Compute the product of 3 dictionaries and concatenate keys and values Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!“Least Astonishment” and the Mutable Default ArgumentHow to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How do I sort a list of dictionaries by a value of the dictionary?How do I sort a dictionary by value?Add new keys to a dictionary?Check if a given key already exists in a dictionaryHow do I concatenate two lists in Python?Iterating over dictionaries using 'for' loopsHow to remove a key from a Python dictionary?check two dictionaries that have similar keys but different valueshow to compare two dictionaries to check if a key is present in both of them

Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?

How to compare two different files line by line in unix?

The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?

Karn the great creator - 'card from outside the game' in sealed

Dynamic filling of a region of a polar plot

How to save space when writing equations with cases?

Sum letters are not two different

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?

The Nth Gryphon Number

Trademark violation for app?

Drawing spherical mirrors

Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

Why are vacuum tubes still used in amateur radios?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

What order were files/directories output in dir?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

Why are my pictures showing a dark band on one edge?

Deconstruction is ambiguous

Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines

How does Belgium enforce obligatory attendance in elections?



Compute the product of 3 dictionaries and concatenate keys and values



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!“Least Astonishment” and the Mutable Default ArgumentHow to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How do I sort a list of dictionaries by a value of the dictionary?How do I sort a dictionary by value?Add new keys to a dictionary?Check if a given key already exists in a dictionaryHow do I concatenate two lists in Python?Iterating over dictionaries using 'for' loopsHow to remove a key from a Python dictionary?check two dictionaries that have similar keys but different valueshow to compare two dictionaries to check if a key is present in both of them



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








9















Assuming that I have 3 different dictionaries:



dict1 = 
"A": "a"


dict2 =
"B": "b",
"C": "c",
"D": "d",
"E": "e"


dict3 =
"F": "f",
"G": "g"



I want to compute the product of these dictionaries (excluding the product between dict2 and dict3) and combine both the keys and values where the keys are concatenated with _ and values with ' and '



The desired output would be a single dictionary:




# dict1 x dict2
"A_B": "a and b",
"A_C": "a and c",
"A_D": "a and d",
"A_E": "a and e",

# dict1 x dict3
"A_F": "a and f",
"A_G": "a and g",

# dict1 x dict2 x dict3
"A_B_F": "a and b and f",
"A_B_G": "a and b and g",
"A_C_F": "a and c and f",
"A_C_G": "a and c and g",
"A_D_F": "a and d and f",
"A_D_G": "a and d and g",
"A_E_F": "a and e and f",
"A_E_G": "a and e and g"



I had a look at the documentation for itertools but I was not able to understand how I can achieve the desired output.










share|improve this question




























    9















    Assuming that I have 3 different dictionaries:



    dict1 = 
    "A": "a"


    dict2 =
    "B": "b",
    "C": "c",
    "D": "d",
    "E": "e"


    dict3 =
    "F": "f",
    "G": "g"



    I want to compute the product of these dictionaries (excluding the product between dict2 and dict3) and combine both the keys and values where the keys are concatenated with _ and values with ' and '



    The desired output would be a single dictionary:




    # dict1 x dict2
    "A_B": "a and b",
    "A_C": "a and c",
    "A_D": "a and d",
    "A_E": "a and e",

    # dict1 x dict3
    "A_F": "a and f",
    "A_G": "a and g",

    # dict1 x dict2 x dict3
    "A_B_F": "a and b and f",
    "A_B_G": "a and b and g",
    "A_C_F": "a and c and f",
    "A_C_G": "a and c and g",
    "A_D_F": "a and d and f",
    "A_D_G": "a and d and g",
    "A_E_F": "a and e and f",
    "A_E_G": "a and e and g"



    I had a look at the documentation for itertools but I was not able to understand how I can achieve the desired output.










    share|improve this question
























      9












      9








      9


      2






      Assuming that I have 3 different dictionaries:



      dict1 = 
      "A": "a"


      dict2 =
      "B": "b",
      "C": "c",
      "D": "d",
      "E": "e"


      dict3 =
      "F": "f",
      "G": "g"



      I want to compute the product of these dictionaries (excluding the product between dict2 and dict3) and combine both the keys and values where the keys are concatenated with _ and values with ' and '



      The desired output would be a single dictionary:




      # dict1 x dict2
      "A_B": "a and b",
      "A_C": "a and c",
      "A_D": "a and d",
      "A_E": "a and e",

      # dict1 x dict3
      "A_F": "a and f",
      "A_G": "a and g",

      # dict1 x dict2 x dict3
      "A_B_F": "a and b and f",
      "A_B_G": "a and b and g",
      "A_C_F": "a and c and f",
      "A_C_G": "a and c and g",
      "A_D_F": "a and d and f",
      "A_D_G": "a and d and g",
      "A_E_F": "a and e and f",
      "A_E_G": "a and e and g"



      I had a look at the documentation for itertools but I was not able to understand how I can achieve the desired output.










      share|improve this question














      Assuming that I have 3 different dictionaries:



      dict1 = 
      "A": "a"


      dict2 =
      "B": "b",
      "C": "c",
      "D": "d",
      "E": "e"


      dict3 =
      "F": "f",
      "G": "g"



      I want to compute the product of these dictionaries (excluding the product between dict2 and dict3) and combine both the keys and values where the keys are concatenated with _ and values with ' and '



      The desired output would be a single dictionary:




      # dict1 x dict2
      "A_B": "a and b",
      "A_C": "a and c",
      "A_D": "a and d",
      "A_E": "a and e",

      # dict1 x dict3
      "A_F": "a and f",
      "A_G": "a and g",

      # dict1 x dict2 x dict3
      "A_B_F": "a and b and f",
      "A_B_G": "a and b and g",
      "A_C_F": "a and c and f",
      "A_C_G": "a and c and g",
      "A_D_F": "a and d and f",
      "A_D_G": "a and d and g",
      "A_E_F": "a and e and f",
      "A_E_G": "a and e and g"



      I had a look at the documentation for itertools but I was not able to understand how I can achieve the desired output.







      python






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Apr 11 at 16:08









      Old-SchoolOld-School

      726




      726






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8














          The function that will do the job is itertools.product.
          First, here is how you can print out the product dict1 x dict2 x dict3:



          for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()): 
          k, v = zip(*t)
          print("_".join(k), "-", " and ".join(v))


          Output:



          A_B_F - a and b and f
          A_B_G - a and b and g
          A_C_F - a and c and f
          A_C_G - a and c and g
          A_D_F - a and d and f
          A_D_G - a and d and g
          A_E_F - a and e and f
          A_E_G - a and e and g


          Now, just populate a result dictionary:



          result = 
          for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()):
          k, v = zip(*t)
          result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)


          You can now add to this dictionary the dict1 x dict2 and dict1 x dict3 products, that are even simpler to compute.




          Based on @ShadowRanger's comment, here is a complete snippet:



          import itertools
          import pprint


          dict1 =
          "A": "a"


          dict2 =
          "B": "b",
          "C": "c",
          "D": "d",
          "E": "e"


          dict3 =
          "F": "f",
          "G": "g"



          result =
          for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)):
          for t in itertools.product(*(d.items() for d in dicts)):
          k, v = zip(*t)
          result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)

          pprint.pprint(result)


          Output:



          'A_B': 'a and b',
          'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
          'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
          'A_C': 'a and c',
          'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
          'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
          'A_D': 'a and d',
          'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
          'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
          'A_E': 'a and e',
          'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
          'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
          'A_F': 'a and f',
          'A_G': 'a and g'





          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            is functools supposed to be itertools?

            – Ben Jones
            Apr 11 at 16:23







          • 1





            @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

            – Right leg
            Apr 11 at 16:24











          • No worries. Now I know about functools!

            – Ben Jones
            Apr 11 at 16:25






          • 1





            @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

            – Right leg
            Apr 11 at 16:27











          • Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

            – ShadowRanger
            Apr 11 at 16:27


















          1














          To produce all pairings, you can use two recursive generator functions: one to find the overall combinations of dictionaries, and the other to pair the keys and values:



          def pair_dicts(data, c):
          if not data:
          keys, values = zip(*c)
          yield ('_'.join(keys), ' and '.join(values))
          else:
          for i in data[0]:
          yield from pair_dicts(data[1:], c+[i])

          def combos(d, c = []):
          if len(c) == len(d):
          yield c
          else:
          if len(c) > 1:
          yield c
          for i in d:
          if all(h != i for h in c):
          yield from combos(d, c+[i])

          new_d = [[list(c.items()) for c in i] for i in combos([dict1, dict2, dict3])]
          final_result = dict(i for b in new_d for i in pair_dicts(b, []))


          Output:



          'A_B': 'a and b', 'A_C': 'a and c', 'A_D': 'a and d', 'A_E': 'a and e', 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f', 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g', 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f', 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g', 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f', 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g', 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f', 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g', 'A_F': 'a and f', 'A_G': 'a and g', 'A_F_B': 'a and f and b', 'A_F_C': 'a and f and c', 'A_F_D': 'a and f and d', 'A_F_E': 'a and f and e', 'A_G_B': 'a and g and b', 'A_G_C': 'a and g and c', 'A_G_D': 'a and g and d', 'A_G_E': 'a and g and e', 'B_A': 'b and a', 'C_A': 'c and a', 'D_A': 'd and a', 'E_A': 'e and a', 'B_A_F': 'b and a and f', 'B_A_G': 'b and a and g', 'C_A_F': 'c and a and f', 'C_A_G': 'c and a and g', 'D_A_F': 'd and a and f', 'D_A_G': 'd and a and g', 'E_A_F': 'e and a and f', 'E_A_G': 'e and a and g', 'B_F': 'b and f', 'B_G': 'b and g', 'C_F': 'c and f', 'C_G': 'c and g', 'D_F': 'd and f', 'D_G': 'd and g', 'E_F': 'e and f', 'E_G': 'e and g', 'B_F_A': 'b and f and a', 'B_G_A': 'b and g and a', 'C_F_A': 'c and f and a', 'C_G_A': 'c and g and a', 'D_F_A': 'd and f and a', 'D_G_A': 'd and g and a', 'E_F_A': 'e and f and a', 'E_G_A': 'e and g and a', 'F_A': 'f and a', 'G_A': 'g and a', 'F_A_B': 'f and a and b', 'F_A_C': 'f and a and c', 'F_A_D': 'f and a and d', 'F_A_E': 'f and a and e', 'G_A_B': 'g and a and b', 'G_A_C': 'g and a and c', 'G_A_D': 'g and a and d', 'G_A_E': 'g and a and e', 'F_B': 'f and b', 'F_C': 'f and c', 'F_D': 'f and d', 'F_E': 'f and e', 'G_B': 'g and b', 'G_C': 'g and c', 'G_D': 'g and d', 'G_E': 'g and e', 'F_B_A': 'f and b and a', 'F_C_A': 'f and c and a', 'F_D_A': 'f and d and a', 'F_E_A': 'f and e and a', 'G_B_A': 'g and b and a', 'G_C_A': 'g and c and a', 'G_D_A': 'g and d and a', 'G_E_A': 'g and e and a'





          share|improve this answer























          • Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

            – Right leg
            Apr 11 at 16:59


















          0














          I created a (not so nice) function to do your task with arbitrary number of dictionaries.



          (Explanation below)



          import itertools as it

          dict1 =
          "A": "a"


          dict2 =
          "B": "b",
          "C": "c",
          "D": "d",
          "E": "e"


          dict3 =
          "F": "f",
          "G": "g"




          def custom_dict_product(dictionaries):
          return dict(zip(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, dictionaries))),
          map(" and ".join, it.product(*map(dict.values, dictionaries)))))

          result = custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2])
          result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict3]))
          result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2,dict3]))
          result
          #'A_B': 'a and b',
          # 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
          # 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
          # 'A_C': 'a and c',
          # 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
          # 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
          # 'A_D': 'a and d',
          # 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
          # 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
          # 'A_E': 'a and e',
          # 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
          # 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
          # 'A_F': 'a and f',
          # 'A_G': 'a and g'


          The function takes the given dictionaries and gets their keys and values, which is done by map(dict.keys, dictionaries))and map(dict.values, dictionaries)). The results of the first call



          list(it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2])))
          # [('A', 'C'), ('A', 'E'), ('A', 'B'), ('A', 'D')]


          The tuples insides this list are then forced to your desired structure with join(and again an map call to do this for every element):



          "_".join(('A', 'C'))
          # 'A_C'
          list(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2]))))
          # ['A_C', 'A_E', 'A_B', 'A_D']


          Finally the two resulting lists are transformed to tuples of (keys, values) with the call of zip and handed to the dictionary creation.






          share|improve this answer
































            0














            Here a dirty, but working, solution that makes use of itertools



            from itertools import product, combinations


            # create a list and sum dict to be used later
            t = [dict1, dict2, dict3]
            k =
            for d in t:
            k.update(d)


            # iterate over "i" order of combinations ("dict1_X" or "dict1_X_Y") and
            # the cartesian product of keys for each combination

            results =
            for i in range(2, 4):
            a = [
            [
            results.update("_".join(y): " and ".join([k[j] for j in y]))
            for y in product(*x)
            ]
            for x in combinations(t, i)
            if dict1 in x
            ]

            results


            Output:



            'A_B': 'a and b',
            'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
            'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
            'A_C': 'a and c',
            'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
            'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
            'A_D': 'a and d',
            'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
            'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
            'A_E': 'a and e',
            'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
            'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
            'A_F': 'a and f',
            'A_G': 'a and g'





            share|improve this answer

























              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              );
              );
              , "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55636895%2fcompute-the-product-of-3-dictionaries-and-concatenate-keys-and-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              8














              The function that will do the job is itertools.product.
              First, here is how you can print out the product dict1 x dict2 x dict3:



              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()): 
              k, v = zip(*t)
              print("_".join(k), "-", " and ".join(v))


              Output:



              A_B_F - a and b and f
              A_B_G - a and b and g
              A_C_F - a and c and f
              A_C_G - a and c and g
              A_D_F - a and d and f
              A_D_G - a and d and g
              A_E_F - a and e and f
              A_E_G - a and e and g


              Now, just populate a result dictionary:



              result = 
              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)


              You can now add to this dictionary the dict1 x dict2 and dict1 x dict3 products, that are even simpler to compute.




              Based on @ShadowRanger's comment, here is a complete snippet:



              import itertools
              import pprint


              dict1 =
              "A": "a"


              dict2 =
              "B": "b",
              "C": "c",
              "D": "d",
              "E": "e"


              dict3 =
              "F": "f",
              "G": "g"



              result =
              for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)):
              for t in itertools.product(*(d.items() for d in dicts)):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)

              pprint.pprint(result)


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b',
              'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
              'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
              'A_C': 'a and c',
              'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
              'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
              'A_D': 'a and d',
              'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
              'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
              'A_E': 'a and e',
              'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
              'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
              'A_F': 'a and f',
              'A_G': 'a and g'





              share|improve this answer




















              • 1





                is functools supposed to be itertools?

                – Ben Jones
                Apr 11 at 16:23







              • 1





                @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:24











              • No worries. Now I know about functools!

                – Ben Jones
                Apr 11 at 16:25






              • 1





                @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:27











              • Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

                – ShadowRanger
                Apr 11 at 16:27















              8














              The function that will do the job is itertools.product.
              First, here is how you can print out the product dict1 x dict2 x dict3:



              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()): 
              k, v = zip(*t)
              print("_".join(k), "-", " and ".join(v))


              Output:



              A_B_F - a and b and f
              A_B_G - a and b and g
              A_C_F - a and c and f
              A_C_G - a and c and g
              A_D_F - a and d and f
              A_D_G - a and d and g
              A_E_F - a and e and f
              A_E_G - a and e and g


              Now, just populate a result dictionary:



              result = 
              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)


              You can now add to this dictionary the dict1 x dict2 and dict1 x dict3 products, that are even simpler to compute.




              Based on @ShadowRanger's comment, here is a complete snippet:



              import itertools
              import pprint


              dict1 =
              "A": "a"


              dict2 =
              "B": "b",
              "C": "c",
              "D": "d",
              "E": "e"


              dict3 =
              "F": "f",
              "G": "g"



              result =
              for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)):
              for t in itertools.product(*(d.items() for d in dicts)):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)

              pprint.pprint(result)


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b',
              'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
              'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
              'A_C': 'a and c',
              'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
              'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
              'A_D': 'a and d',
              'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
              'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
              'A_E': 'a and e',
              'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
              'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
              'A_F': 'a and f',
              'A_G': 'a and g'





              share|improve this answer




















              • 1





                is functools supposed to be itertools?

                – Ben Jones
                Apr 11 at 16:23







              • 1





                @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:24











              • No worries. Now I know about functools!

                – Ben Jones
                Apr 11 at 16:25






              • 1





                @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:27











              • Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

                – ShadowRanger
                Apr 11 at 16:27













              8












              8








              8







              The function that will do the job is itertools.product.
              First, here is how you can print out the product dict1 x dict2 x dict3:



              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()): 
              k, v = zip(*t)
              print("_".join(k), "-", " and ".join(v))


              Output:



              A_B_F - a and b and f
              A_B_G - a and b and g
              A_C_F - a and c and f
              A_C_G - a and c and g
              A_D_F - a and d and f
              A_D_G - a and d and g
              A_E_F - a and e and f
              A_E_G - a and e and g


              Now, just populate a result dictionary:



              result = 
              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)


              You can now add to this dictionary the dict1 x dict2 and dict1 x dict3 products, that are even simpler to compute.




              Based on @ShadowRanger's comment, here is a complete snippet:



              import itertools
              import pprint


              dict1 =
              "A": "a"


              dict2 =
              "B": "b",
              "C": "c",
              "D": "d",
              "E": "e"


              dict3 =
              "F": "f",
              "G": "g"



              result =
              for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)):
              for t in itertools.product(*(d.items() for d in dicts)):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)

              pprint.pprint(result)


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b',
              'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
              'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
              'A_C': 'a and c',
              'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
              'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
              'A_D': 'a and d',
              'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
              'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
              'A_E': 'a and e',
              'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
              'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
              'A_F': 'a and f',
              'A_G': 'a and g'





              share|improve this answer















              The function that will do the job is itertools.product.
              First, here is how you can print out the product dict1 x dict2 x dict3:



              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()): 
              k, v = zip(*t)
              print("_".join(k), "-", " and ".join(v))


              Output:



              A_B_F - a and b and f
              A_B_G - a and b and g
              A_C_F - a and c and f
              A_C_G - a and c and g
              A_D_F - a and d and f
              A_D_G - a and d and g
              A_E_F - a and e and f
              A_E_G - a and e and g


              Now, just populate a result dictionary:



              result = 
              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)


              You can now add to this dictionary the dict1 x dict2 and dict1 x dict3 products, that are even simpler to compute.




              Based on @ShadowRanger's comment, here is a complete snippet:



              import itertools
              import pprint


              dict1 =
              "A": "a"


              dict2 =
              "B": "b",
              "C": "c",
              "D": "d",
              "E": "e"


              dict3 =
              "F": "f",
              "G": "g"



              result =
              for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)):
              for t in itertools.product(*(d.items() for d in dicts)):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)

              pprint.pprint(result)


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b',
              'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
              'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
              'A_C': 'a and c',
              'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
              'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
              'A_D': 'a and d',
              'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
              'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
              'A_E': 'a and e',
              'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
              'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
              'A_F': 'a and f',
              'A_G': 'a and g'






              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Apr 11 at 16:39

























              answered Apr 11 at 16:19









              Right legRight leg

              8,62242450




              8,62242450







              • 1





                is functools supposed to be itertools?

                – Ben Jones
                Apr 11 at 16:23







              • 1





                @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:24











              • No worries. Now I know about functools!

                – Ben Jones
                Apr 11 at 16:25






              • 1





                @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:27











              • Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

                – ShadowRanger
                Apr 11 at 16:27












              • 1





                is functools supposed to be itertools?

                – Ben Jones
                Apr 11 at 16:23







              • 1





                @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:24











              • No worries. Now I know about functools!

                – Ben Jones
                Apr 11 at 16:25






              • 1





                @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:27











              • Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

                – ShadowRanger
                Apr 11 at 16:27







              1




              1





              is functools supposed to be itertools?

              – Ben Jones
              Apr 11 at 16:23






              is functools supposed to be itertools?

              – Ben Jones
              Apr 11 at 16:23





              1




              1





              @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

              – Right leg
              Apr 11 at 16:24





              @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

              – Right leg
              Apr 11 at 16:24













              No worries. Now I know about functools!

              – Ben Jones
              Apr 11 at 16:25





              No worries. Now I know about functools!

              – Ben Jones
              Apr 11 at 16:25




              1




              1





              @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

              – Right leg
              Apr 11 at 16:27





              @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

              – Right leg
              Apr 11 at 16:27













              Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

              – ShadowRanger
              Apr 11 at 16:27





              Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

              – ShadowRanger
              Apr 11 at 16:27













              1














              To produce all pairings, you can use two recursive generator functions: one to find the overall combinations of dictionaries, and the other to pair the keys and values:



              def pair_dicts(data, c):
              if not data:
              keys, values = zip(*c)
              yield ('_'.join(keys), ' and '.join(values))
              else:
              for i in data[0]:
              yield from pair_dicts(data[1:], c+[i])

              def combos(d, c = []):
              if len(c) == len(d):
              yield c
              else:
              if len(c) > 1:
              yield c
              for i in d:
              if all(h != i for h in c):
              yield from combos(d, c+[i])

              new_d = [[list(c.items()) for c in i] for i in combos([dict1, dict2, dict3])]
              final_result = dict(i for b in new_d for i in pair_dicts(b, []))


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b', 'A_C': 'a and c', 'A_D': 'a and d', 'A_E': 'a and e', 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f', 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g', 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f', 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g', 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f', 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g', 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f', 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g', 'A_F': 'a and f', 'A_G': 'a and g', 'A_F_B': 'a and f and b', 'A_F_C': 'a and f and c', 'A_F_D': 'a and f and d', 'A_F_E': 'a and f and e', 'A_G_B': 'a and g and b', 'A_G_C': 'a and g and c', 'A_G_D': 'a and g and d', 'A_G_E': 'a and g and e', 'B_A': 'b and a', 'C_A': 'c and a', 'D_A': 'd and a', 'E_A': 'e and a', 'B_A_F': 'b and a and f', 'B_A_G': 'b and a and g', 'C_A_F': 'c and a and f', 'C_A_G': 'c and a and g', 'D_A_F': 'd and a and f', 'D_A_G': 'd and a and g', 'E_A_F': 'e and a and f', 'E_A_G': 'e and a and g', 'B_F': 'b and f', 'B_G': 'b and g', 'C_F': 'c and f', 'C_G': 'c and g', 'D_F': 'd and f', 'D_G': 'd and g', 'E_F': 'e and f', 'E_G': 'e and g', 'B_F_A': 'b and f and a', 'B_G_A': 'b and g and a', 'C_F_A': 'c and f and a', 'C_G_A': 'c and g and a', 'D_F_A': 'd and f and a', 'D_G_A': 'd and g and a', 'E_F_A': 'e and f and a', 'E_G_A': 'e and g and a', 'F_A': 'f and a', 'G_A': 'g and a', 'F_A_B': 'f and a and b', 'F_A_C': 'f and a and c', 'F_A_D': 'f and a and d', 'F_A_E': 'f and a and e', 'G_A_B': 'g and a and b', 'G_A_C': 'g and a and c', 'G_A_D': 'g and a and d', 'G_A_E': 'g and a and e', 'F_B': 'f and b', 'F_C': 'f and c', 'F_D': 'f and d', 'F_E': 'f and e', 'G_B': 'g and b', 'G_C': 'g and c', 'G_D': 'g and d', 'G_E': 'g and e', 'F_B_A': 'f and b and a', 'F_C_A': 'f and c and a', 'F_D_A': 'f and d and a', 'F_E_A': 'f and e and a', 'G_B_A': 'g and b and a', 'G_C_A': 'g and c and a', 'G_D_A': 'g and d and a', 'G_E_A': 'g and e and a'





              share|improve this answer























              • Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:59















              1














              To produce all pairings, you can use two recursive generator functions: one to find the overall combinations of dictionaries, and the other to pair the keys and values:



              def pair_dicts(data, c):
              if not data:
              keys, values = zip(*c)
              yield ('_'.join(keys), ' and '.join(values))
              else:
              for i in data[0]:
              yield from pair_dicts(data[1:], c+[i])

              def combos(d, c = []):
              if len(c) == len(d):
              yield c
              else:
              if len(c) > 1:
              yield c
              for i in d:
              if all(h != i for h in c):
              yield from combos(d, c+[i])

              new_d = [[list(c.items()) for c in i] for i in combos([dict1, dict2, dict3])]
              final_result = dict(i for b in new_d for i in pair_dicts(b, []))


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b', 'A_C': 'a and c', 'A_D': 'a and d', 'A_E': 'a and e', 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f', 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g', 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f', 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g', 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f', 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g', 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f', 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g', 'A_F': 'a and f', 'A_G': 'a and g', 'A_F_B': 'a and f and b', 'A_F_C': 'a and f and c', 'A_F_D': 'a and f and d', 'A_F_E': 'a and f and e', 'A_G_B': 'a and g and b', 'A_G_C': 'a and g and c', 'A_G_D': 'a and g and d', 'A_G_E': 'a and g and e', 'B_A': 'b and a', 'C_A': 'c and a', 'D_A': 'd and a', 'E_A': 'e and a', 'B_A_F': 'b and a and f', 'B_A_G': 'b and a and g', 'C_A_F': 'c and a and f', 'C_A_G': 'c and a and g', 'D_A_F': 'd and a and f', 'D_A_G': 'd and a and g', 'E_A_F': 'e and a and f', 'E_A_G': 'e and a and g', 'B_F': 'b and f', 'B_G': 'b and g', 'C_F': 'c and f', 'C_G': 'c and g', 'D_F': 'd and f', 'D_G': 'd and g', 'E_F': 'e and f', 'E_G': 'e and g', 'B_F_A': 'b and f and a', 'B_G_A': 'b and g and a', 'C_F_A': 'c and f and a', 'C_G_A': 'c and g and a', 'D_F_A': 'd and f and a', 'D_G_A': 'd and g and a', 'E_F_A': 'e and f and a', 'E_G_A': 'e and g and a', 'F_A': 'f and a', 'G_A': 'g and a', 'F_A_B': 'f and a and b', 'F_A_C': 'f and a and c', 'F_A_D': 'f and a and d', 'F_A_E': 'f and a and e', 'G_A_B': 'g and a and b', 'G_A_C': 'g and a and c', 'G_A_D': 'g and a and d', 'G_A_E': 'g and a and e', 'F_B': 'f and b', 'F_C': 'f and c', 'F_D': 'f and d', 'F_E': 'f and e', 'G_B': 'g and b', 'G_C': 'g and c', 'G_D': 'g and d', 'G_E': 'g and e', 'F_B_A': 'f and b and a', 'F_C_A': 'f and c and a', 'F_D_A': 'f and d and a', 'F_E_A': 'f and e and a', 'G_B_A': 'g and b and a', 'G_C_A': 'g and c and a', 'G_D_A': 'g and d and a', 'G_E_A': 'g and e and a'





              share|improve this answer























              • Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:59













              1












              1








              1







              To produce all pairings, you can use two recursive generator functions: one to find the overall combinations of dictionaries, and the other to pair the keys and values:



              def pair_dicts(data, c):
              if not data:
              keys, values = zip(*c)
              yield ('_'.join(keys), ' and '.join(values))
              else:
              for i in data[0]:
              yield from pair_dicts(data[1:], c+[i])

              def combos(d, c = []):
              if len(c) == len(d):
              yield c
              else:
              if len(c) > 1:
              yield c
              for i in d:
              if all(h != i for h in c):
              yield from combos(d, c+[i])

              new_d = [[list(c.items()) for c in i] for i in combos([dict1, dict2, dict3])]
              final_result = dict(i for b in new_d for i in pair_dicts(b, []))


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b', 'A_C': 'a and c', 'A_D': 'a and d', 'A_E': 'a and e', 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f', 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g', 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f', 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g', 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f', 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g', 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f', 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g', 'A_F': 'a and f', 'A_G': 'a and g', 'A_F_B': 'a and f and b', 'A_F_C': 'a and f and c', 'A_F_D': 'a and f and d', 'A_F_E': 'a and f and e', 'A_G_B': 'a and g and b', 'A_G_C': 'a and g and c', 'A_G_D': 'a and g and d', 'A_G_E': 'a and g and e', 'B_A': 'b and a', 'C_A': 'c and a', 'D_A': 'd and a', 'E_A': 'e and a', 'B_A_F': 'b and a and f', 'B_A_G': 'b and a and g', 'C_A_F': 'c and a and f', 'C_A_G': 'c and a and g', 'D_A_F': 'd and a and f', 'D_A_G': 'd and a and g', 'E_A_F': 'e and a and f', 'E_A_G': 'e and a and g', 'B_F': 'b and f', 'B_G': 'b and g', 'C_F': 'c and f', 'C_G': 'c and g', 'D_F': 'd and f', 'D_G': 'd and g', 'E_F': 'e and f', 'E_G': 'e and g', 'B_F_A': 'b and f and a', 'B_G_A': 'b and g and a', 'C_F_A': 'c and f and a', 'C_G_A': 'c and g and a', 'D_F_A': 'd and f and a', 'D_G_A': 'd and g and a', 'E_F_A': 'e and f and a', 'E_G_A': 'e and g and a', 'F_A': 'f and a', 'G_A': 'g and a', 'F_A_B': 'f and a and b', 'F_A_C': 'f and a and c', 'F_A_D': 'f and a and d', 'F_A_E': 'f and a and e', 'G_A_B': 'g and a and b', 'G_A_C': 'g and a and c', 'G_A_D': 'g and a and d', 'G_A_E': 'g and a and e', 'F_B': 'f and b', 'F_C': 'f and c', 'F_D': 'f and d', 'F_E': 'f and e', 'G_B': 'g and b', 'G_C': 'g and c', 'G_D': 'g and d', 'G_E': 'g and e', 'F_B_A': 'f and b and a', 'F_C_A': 'f and c and a', 'F_D_A': 'f and d and a', 'F_E_A': 'f and e and a', 'G_B_A': 'g and b and a', 'G_C_A': 'g and c and a', 'G_D_A': 'g and d and a', 'G_E_A': 'g and e and a'





              share|improve this answer













              To produce all pairings, you can use two recursive generator functions: one to find the overall combinations of dictionaries, and the other to pair the keys and values:



              def pair_dicts(data, c):
              if not data:
              keys, values = zip(*c)
              yield ('_'.join(keys), ' and '.join(values))
              else:
              for i in data[0]:
              yield from pair_dicts(data[1:], c+[i])

              def combos(d, c = []):
              if len(c) == len(d):
              yield c
              else:
              if len(c) > 1:
              yield c
              for i in d:
              if all(h != i for h in c):
              yield from combos(d, c+[i])

              new_d = [[list(c.items()) for c in i] for i in combos([dict1, dict2, dict3])]
              final_result = dict(i for b in new_d for i in pair_dicts(b, []))


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b', 'A_C': 'a and c', 'A_D': 'a and d', 'A_E': 'a and e', 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f', 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g', 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f', 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g', 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f', 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g', 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f', 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g', 'A_F': 'a and f', 'A_G': 'a and g', 'A_F_B': 'a and f and b', 'A_F_C': 'a and f and c', 'A_F_D': 'a and f and d', 'A_F_E': 'a and f and e', 'A_G_B': 'a and g and b', 'A_G_C': 'a and g and c', 'A_G_D': 'a and g and d', 'A_G_E': 'a and g and e', 'B_A': 'b and a', 'C_A': 'c and a', 'D_A': 'd and a', 'E_A': 'e and a', 'B_A_F': 'b and a and f', 'B_A_G': 'b and a and g', 'C_A_F': 'c and a and f', 'C_A_G': 'c and a and g', 'D_A_F': 'd and a and f', 'D_A_G': 'd and a and g', 'E_A_F': 'e and a and f', 'E_A_G': 'e and a and g', 'B_F': 'b and f', 'B_G': 'b and g', 'C_F': 'c and f', 'C_G': 'c and g', 'D_F': 'd and f', 'D_G': 'd and g', 'E_F': 'e and f', 'E_G': 'e and g', 'B_F_A': 'b and f and a', 'B_G_A': 'b and g and a', 'C_F_A': 'c and f and a', 'C_G_A': 'c and g and a', 'D_F_A': 'd and f and a', 'D_G_A': 'd and g and a', 'E_F_A': 'e and f and a', 'E_G_A': 'e and g and a', 'F_A': 'f and a', 'G_A': 'g and a', 'F_A_B': 'f and a and b', 'F_A_C': 'f and a and c', 'F_A_D': 'f and a and d', 'F_A_E': 'f and a and e', 'G_A_B': 'g and a and b', 'G_A_C': 'g and a and c', 'G_A_D': 'g and a and d', 'G_A_E': 'g and a and e', 'F_B': 'f and b', 'F_C': 'f and c', 'F_D': 'f and d', 'F_E': 'f and e', 'G_B': 'g and b', 'G_C': 'g and c', 'G_D': 'g and d', 'G_E': 'g and e', 'F_B_A': 'f and b and a', 'F_C_A': 'f and c and a', 'F_D_A': 'f and d and a', 'F_E_A': 'f and e and a', 'G_B_A': 'g and b and a', 'G_C_A': 'g and c and a', 'G_D_A': 'g and d and a', 'G_E_A': 'g and e and a'






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Apr 11 at 16:35









              Ajax1234Ajax1234

              43.3k42954




              43.3k42954












              • Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:59

















              • Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

                – Right leg
                Apr 11 at 16:59
















              Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

              – Right leg
              Apr 11 at 16:59





              Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

              – Right leg
              Apr 11 at 16:59











              0














              I created a (not so nice) function to do your task with arbitrary number of dictionaries.



              (Explanation below)



              import itertools as it

              dict1 =
              "A": "a"


              dict2 =
              "B": "b",
              "C": "c",
              "D": "d",
              "E": "e"


              dict3 =
              "F": "f",
              "G": "g"




              def custom_dict_product(dictionaries):
              return dict(zip(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, dictionaries))),
              map(" and ".join, it.product(*map(dict.values, dictionaries)))))

              result = custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2])
              result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict3]))
              result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2,dict3]))
              result
              #'A_B': 'a and b',
              # 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
              # 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
              # 'A_C': 'a and c',
              # 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
              # 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
              # 'A_D': 'a and d',
              # 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
              # 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
              # 'A_E': 'a and e',
              # 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
              # 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
              # 'A_F': 'a and f',
              # 'A_G': 'a and g'


              The function takes the given dictionaries and gets their keys and values, which is done by map(dict.keys, dictionaries))and map(dict.values, dictionaries)). The results of the first call



              list(it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2])))
              # [('A', 'C'), ('A', 'E'), ('A', 'B'), ('A', 'D')]


              The tuples insides this list are then forced to your desired structure with join(and again an map call to do this for every element):



              "_".join(('A', 'C'))
              # 'A_C'
              list(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2]))))
              # ['A_C', 'A_E', 'A_B', 'A_D']


              Finally the two resulting lists are transformed to tuples of (keys, values) with the call of zip and handed to the dictionary creation.






              share|improve this answer





























                0














                I created a (not so nice) function to do your task with arbitrary number of dictionaries.



                (Explanation below)



                import itertools as it

                dict1 =
                "A": "a"


                dict2 =
                "B": "b",
                "C": "c",
                "D": "d",
                "E": "e"


                dict3 =
                "F": "f",
                "G": "g"




                def custom_dict_product(dictionaries):
                return dict(zip(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, dictionaries))),
                map(" and ".join, it.product(*map(dict.values, dictionaries)))))

                result = custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2])
                result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict3]))
                result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2,dict3]))
                result
                #'A_B': 'a and b',
                # 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                # 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                # 'A_C': 'a and c',
                # 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                # 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                # 'A_D': 'a and d',
                # 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                # 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                # 'A_E': 'a and e',
                # 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                # 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                # 'A_F': 'a and f',
                # 'A_G': 'a and g'


                The function takes the given dictionaries and gets their keys and values, which is done by map(dict.keys, dictionaries))and map(dict.values, dictionaries)). The results of the first call



                list(it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2])))
                # [('A', 'C'), ('A', 'E'), ('A', 'B'), ('A', 'D')]


                The tuples insides this list are then forced to your desired structure with join(and again an map call to do this for every element):



                "_".join(('A', 'C'))
                # 'A_C'
                list(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2]))))
                # ['A_C', 'A_E', 'A_B', 'A_D']


                Finally the two resulting lists are transformed to tuples of (keys, values) with the call of zip and handed to the dictionary creation.






                share|improve this answer



























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  I created a (not so nice) function to do your task with arbitrary number of dictionaries.



                  (Explanation below)



                  import itertools as it

                  dict1 =
                  "A": "a"


                  dict2 =
                  "B": "b",
                  "C": "c",
                  "D": "d",
                  "E": "e"


                  dict3 =
                  "F": "f",
                  "G": "g"




                  def custom_dict_product(dictionaries):
                  return dict(zip(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, dictionaries))),
                  map(" and ".join, it.product(*map(dict.values, dictionaries)))))

                  result = custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2])
                  result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict3]))
                  result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2,dict3]))
                  result
                  #'A_B': 'a and b',
                  # 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                  # 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                  # 'A_C': 'a and c',
                  # 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                  # 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                  # 'A_D': 'a and d',
                  # 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                  # 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                  # 'A_E': 'a and e',
                  # 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                  # 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                  # 'A_F': 'a and f',
                  # 'A_G': 'a and g'


                  The function takes the given dictionaries and gets their keys and values, which is done by map(dict.keys, dictionaries))and map(dict.values, dictionaries)). The results of the first call



                  list(it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2])))
                  # [('A', 'C'), ('A', 'E'), ('A', 'B'), ('A', 'D')]


                  The tuples insides this list are then forced to your desired structure with join(and again an map call to do this for every element):



                  "_".join(('A', 'C'))
                  # 'A_C'
                  list(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2]))))
                  # ['A_C', 'A_E', 'A_B', 'A_D']


                  Finally the two resulting lists are transformed to tuples of (keys, values) with the call of zip and handed to the dictionary creation.






                  share|improve this answer















                  I created a (not so nice) function to do your task with arbitrary number of dictionaries.



                  (Explanation below)



                  import itertools as it

                  dict1 =
                  "A": "a"


                  dict2 =
                  "B": "b",
                  "C": "c",
                  "D": "d",
                  "E": "e"


                  dict3 =
                  "F": "f",
                  "G": "g"




                  def custom_dict_product(dictionaries):
                  return dict(zip(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, dictionaries))),
                  map(" and ".join, it.product(*map(dict.values, dictionaries)))))

                  result = custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2])
                  result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict3]))
                  result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2,dict3]))
                  result
                  #'A_B': 'a and b',
                  # 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                  # 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                  # 'A_C': 'a and c',
                  # 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                  # 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                  # 'A_D': 'a and d',
                  # 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                  # 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                  # 'A_E': 'a and e',
                  # 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                  # 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                  # 'A_F': 'a and f',
                  # 'A_G': 'a and g'


                  The function takes the given dictionaries and gets their keys and values, which is done by map(dict.keys, dictionaries))and map(dict.values, dictionaries)). The results of the first call



                  list(it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2])))
                  # [('A', 'C'), ('A', 'E'), ('A', 'B'), ('A', 'D')]


                  The tuples insides this list are then forced to your desired structure with join(and again an map call to do this for every element):



                  "_".join(('A', 'C'))
                  # 'A_C'
                  list(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2]))))
                  # ['A_C', 'A_E', 'A_B', 'A_D']


                  Finally the two resulting lists are transformed to tuples of (keys, values) with the call of zip and handed to the dictionary creation.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Apr 11 at 16:45

























                  answered Apr 11 at 16:38









                  Sparky05Sparky05

                  2156




                  2156





















                      0














                      Here a dirty, but working, solution that makes use of itertools



                      from itertools import product, combinations


                      # create a list and sum dict to be used later
                      t = [dict1, dict2, dict3]
                      k =
                      for d in t:
                      k.update(d)


                      # iterate over "i" order of combinations ("dict1_X" or "dict1_X_Y") and
                      # the cartesian product of keys for each combination

                      results =
                      for i in range(2, 4):
                      a = [
                      [
                      results.update("_".join(y): " and ".join([k[j] for j in y]))
                      for y in product(*x)
                      ]
                      for x in combinations(t, i)
                      if dict1 in x
                      ]

                      results


                      Output:



                      'A_B': 'a and b',
                      'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                      'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                      'A_C': 'a and c',
                      'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                      'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                      'A_D': 'a and d',
                      'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                      'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                      'A_E': 'a and e',
                      'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                      'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                      'A_F': 'a and f',
                      'A_G': 'a and g'





                      share|improve this answer





























                        0














                        Here a dirty, but working, solution that makes use of itertools



                        from itertools import product, combinations


                        # create a list and sum dict to be used later
                        t = [dict1, dict2, dict3]
                        k =
                        for d in t:
                        k.update(d)


                        # iterate over "i" order of combinations ("dict1_X" or "dict1_X_Y") and
                        # the cartesian product of keys for each combination

                        results =
                        for i in range(2, 4):
                        a = [
                        [
                        results.update("_".join(y): " and ".join([k[j] for j in y]))
                        for y in product(*x)
                        ]
                        for x in combinations(t, i)
                        if dict1 in x
                        ]

                        results


                        Output:



                        'A_B': 'a and b',
                        'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                        'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                        'A_C': 'a and c',
                        'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                        'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                        'A_D': 'a and d',
                        'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                        'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                        'A_E': 'a and e',
                        'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                        'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                        'A_F': 'a and f',
                        'A_G': 'a and g'





                        share|improve this answer



























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          Here a dirty, but working, solution that makes use of itertools



                          from itertools import product, combinations


                          # create a list and sum dict to be used later
                          t = [dict1, dict2, dict3]
                          k =
                          for d in t:
                          k.update(d)


                          # iterate over "i" order of combinations ("dict1_X" or "dict1_X_Y") and
                          # the cartesian product of keys for each combination

                          results =
                          for i in range(2, 4):
                          a = [
                          [
                          results.update("_".join(y): " and ".join([k[j] for j in y]))
                          for y in product(*x)
                          ]
                          for x in combinations(t, i)
                          if dict1 in x
                          ]

                          results


                          Output:



                          'A_B': 'a and b',
                          'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                          'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                          'A_C': 'a and c',
                          'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                          'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                          'A_D': 'a and d',
                          'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                          'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                          'A_E': 'a and e',
                          'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                          'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                          'A_F': 'a and f',
                          'A_G': 'a and g'





                          share|improve this answer















                          Here a dirty, but working, solution that makes use of itertools



                          from itertools import product, combinations


                          # create a list and sum dict to be used later
                          t = [dict1, dict2, dict3]
                          k =
                          for d in t:
                          k.update(d)


                          # iterate over "i" order of combinations ("dict1_X" or "dict1_X_Y") and
                          # the cartesian product of keys for each combination

                          results =
                          for i in range(2, 4):
                          a = [
                          [
                          results.update("_".join(y): " and ".join([k[j] for j in y]))
                          for y in product(*x)
                          ]
                          for x in combinations(t, i)
                          if dict1 in x
                          ]

                          results


                          Output:



                          'A_B': 'a and b',
                          'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                          'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                          'A_C': 'a and c',
                          'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                          'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                          'A_D': 'a and d',
                          'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                          'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                          'A_E': 'a and e',
                          'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                          'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                          'A_F': 'a and f',
                          'A_G': 'a and g'






                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Apr 11 at 18:21

























                          answered Apr 11 at 17:41









                          Lante DellarovereLante Dellarovere

                          34816




                          34816



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55636895%2fcompute-the-product-of-3-dictionaries-and-concatenate-keys-and-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              រឿង រ៉ូមេអូ និង ហ្ស៊ុយលីយេ សង្ខេបរឿង តួអង្គ បញ្ជីណែនាំ

                              Crop image to path created in TikZ? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Crop an inserted image?TikZ pictures does not appear in posterImage behind and beyond crop marks?Tikz picture as large as possible on A4 PageTransparency vs image compression dilemmaHow to crop background from image automatically?Image does not cropTikzexternal capturing crop marks when externalizing pgfplots?How to include image path that contains a dollar signCrop image with left size given

                              Romeo and Juliet ContentsCharactersSynopsisSourcesDate and textThemes and motifsCriticism and interpretationLegacyScene by sceneSee alsoNotes and referencesSourcesExternal linksNavigation menu"Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–"10.2307/28710160037-3222287101610.1093/res/II.5.31910.2307/45967845967810.2307/2869925286992510.1525/jams.1982.35.3.03a00050"Dada Masilo: South African dancer who breaks the rules"10.1093/res/os-XV.57.1610.2307/28680942868094"Sweet Sorrow: Mann-Korman's Romeo and Juliet Closes Sept. 5 at MN's Ordway"the original10.2307/45957745957710.1017/CCOL0521570476.009"Ram Leela box office collections hit massive Rs 100 crore, pulverises prediction"Archived"Broadway Revival of Romeo and Juliet, Starring Orlando Bloom and Condola Rashad, Will Close Dec. 8"Archived10.1075/jhp.7.1.04hon"Wherefore art thou, Romeo? To make us laugh at Navy Pier"the original10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O006772"Ram-leela Review Roundup: Critics Hail Film as Best Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet"Archived10.2307/31946310047-77293194631"Romeo and Juliet get Twitter treatment""Juliet's Nurse by Lois Leveen""Romeo and Juliet: Orlando Bloom's Broadway Debut Released in Theaters for Valentine's Day"Archived"Romeo and Juliet Has No Balcony"10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O00778110.2307/2867423286742310.1076/enst.82.2.115.959510.1080/00138380601042675"A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology""Juliet of the Five O'Clock Shadow, and Other Wonders"10.2307/33912430027-4321339124310.2307/28487440038-7134284874410.2307/29123140149-661129123144728341M"Weekender Guide: Shakespeare on The Drive""balcony"UK public library membership"romeo"UK public library membership10.1017/CCOL9780521844291"Post-Zionist Critique on Israel and the Palestinians Part III: Popular Culture"10.2307/25379071533-86140377-919X2537907"Capulets and Montagues: UK exam board admit mixing names up in Romeo and Juliet paper"Istoria Novellamente Ritrovata di Due Nobili Amanti2027/mdp.390150822329610820-750X"GCSE exam error: Board accidentally rewrites Shakespeare"10.2307/29176390149-66112917639"Exam board apologises after error in English GCSE paper which confused characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet""From Mariotto and Ganozza to Romeo and Guilietta: Metamorphoses of a Renaissance Tale"10.2307/37323537323510.2307/2867455286745510.2307/28678912867891"10 Questions for Taylor Swift"10.2307/28680922868092"Haymarket Theatre""The Zeffirelli Way: Revealing Talk by Florentine Director""Michael Smuin: 1938-2007 / Prolific dance director had showy career"The Life and Art of Edwin BoothRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietRomeo and JulietEasy Read Romeo and JulietRomeo and Julieteeecb12003684p(data)4099369-3n8211610759dbe00d-a9e2-41a3-b2c1-977dd692899302814385X313670221313670221