How long should it take to generate a Hydro Network? [closed] Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Network Analyst does not take oneway street from attribute tableNetwork Analyst in Arcgis to generate the network for further analysis what should the attribute table must contain?How to run Arc Hydro in ModelBuilder?Where should I create my network dataset in ArcGIS?How to derive stream order from vector networkHow long should Delete Identical take on 3.25 GB feature class of polygons with spatial index?Automatically selecting main rivers of very branched river network using Arc Hydro?ArcMap basemap layers take a long time to displayHow to create “AGREE Stream” for DEM Reconditioning in Arc Hydro tool?Network Analyst takes so long
Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?
Intuitive explanation of the rank-nullity theorem
What does this say in Elvish?
Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?
How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?
The Nth Gryphon Number
What does it mean that physics no longer uses mechanical models to describe phenomena?
What to do with repeated rejections for phd position
Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours
Would it be easier to apply for a UK visa if there is a host family to sponsor for you in going there?
What makes a man succeed?
Flash light on something
Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?
Misunderstanding of Sylow theory
In musical terms, what properties are varied by the human voice to produce different words / syllables?
How to pronounce 伝統色
How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?
How many time has Arya actually used Needle?
What initially awakened the Balrog?
A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way
Dyck paths with extra diagonals from valleys (Laser construction)
Lagrange four-squares theorem --- deterministic complexity
Unit testing extension method adding view location expander
A letter with no particular backstory
How long should it take to generate a Hydro Network? [closed]
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Network Analyst does not take oneway street from attribute tableNetwork Analyst in Arcgis to generate the network for further analysis what should the attribute table must contain?How to run Arc Hydro in ModelBuilder?Where should I create my network dataset in ArcGIS?How to derive stream order from vector networkHow long should Delete Identical take on 3.25 GB feature class of polygons with spatial index?Automatically selecting main rivers of very branched river network using Arc Hydro?ArcMap basemap layers take a long time to displayHow to create “AGREE Stream” for DEM Reconditioning in Arc Hydro tool?Network Analyst takes so long
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
How long should the geoprocessing take to generate a geometric Hydro Network for a fairly large watershed, using ArcHydro?
I have ~ 53,000 DrainageLine segments in the stream layer. I'm using ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 on a laptop with a 2.4 GHz processor and 4 GB of RAM.
The Hydro Network Generation tool ran for a few hours, I stopped it, and it looked like about 20% of the network was generated, so I went ahead and tried again. I'm just wondering what to expect time-wise.
Finally finished after 24 hours.
arcgis-desktop arc-hydro
closed as too broad by Vince, Hornbydd, whyzar, wetland, LaughU Apr 12 at 11:23
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
How long should the geoprocessing take to generate a geometric Hydro Network for a fairly large watershed, using ArcHydro?
I have ~ 53,000 DrainageLine segments in the stream layer. I'm using ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 on a laptop with a 2.4 GHz processor and 4 GB of RAM.
The Hydro Network Generation tool ran for a few hours, I stopped it, and it looked like about 20% of the network was generated, so I went ahead and tried again. I'm just wondering what to expect time-wise.
Finally finished after 24 hours.
arcgis-desktop arc-hydro
closed as too broad by Vince, Hornbydd, whyzar, wetland, LaughU Apr 12 at 11:23
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
Welcome to GIS SE. Thank you for taking the Tour. The answer will vary according to the computing power of your workstation and the complexity of the network. Without knowing these things (and the quality of the network data, and the version of ArcGIS), this is more like an opinion poll than a question. In theory, seeking this sort of feedback would be a perfect use of the Geographic Information Systems Chat feature, but it has a minimum reputation requirement, and it isn't all that active (most folks come here for answers, not to hang out)
– Vince
Apr 11 at 16:31
1
Good point. I apologize for being vague. For what it's worth, I'm using ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 on a laptop with a 2.4 GHz processor and 4 GB of RAM. I just did a check on ArcGIS Desktop Help and see I'm at the bare minimum for RAM. I guess I should switch computers for this task, and see about adding memory to the laptop. The network is for a mountain region, so the streams are fairly bifurcated so I assume it's quite a complex network.
– Philip
Apr 11 at 17:34
It sounds like your laptop might be able to complete this processing task if you let it run overnight. Make sure it's plugged in and set to not fall asleep when left unattended. But if you do this sort of geoprocessing task often, your hardware is really going to slow you down.
– csk
Apr 11 at 18:58
1
My work laptop is 4x2.9Ghz, 16Gb RAM, and 2x1000Gb SSD. 4Gb of RAM is 4-12Gb too little. The price (and storage) capacity of SSDs have come down (and up) to the point that not having <1ms seek time on disk is throwing a way 90% of the capacity of the system. In the future, please edit the question to provide details, since that's where they're expected to be when folks read the question.
– Vince
Apr 12 at 3:13
add a comment |
How long should the geoprocessing take to generate a geometric Hydro Network for a fairly large watershed, using ArcHydro?
I have ~ 53,000 DrainageLine segments in the stream layer. I'm using ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 on a laptop with a 2.4 GHz processor and 4 GB of RAM.
The Hydro Network Generation tool ran for a few hours, I stopped it, and it looked like about 20% of the network was generated, so I went ahead and tried again. I'm just wondering what to expect time-wise.
Finally finished after 24 hours.
arcgis-desktop arc-hydro
How long should the geoprocessing take to generate a geometric Hydro Network for a fairly large watershed, using ArcHydro?
I have ~ 53,000 DrainageLine segments in the stream layer. I'm using ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 on a laptop with a 2.4 GHz processor and 4 GB of RAM.
The Hydro Network Generation tool ran for a few hours, I stopped it, and it looked like about 20% of the network was generated, so I went ahead and tried again. I'm just wondering what to expect time-wise.
Finally finished after 24 hours.
arcgis-desktop arc-hydro
arcgis-desktop arc-hydro
edited Apr 14 at 6:47
PolyGeo♦
54k1782246
54k1782246
asked Apr 11 at 14:50
PhilipPhilip
43
43
closed as too broad by Vince, Hornbydd, whyzar, wetland, LaughU Apr 12 at 11:23
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as too broad by Vince, Hornbydd, whyzar, wetland, LaughU Apr 12 at 11:23
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
Welcome to GIS SE. Thank you for taking the Tour. The answer will vary according to the computing power of your workstation and the complexity of the network. Without knowing these things (and the quality of the network data, and the version of ArcGIS), this is more like an opinion poll than a question. In theory, seeking this sort of feedback would be a perfect use of the Geographic Information Systems Chat feature, but it has a minimum reputation requirement, and it isn't all that active (most folks come here for answers, not to hang out)
– Vince
Apr 11 at 16:31
1
Good point. I apologize for being vague. For what it's worth, I'm using ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 on a laptop with a 2.4 GHz processor and 4 GB of RAM. I just did a check on ArcGIS Desktop Help and see I'm at the bare minimum for RAM. I guess I should switch computers for this task, and see about adding memory to the laptop. The network is for a mountain region, so the streams are fairly bifurcated so I assume it's quite a complex network.
– Philip
Apr 11 at 17:34
It sounds like your laptop might be able to complete this processing task if you let it run overnight. Make sure it's plugged in and set to not fall asleep when left unattended. But if you do this sort of geoprocessing task often, your hardware is really going to slow you down.
– csk
Apr 11 at 18:58
1
My work laptop is 4x2.9Ghz, 16Gb RAM, and 2x1000Gb SSD. 4Gb of RAM is 4-12Gb too little. The price (and storage) capacity of SSDs have come down (and up) to the point that not having <1ms seek time on disk is throwing a way 90% of the capacity of the system. In the future, please edit the question to provide details, since that's where they're expected to be when folks read the question.
– Vince
Apr 12 at 3:13
add a comment |
2
Welcome to GIS SE. Thank you for taking the Tour. The answer will vary according to the computing power of your workstation and the complexity of the network. Without knowing these things (and the quality of the network data, and the version of ArcGIS), this is more like an opinion poll than a question. In theory, seeking this sort of feedback would be a perfect use of the Geographic Information Systems Chat feature, but it has a minimum reputation requirement, and it isn't all that active (most folks come here for answers, not to hang out)
– Vince
Apr 11 at 16:31
1
Good point. I apologize for being vague. For what it's worth, I'm using ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 on a laptop with a 2.4 GHz processor and 4 GB of RAM. I just did a check on ArcGIS Desktop Help and see I'm at the bare minimum for RAM. I guess I should switch computers for this task, and see about adding memory to the laptop. The network is for a mountain region, so the streams are fairly bifurcated so I assume it's quite a complex network.
– Philip
Apr 11 at 17:34
It sounds like your laptop might be able to complete this processing task if you let it run overnight. Make sure it's plugged in and set to not fall asleep when left unattended. But if you do this sort of geoprocessing task often, your hardware is really going to slow you down.
– csk
Apr 11 at 18:58
1
My work laptop is 4x2.9Ghz, 16Gb RAM, and 2x1000Gb SSD. 4Gb of RAM is 4-12Gb too little. The price (and storage) capacity of SSDs have come down (and up) to the point that not having <1ms seek time on disk is throwing a way 90% of the capacity of the system. In the future, please edit the question to provide details, since that's where they're expected to be when folks read the question.
– Vince
Apr 12 at 3:13
2
2
Welcome to GIS SE. Thank you for taking the Tour. The answer will vary according to the computing power of your workstation and the complexity of the network. Without knowing these things (and the quality of the network data, and the version of ArcGIS), this is more like an opinion poll than a question. In theory, seeking this sort of feedback would be a perfect use of the Geographic Information Systems Chat feature, but it has a minimum reputation requirement, and it isn't all that active (most folks come here for answers, not to hang out)
– Vince
Apr 11 at 16:31
Welcome to GIS SE. Thank you for taking the Tour. The answer will vary according to the computing power of your workstation and the complexity of the network. Without knowing these things (and the quality of the network data, and the version of ArcGIS), this is more like an opinion poll than a question. In theory, seeking this sort of feedback would be a perfect use of the Geographic Information Systems Chat feature, but it has a minimum reputation requirement, and it isn't all that active (most folks come here for answers, not to hang out)
– Vince
Apr 11 at 16:31
1
1
Good point. I apologize for being vague. For what it's worth, I'm using ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 on a laptop with a 2.4 GHz processor and 4 GB of RAM. I just did a check on ArcGIS Desktop Help and see I'm at the bare minimum for RAM. I guess I should switch computers for this task, and see about adding memory to the laptop. The network is for a mountain region, so the streams are fairly bifurcated so I assume it's quite a complex network.
– Philip
Apr 11 at 17:34
Good point. I apologize for being vague. For what it's worth, I'm using ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 on a laptop with a 2.4 GHz processor and 4 GB of RAM. I just did a check on ArcGIS Desktop Help and see I'm at the bare minimum for RAM. I guess I should switch computers for this task, and see about adding memory to the laptop. The network is for a mountain region, so the streams are fairly bifurcated so I assume it's quite a complex network.
– Philip
Apr 11 at 17:34
It sounds like your laptop might be able to complete this processing task if you let it run overnight. Make sure it's plugged in and set to not fall asleep when left unattended. But if you do this sort of geoprocessing task often, your hardware is really going to slow you down.
– csk
Apr 11 at 18:58
It sounds like your laptop might be able to complete this processing task if you let it run overnight. Make sure it's plugged in and set to not fall asleep when left unattended. But if you do this sort of geoprocessing task often, your hardware is really going to slow you down.
– csk
Apr 11 at 18:58
1
1
My work laptop is 4x2.9Ghz, 16Gb RAM, and 2x1000Gb SSD. 4Gb of RAM is 4-12Gb too little. The price (and storage) capacity of SSDs have come down (and up) to the point that not having <1ms seek time on disk is throwing a way 90% of the capacity of the system. In the future, please edit the question to provide details, since that's where they're expected to be when folks read the question.
– Vince
Apr 12 at 3:13
My work laptop is 4x2.9Ghz, 16Gb RAM, and 2x1000Gb SSD. 4Gb of RAM is 4-12Gb too little. The price (and storage) capacity of SSDs have come down (and up) to the point that not having <1ms seek time on disk is throwing a way 90% of the capacity of the system. In the future, please edit the question to provide details, since that's where they're expected to be when folks read the question.
– Vince
Apr 12 at 3:13
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Looking at the help file I see the Hydro Network Generation tool is creating a geometric network. It should not be taking hours for 53,000 lines, minutes may be, but not hours.
So this strongly points to your system being the bottle neck. I would follow the advice above, take the hit and run it over night fully expecting not to have completed by the next day or move your processing to a faster machine. That said you have 4GB of ram and a reasonable processor which suggests it's the hard disk, network connection or your laptop is bloated with other applications fighting for resources. You are not one of these people who has email open, 10 tabs on chrome, facebook, twitter, slack, skype, boinc and itunes all running at the same time...? ;)
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Looking at the help file I see the Hydro Network Generation tool is creating a geometric network. It should not be taking hours for 53,000 lines, minutes may be, but not hours.
So this strongly points to your system being the bottle neck. I would follow the advice above, take the hit and run it over night fully expecting not to have completed by the next day or move your processing to a faster machine. That said you have 4GB of ram and a reasonable processor which suggests it's the hard disk, network connection or your laptop is bloated with other applications fighting for resources. You are not one of these people who has email open, 10 tabs on chrome, facebook, twitter, slack, skype, boinc and itunes all running at the same time...? ;)
add a comment |
Looking at the help file I see the Hydro Network Generation tool is creating a geometric network. It should not be taking hours for 53,000 lines, minutes may be, but not hours.
So this strongly points to your system being the bottle neck. I would follow the advice above, take the hit and run it over night fully expecting not to have completed by the next day or move your processing to a faster machine. That said you have 4GB of ram and a reasonable processor which suggests it's the hard disk, network connection or your laptop is bloated with other applications fighting for resources. You are not one of these people who has email open, 10 tabs on chrome, facebook, twitter, slack, skype, boinc and itunes all running at the same time...? ;)
add a comment |
Looking at the help file I see the Hydro Network Generation tool is creating a geometric network. It should not be taking hours for 53,000 lines, minutes may be, but not hours.
So this strongly points to your system being the bottle neck. I would follow the advice above, take the hit and run it over night fully expecting not to have completed by the next day or move your processing to a faster machine. That said you have 4GB of ram and a reasonable processor which suggests it's the hard disk, network connection or your laptop is bloated with other applications fighting for resources. You are not one of these people who has email open, 10 tabs on chrome, facebook, twitter, slack, skype, boinc and itunes all running at the same time...? ;)
Looking at the help file I see the Hydro Network Generation tool is creating a geometric network. It should not be taking hours for 53,000 lines, minutes may be, but not hours.
So this strongly points to your system being the bottle neck. I would follow the advice above, take the hit and run it over night fully expecting not to have completed by the next day or move your processing to a faster machine. That said you have 4GB of ram and a reasonable processor which suggests it's the hard disk, network connection or your laptop is bloated with other applications fighting for resources. You are not one of these people who has email open, 10 tabs on chrome, facebook, twitter, slack, skype, boinc and itunes all running at the same time...? ;)
answered Apr 11 at 19:10
HornbyddHornbydd
27.2k32958
27.2k32958
add a comment |
add a comment |
2
Welcome to GIS SE. Thank you for taking the Tour. The answer will vary according to the computing power of your workstation and the complexity of the network. Without knowing these things (and the quality of the network data, and the version of ArcGIS), this is more like an opinion poll than a question. In theory, seeking this sort of feedback would be a perfect use of the Geographic Information Systems Chat feature, but it has a minimum reputation requirement, and it isn't all that active (most folks come here for answers, not to hang out)
– Vince
Apr 11 at 16:31
1
Good point. I apologize for being vague. For what it's worth, I'm using ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 on a laptop with a 2.4 GHz processor and 4 GB of RAM. I just did a check on ArcGIS Desktop Help and see I'm at the bare minimum for RAM. I guess I should switch computers for this task, and see about adding memory to the laptop. The network is for a mountain region, so the streams are fairly bifurcated so I assume it's quite a complex network.
– Philip
Apr 11 at 17:34
It sounds like your laptop might be able to complete this processing task if you let it run overnight. Make sure it's plugged in and set to not fall asleep when left unattended. But if you do this sort of geoprocessing task often, your hardware is really going to slow you down.
– csk
Apr 11 at 18:58
1
My work laptop is 4x2.9Ghz, 16Gb RAM, and 2x1000Gb SSD. 4Gb of RAM is 4-12Gb too little. The price (and storage) capacity of SSDs have come down (and up) to the point that not having <1ms seek time on disk is throwing a way 90% of the capacity of the system. In the future, please edit the question to provide details, since that's where they're expected to be when folks read the question.
– Vince
Apr 12 at 3:13