Strange output of Kriging standard deviation Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Keeping unchanged observed values after kriging interpolationError when kriging: “output variance prediction raster”Strange spatial interpolation results from ordinary krigingError executing kriging in modelbuilder: 'invalid output extent'Understanding regression function output in ArcGIS Kriging?Backtransformation of kriging predictions and variancesHow to do spatio-temporal kriging with irregular data?Kriging with uncertain observational dataKriging: Large standard error very close to known value pointsQGIS 3.6 ordinary kriging produce one constant output

Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?

What is best way to wire a ceiling receptacle in this situation?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

How to ternary Plot3D a function

Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?

How can someone know whether he/she is a Good QA or Tester?

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

What is the difference between a "ranged attack" and a "ranged weapon attack"?

Creating an enum from its name not value

How does the math work when buying airline miles?

Can a new player join a group only when a new campaign starts?

Why is it faster to reheat something than it is to cook it?

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

How to write capital alpha?

The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?

Why does electrolysis of aqueous concentrated sodium bromide produce bromine at the anode?

Is multiple magic items in one inherently imbalanced?

Karn, the Great Creator - what defines a 'card from outside the game' in sealed?

How long can equipment go unused before powering up runs the risk of damage?

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

How could we fake a moon landing now?



Strange output of Kriging standard deviation



Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Keeping unchanged observed values after kriging interpolationError when kriging: “output variance prediction raster”Strange spatial interpolation results from ordinary krigingError executing kriging in modelbuilder: 'invalid output extent'Understanding regression function output in ArcGIS Kriging?Backtransformation of kriging predictions and variancesHow to do spatio-temporal kriging with irregular data?Kriging with uncertain observational dataKriging: Large standard error very close to known value pointsQGIS 3.6 ordinary kriging produce one constant output



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















For my thesis I am interpolating some 4000 boreholepoints via Kriging to try and visualize a geological layer under the ground level. Since I know there is a strong trend in my data (SW-NE slope) I read that using a lineair detrend can be useful to get more detail in the result. I wanted to compare the results of applying a detrend and not applying one. And indeed, the detrended gives a more useful semi-variogram and shows more detail (whether this is useful for my case is still the question).
However, I also want to compare both standard deviation outputs, to view where the interpolation isn't working as well. For the detrend outpout it shows a clear map. But on the no-detrend one gives a rather strange output. enter image description here



The two upper maps are the Kriging output and the two below are the standard deviations. Can someone perhaps clarify this output and why it has these holes in it?










share|improve this question




























    1















    For my thesis I am interpolating some 4000 boreholepoints via Kriging to try and visualize a geological layer under the ground level. Since I know there is a strong trend in my data (SW-NE slope) I read that using a lineair detrend can be useful to get more detail in the result. I wanted to compare the results of applying a detrend and not applying one. And indeed, the detrended gives a more useful semi-variogram and shows more detail (whether this is useful for my case is still the question).
    However, I also want to compare both standard deviation outputs, to view where the interpolation isn't working as well. For the detrend outpout it shows a clear map. But on the no-detrend one gives a rather strange output. enter image description here



    The two upper maps are the Kriging output and the two below are the standard deviations. Can someone perhaps clarify this output and why it has these holes in it?










    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1








      For my thesis I am interpolating some 4000 boreholepoints via Kriging to try and visualize a geological layer under the ground level. Since I know there is a strong trend in my data (SW-NE slope) I read that using a lineair detrend can be useful to get more detail in the result. I wanted to compare the results of applying a detrend and not applying one. And indeed, the detrended gives a more useful semi-variogram and shows more detail (whether this is useful for my case is still the question).
      However, I also want to compare both standard deviation outputs, to view where the interpolation isn't working as well. For the detrend outpout it shows a clear map. But on the no-detrend one gives a rather strange output. enter image description here



      The two upper maps are the Kriging output and the two below are the standard deviations. Can someone perhaps clarify this output and why it has these holes in it?










      share|improve this question














      For my thesis I am interpolating some 4000 boreholepoints via Kriging to try and visualize a geological layer under the ground level. Since I know there is a strong trend in my data (SW-NE slope) I read that using a lineair detrend can be useful to get more detail in the result. I wanted to compare the results of applying a detrend and not applying one. And indeed, the detrended gives a more useful semi-variogram and shows more detail (whether this is useful for my case is still the question).
      However, I also want to compare both standard deviation outputs, to view where the interpolation isn't working as well. For the detrend outpout it shows a clear map. But on the no-detrend one gives a rather strange output. enter image description here



      The two upper maps are the Kriging output and the two below are the standard deviations. Can someone perhaps clarify this output and why it has these holes in it?







      kriging surfer






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Apr 11 at 21:11









      Konan PruiksmaKonan Pruiksma

      43427




      43427




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "79"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f318538%2fstrange-output-of-kriging-standard-deviation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f318538%2fstrange-output-of-kriging-standard-deviation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given

          រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

          Ромео және Джульетта Мазмұны Қысқаша сипаттамасы Кейіпкерлері Кино Дереккөздер Бағыттау мәзірі