Prodigo = pro + ago?What did 'prō' mean in 'prōrogō' ? What is its Semantic Field?Is there any connection between “ave” (as in Ave Cesar) and “aveo”?How did '-met' + 'ipse' + '-issimus' compound to mean <the same> (in *metipsimus)?Does the Latin nosco come from Greek?How do we end up with three vowels at the end of Περικλέους? (Greek)Are there other Latin words from the same PIE root as oculus?Where did the passive infinitive come from?Etymology of Ἀσκληπιός (Greek)Where does quire come from?What is the etymology of the word “anterior”?

Assassin's bullet with mercury

90's TV series where a boy goes to another dimension through portal near power lines

A geometry theory without irrational numbers?

Why does Optional.map make this assignment work?

Python: return float 1.0 as int 1 but float 1.5 as float 1.5

Plain language with long required phrases

Where does SFDX store details about scratch orgs?

Emailing HOD to enhance faculty application

Does casting Light, or a similar spell, have any effect when the caster is swallowed by a monster?

How to take photos in burst mode, without vibration?

UK: Is there precedent for the governments e-petition site changing the direction of a government decision?

Brothers & sisters

table going outside the page

Doing something right before you need it - expression for this?

intersection of two sorted vectors in C++

Can one be a co-translator of a book, if he does not know the language that the book is translated into?

Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?

How to model explosives?

Why can't we play rap on piano?

Is "remove commented out code" correct English?

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

Infinite Abelian subgroup of infinite non Abelian group example

Issue with type force PATH search

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?



Prodigo = pro + ago?


What did 'prō' mean in 'prōrogō' ? What is its Semantic Field?Is there any connection between “ave” (as in Ave Cesar) and “aveo”?How did '-met' + 'ipse' + '-issimus' compound to mean <the same> (in *metipsimus)?Does the Latin nosco come from Greek?How do we end up with three vowels at the end of Περικλέους? (Greek)Are there other Latin words from the same PIE root as oculus?Where did the passive infinitive come from?Etymology of Ἀσκληπιός (Greek)Where does quire come from?What is the etymology of the word “anterior”?













6















According to Wiktionary, prodigo is a verb which etymology comes from "pro + ago". The same is suggested by L&S. However, I cannot see how ago fits here. The conjugation of this verb seems at odds with that of prodigo. Is there some mutation involved? How did proago become prodigo?










share|improve this question




























    6















    According to Wiktionary, prodigo is a verb which etymology comes from "pro + ago". The same is suggested by L&S. However, I cannot see how ago fits here. The conjugation of this verb seems at odds with that of prodigo. Is there some mutation involved? How did proago become prodigo?










    share|improve this question


























      6












      6








      6


      2






      According to Wiktionary, prodigo is a verb which etymology comes from "pro + ago". The same is suggested by L&S. However, I cannot see how ago fits here. The conjugation of this verb seems at odds with that of prodigo. Is there some mutation involved? How did proago become prodigo?










      share|improve this question
















      According to Wiktionary, prodigo is a verb which etymology comes from "pro + ago". The same is suggested by L&S. However, I cannot see how ago fits here. The conjugation of this verb seems at odds with that of prodigo. Is there some mutation involved? How did proago become prodigo?







      etymologia verbs prefix






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 1 at 14:16









      Joonas Ilmavirta

      48.9k1271287




      48.9k1271287










      asked Apr 1 at 8:34









      luchonacholuchonacho

      6,07051560




      6,07051560




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          Before vowels the prefix pro- becomes prod-.
          In addition to prodigere, we have prodire, prodesse, and maybe others that I forget now.
          Where the -d- comes from is another question, but for practical purposes of learning Latin one can just learn the prevocalic version of the prefix.



          It is very common that a short a in a short first syllable of a verb becomes i when a prefix is added.
          For example, consider ex-facere > efficere.
          This has happened with agere, too, turning it into -igere after (one-syllable) prefixes.



          Once you change the short a into a short i in the present stem (otherwise the vowel or syllable is long) and remember to put the extra d in pro-, the conjugations of agere and prodigere match perfectly.






          share|improve this answer






























            9














            Joonas's answer is entirely correct, but just to add onto it a bit:



            The way I learned it, prōd is an archaic form of prō. You'll also sometimes see pōr as in pōrrigō, pōlluō, etc: these three all came from different forms of the same PIE root.



            In the end, prō was the one that won out, and so that's the only one you'll see used as a preposition. But all three of them show up in verb prefixes. Prōd was generally used in front of vowels, because Latin doesn't like vowels in hiatus (next to each other with nothing in between). And pōr was generally used before l or r, where prō would be awkward (forms like *prōrigō are somewhat unwieldy).



            (It's also possible that prōd turned into prō, because Latin generally got rid of final ds: that's how we got filiā < filiād and < med (mēd?). But that's just conjecture; I don't actually know where the different forms came from.)



            Re the vowel, Old Latin used to stress the first syllable of a word. And during this time, short vowels in non-final unstressed syllables (that is, any syllable besides the first and the last) got "reduced". The following rules aren't watertight, but they're decent guidelines:



            • If the vowel was next to an r, it became e

            • If the vowel came before two consonants, it became e.

            • If the vowel was next to a "dark l" (short l not touching a front vowel), it became u

            • Otherwise, it became i

            You see this in a lot of prefixed verbs, like faciō ~ afficiō ~ affectus, or ce ~ occultus. The a was the original vowel here, but it only survives when it's in the first syllable of the word. (You also see this reduction a lot in reduplicated perfects, like ca ~ ceci. Basically any time you have a prefix before a short vowel.)



            And that's what happened here: the original vowel was an a, but when it was pushed out of the first syllable, it got reduced to an i.



            Once you make that change, you'll see that the conjugation actually lines up quite nicely! It's just one of the quirks of Latin that you have to get used to.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

              – Joonas Ilmavirta
              Apr 1 at 15:36











            • @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

              – Draconis
              Apr 1 at 16:06






            • 2





              @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

              – Draconis
              2 days ago






            • 2





              (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

              – Draconis
              2 days ago






            • 2





              I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

              – sumelic
              2 days ago












            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "644"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9390%2fprodigo-pro-ago%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            7














            Before vowels the prefix pro- becomes prod-.
            In addition to prodigere, we have prodire, prodesse, and maybe others that I forget now.
            Where the -d- comes from is another question, but for practical purposes of learning Latin one can just learn the prevocalic version of the prefix.



            It is very common that a short a in a short first syllable of a verb becomes i when a prefix is added.
            For example, consider ex-facere > efficere.
            This has happened with agere, too, turning it into -igere after (one-syllable) prefixes.



            Once you change the short a into a short i in the present stem (otherwise the vowel or syllable is long) and remember to put the extra d in pro-, the conjugations of agere and prodigere match perfectly.






            share|improve this answer



























              7














              Before vowels the prefix pro- becomes prod-.
              In addition to prodigere, we have prodire, prodesse, and maybe others that I forget now.
              Where the -d- comes from is another question, but for practical purposes of learning Latin one can just learn the prevocalic version of the prefix.



              It is very common that a short a in a short first syllable of a verb becomes i when a prefix is added.
              For example, consider ex-facere > efficere.
              This has happened with agere, too, turning it into -igere after (one-syllable) prefixes.



              Once you change the short a into a short i in the present stem (otherwise the vowel or syllable is long) and remember to put the extra d in pro-, the conjugations of agere and prodigere match perfectly.






              share|improve this answer

























                7












                7








                7







                Before vowels the prefix pro- becomes prod-.
                In addition to prodigere, we have prodire, prodesse, and maybe others that I forget now.
                Where the -d- comes from is another question, but for practical purposes of learning Latin one can just learn the prevocalic version of the prefix.



                It is very common that a short a in a short first syllable of a verb becomes i when a prefix is added.
                For example, consider ex-facere > efficere.
                This has happened with agere, too, turning it into -igere after (one-syllable) prefixes.



                Once you change the short a into a short i in the present stem (otherwise the vowel or syllable is long) and remember to put the extra d in pro-, the conjugations of agere and prodigere match perfectly.






                share|improve this answer













                Before vowels the prefix pro- becomes prod-.
                In addition to prodigere, we have prodire, prodesse, and maybe others that I forget now.
                Where the -d- comes from is another question, but for practical purposes of learning Latin one can just learn the prevocalic version of the prefix.



                It is very common that a short a in a short first syllable of a verb becomes i when a prefix is added.
                For example, consider ex-facere > efficere.
                This has happened with agere, too, turning it into -igere after (one-syllable) prefixes.



                Once you change the short a into a short i in the present stem (otherwise the vowel or syllable is long) and remember to put the extra d in pro-, the conjugations of agere and prodigere match perfectly.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Apr 1 at 14:21









                Joonas IlmavirtaJoonas Ilmavirta

                48.9k1271287




                48.9k1271287





















                    9














                    Joonas's answer is entirely correct, but just to add onto it a bit:



                    The way I learned it, prōd is an archaic form of prō. You'll also sometimes see pōr as in pōrrigō, pōlluō, etc: these three all came from different forms of the same PIE root.



                    In the end, prō was the one that won out, and so that's the only one you'll see used as a preposition. But all three of them show up in verb prefixes. Prōd was generally used in front of vowels, because Latin doesn't like vowels in hiatus (next to each other with nothing in between). And pōr was generally used before l or r, where prō would be awkward (forms like *prōrigō are somewhat unwieldy).



                    (It's also possible that prōd turned into prō, because Latin generally got rid of final ds: that's how we got filiā < filiād and < med (mēd?). But that's just conjecture; I don't actually know where the different forms came from.)



                    Re the vowel, Old Latin used to stress the first syllable of a word. And during this time, short vowels in non-final unstressed syllables (that is, any syllable besides the first and the last) got "reduced". The following rules aren't watertight, but they're decent guidelines:



                    • If the vowel was next to an r, it became e

                    • If the vowel came before two consonants, it became e.

                    • If the vowel was next to a "dark l" (short l not touching a front vowel), it became u

                    • Otherwise, it became i

                    You see this in a lot of prefixed verbs, like faciō ~ afficiō ~ affectus, or ce ~ occultus. The a was the original vowel here, but it only survives when it's in the first syllable of the word. (You also see this reduction a lot in reduplicated perfects, like ca ~ ceci. Basically any time you have a prefix before a short vowel.)



                    And that's what happened here: the original vowel was an a, but when it was pushed out of the first syllable, it got reduced to an i.



                    Once you make that change, you'll see that the conjugation actually lines up quite nicely! It's just one of the quirks of Latin that you have to get used to.






                    share|improve this answer

























                    • Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                      – Joonas Ilmavirta
                      Apr 1 at 15:36











                    • @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 16:06






                    • 2





                      @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                      – Draconis
                      2 days ago






                    • 2





                      (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                      – Draconis
                      2 days ago






                    • 2





                      I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                      – sumelic
                      2 days ago
















                    9














                    Joonas's answer is entirely correct, but just to add onto it a bit:



                    The way I learned it, prōd is an archaic form of prō. You'll also sometimes see pōr as in pōrrigō, pōlluō, etc: these three all came from different forms of the same PIE root.



                    In the end, prō was the one that won out, and so that's the only one you'll see used as a preposition. But all three of them show up in verb prefixes. Prōd was generally used in front of vowels, because Latin doesn't like vowels in hiatus (next to each other with nothing in between). And pōr was generally used before l or r, where prō would be awkward (forms like *prōrigō are somewhat unwieldy).



                    (It's also possible that prōd turned into prō, because Latin generally got rid of final ds: that's how we got filiā < filiād and < med (mēd?). But that's just conjecture; I don't actually know where the different forms came from.)



                    Re the vowel, Old Latin used to stress the first syllable of a word. And during this time, short vowels in non-final unstressed syllables (that is, any syllable besides the first and the last) got "reduced". The following rules aren't watertight, but they're decent guidelines:



                    • If the vowel was next to an r, it became e

                    • If the vowel came before two consonants, it became e.

                    • If the vowel was next to a "dark l" (short l not touching a front vowel), it became u

                    • Otherwise, it became i

                    You see this in a lot of prefixed verbs, like faciō ~ afficiō ~ affectus, or ce ~ occultus. The a was the original vowel here, but it only survives when it's in the first syllable of the word. (You also see this reduction a lot in reduplicated perfects, like ca ~ ceci. Basically any time you have a prefix before a short vowel.)



                    And that's what happened here: the original vowel was an a, but when it was pushed out of the first syllable, it got reduced to an i.



                    Once you make that change, you'll see that the conjugation actually lines up quite nicely! It's just one of the quirks of Latin that you have to get used to.






                    share|improve this answer

























                    • Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                      – Joonas Ilmavirta
                      Apr 1 at 15:36











                    • @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 16:06






                    • 2





                      @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                      – Draconis
                      2 days ago






                    • 2





                      (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                      – Draconis
                      2 days ago






                    • 2





                      I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                      – sumelic
                      2 days ago














                    9












                    9








                    9







                    Joonas's answer is entirely correct, but just to add onto it a bit:



                    The way I learned it, prōd is an archaic form of prō. You'll also sometimes see pōr as in pōrrigō, pōlluō, etc: these three all came from different forms of the same PIE root.



                    In the end, prō was the one that won out, and so that's the only one you'll see used as a preposition. But all three of them show up in verb prefixes. Prōd was generally used in front of vowels, because Latin doesn't like vowels in hiatus (next to each other with nothing in between). And pōr was generally used before l or r, where prō would be awkward (forms like *prōrigō are somewhat unwieldy).



                    (It's also possible that prōd turned into prō, because Latin generally got rid of final ds: that's how we got filiā < filiād and < med (mēd?). But that's just conjecture; I don't actually know where the different forms came from.)



                    Re the vowel, Old Latin used to stress the first syllable of a word. And during this time, short vowels in non-final unstressed syllables (that is, any syllable besides the first and the last) got "reduced". The following rules aren't watertight, but they're decent guidelines:



                    • If the vowel was next to an r, it became e

                    • If the vowel came before two consonants, it became e.

                    • If the vowel was next to a "dark l" (short l not touching a front vowel), it became u

                    • Otherwise, it became i

                    You see this in a lot of prefixed verbs, like faciō ~ afficiō ~ affectus, or ce ~ occultus. The a was the original vowel here, but it only survives when it's in the first syllable of the word. (You also see this reduction a lot in reduplicated perfects, like ca ~ ceci. Basically any time you have a prefix before a short vowel.)



                    And that's what happened here: the original vowel was an a, but when it was pushed out of the first syllable, it got reduced to an i.



                    Once you make that change, you'll see that the conjugation actually lines up quite nicely! It's just one of the quirks of Latin that you have to get used to.






                    share|improve this answer















                    Joonas's answer is entirely correct, but just to add onto it a bit:



                    The way I learned it, prōd is an archaic form of prō. You'll also sometimes see pōr as in pōrrigō, pōlluō, etc: these three all came from different forms of the same PIE root.



                    In the end, prō was the one that won out, and so that's the only one you'll see used as a preposition. But all three of them show up in verb prefixes. Prōd was generally used in front of vowels, because Latin doesn't like vowels in hiatus (next to each other with nothing in between). And pōr was generally used before l or r, where prō would be awkward (forms like *prōrigō are somewhat unwieldy).



                    (It's also possible that prōd turned into prō, because Latin generally got rid of final ds: that's how we got filiā < filiād and < med (mēd?). But that's just conjecture; I don't actually know where the different forms came from.)



                    Re the vowel, Old Latin used to stress the first syllable of a word. And during this time, short vowels in non-final unstressed syllables (that is, any syllable besides the first and the last) got "reduced". The following rules aren't watertight, but they're decent guidelines:



                    • If the vowel was next to an r, it became e

                    • If the vowel came before two consonants, it became e.

                    • If the vowel was next to a "dark l" (short l not touching a front vowel), it became u

                    • Otherwise, it became i

                    You see this in a lot of prefixed verbs, like faciō ~ afficiō ~ affectus, or ce ~ occultus. The a was the original vowel here, but it only survives when it's in the first syllable of the word. (You also see this reduction a lot in reduplicated perfects, like ca ~ ceci. Basically any time you have a prefix before a short vowel.)



                    And that's what happened here: the original vowel was an a, but when it was pushed out of the first syllable, it got reduced to an i.



                    Once you make that change, you'll see that the conjugation actually lines up quite nicely! It's just one of the quirks of Latin that you have to get used to.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 2 days ago

























                    answered Apr 1 at 15:28









                    DraconisDraconis

                    18.1k22474




                    18.1k22474












                    • Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                      – Joonas Ilmavirta
                      Apr 1 at 15:36











                    • @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 16:06






                    • 2





                      @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                      – Draconis
                      2 days ago






                    • 2





                      (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                      – Draconis
                      2 days ago






                    • 2





                      I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                      – sumelic
                      2 days ago


















                    • Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                      – Joonas Ilmavirta
                      Apr 1 at 15:36











                    • @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                      – Draconis
                      Apr 1 at 16:06






                    • 2





                      @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                      – Draconis
                      2 days ago






                    • 2





                      (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                      – Draconis
                      2 days ago






                    • 2





                      I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                      – sumelic
                      2 days ago

















                    Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                    – Joonas Ilmavirta
                    Apr 1 at 15:36





                    Great answer! One point, though: It seems to make a difference for the vowel change whether the prefix has one or more syllables. We have circumagere, but circumiacere also has the reduced variant. Maybe the new stress on the first syllable of the prefix is far enough so that a secondary stress can be kept on the first syllable of agere in old Latin?

                    – Joonas Ilmavirta
                    Apr 1 at 15:36













                    @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                    – Draconis
                    Apr 1 at 16:06





                    @JoonasIlmavirta I think those forms are later derivations, since the second syllable of circum doesn't get reduced either. Alternately, L&S say that verbs prefixed with circum are often written as two separate words, so the Romans might not have thought of them as truly joined.

                    – Draconis
                    Apr 1 at 16:06




                    2




                    2





                    @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                    – Draconis
                    2 days ago





                    @ColinFine Oh, sorry—what I meant wasn't that the writing made the sounds not change, but that the Romans wrote them separately because they thought of circum and as two separate words. In which case the sound changes, which happened only in words of 3+ syllables, would have left them alone.

                    – Draconis
                    2 days ago




                    2




                    2





                    (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                    – Draconis
                    2 days ago





                    (In other words, the writing reflects the Romans' pronouncing them as separate words, not the other way around.)

                    – Draconis
                    2 days ago




                    2




                    2





                    I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                    – sumelic
                    2 days ago






                    I've always seen prod- written as prōd-, with a long vowel. The first syllable of prodigo scans as long, and I don't think that it's a case of the d acting as a coda consonant that makes a heavy syllable with a short vowel, because the similar example of redigo has a light first syllable.

                    – sumelic
                    2 days ago


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Latin Language Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9390%2fprodigo-pro-ago%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221

                    Creating closest line along the point''s azimuth using PostgreSQL Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Drawing line between points at specific distance in PostGIS?How to efficiently find the closest point over the dateline?How to find the nearest point by using PostGIS function?PostGIS nearest point with LATERAL JOIN in PostgreSQL 9.3+Creating a table and inserting selected streets using plpgsql functionsCreating a table that stores Distances and other columnSaving select query results (year wise) from PostgreSQL/PostGIS to text filesWhat is the information behind this geometry?How to give start and end vertex ids dynamically in pgr_dijkstra?Point to Polygon nearest distance DS_distance is not using geography index & knn <-> or <#> does not give result in orderLine to point conversion with start point and end point detection?

                    Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given