Do other languages have an “irreversible aspect”? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat is permansive aspect?How do languages with imperfect aspect typically convey distinctions between habitual, iterative, and progressive aspects?What aspect or feature do “over TIME” constructions have?Why does English have progressive aspect but German does not?Can every language express any lexical aspect?Grammatical Aspect and Lexical AspectDoes English have [ inchoative aspect ]?Is the obligatory omission of tense/aspect/mood marking in polar interrogatives common?habitual aspect in englishAre there any languages which inflect the noun for morphosyntactic categories normally reserved for verbs (e.g. tense, aspect, etc.)?
Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?
The phrase "to the numbers born"?
Slides for 30 min~1 hr Skype tenure track application interview
writing variables above the numbers in tikz picture
Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?
I am an eight letter word. What am I?
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
Sums of normal random variables
What is this sharp, curved notch on my knife for?
How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
How do PCB vias affect signal quality?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
How to type a long/em dash `—`
How to display lines in a file like ls displays files in a directory?
Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?
What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?
Is it possible for absolutely everyone to attain enlightenment?
Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?
Output the Arecibo Message
Do other languages have an “irreversible aspect”?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat is permansive aspect?How do languages with imperfect aspect typically convey distinctions between habitual, iterative, and progressive aspects?What aspect or feature do “over TIME” constructions have?Why does English have progressive aspect but German does not?Can every language express any lexical aspect?Grammatical Aspect and Lexical AspectDoes English have [ inchoative aspect ]?Is the obligatory omission of tense/aspect/mood marking in polar interrogatives common?habitual aspect in englishAre there any languages which inflect the noun for morphosyntactic categories normally reserved for verbs (e.g. tense, aspect, etc.)?
Like many languages, Lingála combines tense, aspect, and mood into a single TAM marking. Three of these TAMs pertain to the past:
a-kɛnd-ákí "he left earlier today" (hodiernal/recent past)
a-kɛnd-áká "he left a long time ago" (distant past)
a-kɛnd-á "he left, and he's never coming back" ("irreversible aspect")
This third of these, sometimes called the "irreversible", "ultimate", or "dead" TAM, describes an action that's happened and now can never be reversed. According to one native speaker, responding to a-kɛnd-á with "so when will he be coming back?" is a breach of conversational maxims and will get you a lot of blank stares.
I've never come across this aspect in other languages, and so I'm curious: are there other languages that have a specific grammatical marking for this meaning? And if so, is there a standard or commonly accepted name for it?
P.S. I'm ignoring vowel harmony in the examples for simplicity. What I'm actually interested in is the meaning.
morphology list-of-languages aspect tense-aspect-mood bantu
add a comment |
Like many languages, Lingála combines tense, aspect, and mood into a single TAM marking. Three of these TAMs pertain to the past:
a-kɛnd-ákí "he left earlier today" (hodiernal/recent past)
a-kɛnd-áká "he left a long time ago" (distant past)
a-kɛnd-á "he left, and he's never coming back" ("irreversible aspect")
This third of these, sometimes called the "irreversible", "ultimate", or "dead" TAM, describes an action that's happened and now can never be reversed. According to one native speaker, responding to a-kɛnd-á with "so when will he be coming back?" is a breach of conversational maxims and will get you a lot of blank stares.
I've never come across this aspect in other languages, and so I'm curious: are there other languages that have a specific grammatical marking for this meaning? And if so, is there a standard or commonly accepted name for it?
P.S. I'm ignoring vowel harmony in the examples for simplicity. What I'm actually interested in is the meaning.
morphology list-of-languages aspect tense-aspect-mood bantu
1
Is not it related to telicity ?
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 21:35
@amegnunsen It could be, potentially! I'd say it's telic in that the action is done: but there's an additional "…and it's done for good" aspect to it. If you'd call that some form of telicity, that would make a good answer!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:43
1
There is something like that in Tuareg, it is called by some linguists "accompli résultatif" (resultive perfective) or "préterit intensif" (intensive preterit).
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 23:01
This looks somewhat like '-te shimau' in Japanese.
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
add a comment |
Like many languages, Lingála combines tense, aspect, and mood into a single TAM marking. Three of these TAMs pertain to the past:
a-kɛnd-ákí "he left earlier today" (hodiernal/recent past)
a-kɛnd-áká "he left a long time ago" (distant past)
a-kɛnd-á "he left, and he's never coming back" ("irreversible aspect")
This third of these, sometimes called the "irreversible", "ultimate", or "dead" TAM, describes an action that's happened and now can never be reversed. According to one native speaker, responding to a-kɛnd-á with "so when will he be coming back?" is a breach of conversational maxims and will get you a lot of blank stares.
I've never come across this aspect in other languages, and so I'm curious: are there other languages that have a specific grammatical marking for this meaning? And if so, is there a standard or commonly accepted name for it?
P.S. I'm ignoring vowel harmony in the examples for simplicity. What I'm actually interested in is the meaning.
morphology list-of-languages aspect tense-aspect-mood bantu
Like many languages, Lingála combines tense, aspect, and mood into a single TAM marking. Three of these TAMs pertain to the past:
a-kɛnd-ákí "he left earlier today" (hodiernal/recent past)
a-kɛnd-áká "he left a long time ago" (distant past)
a-kɛnd-á "he left, and he's never coming back" ("irreversible aspect")
This third of these, sometimes called the "irreversible", "ultimate", or "dead" TAM, describes an action that's happened and now can never be reversed. According to one native speaker, responding to a-kɛnd-á with "so when will he be coming back?" is a breach of conversational maxims and will get you a lot of blank stares.
I've never come across this aspect in other languages, and so I'm curious: are there other languages that have a specific grammatical marking for this meaning? And if so, is there a standard or commonly accepted name for it?
P.S. I'm ignoring vowel harmony in the examples for simplicity. What I'm actually interested in is the meaning.
morphology list-of-languages aspect tense-aspect-mood bantu
morphology list-of-languages aspect tense-aspect-mood bantu
edited Apr 8 at 14:15
Draconis
asked Apr 5 at 19:36
DraconisDraconis
12.9k12054
12.9k12054
1
Is not it related to telicity ?
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 21:35
@amegnunsen It could be, potentially! I'd say it's telic in that the action is done: but there's an additional "…and it's done for good" aspect to it. If you'd call that some form of telicity, that would make a good answer!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:43
1
There is something like that in Tuareg, it is called by some linguists "accompli résultatif" (resultive perfective) or "préterit intensif" (intensive preterit).
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 23:01
This looks somewhat like '-te shimau' in Japanese.
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
add a comment |
1
Is not it related to telicity ?
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 21:35
@amegnunsen It could be, potentially! I'd say it's telic in that the action is done: but there's an additional "…and it's done for good" aspect to it. If you'd call that some form of telicity, that would make a good answer!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:43
1
There is something like that in Tuareg, it is called by some linguists "accompli résultatif" (resultive perfective) or "préterit intensif" (intensive preterit).
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 23:01
This looks somewhat like '-te shimau' in Japanese.
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
1
1
Is not it related to telicity ?
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 21:35
Is not it related to telicity ?
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 21:35
@amegnunsen It could be, potentially! I'd say it's telic in that the action is done: but there's an additional "…and it's done for good" aspect to it. If you'd call that some form of telicity, that would make a good answer!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:43
@amegnunsen It could be, potentially! I'd say it's telic in that the action is done: but there's an additional "…and it's done for good" aspect to it. If you'd call that some form of telicity, that would make a good answer!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:43
1
1
There is something like that in Tuareg, it is called by some linguists "accompli résultatif" (resultive perfective) or "préterit intensif" (intensive preterit).
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 23:01
There is something like that in Tuareg, it is called by some linguists "accompli résultatif" (resultive perfective) or "préterit intensif" (intensive preterit).
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 23:01
This looks somewhat like '-te shimau' in Japanese.
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
This looks somewhat like '-te shimau' in Japanese.
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I have not heard of such a thing, but I have heard of similar things in other Bantu languages. Generally, when you investigate the pragmatics and semantics of a Bantu language's tense system, you will find many subtle conditions of usage, for example "when you say it this way, you are disputing someone else's claim", or "you say it this way if you want to know where the thing went to". The things that inflectional categories encode are not at all limited to classical utterance-time etc. Neo-Reichenbachian distinctions. Sometimes the distinctions are common enough that we invent special terms (e.g. "perstitive" or "persistive", which has only recently spread outside Bantu). I have heard of this being described as "present grounded in distant past" for Lingala, and perhaps Michael Meeuwis (who works on Lingala tense) has an analysis and terminology to go with it. I just located an instance in Nurse's book Tense and Aspect in Bantu p. 113 where he calls this the "anterior" aspect, P2 tense.
A strategy that I don't entirely disagree with is to assume that the Neo-Reichenbachian approach is somewhat reasonable, and try to figure out what kind of aspect this could be, for example "perfective", and see if that predicts anything else. I would especially focus on the question of defeasibility in deciding whether a certain property is part of the literal meaning of the form.
Thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for. I'm looking for a copy of Nurse's book now, but: what does "P2" mean here? "Past tense #2"?
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:47
P2 is "degree 2 past" with P1 being most recent. Lingala has only two degrees, AFAIK.
– user6726
Apr 5 at 22:08
Interesting, thanks!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 22:27
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "312"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31083%2fdo-other-languages-have-an-irreversible-aspect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I have not heard of such a thing, but I have heard of similar things in other Bantu languages. Generally, when you investigate the pragmatics and semantics of a Bantu language's tense system, you will find many subtle conditions of usage, for example "when you say it this way, you are disputing someone else's claim", or "you say it this way if you want to know where the thing went to". The things that inflectional categories encode are not at all limited to classical utterance-time etc. Neo-Reichenbachian distinctions. Sometimes the distinctions are common enough that we invent special terms (e.g. "perstitive" or "persistive", which has only recently spread outside Bantu). I have heard of this being described as "present grounded in distant past" for Lingala, and perhaps Michael Meeuwis (who works on Lingala tense) has an analysis and terminology to go with it. I just located an instance in Nurse's book Tense and Aspect in Bantu p. 113 where he calls this the "anterior" aspect, P2 tense.
A strategy that I don't entirely disagree with is to assume that the Neo-Reichenbachian approach is somewhat reasonable, and try to figure out what kind of aspect this could be, for example "perfective", and see if that predicts anything else. I would especially focus on the question of defeasibility in deciding whether a certain property is part of the literal meaning of the form.
Thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for. I'm looking for a copy of Nurse's book now, but: what does "P2" mean here? "Past tense #2"?
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:47
P2 is "degree 2 past" with P1 being most recent. Lingala has only two degrees, AFAIK.
– user6726
Apr 5 at 22:08
Interesting, thanks!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 22:27
add a comment |
I have not heard of such a thing, but I have heard of similar things in other Bantu languages. Generally, when you investigate the pragmatics and semantics of a Bantu language's tense system, you will find many subtle conditions of usage, for example "when you say it this way, you are disputing someone else's claim", or "you say it this way if you want to know where the thing went to". The things that inflectional categories encode are not at all limited to classical utterance-time etc. Neo-Reichenbachian distinctions. Sometimes the distinctions are common enough that we invent special terms (e.g. "perstitive" or "persistive", which has only recently spread outside Bantu). I have heard of this being described as "present grounded in distant past" for Lingala, and perhaps Michael Meeuwis (who works on Lingala tense) has an analysis and terminology to go with it. I just located an instance in Nurse's book Tense and Aspect in Bantu p. 113 where he calls this the "anterior" aspect, P2 tense.
A strategy that I don't entirely disagree with is to assume that the Neo-Reichenbachian approach is somewhat reasonable, and try to figure out what kind of aspect this could be, for example "perfective", and see if that predicts anything else. I would especially focus on the question of defeasibility in deciding whether a certain property is part of the literal meaning of the form.
Thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for. I'm looking for a copy of Nurse's book now, but: what does "P2" mean here? "Past tense #2"?
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:47
P2 is "degree 2 past" with P1 being most recent. Lingala has only two degrees, AFAIK.
– user6726
Apr 5 at 22:08
Interesting, thanks!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 22:27
add a comment |
I have not heard of such a thing, but I have heard of similar things in other Bantu languages. Generally, when you investigate the pragmatics and semantics of a Bantu language's tense system, you will find many subtle conditions of usage, for example "when you say it this way, you are disputing someone else's claim", or "you say it this way if you want to know where the thing went to". The things that inflectional categories encode are not at all limited to classical utterance-time etc. Neo-Reichenbachian distinctions. Sometimes the distinctions are common enough that we invent special terms (e.g. "perstitive" or "persistive", which has only recently spread outside Bantu). I have heard of this being described as "present grounded in distant past" for Lingala, and perhaps Michael Meeuwis (who works on Lingala tense) has an analysis and terminology to go with it. I just located an instance in Nurse's book Tense and Aspect in Bantu p. 113 where he calls this the "anterior" aspect, P2 tense.
A strategy that I don't entirely disagree with is to assume that the Neo-Reichenbachian approach is somewhat reasonable, and try to figure out what kind of aspect this could be, for example "perfective", and see if that predicts anything else. I would especially focus on the question of defeasibility in deciding whether a certain property is part of the literal meaning of the form.
I have not heard of such a thing, but I have heard of similar things in other Bantu languages. Generally, when you investigate the pragmatics and semantics of a Bantu language's tense system, you will find many subtle conditions of usage, for example "when you say it this way, you are disputing someone else's claim", or "you say it this way if you want to know where the thing went to". The things that inflectional categories encode are not at all limited to classical utterance-time etc. Neo-Reichenbachian distinctions. Sometimes the distinctions are common enough that we invent special terms (e.g. "perstitive" or "persistive", which has only recently spread outside Bantu). I have heard of this being described as "present grounded in distant past" for Lingala, and perhaps Michael Meeuwis (who works on Lingala tense) has an analysis and terminology to go with it. I just located an instance in Nurse's book Tense and Aspect in Bantu p. 113 where he calls this the "anterior" aspect, P2 tense.
A strategy that I don't entirely disagree with is to assume that the Neo-Reichenbachian approach is somewhat reasonable, and try to figure out what kind of aspect this could be, for example "perfective", and see if that predicts anything else. I would especially focus on the question of defeasibility in deciding whether a certain property is part of the literal meaning of the form.
edited Apr 5 at 21:27
answered Apr 5 at 20:17
user6726user6726
36k12471
36k12471
Thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for. I'm looking for a copy of Nurse's book now, but: what does "P2" mean here? "Past tense #2"?
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:47
P2 is "degree 2 past" with P1 being most recent. Lingala has only two degrees, AFAIK.
– user6726
Apr 5 at 22:08
Interesting, thanks!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 22:27
add a comment |
Thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for. I'm looking for a copy of Nurse's book now, but: what does "P2" mean here? "Past tense #2"?
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:47
P2 is "degree 2 past" with P1 being most recent. Lingala has only two degrees, AFAIK.
– user6726
Apr 5 at 22:08
Interesting, thanks!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 22:27
Thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for. I'm looking for a copy of Nurse's book now, but: what does "P2" mean here? "Past tense #2"?
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:47
Thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for. I'm looking for a copy of Nurse's book now, but: what does "P2" mean here? "Past tense #2"?
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:47
P2 is "degree 2 past" with P1 being most recent. Lingala has only two degrees, AFAIK.
– user6726
Apr 5 at 22:08
P2 is "degree 2 past" with P1 being most recent. Lingala has only two degrees, AFAIK.
– user6726
Apr 5 at 22:08
Interesting, thanks!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 22:27
Interesting, thanks!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 22:27
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31083%2fdo-other-languages-have-an-irreversible-aspect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Is not it related to telicity ?
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 21:35
@amegnunsen It could be, potentially! I'd say it's telic in that the action is done: but there's an additional "…and it's done for good" aspect to it. If you'd call that some form of telicity, that would make a good answer!
– Draconis
Apr 5 at 21:43
1
There is something like that in Tuareg, it is called by some linguists "accompli résultatif" (resultive perfective) or "préterit intensif" (intensive preterit).
– amegnunsen
Apr 5 at 23:01
This looks somewhat like '-te shimau' in Japanese.
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday