Correctly defining the return of a procedure Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?Defining a string based sort functionDefining functions in a loopReturn value of Reap when using tagsHow to define even permutations correctly?How to exclude some indices in defining Table?How to make a repetive procedure with LinearModelFitTable with List iterator return unpacked listreverse procedure of KroneckerProductDefine the substitution procedure as a functionRebuild a vector defining the sign of the elements
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?
Do we know why communications with Beresheet and NASA were lost during the attempted landing of the Moon lander?
Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps
Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?
Two different pronunciation of "понял"
How does modal jazz use chord progressions?
What is the electric potential inside a point charge?
How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?
Writing Thesis: Copying from published papers
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
When is phishing education going too far?
Autumning in love
How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time
What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?
What are the performance impacts of 'functional' Rust?
Stars Make Stars
How to say that you spent the night with someone, you were only sleeping and nothing else?
Is there folklore associating late breastfeeding with low intelligence and/or gullibility?
Area of a 2D convex hull
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
Estimate capacitor parameters
Should you tell Jews they are breaking a commandment?
Correctly defining the return of a procedure
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?Defining a string based sort functionDefining functions in a loopReturn value of Reap when using tagsHow to define even permutations correctly?How to exclude some indices in defining Table?How to make a repetive procedure with LinearModelFitTable with List iterator return unpacked listreverse procedure of KroneckerProductDefine the substitution procedure as a functionRebuild a vector defining the sign of the elements
$begingroup$
I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.
I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:
1- set $x_0 = 0.5$
2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.
This is what I came up with so far
x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,
x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)
];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)
but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)
list-manipulation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.
I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:
1- set $x_0 = 0.5$
2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.
This is what I came up with so far
x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,
x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)
];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)
but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)
list-manipulation
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. UseModule
,Block
, orWith
for code blocks. And try not to useFor
.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 8 at 10:45
3
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
Apr 8 at 11:34
1
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
$endgroup$
– John Doty
Apr 8 at 13:17
$begingroup$
You might also look intoNest
andNestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
$endgroup$
– Chris K
Apr 8 at 13:20
$begingroup$
Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.
I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:
1- set $x_0 = 0.5$
2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.
This is what I came up with so far
x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,
x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)
];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)
but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)
list-manipulation
New contributor
$endgroup$
I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.
I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:
1- set $x_0 = 0.5$
2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.
This is what I came up with so far
x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,
x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)
];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)
but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)
list-manipulation
list-manipulation
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Apr 8 at 9:54
JacquesLeenJacquesLeen
304
304
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. UseModule
,Block
, orWith
for code blocks. And try not to useFor
.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 8 at 10:45
3
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
Apr 8 at 11:34
1
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
$endgroup$
– John Doty
Apr 8 at 13:17
$begingroup$
You might also look intoNest
andNestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
$endgroup$
– Chris K
Apr 8 at 13:20
$begingroup$
Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. UseModule
,Block
, orWith
for code blocks. And try not to useFor
.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 8 at 10:45
3
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
Apr 8 at 11:34
1
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
$endgroup$
– John Doty
Apr 8 at 13:17
$begingroup$
You might also look intoNest
andNestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
$endgroup$
– Chris K
Apr 8 at 13:20
$begingroup$
Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use
Module
, Block
, or With
for code blocks. And try not to use For
.$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 8 at 10:45
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use
Module
, Block
, or With
for code blocks. And try not to use For
.$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 8 at 10:45
3
3
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
Apr 8 at 11:34
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
Apr 8 at 11:34
1
1
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.$endgroup$
– John Doty
Apr 8 at 13:17
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.$endgroup$
– John Doty
Apr 8 at 13:17
$begingroup$
You might also look into
Nest
and NestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.$endgroup$
– Chris K
Apr 8 at 13:20
$begingroup$
You might also look into
Nest
and NestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.$endgroup$
– Chris K
Apr 8 at 13:20
$begingroup$
Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Try this:
f[r_] := Union[
Take[
RecurrenceTable[
a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
a, n, 1, 1000
],
-100]
]
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Apr 8 at 13:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a specific value of $r$ you can do
With[r = 3.7,
NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]
0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923
I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:
With[r = 3.5,
NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997
// Union
does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
if you prefer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194802%2fcorrectly-defining-the-return-of-a-procedure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Try this:
f[r_] := Union[
Take[
RecurrenceTable[
a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
a, n, 1, 1000
],
-100]
]
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Apr 8 at 13:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Try this:
f[r_] := Union[
Take[
RecurrenceTable[
a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
a, n, 1, 1000
],
-100]
]
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Apr 8 at 13:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Try this:
f[r_] := Union[
Take[
RecurrenceTable[
a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
a, n, 1, 1000
],
-100]
]
$endgroup$
Try this:
f[r_] := Union[
Take[
RecurrenceTable[
a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
a, n, 1, 1000
],
-100]
]
edited Apr 8 at 13:08
MarcoB
38.7k557116
38.7k557116
answered Apr 8 at 10:29
Innerw0lfInnerw0lf
814
814
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Apr 8 at 13:50
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Apr 8 at 13:50
2
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,
f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Apr 8 at 13:50
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,
f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Apr 8 at 13:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a specific value of $r$ you can do
With[r = 3.7,
NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]
0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923
I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:
With[r = 3.5,
NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997
// Union
does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
if you prefer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a specific value of $r$ you can do
With[r = 3.7,
NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]
0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923
I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:
With[r = 3.5,
NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997
// Union
does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
if you prefer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a specific value of $r$ you can do
With[r = 3.7,
NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]
0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923
I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:
With[r = 3.5,
NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997
// Union
does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
if you prefer.
$endgroup$
For a specific value of $r$ you can do
With[r = 3.7,
NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]
0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923
I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:
With[r = 3.5,
NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997
// Union
does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
if you prefer.
edited Apr 8 at 15:04
answered Apr 8 at 14:01
RomanRoman
5,29511131
5,29511131
add a comment |
add a comment |
JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194802%2fcorrectly-defining-the-return-of-a-procedure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use
Module
,Block
, orWith
for code blocks. And try not to useFor
.$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 8 at 10:45
3
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
Apr 8 at 11:34
1
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.$endgroup$
– John Doty
Apr 8 at 13:17
$begingroup$
You might also look into
Nest
andNestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.$endgroup$
– Chris K
Apr 8 at 13:20
$begingroup$
Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
2 days ago