of it for flute and guitar, though, besides maybe the fingering aspect being similar.



                  I play a couple instruments (decently), and I think the most important thing to remember is that each instrument is different, and serves a different role. Keyboard instruments, like piano, can certainly be melodic, but flute is nearly always carrying the melody, and guitarists need to be able to create harmony in a way that flautists don't usually need to learn.



                  Best of luck in this endeavor!






                  share|improve this answer















                  Well, it certainly won't be easy, but I think it'll be easier than starting as a complete beginner.



                  For starters, you'll know the musical side of things. Everyone who's played an instrument knows music theory to some extent, and even if you just know what notes are in a scale, you'll have an advantage over a complete beginner. Any music theory knowledge will help one understand more what one is learning. It may seem like there's a longer way to go because you know from learning one instrument what it takes to learn another, but you're closer than you think, and closer than beginners.



                  For some instruments, there is a bit of correlation in the actual playing. I imagine most keyboard instruments share similar technique and ergonomics, and instruments of the same family are similar to play (like saxophones). I wouldn't count on much of it for flute and guitar, though, besides maybe the fingering aspect being similar.



                  I play a couple instruments (decently), and I think the most important thing to remember is that each instrument is different, and serves a different role. Keyboard instruments, like piano, can certainly be melodic, but flute is nearly always carrying the melody, and guitarists need to be able to create harmony in a way that flautists don't usually need to learn.



                  Best of luck in this endeavor!







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Apr 4 at 5:41

























                  answered Apr 4 at 5:06









                  user45266user45266

                  3,9651734




                  3,9651734



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82337%2fis-the-myth-that-if-you-can-play-one-instrument-you-can-learn-another-instrumen%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

                      QGIS export composer to PDF scale the map [closed] Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Print Composer QGIS 2.6, how to export image?QGIS 2.8.1 print composer won't export all OpenCycleMap base layer tilesSave Print/Map QGIS composer view as PNG/PDF using Python (without changing anything in visible layout)?Export QGIS Print Composer PDF with searchable text labelsQGIS Print Composer does not change from landscape to portrait orientation?How can I avoid map size and scale changes in print composer?Fuzzy PDF export in QGIS running on macSierra OSExport the legend into its 100% size using Print ComposerScale-dependent rendering in QGIS PDF output

                      PDF-ში გადმოწერა სანავიგაციო მენიუproject page