Shortening a title without changing its meaningTitle Choice: “The Girl [Without/Who Didn't Have] A Soul”Writing a programming book: how to present directory structuresDoes the word “Its” get a capital in The Economist Style title case?Changing a story's title to hint at story's meaningIs this title suitable for a chapter section?Name of a subsection and its parent section clashCry, the beloved country title meaningCan basic grammar rules be skipped when writing text for machine safety labels?A different question regarding titling a novel - EditedToo Long for Title/Subtitle?
Why does Arabsat 6A need a Falcon Heavy to launch
Western buddy movie with a supernatural twist where a woman turns into an eagle at the end
How to draw the figure with four pentagons?
Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert
intersection of two sorted vectors in C++
Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?
Today is the Center
Will google still index a page if I use a $_SESSION variable?
Assassin's bullet with mercury
Stopping power of mountain vs road bike
What's the difference between 'rename' and 'mv'?
Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?
Is "remove commented out code" correct English?
How to say in German "enjoying home comforts"
How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?
How to model explosives?
Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?
Combinations of multiple lists
How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?
Emailing HOD to enhance faculty application
Can I use a neutral wire from another outlet to repair a broken neutral?
Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter
What to put in ESTA if staying in US for a few days before going on to Canada
What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?
Shortening a title without changing its meaning
Title Choice: “The Girl [Without/Who Didn't Have] A Soul”Writing a programming book: how to present directory structuresDoes the word “Its” get a capital in The Economist Style title case?Changing a story's title to hint at story's meaningIs this title suitable for a chapter section?Name of a subsection and its parent section clashCry, the beloved country title meaningCan basic grammar rules be skipped when writing text for machine safety labels?A different question regarding titling a novel - EditedToo Long for Title/Subtitle?
Essentially, I want to change:
Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
to:
Lot of people, difficult problem
I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?
technical-writing titles
New contributor
add a comment |
Essentially, I want to change:
Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
to:
Lot of people, difficult problem
I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?
technical-writing titles
New contributor
14
Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?
– Azor Ahai
Apr 1 at 17:17
1
"Managing large teams: problems and solutions"
– David Rice
Apr 1 at 20:18
@AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.
– user45266
2 days ago
2
Managing many is difficult
– mcalex
2 days ago
@user you must have read a different comment then
– Azor Ahai
2 days ago
add a comment |
Essentially, I want to change:
Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
to:
Lot of people, difficult problem
I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?
technical-writing titles
New contributor
Essentially, I want to change:
Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
to:
Lot of people, difficult problem
I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?
technical-writing titles
technical-writing titles
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Apr 1 at 13:54
tefisjbtefisjb
233
233
New contributor
New contributor
14
Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?
– Azor Ahai
Apr 1 at 17:17
1
"Managing large teams: problems and solutions"
– David Rice
Apr 1 at 20:18
@AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.
– user45266
2 days ago
2
Managing many is difficult
– mcalex
2 days ago
@user you must have read a different comment then
– Azor Ahai
2 days ago
add a comment |
14
Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?
– Azor Ahai
Apr 1 at 17:17
1
"Managing large teams: problems and solutions"
– David Rice
Apr 1 at 20:18
@AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.
– user45266
2 days ago
2
Managing many is difficult
– mcalex
2 days ago
@user you must have read a different comment then
– Azor Ahai
2 days ago
14
14
Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?
– Azor Ahai
Apr 1 at 17:17
Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?
– Azor Ahai
Apr 1 at 17:17
1
1
"Managing large teams: problems and solutions"
– David Rice
Apr 1 at 20:18
"Managing large teams: problems and solutions"
– David Rice
Apr 1 at 20:18
@AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.
– user45266
2 days ago
@AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.
– user45266
2 days ago
2
2
Managing many is difficult
– mcalex
2 days ago
Managing many is difficult
– mcalex
2 days ago
@user you must have read a different comment then
– Azor Ahai
2 days ago
@user you must have read a different comment then
– Azor Ahai
2 days ago
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.
So far, you have:
Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
to
Lot of
people, difficult problem
In this example, you have 3 concepts:
- It's about managing people
- There are a lot of people
- It's hard
The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.
I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.
This leaves you with:
Managing a lot of people
It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.
I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.
What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?
add a comment |
How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"
Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".
1
"Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)
– wizzwizz4
Apr 1 at 18:29
4
crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.
– Alexandre Aubrey
Apr 1 at 19:23
add a comment |
Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount
Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.
Apply the same rule to your titles.
add a comment |
Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.
Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.
You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.
Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.
Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.
Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.
add a comment |
I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.
I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44248%2fshortening-a-title-without-changing-its-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.
So far, you have:
Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
to
Lot of
people, difficult problem
In this example, you have 3 concepts:
- It's about managing people
- There are a lot of people
- It's hard
The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.
I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.
This leaves you with:
Managing a lot of people
It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.
I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.
What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?
add a comment |
It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.
So far, you have:
Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
to
Lot of
people, difficult problem
In this example, you have 3 concepts:
- It's about managing people
- There are a lot of people
- It's hard
The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.
I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.
This leaves you with:
Managing a lot of people
It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.
I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.
What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?
add a comment |
It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.
So far, you have:
Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
to
Lot of
people, difficult problem
In this example, you have 3 concepts:
- It's about managing people
- There are a lot of people
- It's hard
The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.
I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.
This leaves you with:
Managing a lot of people
It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.
I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.
What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?
It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.
So far, you have:
Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
to
Lot of
people, difficult problem
In this example, you have 3 concepts:
- It's about managing people
- There are a lot of people
- It's hard
The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.
I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.
This leaves you with:
Managing a lot of people
It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.
I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.
What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?
answered Apr 1 at 15:19
CynCyn
17.1k13681
17.1k13681
add a comment |
add a comment |
How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"
Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".
1
"Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)
– wizzwizz4
Apr 1 at 18:29
4
crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.
– Alexandre Aubrey
Apr 1 at 19:23
add a comment |
How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"
Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".
1
"Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)
– wizzwizz4
Apr 1 at 18:29
4
crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.
– Alexandre Aubrey
Apr 1 at 19:23
add a comment |
How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"
Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".
How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"
Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".
answered Apr 1 at 14:57
Henry TaylorHenry Taylor
9,5661732
9,5661732
1
"Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)
– wizzwizz4
Apr 1 at 18:29
4
crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.
– Alexandre Aubrey
Apr 1 at 19:23
add a comment |
1
"Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)
– wizzwizz4
Apr 1 at 18:29
4
crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.
– Alexandre Aubrey
Apr 1 at 19:23
1
1
"Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)
– wizzwizz4
Apr 1 at 18:29
"Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)
– wizzwizz4
Apr 1 at 18:29
4
4
crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.
– Alexandre Aubrey
Apr 1 at 19:23
crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.
– Alexandre Aubrey
Apr 1 at 19:23
add a comment |
Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount
Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.
Apply the same rule to your titles.
add a comment |
Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount
Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.
Apply the same rule to your titles.
add a comment |
Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount
Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.
Apply the same rule to your titles.
Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount
Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.
Apply the same rule to your titles.
answered Apr 1 at 15:07
AmadeusAmadeus
57.9k574186
57.9k574186
add a comment |
add a comment |
Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.
Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.
You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.
Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.
Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.
Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.
add a comment |
Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.
Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.
You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.
Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.
Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.
Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.
add a comment |
Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.
Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.
You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.
Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.
Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.
Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.
Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.
Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.
You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.
Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.
Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.
Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.
answered Apr 1 at 14:39
RasdashanRasdashan
9,4981160
9,4981160
add a comment |
add a comment |
I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.
I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.
New contributor
add a comment |
I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.
I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.
New contributor
add a comment |
I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.
I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.
New contributor
I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.
I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
Chenmunka
6991319
6991319
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
ChatterOneChatterOne
1114
1114
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44248%2fshortening-a-title-without-changing-its-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
14
Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?
– Azor Ahai
Apr 1 at 17:17
1
"Managing large teams: problems and solutions"
– David Rice
Apr 1 at 20:18
@AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.
– user45266
2 days ago
2
Managing many is difficult
– mcalex
2 days ago
@user you must have read a different comment then
– Azor Ahai
2 days ago