I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told him about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize? [closed] Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Should a year of Americorps service be listed as “professional experience” or “volunteering” on a resume and LinkedIn?Boss didn't give me a w-4 to fill out before I started working and now I can't get paidHow long should I wait before networking on LinkedIn with coworkers at a new job?How much information about my job should I reveal on my LinkedIn profile?Manager reveals private information about other employees offhandedly: best way to approach?Recommending a current co-workerShould I tell my coworker that someone has made a fake Linkedin account of him?What to do about unethical or possibly illegal behavior at work?How to describe a job on linkedin without overinflating and underselling it?Owner of company practicing unethical behavior

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

Why did the rest of the Eastern Bloc not invade Yugoslavia?

What does this icon in iOS Stardew Valley mean?

Can I cast Passwall to drop an enemy into a 20-foot pit?

Short Story with Cinderella as a Voo-doo Witch

Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?

Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?

What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?

When were vectors invented?

How much time will it take to get my passport back if I am applying for multiple Schengen visa countries?

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

How does the particle を relate to the verb 行く in the structure「A を + B に行く」?

List of Python versions

Generate an RGB colour grid

Ring Automorphisms that fix 1.

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages

Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?

When do you get frequent flier miles - when you buy, or when you fly?

What is Wonderstone and are there any references to it pre-1982?

The logistics of corpse disposal

How to find out what spells would be useless to a blind NPC spellcaster?

Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters

Resolving to minmaj7



I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told him about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize? [closed]



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Should a year of Americorps service be listed as “professional experience” or “volunteering” on a resume and LinkedIn?Boss didn't give me a w-4 to fill out before I started working and now I can't get paidHow long should I wait before networking on LinkedIn with coworkers at a new job?How much information about my job should I reveal on my LinkedIn profile?Manager reveals private information about other employees offhandedly: best way to approach?Recommending a current co-workerShould I tell my coworker that someone has made a fake Linkedin account of him?What to do about unethical or possibly illegal behavior at work?How to describe a job on linkedin without overinflating and underselling it?Owner of company practicing unethical behavior



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








62















I was thinking about this and was wondering if my behavior is unethical - the information was public, and I didn't think much of doing so at the time.










share|improve this question















closed as primarily opinion-based by sf02, gnat, yoozer8, MonkeyZeus, Jenny D Apr 10 at 16:27


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 1





    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Snow
    Apr 10 at 9:23






  • 5





    Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.

    – Nelson
    Apr 10 at 9:29






  • 6





    I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.

    – Lukali
    Apr 10 at 10:26







  • 1





    Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?

    – Lamar Latrell
    Apr 10 at 11:36






  • 1





    As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.

    – teego1967
    Apr 10 at 12:09


















62















I was thinking about this and was wondering if my behavior is unethical - the information was public, and I didn't think much of doing so at the time.










share|improve this question















closed as primarily opinion-based by sf02, gnat, yoozer8, MonkeyZeus, Jenny D Apr 10 at 16:27


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 1





    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Snow
    Apr 10 at 9:23






  • 5





    Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.

    – Nelson
    Apr 10 at 9:29






  • 6





    I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.

    – Lukali
    Apr 10 at 10:26







  • 1





    Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?

    – Lamar Latrell
    Apr 10 at 11:36






  • 1





    As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.

    – teego1967
    Apr 10 at 12:09














62












62








62


2






I was thinking about this and was wondering if my behavior is unethical - the information was public, and I didn't think much of doing so at the time.










share|improve this question
















I was thinking about this and was wondering if my behavior is unethical - the information was public, and I didn't think much of doing so at the time.







ethics linkedin






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 10 at 12:43









Community

1




1










asked Apr 9 at 17:20









M VM V

267124




267124




closed as primarily opinion-based by sf02, gnat, yoozer8, MonkeyZeus, Jenny D Apr 10 at 16:27


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as primarily opinion-based by sf02, gnat, yoozer8, MonkeyZeus, Jenny D Apr 10 at 16:27


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1





    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Snow
    Apr 10 at 9:23






  • 5





    Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.

    – Nelson
    Apr 10 at 9:29






  • 6





    I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.

    – Lukali
    Apr 10 at 10:26







  • 1





    Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?

    – Lamar Latrell
    Apr 10 at 11:36






  • 1





    As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.

    – teego1967
    Apr 10 at 12:09













  • 1





    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Snow
    Apr 10 at 9:23






  • 5





    Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.

    – Nelson
    Apr 10 at 9:29






  • 6





    I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.

    – Lukali
    Apr 10 at 10:26







  • 1





    Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?

    – Lamar Latrell
    Apr 10 at 11:36






  • 1





    As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.

    – teego1967
    Apr 10 at 12:09








1




1





Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– Snow
Apr 10 at 9:23





Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– Snow
Apr 10 at 9:23




5




5





Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.

– Nelson
Apr 10 at 9:29





Surprised is different than offended. I'm not even sure if it is clear whether you're apologizing to an offense or to him being surprised.

– Nelson
Apr 10 at 9:29




6




6





I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.

– Lukali
Apr 10 at 10:26






I'm generally confused as to whether he looked up a colleague and then told another colleague that he looked them up, or that he told the colleague he looked up that he will be starting there... Second seems more plausible, but not clear from the question.

– Lukali
Apr 10 at 10:26





1




1





Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?

– Lamar Latrell
Apr 10 at 11:36





Why does ethics immediately spring to mind? Maybe you'd be better off framing it in terms of basic politeness first?

– Lamar Latrell
Apr 10 at 11:36




1




1





As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.

– teego1967
Apr 10 at 12:09






As you can tell from all the answers and commentary, opinion is totally mixed on whether reaching out to a future colleague via LinkedIn is appropriate. It's safe to assume that this future colleague is on the other side of the opinion that you (though you didn't detail his actual reaction). The best thing you can do is introduce yourself to him when you see him and explain that you were just enthusiastic about joining the team.

– teego1967
Apr 10 at 12:09











6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















216














No. Don't apologize.



Had it happen to me, and I've done it myself. If a person doesn't want their profile accessed, they shouldn't make it publicly available. There is nothing wrong with that.






share|improve this answer




















  • 120





    Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.

    – dwizum
    Apr 9 at 17:38






  • 11





    @Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?

    – mkennedy
    Apr 9 at 20:30






  • 20





    @sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?

    – mkennedy
    Apr 9 at 20:41






  • 22





    @sf02 yes of course it is.

    – edc65
    Apr 9 at 20:51






  • 23





    Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Apr 10 at 0:44


















6















I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?




I suggest you ask him, e.g.




"I noticed you seemed surprised when I said I'd looked you up on LinkedIn. I've been feeling bad about it in case it upset you in any way. *Are you okay about it?"




Note



I have edited the last part of my answer in response to valid comments. I feel that a final question is needed in order to encourage the other person to have their say. I'm open to other suggestions.



As Ister suggests, "I hope you weren't offended" is another good possibility to finish with.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.

    – Ister
    Apr 10 at 13:28






  • 1





    I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.

    – aslum
    Apr 10 at 13:35











  • @Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.

    – chasly from UK
    Apr 10 at 15:26


















2














Other answers are fairly blunt in the “No…” category, but I believe there is subtlety here:



If you feel you need to apologize, then you should apologize…



But don’t feel bad about it.



Yes, if a LinkedIn profile is made public then people can view that profile and then (based on their level of access in LinkedIn) they can see they viewed your profile. All fair.



And yes, you can lock down your LinkedIn profile so you can only allow people you are connected to to view that profile. That is fair.



But at the end of the day there is human etiquette. And if you feel that you might have offended someone by simply looking at their profile, you should apologize.



You should not recommend that they lock down their profile because why should they? Because ultimately if the profile is public, they might have a good reason to do so and not really want to alter their online presence for the needs of one random person they just met.



In general think about public online profiles like mail: You know, I can see my neighbors ordered items from Amazon. And many packages have tracking numbers right on them. There is technically nothing stopping me from making note of that tracking number and then—the next time I saw my neighbor—say something like, “Boy! That Amazon package you just got took a long time to get to you!” I mean, that’s prying and kinda crazy, right?



Ditto with online public profiles.



In the case of your co-worker, if they were stunned by what you did just say something like:




“Well, sorry about that. But since I was starting this job and just wanted to get to know my co-workers. My apologizes if that was an indirect way of going about it.”




The reality is that technical boundaries—such as blocking access to a profile—and human etiquette are two different things.






share|improve this answer
































    1














    There's no need for an apology.



    If someone creates a profile on LinkedIn, then they should expect that people will be looking at it, whether it be potential employers, peers or anyone using the site. I wouldn't even bring it up again, unless it seems like there's some unspoken tension over it.






    share|improve this answer
































      0














      I told him about it and he seemed surprised.



      ^^ So what??



      When I see acquaintances shopping at the same store as me I get surprised too. It doesn't mean that they should apologize.



      Stop overthinking and don't make things weird by apologizing. Move on with your life.






      share|improve this answer






























        -12














        NOTE: reviewing the answer I changed the usage of "creepy" to "weird, strange"



        I agree with two points made by participants in answers and comments:



        1. You shouldn't apologize

        2. It's weird, strange


        why?



        1. As stated previously, once you open a public profile (in any site, FB, LI, etc) you should be aware that you could be contacted by people you don't know, so it is something expected, thus, I think there is no need for apologizing



        2. I infer from OP's words ("future colleague") that he/she does not even know the OP. So for me is weird, strange to see the 3rd item of this sequence in my timeline:



          • OP has viewed your profile (Ok, it's expected)

          • OP wants to connect (Let see if industry or people in common)

          • OP says "Hi, you don't know me but I will be working with you soon. I will start this date" (weird, strange)


        But...



        If that was the approach of the OP, it's weird, strange enough for me. I would say something like "mmm, ok congrats".



        However, if the message is more like:



        "Hi, I am OP, I have been working as XXX and I will be starting soon at THE COMPANY in your department. I saw that you are working there, Could I ask YYYY if you don't mind? I would like to know more about the workplace/tools/procedures/advice etc"



        I think that is more professional and I will be eager to help, verifying first that this is true or redirecting to the relevant area (HR, manager) if there are some information concerns.




        My point is that I wouldn't be offended or scared, just a bit uncomfortable with someone trying approach me in a non-professional way






        share|improve this answer




















        • 6





          The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.

          – Voo
          Apr 10 at 9:20






        • 23





          Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1

          – virolino
          Apr 10 at 9:24






        • 1





          Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!

          – virolino
          Apr 10 at 9:30






        • 1





          Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.

          – gustavovelascoh
          Apr 10 at 9:34






        • 5





          It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.

          – StarWeaver
          Apr 10 at 9:44

















        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        216














        No. Don't apologize.



        Had it happen to me, and I've done it myself. If a person doesn't want their profile accessed, they shouldn't make it publicly available. There is nothing wrong with that.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 120





          Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.

          – dwizum
          Apr 9 at 17:38






        • 11





          @Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?

          – mkennedy
          Apr 9 at 20:30






        • 20





          @sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?

          – mkennedy
          Apr 9 at 20:41






        • 22





          @sf02 yes of course it is.

          – edc65
          Apr 9 at 20:51






        • 23





          Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.

          – Lightness Races in Orbit
          Apr 10 at 0:44















        216














        No. Don't apologize.



        Had it happen to me, and I've done it myself. If a person doesn't want their profile accessed, they shouldn't make it publicly available. There is nothing wrong with that.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 120





          Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.

          – dwizum
          Apr 9 at 17:38






        • 11





          @Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?

          – mkennedy
          Apr 9 at 20:30






        • 20





          @sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?

          – mkennedy
          Apr 9 at 20:41






        • 22





          @sf02 yes of course it is.

          – edc65
          Apr 9 at 20:51






        • 23





          Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.

          – Lightness Races in Orbit
          Apr 10 at 0:44













        216












        216








        216







        No. Don't apologize.



        Had it happen to me, and I've done it myself. If a person doesn't want their profile accessed, they shouldn't make it publicly available. There is nothing wrong with that.






        share|improve this answer















        No. Don't apologize.



        Had it happen to me, and I've done it myself. If a person doesn't want their profile accessed, they shouldn't make it publicly available. There is nothing wrong with that.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 10 at 13:44









        JakeGould

        8,81812343




        8,81812343










        answered Apr 9 at 17:21









        KeithKeith

        3,8853722




        3,8853722







        • 120





          Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.

          – dwizum
          Apr 9 at 17:38






        • 11





          @Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?

          – mkennedy
          Apr 9 at 20:30






        • 20





          @sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?

          – mkennedy
          Apr 9 at 20:41






        • 22





          @sf02 yes of course it is.

          – edc65
          Apr 9 at 20:51






        • 23





          Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.

          – Lightness Races in Orbit
          Apr 10 at 0:44












        • 120





          Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.

          – dwizum
          Apr 9 at 17:38






        • 11





          @Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?

          – mkennedy
          Apr 9 at 20:30






        • 20





          @sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?

          – mkennedy
          Apr 9 at 20:41






        • 22





          @sf02 yes of course it is.

          – edc65
          Apr 9 at 20:51






        • 23





          Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.

          – Lightness Races in Orbit
          Apr 10 at 0:44







        120




        120





        Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.

        – dwizum
        Apr 9 at 17:38





        Not only is there nothing wrong with it, but LinkedIn essentially exists purely to allow and support professional networking. Checking out the people who work for a potential or future employer is a very common use case of "professional networking" and I would be quite surprised if someone found it unusual.

        – dwizum
        Apr 9 at 17:38




        11




        11





        @Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?

        – mkennedy
        Apr 9 at 20:30





        @Abigail how do you feel when LinkedIn tells you things like "8 people looked at your profile this week"?

        – mkennedy
        Apr 9 at 20:30




        20




        20





        @sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?

        – mkennedy
        Apr 9 at 20:41





        @sf02 Uh, "colleague", not anonymous person. I get people contacting me via LinkedIn to ask questions. Sometimes I know them. It gives them a way to break the ice too by knowing how long you've been at the company, where you previously worked, went to school, etc. What's creepier? Someone states where they learned something about you or when they don't tell you where they learned it?

        – mkennedy
        Apr 9 at 20:41




        22




        22





        @sf02 yes of course it is.

        – edc65
        Apr 9 at 20:51





        @sf02 yes of course it is.

        – edc65
        Apr 9 at 20:51




        23




        23





        Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.

        – Lightness Races in Orbit
        Apr 10 at 0:44





        Stronger: this is not just okay; it is expected. It is, indeed, the entire point of the website. OP's colleague is insane.

        – Lightness Races in Orbit
        Apr 10 at 0:44













        6















        I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?




        I suggest you ask him, e.g.




        "I noticed you seemed surprised when I said I'd looked you up on LinkedIn. I've been feeling bad about it in case it upset you in any way. *Are you okay about it?"




        Note



        I have edited the last part of my answer in response to valid comments. I feel that a final question is needed in order to encourage the other person to have their say. I'm open to other suggestions.



        As Ister suggests, "I hope you weren't offended" is another good possibility to finish with.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 3





          I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.

          – Ister
          Apr 10 at 13:28






        • 1





          I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.

          – aslum
          Apr 10 at 13:35











        • @Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.

          – chasly from UK
          Apr 10 at 15:26















        6















        I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?




        I suggest you ask him, e.g.




        "I noticed you seemed surprised when I said I'd looked you up on LinkedIn. I've been feeling bad about it in case it upset you in any way. *Are you okay about it?"




        Note



        I have edited the last part of my answer in response to valid comments. I feel that a final question is needed in order to encourage the other person to have their say. I'm open to other suggestions.



        As Ister suggests, "I hope you weren't offended" is another good possibility to finish with.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 3





          I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.

          – Ister
          Apr 10 at 13:28






        • 1





          I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.

          – aslum
          Apr 10 at 13:35











        • @Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.

          – chasly from UK
          Apr 10 at 15:26













        6












        6








        6








        I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?




        I suggest you ask him, e.g.




        "I noticed you seemed surprised when I said I'd looked you up on LinkedIn. I've been feeling bad about it in case it upset you in any way. *Are you okay about it?"




        Note



        I have edited the last part of my answer in response to valid comments. I feel that a final question is needed in order to encourage the other person to have their say. I'm open to other suggestions.



        As Ister suggests, "I hope you weren't offended" is another good possibility to finish with.






        share|improve this answer
















        I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?




        I suggest you ask him, e.g.




        "I noticed you seemed surprised when I said I'd looked you up on LinkedIn. I've been feeling bad about it in case it upset you in any way. *Are you okay about it?"




        Note



        I have edited the last part of my answer in response to valid comments. I feel that a final question is needed in order to encourage the other person to have their say. I'm open to other suggestions.



        As Ister suggests, "I hope you weren't offended" is another good possibility to finish with.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 10 at 15:32

























        answered Apr 10 at 11:37









        chasly from UKchasly from UK

        513212




        513212







        • 3





          I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.

          – Ister
          Apr 10 at 13:28






        • 1





          I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.

          – aslum
          Apr 10 at 13:35











        • @Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.

          – chasly from UK
          Apr 10 at 15:26












        • 3





          I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.

          – Ister
          Apr 10 at 13:28






        • 1





          I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.

          – aslum
          Apr 10 at 13:35











        • @Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.

          – chasly from UK
          Apr 10 at 15:26







        3




        3





        I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.

        – Ister
        Apr 10 at 13:28





        I would keep the first phrase but replace the rest with something along lines: "I hope you didn't feel offended". Asking someone outright if you should apologise them sounds a bit awkward to me. With my version if someone confirms being offended it automatically opens a space to apologise.

        – Ister
        Apr 10 at 13:28




        1




        1





        I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.

        – aslum
        Apr 10 at 13:35





        I'll second @Ister Remove the last three words and this is a great answer.

        – aslum
        Apr 10 at 13:35













        @Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.

        – chasly from UK
        Apr 10 at 15:26





        @Ister - Yes. I added that because I felt it needed some kind of question at the end. Otherwise it is merely a blank statement and there is nothing to be said in return. I'll edit.

        – chasly from UK
        Apr 10 at 15:26











        2














        Other answers are fairly blunt in the “No…” category, but I believe there is subtlety here:



        If you feel you need to apologize, then you should apologize…



        But don’t feel bad about it.



        Yes, if a LinkedIn profile is made public then people can view that profile and then (based on their level of access in LinkedIn) they can see they viewed your profile. All fair.



        And yes, you can lock down your LinkedIn profile so you can only allow people you are connected to to view that profile. That is fair.



        But at the end of the day there is human etiquette. And if you feel that you might have offended someone by simply looking at their profile, you should apologize.



        You should not recommend that they lock down their profile because why should they? Because ultimately if the profile is public, they might have a good reason to do so and not really want to alter their online presence for the needs of one random person they just met.



        In general think about public online profiles like mail: You know, I can see my neighbors ordered items from Amazon. And many packages have tracking numbers right on them. There is technically nothing stopping me from making note of that tracking number and then—the next time I saw my neighbor—say something like, “Boy! That Amazon package you just got took a long time to get to you!” I mean, that’s prying and kinda crazy, right?



        Ditto with online public profiles.



        In the case of your co-worker, if they were stunned by what you did just say something like:




        “Well, sorry about that. But since I was starting this job and just wanted to get to know my co-workers. My apologizes if that was an indirect way of going about it.”




        The reality is that technical boundaries—such as blocking access to a profile—and human etiquette are two different things.






        share|improve this answer





























          2














          Other answers are fairly blunt in the “No…” category, but I believe there is subtlety here:



          If you feel you need to apologize, then you should apologize…



          But don’t feel bad about it.



          Yes, if a LinkedIn profile is made public then people can view that profile and then (based on their level of access in LinkedIn) they can see they viewed your profile. All fair.



          And yes, you can lock down your LinkedIn profile so you can only allow people you are connected to to view that profile. That is fair.



          But at the end of the day there is human etiquette. And if you feel that you might have offended someone by simply looking at their profile, you should apologize.



          You should not recommend that they lock down their profile because why should they? Because ultimately if the profile is public, they might have a good reason to do so and not really want to alter their online presence for the needs of one random person they just met.



          In general think about public online profiles like mail: You know, I can see my neighbors ordered items from Amazon. And many packages have tracking numbers right on them. There is technically nothing stopping me from making note of that tracking number and then—the next time I saw my neighbor—say something like, “Boy! That Amazon package you just got took a long time to get to you!” I mean, that’s prying and kinda crazy, right?



          Ditto with online public profiles.



          In the case of your co-worker, if they were stunned by what you did just say something like:




          “Well, sorry about that. But since I was starting this job and just wanted to get to know my co-workers. My apologizes if that was an indirect way of going about it.”




          The reality is that technical boundaries—such as blocking access to a profile—and human etiquette are two different things.






          share|improve this answer



























            2












            2








            2







            Other answers are fairly blunt in the “No…” category, but I believe there is subtlety here:



            If you feel you need to apologize, then you should apologize…



            But don’t feel bad about it.



            Yes, if a LinkedIn profile is made public then people can view that profile and then (based on their level of access in LinkedIn) they can see they viewed your profile. All fair.



            And yes, you can lock down your LinkedIn profile so you can only allow people you are connected to to view that profile. That is fair.



            But at the end of the day there is human etiquette. And if you feel that you might have offended someone by simply looking at their profile, you should apologize.



            You should not recommend that they lock down their profile because why should they? Because ultimately if the profile is public, they might have a good reason to do so and not really want to alter their online presence for the needs of one random person they just met.



            In general think about public online profiles like mail: You know, I can see my neighbors ordered items from Amazon. And many packages have tracking numbers right on them. There is technically nothing stopping me from making note of that tracking number and then—the next time I saw my neighbor—say something like, “Boy! That Amazon package you just got took a long time to get to you!” I mean, that’s prying and kinda crazy, right?



            Ditto with online public profiles.



            In the case of your co-worker, if they were stunned by what you did just say something like:




            “Well, sorry about that. But since I was starting this job and just wanted to get to know my co-workers. My apologizes if that was an indirect way of going about it.”




            The reality is that technical boundaries—such as blocking access to a profile—and human etiquette are two different things.






            share|improve this answer















            Other answers are fairly blunt in the “No…” category, but I believe there is subtlety here:



            If you feel you need to apologize, then you should apologize…



            But don’t feel bad about it.



            Yes, if a LinkedIn profile is made public then people can view that profile and then (based on their level of access in LinkedIn) they can see they viewed your profile. All fair.



            And yes, you can lock down your LinkedIn profile so you can only allow people you are connected to to view that profile. That is fair.



            But at the end of the day there is human etiquette. And if you feel that you might have offended someone by simply looking at their profile, you should apologize.



            You should not recommend that they lock down their profile because why should they? Because ultimately if the profile is public, they might have a good reason to do so and not really want to alter their online presence for the needs of one random person they just met.



            In general think about public online profiles like mail: You know, I can see my neighbors ordered items from Amazon. And many packages have tracking numbers right on them. There is technically nothing stopping me from making note of that tracking number and then—the next time I saw my neighbor—say something like, “Boy! That Amazon package you just got took a long time to get to you!” I mean, that’s prying and kinda crazy, right?



            Ditto with online public profiles.



            In the case of your co-worker, if they were stunned by what you did just say something like:




            “Well, sorry about that. But since I was starting this job and just wanted to get to know my co-workers. My apologizes if that was an indirect way of going about it.”




            The reality is that technical boundaries—such as blocking access to a profile—and human etiquette are two different things.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Apr 10 at 15:07

























            answered Apr 10 at 13:58









            JakeGouldJakeGould

            8,81812343




            8,81812343





















                1














                There's no need for an apology.



                If someone creates a profile on LinkedIn, then they should expect that people will be looking at it, whether it be potential employers, peers or anyone using the site. I wouldn't even bring it up again, unless it seems like there's some unspoken tension over it.






                share|improve this answer





























                  1














                  There's no need for an apology.



                  If someone creates a profile on LinkedIn, then they should expect that people will be looking at it, whether it be potential employers, peers or anyone using the site. I wouldn't even bring it up again, unless it seems like there's some unspoken tension over it.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    There's no need for an apology.



                    If someone creates a profile on LinkedIn, then they should expect that people will be looking at it, whether it be potential employers, peers or anyone using the site. I wouldn't even bring it up again, unless it seems like there's some unspoken tension over it.






                    share|improve this answer















                    There's no need for an apology.



                    If someone creates a profile on LinkedIn, then they should expect that people will be looking at it, whether it be potential employers, peers or anyone using the site. I wouldn't even bring it up again, unless it seems like there's some unspoken tension over it.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 10 at 13:45









                    JakeGould

                    8,81812343




                    8,81812343










                    answered Apr 10 at 12:56









                    Tom GalloTom Gallo

                    1072




                    1072





















                        0














                        I told him about it and he seemed surprised.



                        ^^ So what??



                        When I see acquaintances shopping at the same store as me I get surprised too. It doesn't mean that they should apologize.



                        Stop overthinking and don't make things weird by apologizing. Move on with your life.






                        share|improve this answer



























                          0














                          I told him about it and he seemed surprised.



                          ^^ So what??



                          When I see acquaintances shopping at the same store as me I get surprised too. It doesn't mean that they should apologize.



                          Stop overthinking and don't make things weird by apologizing. Move on with your life.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            I told him about it and he seemed surprised.



                            ^^ So what??



                            When I see acquaintances shopping at the same store as me I get surprised too. It doesn't mean that they should apologize.



                            Stop overthinking and don't make things weird by apologizing. Move on with your life.






                            share|improve this answer













                            I told him about it and he seemed surprised.



                            ^^ So what??



                            When I see acquaintances shopping at the same store as me I get surprised too. It doesn't mean that they should apologize.



                            Stop overthinking and don't make things weird by apologizing. Move on with your life.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Apr 10 at 16:19









                            MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus

                            4,31011130




                            4,31011130





















                                -12














                                NOTE: reviewing the answer I changed the usage of "creepy" to "weird, strange"



                                I agree with two points made by participants in answers and comments:



                                1. You shouldn't apologize

                                2. It's weird, strange


                                why?



                                1. As stated previously, once you open a public profile (in any site, FB, LI, etc) you should be aware that you could be contacted by people you don't know, so it is something expected, thus, I think there is no need for apologizing



                                2. I infer from OP's words ("future colleague") that he/she does not even know the OP. So for me is weird, strange to see the 3rd item of this sequence in my timeline:



                                  • OP has viewed your profile (Ok, it's expected)

                                  • OP wants to connect (Let see if industry or people in common)

                                  • OP says "Hi, you don't know me but I will be working with you soon. I will start this date" (weird, strange)


                                But...



                                If that was the approach of the OP, it's weird, strange enough for me. I would say something like "mmm, ok congrats".



                                However, if the message is more like:



                                "Hi, I am OP, I have been working as XXX and I will be starting soon at THE COMPANY in your department. I saw that you are working there, Could I ask YYYY if you don't mind? I would like to know more about the workplace/tools/procedures/advice etc"



                                I think that is more professional and I will be eager to help, verifying first that this is true or redirecting to the relevant area (HR, manager) if there are some information concerns.




                                My point is that I wouldn't be offended or scared, just a bit uncomfortable with someone trying approach me in a non-professional way






                                share|improve this answer




















                                • 6





                                  The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.

                                  – Voo
                                  Apr 10 at 9:20






                                • 23





                                  Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1

                                  – virolino
                                  Apr 10 at 9:24






                                • 1





                                  Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!

                                  – virolino
                                  Apr 10 at 9:30






                                • 1





                                  Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.

                                  – gustavovelascoh
                                  Apr 10 at 9:34






                                • 5





                                  It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.

                                  – StarWeaver
                                  Apr 10 at 9:44















                                -12














                                NOTE: reviewing the answer I changed the usage of "creepy" to "weird, strange"



                                I agree with two points made by participants in answers and comments:



                                1. You shouldn't apologize

                                2. It's weird, strange


                                why?



                                1. As stated previously, once you open a public profile (in any site, FB, LI, etc) you should be aware that you could be contacted by people you don't know, so it is something expected, thus, I think there is no need for apologizing



                                2. I infer from OP's words ("future colleague") that he/she does not even know the OP. So for me is weird, strange to see the 3rd item of this sequence in my timeline:



                                  • OP has viewed your profile (Ok, it's expected)

                                  • OP wants to connect (Let see if industry or people in common)

                                  • OP says "Hi, you don't know me but I will be working with you soon. I will start this date" (weird, strange)


                                But...



                                If that was the approach of the OP, it's weird, strange enough for me. I would say something like "mmm, ok congrats".



                                However, if the message is more like:



                                "Hi, I am OP, I have been working as XXX and I will be starting soon at THE COMPANY in your department. I saw that you are working there, Could I ask YYYY if you don't mind? I would like to know more about the workplace/tools/procedures/advice etc"



                                I think that is more professional and I will be eager to help, verifying first that this is true or redirecting to the relevant area (HR, manager) if there are some information concerns.




                                My point is that I wouldn't be offended or scared, just a bit uncomfortable with someone trying approach me in a non-professional way






                                share|improve this answer




















                                • 6





                                  The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.

                                  – Voo
                                  Apr 10 at 9:20






                                • 23





                                  Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1

                                  – virolino
                                  Apr 10 at 9:24






                                • 1





                                  Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!

                                  – virolino
                                  Apr 10 at 9:30






                                • 1





                                  Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.

                                  – gustavovelascoh
                                  Apr 10 at 9:34






                                • 5





                                  It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.

                                  – StarWeaver
                                  Apr 10 at 9:44













                                -12












                                -12








                                -12







                                NOTE: reviewing the answer I changed the usage of "creepy" to "weird, strange"



                                I agree with two points made by participants in answers and comments:



                                1. You shouldn't apologize

                                2. It's weird, strange


                                why?



                                1. As stated previously, once you open a public profile (in any site, FB, LI, etc) you should be aware that you could be contacted by people you don't know, so it is something expected, thus, I think there is no need for apologizing



                                2. I infer from OP's words ("future colleague") that he/she does not even know the OP. So for me is weird, strange to see the 3rd item of this sequence in my timeline:



                                  • OP has viewed your profile (Ok, it's expected)

                                  • OP wants to connect (Let see if industry or people in common)

                                  • OP says "Hi, you don't know me but I will be working with you soon. I will start this date" (weird, strange)


                                But...



                                If that was the approach of the OP, it's weird, strange enough for me. I would say something like "mmm, ok congrats".



                                However, if the message is more like:



                                "Hi, I am OP, I have been working as XXX and I will be starting soon at THE COMPANY in your department. I saw that you are working there, Could I ask YYYY if you don't mind? I would like to know more about the workplace/tools/procedures/advice etc"



                                I think that is more professional and I will be eager to help, verifying first that this is true or redirecting to the relevant area (HR, manager) if there are some information concerns.




                                My point is that I wouldn't be offended or scared, just a bit uncomfortable with someone trying approach me in a non-professional way






                                share|improve this answer















                                NOTE: reviewing the answer I changed the usage of "creepy" to "weird, strange"



                                I agree with two points made by participants in answers and comments:



                                1. You shouldn't apologize

                                2. It's weird, strange


                                why?



                                1. As stated previously, once you open a public profile (in any site, FB, LI, etc) you should be aware that you could be contacted by people you don't know, so it is something expected, thus, I think there is no need for apologizing



                                2. I infer from OP's words ("future colleague") that he/she does not even know the OP. So for me is weird, strange to see the 3rd item of this sequence in my timeline:



                                  • OP has viewed your profile (Ok, it's expected)

                                  • OP wants to connect (Let see if industry or people in common)

                                  • OP says "Hi, you don't know me but I will be working with you soon. I will start this date" (weird, strange)


                                But...



                                If that was the approach of the OP, it's weird, strange enough for me. I would say something like "mmm, ok congrats".



                                However, if the message is more like:



                                "Hi, I am OP, I have been working as XXX and I will be starting soon at THE COMPANY in your department. I saw that you are working there, Could I ask YYYY if you don't mind? I would like to know more about the workplace/tools/procedures/advice etc"



                                I think that is more professional and I will be eager to help, verifying first that this is true or redirecting to the relevant area (HR, manager) if there are some information concerns.




                                My point is that I wouldn't be offended or scared, just a bit uncomfortable with someone trying approach me in a non-professional way







                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited Apr 10 at 9:40

























                                answered Apr 10 at 8:51









                                gustavovelascohgustavovelascoh

                                934




                                934







                                • 6





                                  The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.

                                  – Voo
                                  Apr 10 at 9:20






                                • 23





                                  Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1

                                  – virolino
                                  Apr 10 at 9:24






                                • 1





                                  Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!

                                  – virolino
                                  Apr 10 at 9:30






                                • 1





                                  Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.

                                  – gustavovelascoh
                                  Apr 10 at 9:34






                                • 5





                                  It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.

                                  – StarWeaver
                                  Apr 10 at 9:44












                                • 6





                                  The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.

                                  – Voo
                                  Apr 10 at 9:20






                                • 23





                                  Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1

                                  – virolino
                                  Apr 10 at 9:24






                                • 1





                                  Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!

                                  – virolino
                                  Apr 10 at 9:30






                                • 1





                                  Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.

                                  – gustavovelascoh
                                  Apr 10 at 9:34






                                • 5





                                  It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.

                                  – StarWeaver
                                  Apr 10 at 9:44







                                6




                                6





                                The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.

                                – Voo
                                Apr 10 at 9:20





                                The OP said they looked the colleague up. How you go from there to sending messages is really not clear to me.

                                – Voo
                                Apr 10 at 9:20




                                23




                                23





                                Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1

                                – virolino
                                Apr 10 at 9:24





                                Reading publicly available information on the Internet is creepy?! -1

                                – virolino
                                Apr 10 at 9:24




                                1




                                1





                                Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!

                                – virolino
                                Apr 10 at 9:30





                                Where did the OP wrote that he said / wrote those things? If you would have said strange or surprising, I might have agreed. But creepy?!

                                – virolino
                                Apr 10 at 9:30




                                1




                                1





                                Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.

                                – gustavovelascoh
                                Apr 10 at 9:34





                                Ok, English is not my first language, so maybe "creepy" is a strong word that I am misunderstanding here. I wouldn't use "surprising". I would use strange or weird instead.

                                – gustavovelascoh
                                Apr 10 at 9:34




                                5




                                5





                                It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.

                                – StarWeaver
                                Apr 10 at 9:44





                                It's not clear from the question, but i thought the OP told the colleague when they first met at the workplace, not preemptively over a messanger service.

                                – StarWeaver
                                Apr 10 at 9:44



                                Popular posts from this blog

                                រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

                                Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given

                                Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221