How do I know where to place holes on an instrument?Tutorials or advice on layering synthsHow to connect a line signal to a guitar amp?Note Accentuation (Dynamic) - When should/shouldn't you apply accentuation?Reed of the Duduk —how to get a sound?Is a wind-string instrument (such as the one I will explain) acoustically possible?A seriously difficult question about mistakes and intepretation of musicMy guitar instrument produced a perfect sine wave?How do uncovered tone holes in middle of a flute work?Is there some means of expanding the range of a capped reed instrument?How do you ream a conical bore when making a woodwind instrument?

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

Ideas for colorfully and clearly highlighting graph edges according to weights

If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?

What does 'script /dev/null' do?

extract characters between two commas?

Finding files for which a command fails

Is Fable (1996) connected in any way to the Fable franchise from Lionhead Studios?

COUNT(id) or MAX(id) - which is faster?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Was there ever an axiom rendered a theorem?

Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet

How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

New order #4: World

How many letters suffice to construct words with no repetition?

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Can produce flame be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?

Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine



How do I know where to place holes on an instrument?


Tutorials or advice on layering synthsHow to connect a line signal to a guitar amp?Note Accentuation (Dynamic) - When should/shouldn't you apply accentuation?Reed of the Duduk —how to get a sound?Is a wind-string instrument (such as the one I will explain) acoustically possible?A seriously difficult question about mistakes and intepretation of musicMy guitar instrument produced a perfect sine wave?How do uncovered tone holes in middle of a flute work?Is there some means of expanding the range of a capped reed instrument?How do you ream a conical bore when making a woodwind instrument?













11















I've been trying to build a double reeded instrument out of plastic straws. I've run into a problem though, when I place fingering holes, the instrument doesn't seem to follow the $$f=/fracnv4L$$ formula. Is there a formula that would allow me to calculate where along the instrument I should place the holes?










share|improve this question
























  • I guess the answer is guess! :D It may also be trial and error.

    – Xilpex
    Apr 3 at 23:44






  • 3





    It seems that MathJax (the fraction code) isn't supported on Music SE.

    – Bladewood
    Apr 4 at 10:36















11















I've been trying to build a double reeded instrument out of plastic straws. I've run into a problem though, when I place fingering holes, the instrument doesn't seem to follow the $$f=/fracnv4L$$ formula. Is there a formula that would allow me to calculate where along the instrument I should place the holes?










share|improve this question
























  • I guess the answer is guess! :D It may also be trial and error.

    – Xilpex
    Apr 3 at 23:44






  • 3





    It seems that MathJax (the fraction code) isn't supported on Music SE.

    – Bladewood
    Apr 4 at 10:36













11












11








11








I've been trying to build a double reeded instrument out of plastic straws. I've run into a problem though, when I place fingering holes, the instrument doesn't seem to follow the $$f=/fracnv4L$$ formula. Is there a formula that would allow me to calculate where along the instrument I should place the holes?










share|improve this question
















I've been trying to build a double reeded instrument out of plastic straws. I've run into a problem though, when I place fingering holes, the instrument doesn't seem to follow the $$f=/fracnv4L$$ formula. Is there a formula that would allow me to calculate where along the instrument I should place the holes?







acoustics construction reeds instrument-making






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 4 at 16:53









Tim H

3,07321944




3,07321944










asked Apr 3 at 23:42









tox123tox123

1558




1558












  • I guess the answer is guess! :D It may also be trial and error.

    – Xilpex
    Apr 3 at 23:44






  • 3





    It seems that MathJax (the fraction code) isn't supported on Music SE.

    – Bladewood
    Apr 4 at 10:36

















  • I guess the answer is guess! :D It may also be trial and error.

    – Xilpex
    Apr 3 at 23:44






  • 3





    It seems that MathJax (the fraction code) isn't supported on Music SE.

    – Bladewood
    Apr 4 at 10:36
















I guess the answer is guess! :D It may also be trial and error.

– Xilpex
Apr 3 at 23:44





I guess the answer is guess! :D It may also be trial and error.

– Xilpex
Apr 3 at 23:44




3




3





It seems that MathJax (the fraction code) isn't supported on Music SE.

– Bladewood
Apr 4 at 10:36





It seems that MathJax (the fraction code) isn't supported on Music SE.

– Bladewood
Apr 4 at 10:36










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8














For a pipe without any holes, the fundamental pitch of a pipe is determined by f = v/2L, where v is the speed of sound and L is the length of the pipe.



But when you start putting holes in, you get a mix of pipe lengths. It gets messy (mathematically) in a big hurry.



Placing a hole in the pipe shortens its length, but the new length - the effective length - isn't the distance to the hole, because that isn't the end of the pipe. The larger the hole, the more it will behave like the ideal. The smaller the hole, the longer the effective length will be.



Because the hole size is a variable, you're not going to find a formula that's going to fit every situation. That's because the hole size is a variable in relation to the diameter of the tube: a 1cm hole in a 10cm tube will have a different effective length than a 1cm hole in a 9cm tube.



Since no formula is going to work for all situations, you have do some trial and error. If the pitch is flat, you can enlarge the hole to shorten the effective length. If the pitch is sharp, you'll have to figure out a way to make that hole smaller (or make the whole tube longer - there's a reason woodwinds have multiple pieces!)



There are other variables, too... conical bores behave differently than cylindrical ones. But I'm assuming you're using a cylindrical tube.






share|improve this answer

























  • “In a perfect world” – that's a bit of a silly way to put it. You might also say in a perfect world the air flow is perfectly linear and laminar – however, in that case the mechanism by which flutes bring the air to vibrate in the first place also wouldn't work! And even assuming you get the air to vibrate in the perfect cylinder: nobody would be able to hear the sound, because all the energy is trapped! I wouldn't call that perfect. No, the world is exactly as good as is actually happens to be – what's imperfect are the models with which we describe certain phenomena in the world.

    – leftaroundabout
    Apr 4 at 11:45






  • 3





    "In a perfect world" is a common idiom that means a world that conforms to the model in use. You're taking it too literally.

    – chepner
    Apr 4 at 11:56











  • @leftaroundabout I changed the answer -- see if it is more readable now.

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 13:04











  • @CarlWitthoft - I altered your edit. Helmholtz resonance is the frequency created by air "bouncing" at the mouth hole. It contributes to the overall timbre whether there are holes or not, and introducing holes does not change the Helmholtz resonance - that's fixed by the size of the mouth hole and the thickness of the tube material. Open holes don't have Helmholtz resonance frequencies, because the air pressure in the tube is always higher than that outside; the air simply escapes without additional vibration.

    – Tom Serb
    Apr 4 at 13:47











  • @TomSerb thanks for doing that. I should have emphasized where Helmholtz was applicable (see "Ocarina" :-) )

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 14:34


















7














The main problem is that it's an oversimplified assumption to consider an open hole as a perfect open boundary condition for the air column. In fact such a hole still has a significant impedance. On the other side, the mouthpiece is not a perfect closed (reeds) or open (flutes) boundary condition, and also a closed hole still affects the column somewhat. A pitch formula would need to take all those factors into account, which depend on hole size and bore. Doing this accurately would require a big CFD model.



In practice, probably almost every wind instrument maker has instead used empirical models, i.e. basically trial and error. It should certainly be possible to fit a formula to that which is more accurate than the overidealisation but still reasonably accurate, but whether one is available publicly I don't know.






share|improve this answer























  • I suspect that Adolphe Sax used the same spacing ratios in (soprano, alto, tenor, bari) at least as a starting point, given the similarity in the bore shapes.

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 13:06











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82335%2fhow-do-i-know-where-to-place-holes-on-an-instrument%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8














For a pipe without any holes, the fundamental pitch of a pipe is determined by f = v/2L, where v is the speed of sound and L is the length of the pipe.



But when you start putting holes in, you get a mix of pipe lengths. It gets messy (mathematically) in a big hurry.



Placing a hole in the pipe shortens its length, but the new length - the effective length - isn't the distance to the hole, because that isn't the end of the pipe. The larger the hole, the more it will behave like the ideal. The smaller the hole, the longer the effective length will be.



Because the hole size is a variable, you're not going to find a formula that's going to fit every situation. That's because the hole size is a variable in relation to the diameter of the tube: a 1cm hole in a 10cm tube will have a different effective length than a 1cm hole in a 9cm tube.



Since no formula is going to work for all situations, you have do some trial and error. If the pitch is flat, you can enlarge the hole to shorten the effective length. If the pitch is sharp, you'll have to figure out a way to make that hole smaller (or make the whole tube longer - there's a reason woodwinds have multiple pieces!)



There are other variables, too... conical bores behave differently than cylindrical ones. But I'm assuming you're using a cylindrical tube.






share|improve this answer

























  • “In a perfect world” – that's a bit of a silly way to put it. You might also say in a perfect world the air flow is perfectly linear and laminar – however, in that case the mechanism by which flutes bring the air to vibrate in the first place also wouldn't work! And even assuming you get the air to vibrate in the perfect cylinder: nobody would be able to hear the sound, because all the energy is trapped! I wouldn't call that perfect. No, the world is exactly as good as is actually happens to be – what's imperfect are the models with which we describe certain phenomena in the world.

    – leftaroundabout
    Apr 4 at 11:45






  • 3





    "In a perfect world" is a common idiom that means a world that conforms to the model in use. You're taking it too literally.

    – chepner
    Apr 4 at 11:56











  • @leftaroundabout I changed the answer -- see if it is more readable now.

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 13:04











  • @CarlWitthoft - I altered your edit. Helmholtz resonance is the frequency created by air "bouncing" at the mouth hole. It contributes to the overall timbre whether there are holes or not, and introducing holes does not change the Helmholtz resonance - that's fixed by the size of the mouth hole and the thickness of the tube material. Open holes don't have Helmholtz resonance frequencies, because the air pressure in the tube is always higher than that outside; the air simply escapes without additional vibration.

    – Tom Serb
    Apr 4 at 13:47











  • @TomSerb thanks for doing that. I should have emphasized where Helmholtz was applicable (see "Ocarina" :-) )

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 14:34















8














For a pipe without any holes, the fundamental pitch of a pipe is determined by f = v/2L, where v is the speed of sound and L is the length of the pipe.



But when you start putting holes in, you get a mix of pipe lengths. It gets messy (mathematically) in a big hurry.



Placing a hole in the pipe shortens its length, but the new length - the effective length - isn't the distance to the hole, because that isn't the end of the pipe. The larger the hole, the more it will behave like the ideal. The smaller the hole, the longer the effective length will be.



Because the hole size is a variable, you're not going to find a formula that's going to fit every situation. That's because the hole size is a variable in relation to the diameter of the tube: a 1cm hole in a 10cm tube will have a different effective length than a 1cm hole in a 9cm tube.



Since no formula is going to work for all situations, you have do some trial and error. If the pitch is flat, you can enlarge the hole to shorten the effective length. If the pitch is sharp, you'll have to figure out a way to make that hole smaller (or make the whole tube longer - there's a reason woodwinds have multiple pieces!)



There are other variables, too... conical bores behave differently than cylindrical ones. But I'm assuming you're using a cylindrical tube.






share|improve this answer

























  • “In a perfect world” – that's a bit of a silly way to put it. You might also say in a perfect world the air flow is perfectly linear and laminar – however, in that case the mechanism by which flutes bring the air to vibrate in the first place also wouldn't work! And even assuming you get the air to vibrate in the perfect cylinder: nobody would be able to hear the sound, because all the energy is trapped! I wouldn't call that perfect. No, the world is exactly as good as is actually happens to be – what's imperfect are the models with which we describe certain phenomena in the world.

    – leftaroundabout
    Apr 4 at 11:45






  • 3





    "In a perfect world" is a common idiom that means a world that conforms to the model in use. You're taking it too literally.

    – chepner
    Apr 4 at 11:56











  • @leftaroundabout I changed the answer -- see if it is more readable now.

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 13:04











  • @CarlWitthoft - I altered your edit. Helmholtz resonance is the frequency created by air "bouncing" at the mouth hole. It contributes to the overall timbre whether there are holes or not, and introducing holes does not change the Helmholtz resonance - that's fixed by the size of the mouth hole and the thickness of the tube material. Open holes don't have Helmholtz resonance frequencies, because the air pressure in the tube is always higher than that outside; the air simply escapes without additional vibration.

    – Tom Serb
    Apr 4 at 13:47











  • @TomSerb thanks for doing that. I should have emphasized where Helmholtz was applicable (see "Ocarina" :-) )

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 14:34













8












8








8







For a pipe without any holes, the fundamental pitch of a pipe is determined by f = v/2L, where v is the speed of sound and L is the length of the pipe.



But when you start putting holes in, you get a mix of pipe lengths. It gets messy (mathematically) in a big hurry.



Placing a hole in the pipe shortens its length, but the new length - the effective length - isn't the distance to the hole, because that isn't the end of the pipe. The larger the hole, the more it will behave like the ideal. The smaller the hole, the longer the effective length will be.



Because the hole size is a variable, you're not going to find a formula that's going to fit every situation. That's because the hole size is a variable in relation to the diameter of the tube: a 1cm hole in a 10cm tube will have a different effective length than a 1cm hole in a 9cm tube.



Since no formula is going to work for all situations, you have do some trial and error. If the pitch is flat, you can enlarge the hole to shorten the effective length. If the pitch is sharp, you'll have to figure out a way to make that hole smaller (or make the whole tube longer - there's a reason woodwinds have multiple pieces!)



There are other variables, too... conical bores behave differently than cylindrical ones. But I'm assuming you're using a cylindrical tube.






share|improve this answer















For a pipe without any holes, the fundamental pitch of a pipe is determined by f = v/2L, where v is the speed of sound and L is the length of the pipe.



But when you start putting holes in, you get a mix of pipe lengths. It gets messy (mathematically) in a big hurry.



Placing a hole in the pipe shortens its length, but the new length - the effective length - isn't the distance to the hole, because that isn't the end of the pipe. The larger the hole, the more it will behave like the ideal. The smaller the hole, the longer the effective length will be.



Because the hole size is a variable, you're not going to find a formula that's going to fit every situation. That's because the hole size is a variable in relation to the diameter of the tube: a 1cm hole in a 10cm tube will have a different effective length than a 1cm hole in a 9cm tube.



Since no formula is going to work for all situations, you have do some trial and error. If the pitch is flat, you can enlarge the hole to shorten the effective length. If the pitch is sharp, you'll have to figure out a way to make that hole smaller (or make the whole tube longer - there's a reason woodwinds have multiple pieces!)



There are other variables, too... conical bores behave differently than cylindrical ones. But I'm assuming you're using a cylindrical tube.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 4 at 13:41

























answered Apr 4 at 3:49









Tom SerbTom Serb

1,267110




1,267110












  • “In a perfect world” – that's a bit of a silly way to put it. You might also say in a perfect world the air flow is perfectly linear and laminar – however, in that case the mechanism by which flutes bring the air to vibrate in the first place also wouldn't work! And even assuming you get the air to vibrate in the perfect cylinder: nobody would be able to hear the sound, because all the energy is trapped! I wouldn't call that perfect. No, the world is exactly as good as is actually happens to be – what's imperfect are the models with which we describe certain phenomena in the world.

    – leftaroundabout
    Apr 4 at 11:45






  • 3





    "In a perfect world" is a common idiom that means a world that conforms to the model in use. You're taking it too literally.

    – chepner
    Apr 4 at 11:56











  • @leftaroundabout I changed the answer -- see if it is more readable now.

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 13:04











  • @CarlWitthoft - I altered your edit. Helmholtz resonance is the frequency created by air "bouncing" at the mouth hole. It contributes to the overall timbre whether there are holes or not, and introducing holes does not change the Helmholtz resonance - that's fixed by the size of the mouth hole and the thickness of the tube material. Open holes don't have Helmholtz resonance frequencies, because the air pressure in the tube is always higher than that outside; the air simply escapes without additional vibration.

    – Tom Serb
    Apr 4 at 13:47











  • @TomSerb thanks for doing that. I should have emphasized where Helmholtz was applicable (see "Ocarina" :-) )

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 14:34

















  • “In a perfect world” – that's a bit of a silly way to put it. You might also say in a perfect world the air flow is perfectly linear and laminar – however, in that case the mechanism by which flutes bring the air to vibrate in the first place also wouldn't work! And even assuming you get the air to vibrate in the perfect cylinder: nobody would be able to hear the sound, because all the energy is trapped! I wouldn't call that perfect. No, the world is exactly as good as is actually happens to be – what's imperfect are the models with which we describe certain phenomena in the world.

    – leftaroundabout
    Apr 4 at 11:45






  • 3





    "In a perfect world" is a common idiom that means a world that conforms to the model in use. You're taking it too literally.

    – chepner
    Apr 4 at 11:56











  • @leftaroundabout I changed the answer -- see if it is more readable now.

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 13:04











  • @CarlWitthoft - I altered your edit. Helmholtz resonance is the frequency created by air "bouncing" at the mouth hole. It contributes to the overall timbre whether there are holes or not, and introducing holes does not change the Helmholtz resonance - that's fixed by the size of the mouth hole and the thickness of the tube material. Open holes don't have Helmholtz resonance frequencies, because the air pressure in the tube is always higher than that outside; the air simply escapes without additional vibration.

    – Tom Serb
    Apr 4 at 13:47











  • @TomSerb thanks for doing that. I should have emphasized where Helmholtz was applicable (see "Ocarina" :-) )

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 14:34
















“In a perfect world” – that's a bit of a silly way to put it. You might also say in a perfect world the air flow is perfectly linear and laminar – however, in that case the mechanism by which flutes bring the air to vibrate in the first place also wouldn't work! And even assuming you get the air to vibrate in the perfect cylinder: nobody would be able to hear the sound, because all the energy is trapped! I wouldn't call that perfect. No, the world is exactly as good as is actually happens to be – what's imperfect are the models with which we describe certain phenomena in the world.

– leftaroundabout
Apr 4 at 11:45





“In a perfect world” – that's a bit of a silly way to put it. You might also say in a perfect world the air flow is perfectly linear and laminar – however, in that case the mechanism by which flutes bring the air to vibrate in the first place also wouldn't work! And even assuming you get the air to vibrate in the perfect cylinder: nobody would be able to hear the sound, because all the energy is trapped! I wouldn't call that perfect. No, the world is exactly as good as is actually happens to be – what's imperfect are the models with which we describe certain phenomena in the world.

– leftaroundabout
Apr 4 at 11:45




3




3





"In a perfect world" is a common idiom that means a world that conforms to the model in use. You're taking it too literally.

– chepner
Apr 4 at 11:56





"In a perfect world" is a common idiom that means a world that conforms to the model in use. You're taking it too literally.

– chepner
Apr 4 at 11:56













@leftaroundabout I changed the answer -- see if it is more readable now.

– Carl Witthoft
Apr 4 at 13:04





@leftaroundabout I changed the answer -- see if it is more readable now.

– Carl Witthoft
Apr 4 at 13:04













@CarlWitthoft - I altered your edit. Helmholtz resonance is the frequency created by air "bouncing" at the mouth hole. It contributes to the overall timbre whether there are holes or not, and introducing holes does not change the Helmholtz resonance - that's fixed by the size of the mouth hole and the thickness of the tube material. Open holes don't have Helmholtz resonance frequencies, because the air pressure in the tube is always higher than that outside; the air simply escapes without additional vibration.

– Tom Serb
Apr 4 at 13:47





@CarlWitthoft - I altered your edit. Helmholtz resonance is the frequency created by air "bouncing" at the mouth hole. It contributes to the overall timbre whether there are holes or not, and introducing holes does not change the Helmholtz resonance - that's fixed by the size of the mouth hole and the thickness of the tube material. Open holes don't have Helmholtz resonance frequencies, because the air pressure in the tube is always higher than that outside; the air simply escapes without additional vibration.

– Tom Serb
Apr 4 at 13:47













@TomSerb thanks for doing that. I should have emphasized where Helmholtz was applicable (see "Ocarina" :-) )

– Carl Witthoft
Apr 4 at 14:34





@TomSerb thanks for doing that. I should have emphasized where Helmholtz was applicable (see "Ocarina" :-) )

– Carl Witthoft
Apr 4 at 14:34











7














The main problem is that it's an oversimplified assumption to consider an open hole as a perfect open boundary condition for the air column. In fact such a hole still has a significant impedance. On the other side, the mouthpiece is not a perfect closed (reeds) or open (flutes) boundary condition, and also a closed hole still affects the column somewhat. A pitch formula would need to take all those factors into account, which depend on hole size and bore. Doing this accurately would require a big CFD model.



In practice, probably almost every wind instrument maker has instead used empirical models, i.e. basically trial and error. It should certainly be possible to fit a formula to that which is more accurate than the overidealisation but still reasonably accurate, but whether one is available publicly I don't know.






share|improve this answer























  • I suspect that Adolphe Sax used the same spacing ratios in (soprano, alto, tenor, bari) at least as a starting point, given the similarity in the bore shapes.

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 13:06















7














The main problem is that it's an oversimplified assumption to consider an open hole as a perfect open boundary condition for the air column. In fact such a hole still has a significant impedance. On the other side, the mouthpiece is not a perfect closed (reeds) or open (flutes) boundary condition, and also a closed hole still affects the column somewhat. A pitch formula would need to take all those factors into account, which depend on hole size and bore. Doing this accurately would require a big CFD model.



In practice, probably almost every wind instrument maker has instead used empirical models, i.e. basically trial and error. It should certainly be possible to fit a formula to that which is more accurate than the overidealisation but still reasonably accurate, but whether one is available publicly I don't know.






share|improve this answer























  • I suspect that Adolphe Sax used the same spacing ratios in (soprano, alto, tenor, bari) at least as a starting point, given the similarity in the bore shapes.

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 13:06













7












7








7







The main problem is that it's an oversimplified assumption to consider an open hole as a perfect open boundary condition for the air column. In fact such a hole still has a significant impedance. On the other side, the mouthpiece is not a perfect closed (reeds) or open (flutes) boundary condition, and also a closed hole still affects the column somewhat. A pitch formula would need to take all those factors into account, which depend on hole size and bore. Doing this accurately would require a big CFD model.



In practice, probably almost every wind instrument maker has instead used empirical models, i.e. basically trial and error. It should certainly be possible to fit a formula to that which is more accurate than the overidealisation but still reasonably accurate, but whether one is available publicly I don't know.






share|improve this answer













The main problem is that it's an oversimplified assumption to consider an open hole as a perfect open boundary condition for the air column. In fact such a hole still has a significant impedance. On the other side, the mouthpiece is not a perfect closed (reeds) or open (flutes) boundary condition, and also a closed hole still affects the column somewhat. A pitch formula would need to take all those factors into account, which depend on hole size and bore. Doing this accurately would require a big CFD model.



In practice, probably almost every wind instrument maker has instead used empirical models, i.e. basically trial and error. It should certainly be possible to fit a formula to that which is more accurate than the overidealisation but still reasonably accurate, but whether one is available publicly I don't know.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 4 at 1:40









leftaroundaboutleftaroundabout

20.8k3690




20.8k3690












  • I suspect that Adolphe Sax used the same spacing ratios in (soprano, alto, tenor, bari) at least as a starting point, given the similarity in the bore shapes.

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 13:06

















  • I suspect that Adolphe Sax used the same spacing ratios in (soprano, alto, tenor, bari) at least as a starting point, given the similarity in the bore shapes.

    – Carl Witthoft
    Apr 4 at 13:06
















I suspect that Adolphe Sax used the same spacing ratios in (soprano, alto, tenor, bari) at least as a starting point, given the similarity in the bore shapes.

– Carl Witthoft
Apr 4 at 13:06





I suspect that Adolphe Sax used the same spacing ratios in (soprano, alto, tenor, bari) at least as a starting point, given the similarity in the bore shapes.

– Carl Witthoft
Apr 4 at 13:06

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82335%2fhow-do-i-know-where-to-place-holes-on-an-instrument%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given

Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221