Does the direction of correlation matter for Instrumental Variable?Identifying instrumental variables for structural modelvalid instrument for oil consumption in IV modelCan you use a moving average as an instrumental variable?Continuous Instrumental Variable?Definition of validity of an instrumental variable2sls - instrumental variables mean and variance of exogenous variableTransformation of instrumental variablesSet of instrumental dummy variables for a discrete endogenous variable - monotonicity assumption, overidentification and balance testsSolving correlation between explanatory variables using instrumental variablesInstrumental variable predicts endogenous variable in an unexpected direction
Latex document compiles but tikzpicture is not showing up
Stopping power of mountain vs road bike
How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?
Plain language with long required phrases
Can I make "comment-region" comment empty lines?
Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert
Could gravitational lensing be used to protect a spaceship from a laser?
What exploit are these user agents trying to use?
A reference to a well-known characterization of scattered compact spaces
What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?
What to put in ESTA if staying in US for a few days before going onto Canada
AES: Why is it a good practice to use only the first 16bytes of a hash for encryption?
Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?
Is there a way to gain immortality short of becoming a Lich or Vampire?
Would Slavery Reparations be considered Bills of Attainder and hence Illegal?
Why does Optional.map make this assignment work?
Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?
Watching something be written to a file live with tail
Is it possible to download Internet Explorer on my Mac running OS X El Capitan?
I would say: "You are another teacher", but she is a woman and I am a man
How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?
Is it possible to create light that imparts a greater proportion of its energy as momentum rather than heat?
Find the age of the oldest file in one line or return zero
Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?
Does the direction of correlation matter for Instrumental Variable?
Identifying instrumental variables for structural modelvalid instrument for oil consumption in IV modelCan you use a moving average as an instrumental variable?Continuous Instrumental Variable?Definition of validity of an instrumental variable2sls - instrumental variables mean and variance of exogenous variableTransformation of instrumental variablesSet of instrumental dummy variables for a discrete endogenous variable - monotonicity assumption, overidentification and balance testsSolving correlation between explanatory variables using instrumental variablesInstrumental variable predicts endogenous variable in an unexpected direction
$begingroup$
For a valid instrumental variable:
(1) the instrument must be correlated with the endogenous explanatory variables, and,
(2) the instrument cannot be correlated with the error term in the explanatory equation.
My question is about point 1. Does the direction of the correlation matter? Suppose I choose Z as an instrument for the endogenous variable X. Z is highly correlated with X (and seemingly unrelated to the outcome of interest), but in the opposite direction that I expected. My hunch is that it undermines my assumptions about point 2, but I wasn't quite sure.
instrumental-variables
New contributor
Patrick Shea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a valid instrumental variable:
(1) the instrument must be correlated with the endogenous explanatory variables, and,
(2) the instrument cannot be correlated with the error term in the explanatory equation.
My question is about point 1. Does the direction of the correlation matter? Suppose I choose Z as an instrument for the endogenous variable X. Z is highly correlated with X (and seemingly unrelated to the outcome of interest), but in the opposite direction that I expected. My hunch is that it undermines my assumptions about point 2, but I wasn't quite sure.
instrumental-variables
New contributor
Patrick Shea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
By direction, do you mean sign? Correlation does not have a direction (unlike, say, causality) but has sign.
$endgroup$
– Richard Hardy
Apr 1 at 17:58
$begingroup$
Yes, I meant sign of the correlation. For example, I expect Z to have a positive correlation with X, but instead find a negative correlation.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Shea
Apr 1 at 19:31
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a valid instrumental variable:
(1) the instrument must be correlated with the endogenous explanatory variables, and,
(2) the instrument cannot be correlated with the error term in the explanatory equation.
My question is about point 1. Does the direction of the correlation matter? Suppose I choose Z as an instrument for the endogenous variable X. Z is highly correlated with X (and seemingly unrelated to the outcome of interest), but in the opposite direction that I expected. My hunch is that it undermines my assumptions about point 2, but I wasn't quite sure.
instrumental-variables
New contributor
Patrick Shea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
For a valid instrumental variable:
(1) the instrument must be correlated with the endogenous explanatory variables, and,
(2) the instrument cannot be correlated with the error term in the explanatory equation.
My question is about point 1. Does the direction of the correlation matter? Suppose I choose Z as an instrument for the endogenous variable X. Z is highly correlated with X (and seemingly unrelated to the outcome of interest), but in the opposite direction that I expected. My hunch is that it undermines my assumptions about point 2, but I wasn't quite sure.
instrumental-variables
instrumental-variables
New contributor
Patrick Shea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Patrick Shea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Patrick Shea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Apr 1 at 14:33
Patrick SheaPatrick Shea
82
82
New contributor
Patrick Shea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Patrick Shea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Patrick Shea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
By direction, do you mean sign? Correlation does not have a direction (unlike, say, causality) but has sign.
$endgroup$
– Richard Hardy
Apr 1 at 17:58
$begingroup$
Yes, I meant sign of the correlation. For example, I expect Z to have a positive correlation with X, but instead find a negative correlation.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Shea
Apr 1 at 19:31
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By direction, do you mean sign? Correlation does not have a direction (unlike, say, causality) but has sign.
$endgroup$
– Richard Hardy
Apr 1 at 17:58
$begingroup$
Yes, I meant sign of the correlation. For example, I expect Z to have a positive correlation with X, but instead find a negative correlation.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Shea
Apr 1 at 19:31
$begingroup$
By direction, do you mean sign? Correlation does not have a direction (unlike, say, causality) but has sign.
$endgroup$
– Richard Hardy
Apr 1 at 17:58
$begingroup$
By direction, do you mean sign? Correlation does not have a direction (unlike, say, causality) but has sign.
$endgroup$
– Richard Hardy
Apr 1 at 17:58
$begingroup$
Yes, I meant sign of the correlation. For example, I expect Z to have a positive correlation with X, but instead find a negative correlation.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Shea
Apr 1 at 19:31
$begingroup$
Yes, I meant sign of the correlation. For example, I expect Z to have a positive correlation with X, but instead find a negative correlation.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Shea
Apr 1 at 19:31
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, direction of correlation does not matter for the purpose at hand.
In the simplest IV-estimation case, the estimator emerges from the assumption of no correlation,
$$E(Z'u) = 0 implies E[Z'(y-Xb)] = 0 implies E(Z'y) = E(Z'X)b$$
Using sample averages instead of expected values as we do with method of moments estimation, and ignoring the scaling $1/n$ we arrive at
$$hat b_IV = (Z'X)^-1Z'y = (Z'X)^-1Z'(Xb+u) = b + (Z'X)^-1Z'u$$
For this estimator to be feasible we want $E(Z'X) neq 0 $ so that we can invert the matrix. The sign of the relation does not matter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Patrick Shea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f400583%2fdoes-the-direction-of-correlation-matter-for-instrumental-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, direction of correlation does not matter for the purpose at hand.
In the simplest IV-estimation case, the estimator emerges from the assumption of no correlation,
$$E(Z'u) = 0 implies E[Z'(y-Xb)] = 0 implies E(Z'y) = E(Z'X)b$$
Using sample averages instead of expected values as we do with method of moments estimation, and ignoring the scaling $1/n$ we arrive at
$$hat b_IV = (Z'X)^-1Z'y = (Z'X)^-1Z'(Xb+u) = b + (Z'X)^-1Z'u$$
For this estimator to be feasible we want $E(Z'X) neq 0 $ so that we can invert the matrix. The sign of the relation does not matter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, direction of correlation does not matter for the purpose at hand.
In the simplest IV-estimation case, the estimator emerges from the assumption of no correlation,
$$E(Z'u) = 0 implies E[Z'(y-Xb)] = 0 implies E(Z'y) = E(Z'X)b$$
Using sample averages instead of expected values as we do with method of moments estimation, and ignoring the scaling $1/n$ we arrive at
$$hat b_IV = (Z'X)^-1Z'y = (Z'X)^-1Z'(Xb+u) = b + (Z'X)^-1Z'u$$
For this estimator to be feasible we want $E(Z'X) neq 0 $ so that we can invert the matrix. The sign of the relation does not matter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, direction of correlation does not matter for the purpose at hand.
In the simplest IV-estimation case, the estimator emerges from the assumption of no correlation,
$$E(Z'u) = 0 implies E[Z'(y-Xb)] = 0 implies E(Z'y) = E(Z'X)b$$
Using sample averages instead of expected values as we do with method of moments estimation, and ignoring the scaling $1/n$ we arrive at
$$hat b_IV = (Z'X)^-1Z'y = (Z'X)^-1Z'(Xb+u) = b + (Z'X)^-1Z'u$$
For this estimator to be feasible we want $E(Z'X) neq 0 $ so that we can invert the matrix. The sign of the relation does not matter.
$endgroup$
No, direction of correlation does not matter for the purpose at hand.
In the simplest IV-estimation case, the estimator emerges from the assumption of no correlation,
$$E(Z'u) = 0 implies E[Z'(y-Xb)] = 0 implies E(Z'y) = E(Z'X)b$$
Using sample averages instead of expected values as we do with method of moments estimation, and ignoring the scaling $1/n$ we arrive at
$$hat b_IV = (Z'X)^-1Z'y = (Z'X)^-1Z'(Xb+u) = b + (Z'X)^-1Z'u$$
For this estimator to be feasible we want $E(Z'X) neq 0 $ so that we can invert the matrix. The sign of the relation does not matter.
answered Apr 1 at 14:57
Alecos PapadopoulosAlecos Papadopoulos
42.8k297198
42.8k297198
add a comment |
add a comment |
Patrick Shea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Patrick Shea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Patrick Shea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Patrick Shea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f400583%2fdoes-the-direction-of-correlation-matter-for-instrumental-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
By direction, do you mean sign? Correlation does not have a direction (unlike, say, causality) but has sign.
$endgroup$
– Richard Hardy
Apr 1 at 17:58
$begingroup$
Yes, I meant sign of the correlation. For example, I expect Z to have a positive correlation with X, but instead find a negative correlation.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Shea
Apr 1 at 19:31